Navistar International Corporation
Navistar International Corporation (NAV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAV | $44.50 | +0.16% | 0 | -23.25 | -$1.91 | N/A |
| CAT | $432.94 | -0.19% | 203.6B | 21.10 | $20.52 | +1.32% |
| DE | $510.55 | -1.32% | 138.3B | 24.67 | $20.70 | +1.22% |
| PCAR | $100.64 | -0.92% | 52.8B | 17.26 | $5.83 | +3.92% |
| CNH | $12.99 | -2.37% | 16.2B | 16.23 | $0.80 | +1.88% |
| CNHI | $11.45 | -0.61% | 14.4B | 6.66 | $1.72 | N/A |
| OSK | $129.50 | +0.61% | 8.3B | 13.84 | $9.36 | +1.51% |
| AGCO | $110.00 | -2.12% | 8.2B | -14.10 | -$7.80 | +1.04% |
| TEX | $51.62 | -1.30% | 3.4B | 14.06 | $3.67 | +1.30% |
| ALG | $217.43 | -0.97% | 2.6B | 22.69 | $9.59 | +0.53% |
Stock Comparison
NAV vs CAT Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 203.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CAT trades at $432.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CAT's competition here
NAV vs DE Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 138.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while DE trades at $510.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check DE's competition here
NAV vs PCAR Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while PCAR trades at $100.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check PCAR's competition here
NAV vs CNH Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CNH trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CNH's competition here
NAV vs CNHI Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CNHI trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CNHI's competition here
NAV vs OSK Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while OSK trades at $129.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check OSK's competition here
NAV vs AGCO Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while AGCO trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is -14.10. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check AGCO's competition here
NAV vs TEX Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while TEX trades at $51.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check TEX's competition here
NAV vs ALG Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ALG trades at $217.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ALG's competition here
NAV vs REVG Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while REVG trades at $48.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check REVG's competition here
NAV vs LNN Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while LNN trades at $137.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check LNN's competition here
NAV vs ASTE Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 927.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ASTE trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 61.48. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ASTE's competition here
NAV vs HY Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 770.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while HY trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas HY's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check HY's competition here
NAV vs TWI Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 606.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while TWI trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -41.39. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check TWI's competition here
NAV vs MTW Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 468.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while MTW trades at $13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check MTW's competition here
NAV vs CMCO Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 457.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CMCO trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is -88.72. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CMCO's competition here
NAV vs SHYF Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while SHYF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 627.00. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check SHYF's competition here
NAV vs WNC Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 435.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while WNC trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check WNC's competition here
NAV vs GENC Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 241.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while GENC trades at $16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check GENC's competition here
NAV vs MNTX Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while MNTX trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check MNTX's competition here
NAV vs LEV Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while LEV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check LEV's competition here
NAV vs XOSWW Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while XOSWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check XOSWW's competition here
NAV vs XOS Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while XOS trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XOS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check XOS's competition here
NAV vs HYFM Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while HYFM trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check HYFM's competition here
NAV vs ARTW Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ARTW trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ARTW's competition here
NAV vs NKLA Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while NKLA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check NKLA's competition here
NAV vs ZEV Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while ZEV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check ZEV's competition here
NAV vs CEAD Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CEAD trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEAD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CEAD's competition here
NAV vs UGRO Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while UGRO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UGRO's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check UGRO's competition here
NAV vs IDEX Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while IDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check IDEX's competition here
NAV vs CEADW Comparison July 2025
NAV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAV stands at 0. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, NAV is priced at $44.50, while CEADW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAV currently has a P/E ratio of -23.25, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAV's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEADW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NAV is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAV.Check CEADW's competition here