National Australia Bank Limited
National Australia Bank Limited (NAUBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAUBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAUBF | $30.76 | +0.00% | 94B | 19.97 | $1.54 | +3.57% |
| BACRP | $201.00 | +0.00% | 1.4T | N/A | N/A | +2.11% |
| CICHY | $20.43 | -1.59% | 362.9B | 5.52 | $3.77 | +4.04% |
| IDCBF | $0.84 | +0.00% | 299.4B | 6.00 | $0.14 | +5.12% |
| IDCBY | $16.34 | -1.09% | 296.7B | 5.80 | $2.87 | +3.90% |
| HBCYF | $16.99 | +0.02% | 296.4B | 18.16 | $0.95 | +3.75% |
| ACGBY | $17.19 | -1.26% | 280.6B | 6.21 | $2.83 | +3.59% |
| CICHF | $1.03 | +2.49% | 251.5B | 5.51 | $0.19 | +5.25% |
| ACGBF | $0.71 | +0.00% | 248.5B | 6.45 | $0.11 | +4.85% |
| CMWAY | $127.45 | -1.41% | 211B | 28.68 | $4.40 | +2.63% |
Stock Comparison
NAUBF vs BACRP Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BACRP trades at $201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACRP's competition here
NAUBF vs CICHY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 362.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CICHY trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CICHY's competition here
NAUBF vs IDCBF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 299.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while IDCBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and IDCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDCBF's competition here
NAUBF vs IDCBY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 296.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while IDCBY trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check IDCBY's competition here
NAUBF vs HBCYF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 296.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while HBCYF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check HBCYF's competition here
NAUBF vs ACGBY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 280.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ACGBY trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check ACGBY's competition here
NAUBF vs CICHF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 251.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CICHF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CICHF's competition here
NAUBF vs ACGBF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 248.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ACGBF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ACGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACGBF's competition here
NAUBF vs CMWAY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 211B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CMWAY trades at $127.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CMWAY's competition here
NAUBF vs MBFJF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 210.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while MBFJF trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check MBFJF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCDRF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 187.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BCDRF trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCDRF's competition here
NAUBF vs BACHY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BACHY trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BACHY's competition here
NAUBF vs BACHF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 175.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BACHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BACHF's competition here
NAUBF vs CBAUF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CBAUF trades at $100.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CBAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBAUF's competition here
NAUBF vs SMFNF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 149.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SMFNF trades at $40.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SMFNF's competition here
NAUBF vs BBVXF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BBVXF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BBVXF's competition here
NAUBF vs NABZY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 103.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while NABZY trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NABZY's competition here
NAUBF vs WEBNF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while WEBNF trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check WEBNF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCLYF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BCLYF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCLYF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANZGY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ANZGY trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check ANZGY's competition here
NAUBF vs INGVF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while INGVF trades at $29.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and INGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INGVF's competition here
NAUBF vs BKFCF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BKFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFCF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCMXY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BCMXY trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCMXY's competition here
NAUBF vs RBSPF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while RBSPF trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check RBSPF's competition here
NAUBF vs SCBFY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SCBFY trades at $48.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SCBFY's competition here
NAUBF vs SCBFF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SCBFF trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SCBFF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANEWF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANEWF's competition here
NAUBF vs NTIOF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while NTIOF trades at $128.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NTIOF's competition here
NAUBF vs FANDY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while FANDY trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and FANDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDY's competition here
NAUBF vs FANDF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while FANDF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check FANDF's competition here
NAUBF vs TDBKF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check TDBKF's competition here
NAUBF vs SVNLF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SVNLF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and SVNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVNLF's competition here
NAUBF vs SVNLY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SVNLY trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SVNLY's competition here
NAUBF vs ABMRF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ABMRF trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABMRF's competition here
NAUBF vs AAVMY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while AAVMY trades at $33.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check AAVMY's competition here
NAUBF vs RBCPF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check RBCPF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNSPF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNSPF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNDSY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BNDSY trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BNDSY's competition here
NAUBF vs BNDSF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BNDSF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BNDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNDSF's competition here
NAUBF vs EFGXY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while EFGXY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and EFGXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EFGXY's competition here
NAUBF vs ALORY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALORY's competition here
NAUBF vs EFGIF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while EFGIF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check EFGIF's competition here
NAUBF vs NBKCF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while NBKCF trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NBKCF's competition here
NAUBF vs WFCNP Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while WFCNP trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check WFCNP's competition here
NAUBF vs CSGKF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSGKF's competition here
NAUBF vs PRRCF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 710.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while PRRCF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRRCF's competition here
NAUBF vs VUPPF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VUPPF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCSO Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BCSO trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BCSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCSO's competition here
NAUBF vs TNTTF Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check TNTTF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANZBY Comparison February 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZBY's competition here