JPO Solutions, Inc.
JPO Solutions, Inc. (MOPN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MOPN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOPN | $0.00 | +0.00% | 200K | -0.05 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| AIQUF | $200.27 | -0.12% | 115.5B | 29.58 | $6.77 | +1.85% |
| AIQUY | $40.00 | -0.10% | 115.5B | 29.02 | $1.38 | +1.82% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | +0.00% | 48.4B | 31.82 | $1.76 | +0.04% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 45.6B | 26.33 | $0.02 | +0.07% |
| GVDBF | $4,476.00 | +0.15% | 41.3B | 30.58 | $146.37 | +1.77% |
| GVDNY | $84.42 | -0.39% | 39B | 28.85 | $2.93 | +1.83% |
| SKFOF | $235.00 | -0.24% | 37.6B | 25.03 | $9.36 | +0.87% |
| SXYAY | $23.38 | -0.17% | 37.5B | 24.63 | $0.95 | +1.77% |
| AKZOY | $21.14 | +0.09% | 32.5B | 22.71 | $0.93 | +3.50% |
Stock Comparison
MOPN vs AIQUF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AIQUF trades at $200.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 29.58. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check AIQUF's competition here
MOPN vs AIQUY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AIQUY trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check AIQUY's competition here
MOPN vs PTCAY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check PTCAY's competition here
MOPN vs PTPIF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check PTPIF's competition here
MOPN vs GVDBF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while GVDBF trades at $4,476.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check GVDBF's competition here
MOPN vs GVDNY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while GVDNY trades at $84.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check GVDNY's competition here
MOPN vs SKFOF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SKFOF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check SKFOF's competition here
MOPN vs SXYAY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SXYAY trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check SXYAY's competition here
MOPN vs AKZOY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AKZOY trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check AKZOY's competition here
MOPN vs NVZMF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NVZMF trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 59.28. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and NVZMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVZMF's competition here
MOPN vs NVZMY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NVZMY trades at $65.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 56.97. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check NVZMY's competition here
MOPN vs NPCPF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NPCPF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check NPCPF's competition here
MOPN vs EMSHF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while EMSHF trades at $764.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check EMSHF's competition here
MOPN vs NDEKF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NDEKF trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check NDEKF's competition here
MOPN vs COVTY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while COVTY trades at $34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -30.16. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check COVTY's competition here
MOPN vs CVVTF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CVVTF trades at $69.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -30.15. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check CVVTF's competition here
MOPN vs SYIEY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SYIEY trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check SYIEY's competition here
MOPN vs SYIEF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SYIEF trades at $91.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and SYIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYIEF's competition here
MOPN vs AKZOF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AKZOF trades at $69.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check AKZOF's competition here
MOPN vs CRTSF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check CRTSF's competition here
MOPN vs CHYHY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check CHYHY's competition here
MOPN vs EVKIF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while EVKIF trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 29.08. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and EVKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVKIF's competition here
MOPN vs BNTGF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while BNTGF trades at $64.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and BNTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNTGF's competition here
MOPN vs BNTGY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while BNTGY trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check BNTGY's competition here
MOPN vs EVKIY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while EVKIY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check EVKIY's competition here
MOPN vs SCVUF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check SCVUF's competition here
MOPN vs IMDZF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while IMDZF trades at $133.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check IMDZF's competition here
MOPN vs ASGLY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ASGLY trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check ASGLY's competition here
MOPN vs ASGLF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check ASGLF's competition here
MOPN vs OCLDY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while OCLDY trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 109.50. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check OCLDY's competition here
MOPN vs NDEKY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NDEKY trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check NDEKY's competition here
MOPN vs FUPBY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FUPBY trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check FUPBY's competition here
MOPN vs FUPEF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and FUPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUPEF's competition here
MOPN vs SCVPY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and SCVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCVPY's competition here
MOPN vs OCLDF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while OCLDF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 102.08. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check OCLDF's competition here
MOPN vs COIHF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while COIHF trades at $40.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check COIHF's competition here
MOPN vs ARKAF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ARKAF trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check ARKAF's competition here
MOPN vs ARKAY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ARKAY trades at $69.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check ARKAY's competition here
MOPN vs COIHY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while COIHY trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check COIHY's competition here
MOPN vs KDSKF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check KDSKF's competition here
MOPN vs FUPPF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check FUPPF's competition here
MOPN vs MITUF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while MITUF trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check MITUF's competition here
MOPN vs MITUY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while MITUY trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check MITUY's competition here
MOPN vs JMPLY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while JMPLY trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and JMPLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JMPLY's competition here
MOPN vs AZLGF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AZLGF trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and AZLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZLGF's competition here
MOPN vs JMPLF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while JMPLF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check JMPLF's competition here
MOPN vs WKCMF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while WKCMF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and WKCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WKCMF's competition here
MOPN vs CLZNF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check CLZNF's competition here
MOPN vs AWTRF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AWTRF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and AWTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWTRF's competition here
MOPN vs CLZNY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CLZNY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check CLZNY's competition here
MOPN vs NOFCF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check NOFCF's competition here
MOPN vs MBGCF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while MBGCF trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check MBGCF's competition here
MOPN vs HXXPY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check HXXPY's competition here
MOPN vs SASOF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SASOF trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check SASOF's competition here
MOPN vs ICPVF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check ICPVF's competition here
MOPN vs HXPLF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HXPLF trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and HXPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HXPLF's competition here
MOPN vs INCZY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check INCZY's competition here
MOPN vs KSANF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check KSANF's competition here
MOPN vs KPTCY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KPTCY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check KPTCY's competition here
MOPN vs TKKYY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check TKKYY's competition here
MOPN vs LNXSY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while LNXSY trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -14.98. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check LNXSY's competition here
MOPN vs LNXSF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while LNXSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and LNXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNXSF's competition here
MOPN vs DACHF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while DACHF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check DACHF's competition here
MOPN vs IRLCF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and IRLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRLCF's competition here
MOPN vs ZEOOY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check ZEOOY's competition here
MOPN vs ZEOOF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check ZEOOF's competition here
MOPN vs OCINF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while OCINF trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and OCINF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCINF's competition here
MOPN vs BRRDF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and BRRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRRDF's competition here
MOPN vs KPLIF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check KPLIF's competition here
MOPN vs TKYMY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKYMY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check TKYMY's competition here
MOPN vs KANKF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and KANKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KANKF's competition here
MOPN vs ALZCF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ALZCF trades at $152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check ALZCF's competition here
MOPN vs ELKEF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ELKEF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and ELKEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELKEF's competition here
MOPN vs EMNSF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while EMNSF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -32.14. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check EMNSF's competition here
MOPN vs TKCBF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check TKCBF's competition here
MOPN vs ELMTY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ELMTY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -30.74. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and ELMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELMTY's competition here
MOPN vs TKCBY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check TKCBY's competition here
MOPN vs CSNVF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CSNVF trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check CSNVF's competition here
MOPN vs HUABF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check HUABF's competition here
MOPN vs CSNVY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CSNVY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check CSNVY's competition here
MOPN vs CUYRF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check CUYRF's competition here
MOPN vs ALPKF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ALPKF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check ALPKF's competition here
MOPN vs TKYMF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and TKYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKYMF's competition here
MOPN vs LNTEF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and LNTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNTEF's competition here
MOPN vs FPLSF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FPLSF trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check FPLSF's competition here
MOPN vs HUIHY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check HUIHY's competition here
MOPN vs AECLY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and AECLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AECLY's competition here
MOPN vs SKKAF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check SKKAF's competition here
MOPN vs HASGF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check HASGF's competition here
MOPN vs VTXPF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while VTXPF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check VTXPF's competition here
MOPN vs VBVBF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 771M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while VBVBF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check VBVBF's competition here
MOPN vs DALQF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check DALQF's competition here
MOPN vs SYCHF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and SYCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYCHF's competition here
MOPN vs TYOBY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check TYOBY's competition here
MOPN vs DLNDY Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 600M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while DLNDY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and DLNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLNDY's competition here
MOPN vs NOPMF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 527.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NOPMF trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -34.11. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check NOPMF's competition here
MOPN vs FLRAF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 448.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FLRAF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and FLRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLRAF's competition here
MOPN vs TNMAF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.Check TNMAF's competition here
MOPN vs NCRBF Comparison August 2025
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200K. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and NCRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCRBF's competition here