National Australia Bank Limited
National Australia Bank Limited (NAUBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAUBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAUBF | $24.74 | +0.00% | 75.6B | 16.95 | $1.46 | +4.28% |
| BACRP | $225.00 | +0.00% | 349.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.21% |
| IDCBY | $15.52 | +0.00% | 343.6B | 5.61 | $2.70 | +5.01% |
| IDCBF | $0.80 | +0.00% | 339.6B | 5.44 | $0.14 | +5.64% |
| ACGBY | $17.50 | +0.00% | 320.2B | 6.57 | $2.61 | +4.38% |
| ACGBF | $0.65 | +0.00% | 298.6B | 6.50 | $0.10 | +5.19% |
| WFCNP | $1.50 | +0.00% | 254.6B | 0.37 | $4.03 | +2.13% |
| CICHY | $20.18 | +0.00% | 249.8B | 5.54 | $3.59 | +4.34% |
| CICHF | $0.97 | +0.00% | 246B | 5.69 | $0.18 | +5.74% |
| BACHF | $0.60 | +0.00% | 233.6B | 6.00 | $0.10 | +5.60% |
Stock Comparison
NAUBF vs BACRP Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 349.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BACRP trades at $225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACRP's competition here
NAUBF vs IDCBY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 343.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while IDCBY trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check IDCBY's competition here
NAUBF vs IDCBF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 339.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while IDCBF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and IDCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDCBF's competition here
NAUBF vs ACGBY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 320.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while ACGBY trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check ACGBY's competition here
NAUBF vs ACGBF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 298.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while ACGBF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ACGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACGBF's competition here
NAUBF vs WFCNP Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 254.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while WFCNP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and WFCNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WFCNP's competition here
NAUBF vs CICHY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 249.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while CICHY trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CICHY's competition here
NAUBF vs CICHF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 246B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while CICHF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CICHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CICHF's competition here
NAUBF vs BACHF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 233.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BACHF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BACHF's competition here
NAUBF vs BACHY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 230.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BACHY trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BACHY's competition here
NAUBF vs HBCYF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 228.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while HBCYF trades at $12.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check HBCYF's competition here
NAUBF vs MBFJF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 192B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while MBFJF trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check MBFJF's competition here
NAUBF vs CBAUF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 184.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while CBAUF trades at $110.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CBAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBAUF's competition here
NAUBF vs CMWAY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 182.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while CMWAY trades at $108.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CMWAY's competition here
NAUBF vs BCDRF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BCDRF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCDRF's competition here
NAUBF vs BBVXF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BBVXF trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BBVXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BBVXF's competition here
NAUBF vs SMFNF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while SMFNF trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SMFNF's competition here
NAUBF vs BKFCF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BKFCF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BKFCF's competition here
NAUBF vs WEBNF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 80.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while WEBNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check WEBNF's competition here
NAUBF vs NABZY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while NABZY trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NABZY's competition here
NAUBF vs INGVF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while INGVF trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and INGVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INGVF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCLYF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 70.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BCLYF trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCLYF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANZGY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while ANZGY trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check ANZGY's competition here
NAUBF vs RBSPF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while RBSPF trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check RBSPF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANEWF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANEWF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCMXY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BCMXY trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BCMXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCMXY's competition here
NAUBF vs NTIOF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while NTIOF trades at $108.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NTIOF's competition here
NAUBF vs NBKCF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while NBKCF trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and NBKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBKCF's competition here
NAUBF vs SCBFY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while SCBFY trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SCBFY's competition here
NAUBF vs SCBFF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while SCBFF trades at $18.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SCBFF's competition here
NAUBF vs TDBKF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check TDBKF's competition here
NAUBF vs ABMRF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while ABMRF trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABMRF's competition here
NAUBF vs SVNLY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while SVNLY trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SVNLY's competition here
NAUBF vs AAVMY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while AAVMY trades at $30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check AAVMY's competition here
NAUBF vs SVNLF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while SVNLF trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SVNLF's competition here
NAUBF vs RBCPF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check RBCPF's competition here
NAUBF vs FANDF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while FANDF trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and FANDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNSPF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNSPF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNDSF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BNDSF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BNDSF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNDSY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BNDSY trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BNDSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNDSY's competition here
NAUBF vs ALORY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while ALORY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALORY's competition here
NAUBF vs EFGIF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while EFGIF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check EFGIF's competition here
NAUBF vs EFGXY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and EFGXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EFGXY's competition here
NAUBF vs CSGKF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSGKF's competition here
NAUBF vs FANDY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while FANDY trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check FANDY's competition here
NAUBF vs PRRCF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while PRRCF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRRCF's competition here
NAUBF vs VUPPF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VUPPF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCSO Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while BCSO trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BCSO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCSO's competition here
NAUBF vs ANZBY Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZBY's competition here
NAUBF vs TNTTF Comparison August 2025
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 75.6B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $24.74, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.95, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check TNTTF's competition here