Mister Spex SE
Mister Spex SE (MRX.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MRX.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRX.F | €1.92 | -2.04% | 65.4M | -0.77 | -€2.48 | N/A |
| AMZ.DE | €204.20 | +1.97% | 2.1T | 37.91 | €5.29 | N/A |
| 2RR.F | €13.27 | +3.03% | 248.6B | 16.17 | €0.80 | +0.11% |
| AHLA.F | €104.80 | +1.75% | 246.3B | 16.11 | €6.38 | +0.88% |
| IXD1.DE | €42.54 | -1.85% | 134.7B | 23.02 | €1.88 | +3.01% |
| MLB1.DE | €2,079.00 | +1.07% | 105.7B | 59.64 | €34.97 | N/A |
| 013A.F | €27.85 | -0.54% | 41B | 7.89 | €3.51 | +3.16% |
| EBA.DE | €80.40 | +18.27% | 31.3B | 18.94 | €3.59 | +1.52% |
| AHLA.DE | €104.60 | +0.19% | 30.7B | 16.17 | €6.37 | +0.11% |
| DHER.DE | €26.29 | -2.63% | 7.9B | -8.61 | -€3.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MRX.F vs AMZ.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, AMZ.DE has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while AMZ.DE trades at €204.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas AMZ.DE's P/E ratio is 37.91. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AMZ.DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to AMZ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check AMZ.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs 2RR.F Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, 2RR.F has a market cap of 248.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while 2RR.F trades at €13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas 2RR.F's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to 2RR.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to 2RR.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check 2RR.F's competition here
MRX.F vs AHLA.F Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, AHLA.F has a market cap of 246.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while AHLA.F trades at €104.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas AHLA.F's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AHLA.F's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to AHLA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check AHLA.F's competition here
MRX.F vs IXD1.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, IXD1.DE has a market cap of 134.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while IXD1.DE trades at €42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IXD1.DE's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to IXD1.DE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to IXD1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check IXD1.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs MLB1.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, MLB1.DE has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while MLB1.DE trades at €2,079.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MLB1.DE's P/E ratio is 59.64. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MLB1.DE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to MLB1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check MLB1.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs 013A.F Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, 013A.F has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while 013A.F trades at €27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas 013A.F's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to 013A.F's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to 013A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check 013A.F's competition here
MRX.F vs EBA.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, EBA.DE has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while EBA.DE trades at €80.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas EBA.DE's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to EBA.DE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is less volatile compared to EBA.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check EBA.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs AHLA.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, AHLA.DE has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while AHLA.DE trades at €104.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas AHLA.DE's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AHLA.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to AHLA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check AHLA.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs DHER.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, DHER.DE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while DHER.DE trades at €26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DHER.DE's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to DHER.DE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to DHER.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check DHER.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs ZAL.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, ZAL.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while ZAL.DE trades at €25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ZAL.DE's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ZAL.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to ZAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check ZAL.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs 3E2.BE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, 3E2.BE has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while 3E2.BE trades at €54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas 3E2.BE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to 3E2.BE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to 3E2.BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check 3E2.BE's competition here
MRX.F vs 3E2.F Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, 3E2.F has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while 3E2.F trades at €54.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas 3E2.F's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to 3E2.F's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to 3E2.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check 3E2.F's competition here
MRX.F vs 3E2.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, 3E2.DE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while 3E2.DE trades at €40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas 3E2.DE's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to 3E2.DE's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is less volatile compared to 3E2.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check 3E2.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs ZO1.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, ZO1.DE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while ZO1.DE trades at €468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ZO1.DE's P/E ratio is -211.10. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ZO1.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to ZO1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check ZO1.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs CEC.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, CEC.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while CEC.DE trades at €4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CEC.DE's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CEC.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to CEC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check CEC.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs YOU.F Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, YOU.F has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while YOU.F trades at €6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas YOU.F's P/E ratio is -11.13. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to YOU.F's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to YOU.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check YOU.F's competition here
MRX.F vs YOU.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, YOU.DE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while YOU.DE trades at €6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas YOU.DE's P/E ratio is -11.02. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to YOU.DE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to YOU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check YOU.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs 8WZ.F Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, 8WZ.F has a market cap of 681.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while 8WZ.F trades at €2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas 8WZ.F's P/E ratio is -19.27. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to 8WZ.F's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to 8WZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check 8WZ.F's competition here
MRX.F vs SNH.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, SNH.DE has a market cap of 670.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while SNH.DE trades at €0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SNH.DE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SNH.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is less volatile compared to SNH.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check SNH.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs G5NA.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, G5NA.DE has a market cap of 360.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while G5NA.DE trades at €11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas G5NA.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to G5NA.DE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to G5NA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check G5NA.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs H24.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, H24.DE has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while H24.DE trades at €7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas H24.DE's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to H24.DE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to H24.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check H24.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs PLDADEL00013.SG Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, PLDADEL00013.SG has a market cap of 143.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while PLDADEL00013.SG trades at €10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PLDADEL00013.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PLDADEL00013.SG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to PLDADEL00013.SG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check PLDADEL00013.SG's competition here
MRX.F vs BIKE.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, BIKE.DE has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while BIKE.DE trades at €2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BIKE.DE's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BIKE.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to BIKE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check BIKE.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs BIKE.F Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, BIKE.F has a market cap of 126.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while BIKE.F trades at €2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BIKE.F's P/E ratio is -10.63. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BIKE.F's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to BIKE.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check BIKE.F's competition here
MRX.F vs FSNT.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, FSNT.DE has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while FSNT.DE trades at €5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas FSNT.DE's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FSNT.DE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to FSNT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check FSNT.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs MRX.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, MRX.DE has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while MRX.DE trades at €1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MRX.DE's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MRX.DE's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to MRX.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check MRX.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs ART.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, ART.DE has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while ART.DE trades at €11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ART.DE's P/E ratio is -80.71. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ART.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to ART.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check ART.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs ECF.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, ECF.DE has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while ECF.DE trades at €2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ECF.DE's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ECF.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to ECF.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check ECF.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs BBY.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, BBY.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while BBY.DE trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BBY.DE's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BBY.DE's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is less volatile compared to BBY.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check BBY.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs BTBB.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, BTBB.DE has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while BTBB.DE trades at €0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BTBB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BTBB.DE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is less volatile compared to BTBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check BTBB.DE's competition here
MRX.F vs U1DA.F Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, U1DA.F has a market cap of 149.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while U1DA.F trades at €2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas U1DA.F's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to U1DA.F's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to U1DA.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check U1DA.F's competition here
MRX.F vs CEC1.DE Comparison July 2025
MRX.F plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MRX.F stands at 65.4M. In comparison, CEC1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MRX.F is priced at €1.92, while CEC1.DE trades at €3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MRX.F currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CEC1.DE's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, MRX.F's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CEC1.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRX.F is more volatile compared to CEC1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRX.F.Check CEC1.DE's competition here