National Australia Bank Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for NAUBF
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for NAUBF
National Australia Bank Limited (NAUBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAUBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAUBF | $32.14 | +0.00% | 98.2B | 20.87 | $1.54 | +3.41% |
| BACRP | $302.00 | +0.00% | 2.2T | N/A | N/A | +2.20% |
| CICHY | $21.64 | +0.09% | 378.4B | 5.76 | $3.77 | +3.88% |
| IDCBY | $17.80 | -0.06% | 316.8B | 6.13 | $2.90 | +3.65% |
| IDCBF | $0.88 | +4.76% | 313.6B | 5.87 | $0.15 | +4.88% |
| HBCYF | $16.91 | +0.65% | 290.4B | 14.09 | $1.20 | +4.42% |
| CICHF | $1.10 | +7.32% | 264.5B | 5.79 | $0.19 | +4.99% |
| ACGBY | $18.16 | +0.20% | 253.7B | 6.40 | $2.83 | +3.49% |
| ACGBF | $0.67 | +0.00% | 234.6B | 6.09 | $0.11 | +5.14% |
| CMWAY | $121.47 | +0.61% | 202.6B | 28.18 | $4.30 | +2.74% |
Stock Comparison
NAUBF vs BACRP Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BACRP trades at $302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACRP's competition here
NAUBF vs CICHY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 378.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while CICHY trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CICHY's competition here
NAUBF vs IDCBY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 316.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while IDCBY trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check IDCBY's competition here
NAUBF vs IDCBF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 313.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while IDCBF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and IDCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDCBF's competition here
NAUBF vs HBCYF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 290.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while HBCYF trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check HBCYF's competition here
NAUBF vs CICHF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 264.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while CICHF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CICHF's competition here
NAUBF vs ACGBY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 253.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while ACGBY trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check ACGBY's competition here
NAUBF vs ACGBF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 234.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while ACGBF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ACGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACGBF's competition here
NAUBF vs CMWAY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 202.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while CMWAY trades at $121.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CMWAY's competition here
NAUBF vs CBAUF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 200.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while CBAUF trades at $119.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CBAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBAUF's competition here
NAUBF vs BACHY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 200.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BACHY trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BACHY's competition here
NAUBF vs MBFJF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 198.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while MBFJF trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and MBFJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MBFJF's competition here
NAUBF vs BACHF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 198B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BACHF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACHF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCDRF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BCDRF trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCDRF's competition here
NAUBF vs SMFNF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while SMFNF trades at $33.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SMFNF's competition here
NAUBF vs BBVXF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BBVXF trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BBVXF's competition here
NAUBF vs WEBNF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while WEBNF trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check WEBNF's competition here
NAUBF vs NABZY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 89.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while NABZY trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NABZY's competition here
NAUBF vs INGVF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 79.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while INGVF trades at $27.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check INGVF's competition here
NAUBF vs BKFCF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BKFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFCF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANZGY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while ANZGY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check ANZGY's competition here
NAUBF vs BCLYF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BCLYF trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCLYF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCMXY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BCMXY trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BCMXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCMXY's competition here
NAUBF vs RBSPF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while RBSPF trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check RBSPF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANEWF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANEWF's competition here
NAUBF vs NTIOF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while NTIOF trades at $133.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NTIOF's competition here
NAUBF vs SCBFY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while SCBFY trades at $42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SCBFY's competition here
NAUBF vs SCBFF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while SCBFF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SCBFF's competition here
NAUBF vs TDBKF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check TDBKF's competition here
NAUBF vs FANDF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while FANDF trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and FANDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDF's competition here
NAUBF vs FANDY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while FANDY trades at $50.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check FANDY's competition here
NAUBF vs AAVMY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while AAVMY trades at $32.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check AAVMY's competition here
NAUBF vs SVNLF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while SVNLF trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SVNLF's competition here
NAUBF vs SVNLY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while SVNLY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SVNLY's competition here
NAUBF vs ABMRF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while ABMRF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABMRF's competition here
NAUBF vs RBCPF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check RBCPF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNSPF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNSPF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNDSY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BNDSY trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BNDSY's competition here
NAUBF vs BNDSF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BNDSF trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BNDSF's competition here
NAUBF vs WFCNP Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while WFCNP trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check WFCNP's competition here
NAUBF vs ALORY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALORY's competition here
NAUBF vs NBKCF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while NBKCF trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NBKCF's competition here
NAUBF vs EFGXY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while EFGXY trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and EFGXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EFGXY's competition here
NAUBF vs EFGIF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while EFGIF trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check EFGIF's competition here
NAUBF vs CSGKF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSGKF's competition here
NAUBF vs VUPPF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VUPPF's competition here
NAUBF vs PRRCF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while PRRCF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRRCF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCSO Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while BCSO trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCSO's competition here
NAUBF vs TNTTF Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check TNTTF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANZBY Comparison April 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 98.2B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $32.14, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.87, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZBY's competition here