Paul Mueller Company
Paul Mueller Company MUEL Peers
See (MUEL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUEL | $315.25 | +1.37% | 407.3M | 2.68 | $117.42 | +0.31% |
| BEKAY | $3.50 | +0.00% | 17.8B | 6.86 | $0.51 | +6.96% |
| TKAMY | $10.90 | +8.08% | 6.8B | -5.87 | -$1.86 | +0.90% |
| TYEKF | $10.25 | -3.48% | 6.4B | -5.45 | -$1.88 | +1.51% |
| BEKSF | $42.13 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 8.58 | $4.91 | +4.51% |
| RMGNF | $42.01 | +0.00% | 2B | 12.58 | $3.34 | +4.78% |
| NOEJF | $20.15 | +0.00% | 642M | 23.71 | $0.85 | +2.22% |
| RYBIF | $15.00 | +0.00% | 485.5M | 10.79 | $1.39 | +4.08% |
| ADFJF | $5.97 | +3.70% | 167.7M | 4.89 | $1.22 | +0.49% |
| LQMT | $0.12 | +2.44% | 111M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MUEL vs BEKAY Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, BEKAY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while BEKAY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas BEKAY's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BEKAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to BEKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs TKAMY Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, TKAMY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while TKAMY trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas TKAMY's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TKAMY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to TKAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs TYEKF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, TYEKF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while TYEKF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas TYEKF's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TYEKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to TYEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs BEKSF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, BEKSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while BEKSF trades at $42.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas BEKSF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BEKSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to BEKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs RMGNF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, RMGNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while RMGNF trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas RMGNF's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RMGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to RMGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs NOEJF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, NOEJF has a market cap of 642M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while NOEJF trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas NOEJF's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NOEJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to NOEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs RYBIF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, RYBIF has a market cap of 485.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while RYBIF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas RYBIF's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RYBIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to RYBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs ADFJF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, ADFJF has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while ADFJF trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ADFJF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ADFJF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to ADFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs LQMT Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, LQMT has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while LQMT trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas LQMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LQMT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to LQMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs ARCW Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, ARCW has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while ARCW trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ARCW's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ARCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to ARCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs OLNCF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, OLNCF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while OLNCF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas OLNCF's P/E ratio is 42.85. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OLNCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to OLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs CYMHF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, CYMHF has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while CYMHF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas CYMHF's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CYMHF's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to CYMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs IAALF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, IAALF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while IAALF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas IAALF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IAALF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to IAALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs ERILF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, ERILF has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while ERILF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ERILF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ERILF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to ERILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs ELNX Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, ELNX has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while ELNX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas ELNX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ELNX's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to ELNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs MTRT Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, MTRT has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while MTRT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas MTRT's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MTRT's ROE of +10.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to MTRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs THRR Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, THRR has a market cap of 100K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while THRR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas THRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to THRR's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to THRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs TIMNF Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, TIMNF has a market cap of 19.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while TIMNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas TIMNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TIMNF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to TIMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs RIVT Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, RIVT has a market cap of 7K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while RIVT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas RIVT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RIVT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to RIVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs AMGY Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, AMGY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while AMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas AMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AMGY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to AMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs TDYT Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, TDYT has a market cap of 629. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while TDYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas TDYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TDYT's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is less volatile compared to TDYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.
MUEL vs CHTM Comparison
MUEL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUEL stands at 407.3M. In comparison, CHTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUEL is priced at $315.25, while CHTM trades at $1,452.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUEL currently has a P/E ratio of 2.68, whereas CHTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUEL's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CHTM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MUEL is more volatile compared to CHTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUEL.