National Australia Bank Limited
National Australia Bank Limited (NAUBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAUBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAUBF | $30.76 | +0.00% | 94B | 19.97 | $1.54 | +3.57% |
| BACRP | $302.00 | +1.00% | 2.2T | N/A | N/A | +2.34% |
| CICHY | $20.54 | +1.99% | 352.3B | 5.36 | $3.77 | +4.16% |
| IDCBF | $0.81 | +0.00% | 288.7B | 5.79 | $0.14 | +5.31% |
| IDCBY | $16.50 | +3.22% | 286.9B | 5.61 | $2.87 | +4.01% |
| HBCYF | $15.60 | -3.26% | 270.6B | 13.13 | $1.20 | +4.75% |
| ACGBY | $16.34 | -0.24% | 261B | 5.77 | $2.83 | +3.86% |
| ACGBF | $0.67 | +0.00% | 234.5B | 6.09 | $0.11 | +5.14% |
| CICHF | $0.98 | -2.20% | 233.2B | 5.11 | $0.19 | +5.49% |
| CMWAY | $123.84 | +2.04% | 201.9B | 27.50 | $4.39 | +2.73% |
Stock Comparison
NAUBF vs BACRP Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BACRP trades at $302.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BACRP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BACRP's competition here
NAUBF vs CICHY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 352.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CICHY trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CICHY's competition here
NAUBF vs IDCBF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 288.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while IDCBF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check IDCBF's competition here
NAUBF vs IDCBY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 286.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while IDCBY trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check IDCBY's competition here
NAUBF vs HBCYF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 270.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while HBCYF trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and HBCYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HBCYF's competition here
NAUBF vs ACGBY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 261B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ACGBY trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check ACGBY's competition here
NAUBF vs ACGBF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 234.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ACGBF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ACGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACGBF's competition here
NAUBF vs CICHF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 233.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CICHF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CICHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CICHF's competition here
NAUBF vs CMWAY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 201.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CMWAY trades at $123.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check CMWAY's competition here
NAUBF vs CBAUF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 200.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CBAUF trades at $119.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CBAUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBAUF's competition here
NAUBF vs MBFJF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 195.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while MBFJF trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check MBFJF's competition here
NAUBF vs BACHY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 172.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BACHY trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BACHY's competition here
NAUBF vs BACHF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 169.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BACHF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BACHF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCDRF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 163.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BCDRF trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCDRF's competition here
NAUBF vs SMFNF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 122.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SMFNF trades at $32.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SMFNF's competition here
NAUBF vs BBVXF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BBVXF trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BBVXF's competition here
NAUBF vs NABZY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while NABZY trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NABZY's competition here
NAUBF vs WEBNF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 95.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while WEBNF trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check WEBNF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANZGY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ANZGY trades at $26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check ANZGY's competition here
NAUBF vs BKFCF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BKFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKFCF's competition here
NAUBF vs INGVF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while INGVF trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check INGVF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCLYF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 73.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BCLYF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCLYF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCMXY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BCMXY trades at $20.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCMXY's competition here
NAUBF vs RBSPF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while RBSPF trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check RBSPF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANEWF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ANEWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANEWF's competition here
NAUBF vs NTIOF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while NTIOF trades at $133.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NTIOF's competition here
NAUBF vs SCBFF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SCBFF trades at $20.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SCBFF's competition here
NAUBF vs SCBFY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SCBFY trades at $41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SCBFY's competition here
NAUBF vs TDBKF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check TDBKF's competition here
NAUBF vs SVNLF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SVNLF trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and SVNLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVNLF's competition here
NAUBF vs FANDY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while FANDY trades at $54.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and FANDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDY's competition here
NAUBF vs FANDF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while FANDF trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and FANDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FANDF's competition here
NAUBF vs ABMRF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ABMRF trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ABMRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABMRF's competition here
NAUBF vs SVNLY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while SVNLY trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check SVNLY's competition here
NAUBF vs AAVMY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while AAVMY trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check AAVMY's competition here
NAUBF vs RBCPF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check RBCPF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNSPF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BNSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNSPF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNDSF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BNDSF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BNDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNDSF's competition here
NAUBF vs BNDSY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BNDSY trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and BNDSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNDSY's competition here
NAUBF vs WFCNP Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while WFCNP trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check WFCNP's competition here
NAUBF vs EFGXY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while EFGXY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check EFGXY's competition here
NAUBF vs ALORY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ALORY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALORY's competition here
NAUBF vs EFGIF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while EFGIF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check EFGIF's competition here
NAUBF vs NBKCF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while NBKCF trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check NBKCF's competition here
NAUBF vs CSGKF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and CSGKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSGKF's competition here
NAUBF vs VUPPF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and VUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VUPPF's competition here
NAUBF vs PRRCF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while PRRCF trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and PRRCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRRCF's competition here
NAUBF vs BCSO Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check BCSO's competition here
NAUBF vs TNTTF Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAUBF.Check TNTTF's competition here
NAUBF vs ANZBY Comparison March 2026
NAUBF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAUBF stands at 94B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAUBF is priced at $30.76, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAUBF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.97, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAUBF's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAUBF and ANZBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANZBY's competition here