O Sorbet D'amour SA
O Sorbet D'amour SA (MLOSA.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLOSA.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLOSA.PA | €2.44 | +0.00% | 8.8M | 32.53 | €0.08 | N/A |
| BN.PA | €67.22 | -0.50% | 42.6B | 23.61 | €2.82 | +3.23% |
| JDEP.AS | €31.74 | +0.13% | 15.4B | 19.74 | €1.61 | +2.30% |
| KRZ.IR | €68.00 | +0.82% | 10.8B | 16.91 | €4.00 | +2.07% |
| LOTB.BR | €10,060.00 | +0.20% | 8.1B | 47.16 | €211.84 | +0.76% |
| GL9.IR | €17.51 | +1.04% | 4.2B | 28.21 | €0.62 | +2.45% |
| LOUP.PA | €109.40 | +2.82% | 3.7B | 14.48 | €7.39 | +1.45% |
| UNBL.PA | €1,180.00 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 37.04 | €31.86 | +0.76% |
| SAVE.PA | €67.00 | -4.01% | 897.9M | 11.73 | €5.73 | +2.38% |
| BON.PA | €8.55 | -1.72% | 277M | 12.91 | €0.67 | +2.89% |
Stock Comparison
MLOSA.PA vs BN.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, BN.PA has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while BN.PA trades at €67.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas BN.PA's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to BN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to BN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check BN.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs JDEP.AS Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, JDEP.AS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while JDEP.AS trades at €31.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas JDEP.AS's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to JDEP.AS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to JDEP.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check JDEP.AS's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs KRZ.IR Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KRZ.IR has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while KRZ.IR trades at €68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas KRZ.IR's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to KRZ.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to KRZ.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check KRZ.IR's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs LOTB.BR Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LOTB.BR has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while LOTB.BR trades at €10,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas LOTB.BR's P/E ratio is 47.16. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to LOTB.BR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to LOTB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check LOTB.BR's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs GL9.IR Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GL9.IR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while GL9.IR trades at €17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas GL9.IR's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to GL9.IR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to GL9.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check GL9.IR's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs LOUP.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LOUP.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while LOUP.PA trades at €109.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas LOUP.PA's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to LOUP.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to LOUP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check LOUP.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs UNBL.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, UNBL.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while UNBL.PA trades at €1,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas UNBL.PA's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to UNBL.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA and UNBL.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UNBL.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs SAVE.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SAVE.PA has a market cap of 897.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while SAVE.PA trades at €67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas SAVE.PA's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SAVE.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to SAVE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check SAVE.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs BON.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, BON.PA has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while BON.PA trades at €8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas BON.PA's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to BON.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to BON.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check BON.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs WHATS.BR Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, WHATS.BR has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while WHATS.BR trades at €142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas WHATS.BR's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to WHATS.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to WHATS.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check WHATS.BR's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs TERB.BR Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TERB.BR has a market cap of 169.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while TERB.BR trades at €93.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas TERB.BR's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TERB.BR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to TERB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check TERB.BR's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs ALFLE.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALFLE.PA has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while ALFLE.PA trades at €22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas ALFLE.PA's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALFLE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to ALFLE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check ALFLE.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs TIPI.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TIPI.PA has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while TIPI.PA trades at €88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas TIPI.PA's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to TIPI.PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA and TIPI.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIPI.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs MIKO.BR Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MIKO.BR has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while MIKO.BR trades at €61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas MIKO.BR's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MIKO.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA and MIKO.BR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIKO.BR's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs SABE.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SABE.PA has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while SABE.PA trades at €20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas SABE.PA's P/E ratio is -63.75. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to SABE.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA and SABE.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SABE.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs ALPOU.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALPOU.PA has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while ALPOU.PA trades at €9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas ALPOU.PA's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALPOU.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA and ALPOU.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALPOU.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs ALMER.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALMER.PA has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while ALMER.PA trades at €4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas ALMER.PA's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALMER.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA and ALMER.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALMER.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs ALPAU.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALPAU.PA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while ALPAU.PA trades at €1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas ALPAU.PA's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to ALPAU.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA is less volatile compared to ALPAU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLOSA.PA.Check ALPAU.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs MLFDV.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MLFDV.PA has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while MLFDV.PA trades at €0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas MLFDV.PA's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to MLFDV.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA and MLFDV.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLFDV.PA's competition here
MLOSA.PA vs FBEL.PA Comparison April 2026
MLOSA.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLOSA.PA stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FBEL.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLOSA.PA is priced at €2.44, while FBEL.PA trades at €550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLOSA.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 32.53, whereas FBEL.PA's P/E ratio is 35.49. In terms of profitability, MLOSA.PA's ROE is N/A, compared to FBEL.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLOSA.PA and FBEL.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FBEL.PA's competition here