Namib Minerals Warrants

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while NEM trades at $125.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check NEM's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while AEM trades at $224.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check AEM's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, B has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while B trades at $48.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to B's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check B's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while WPM trades at $145.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 68.06. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check WPM's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while AU trades at $107.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check AU's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while FNV trades at $254.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 54.57. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check FNV's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while GFI trades at $52.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check GFI's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while KGC trades at $33.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check KGC's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while HL-PB trades at $75.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 2598.33. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check HL-PB's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while AGI trades at $45.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check AGI's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while RGLD trades at $271.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check RGLD's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while HL trades at $22.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 77.44. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check HL's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while CDE trades at $24.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check CDE's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while EQX trades at $16.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 168.20. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check EQX's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while IAG trades at $22.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 37.03. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check IAG's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while HMY trades at $20.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check HMY's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while SBSW trades at $15.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -51.39. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check SBSW's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while NGD trades at $11.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check NGD's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while EGO trades at $47.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check EGO's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while OR trades at $41.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 55.97. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check OR's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while BTG trades at $5.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check BTG's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while ORLA trades at $17.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 116.94. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check ORLA's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while SSRM trades at $29.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check SSRM's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while AUY trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check AUY's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while NG trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -43.14. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check NG's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while ARMN trades at $19.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check ARMN's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while AAUC trades at $31.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is -111.89. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check AAUC's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while CGAU trades at $18.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check CGAU's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while SA trades at $34.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -88.70. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check SA's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while SAND trades at $12.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check SAND's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while HYMC trades at $42.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check HYMC's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while DRD trades at $34.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check DRD's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while IAUX trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check IAUX's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 792.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while GAU trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GAU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check GAU's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 689.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while DC trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -23.42. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check DC's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 657.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while NFGC trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -16.74. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check NFGC's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 600.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while IDR trades at $39.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 52.78. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check IDR's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 585.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while CMCL trades at $28.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check CMCL's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 548.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while ODV trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check ODV's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 516.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while TRX trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -180.00. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check TRX's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 508.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while THM trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -90.33. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check THM's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 502.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while NVAWW trades at $36.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check NVAWW's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while GSS trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check GSS's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 439.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while DC-WT trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check DC-WT's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while VGZ trades at $2.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -38.64. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check VGZ's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 340.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while CTGO trades at $27.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is 146.74. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check CTGO's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 328.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while GLDG trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -31.30. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check GLDG's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while MINE trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -34.25. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check MINE's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while USAU trades at $17.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.66. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check USAU's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while GORO trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check GORO's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while PZG trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check PZG's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while NAMM trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check NAMM's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while GSV trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check GSV's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while BGL trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BGL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to BGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check BGL's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while ODVWZ trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check ODVWZ's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while AUST trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check AUST's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while AAU trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check AAU's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while BGLWW trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check BGLWW's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check HYMCZ's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check HYMCL's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check HYMCW's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while GPL trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check GPL's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while KL trades at $38.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check KL's competition here

NAMMW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NAMMW stands at 9.3M. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAMMW is priced at $0.21, while PVG trades at $15.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NAMMW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAMMW's ROE is +0.80%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAMMW is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAMMW.Check PVG's competition here