JPO Solutions, Inc.
JPO Solutions, Inc. MOPN Peers
See (MOPN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOPN | $0.00 | N/A | 200000.00 | -0.05 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| AIQUY | $40.89 | +0.42% | 117.89B | 31.70 | $1.29 | +1.55% |
| AIQUF | $203.75 | +0.12% | 117.49B | 31.49 | $6.47 | +1.71% |
| PTCAY | $62.61 | +67.18% | 54.16B | -569.18 | -$0.11 | +0.06% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | N/A | 45.56B | -52.67 | -$0.01 | +1058.74% |
| GVDNY | $94.31 | +0.31% | 43.51B | 33.44 | $2.82 | +1.65% |
| GVDBF | $4,638.00 | -5.17% | 42.79B | 32.81 | $141.34 | +1.74% |
| SXYAY | $26.15 | +0.93% | 41.96B | 28.12 | $0.93 | +1.49% |
| SKFOF | $237.80 | -0.97% | 38.15B | 25.08 | $9.48 | +1.32% |
| AKZOY | $22.00 | -0.90% | 33.82B | 21.57 | $1.02 | +3.19% |
Stock Comparison
MOPN vs AIQUY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 117.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AIQUY trades at $40.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs AIQUF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 117.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AIQUF trades at $203.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs PTCAY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 54.16B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while PTCAY trades at $62.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -569.18. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs PTPIF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.56B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs GVDNY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 43.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while GVDNY trades at $94.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs GVDBF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 42.79B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while GVDBF trades at $4,638.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and GVDBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs SXYAY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 41.96B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SXYAY trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs SKFOF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 38.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SKFOF trades at $237.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs AKZOY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 33.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AKZOY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs NVZMF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 31.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NVZMF trades at $66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 87.76. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and NVZMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs NVZMY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 30.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NVZMY trades at $66.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs SYIEF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 16.01B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SYIEF trades at $114.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs SYIEY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 15.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SYIEY trades at $28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs EMSHF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 15.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while EMSHF trades at $651.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs NPCPF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 14.73B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NPCPF trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs NDEKF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 13.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NDEKF trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and NDEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs NDEKY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 12.90B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NDEKY trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs COVTY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 12.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while COVTY trades at $33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -28.80. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs CVVTF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 11.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CVVTF trades at $62.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -39.01. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs AKZOF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 11.43B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AKZOF trades at $66.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs EVKIF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 10.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while EVKIF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs CRTSF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs CHYHY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs EVKIY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while EVKIY trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 40.87. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs BNTGY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while BNTGY trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs BNTGF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while BNTGF trades at $67.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs SCVUF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.59B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs SCVPY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SCVPY trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 41.50. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and SCVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs IMDZF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while IMDZF trades at $131.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and IMDZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs TKKYY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 7.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKKYY trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs ASGLF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ASGLF trades at $31.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and ASGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs FUPBY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FUPBY trades at $12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs ASGLY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ASGLY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs KPTCY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KPTCY trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs COIHF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.90B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while COIHF trades at $42.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs FUPPF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and FUPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs ARKAY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ARKAY trades at $77.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs OCLDY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while OCLDY trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs COIHY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while COIHY trades at $20.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs ARKAF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ARKAF trades at $74.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs TKCBY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 5.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs OCLDF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while OCLDF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs MITUF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while MITUF trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs KDSKF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs MITUY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while MITUY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs CLZNF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CLZNF trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs AZLGF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AZLGF trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs FUPEF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FUPEF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs WKCMF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while WKCMF trades at $75.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs CLZNY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CLZNY trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs NOFCF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.39B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 13.96. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and NOFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs MBGCF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while MBGCF trades at $17.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs HXXPY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs JMPLY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while JMPLY trades at $36.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and JMPLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs HXPLF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HXPLF trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs LNXSY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while LNXSY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -18.14. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs LNXSF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while LNXSF trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -13.97. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and LNXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs ICPVF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ICPVF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs INCZY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs KSANF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs AWTRF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AWTRF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs JMPLF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while JMPLF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs KPLIF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KPLIF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and KPLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs DACHF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while DACHF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and DACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs SASOF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 2.19B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SASOF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs IRLCF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and IRLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs ZEOOY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs ZEOOF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs OCINF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while OCINF trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs BRRDF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and BRRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs KANKF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and KANKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs TKYMY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKYMY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs ELKEF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ELKEF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs TKCBF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs CSNVY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CSNVY trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs ALPKF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ALPKF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs CSNVF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CSNVF trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs CUYRF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs EMNSF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while EMNSF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs TKYMF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and TKYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs LNTEF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs ELMTY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ELMTY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and ELMTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs ALZCF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while ALZCF trades at $101.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and ALZCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs SKKAF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 984.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SKKAF trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs HUIHY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs HUABF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 878.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HUABF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -13.60. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs AECLY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and AECLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs VTXPF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 833.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while VTXPF trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs HASGF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs DALQF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs SYCHF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SYCHF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and SYCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs VBVBF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 719.99M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while VBVBF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.16. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs DLNDY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 718.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while DLNDY trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and DLNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs SYHMY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, SYHMY has a market cap of 616.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while SYHMY trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas SYHMY's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to SYHMY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and SYHMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs TYOBY Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 603.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs FPLSF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 545.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FPLSF trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 25.54. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs TNMAF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 402.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN is less volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOPN.
MOPN vs FLRAF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 392.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while FLRAF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 27.40. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and FLRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOPN vs NCRBF Comparison
MOPN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOPN stands at 200000.00. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MOPN is priced at $0.00, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOPN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MOPN's ROE is N/A, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOPN and NCRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).