Glanbia plc
Glanbia plc (GL9.IR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GL9.IR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GL9.IR | €19.15 | +9.49% | 4.2B | 28.26 | €0.62 | +2.45% |
| BN.PA | €66.10 | -0.72% | 43.1B | 23.90 | €2.82 | +3.19% |
| JDEP.AS | €31.84 | +0.19% | 15.4B | 19.73 | €1.61 | +2.30% |
| KRZ.IR | €69.85 | +3.25% | 11B | 17.28 | €3.99 | +2.03% |
| LOTB.BR | €10,140.00 | +1.50% | 8.2B | 47.68 | €211.84 | +0.75% |
| LOUP.PA | €109.60 | +2.43% | 3.8B | 14.86 | €7.39 | +1.41% |
| UNBL.PA | €1,180.00 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 37.04 | €31.86 | +0.76% |
| SAVE.PA | €65.60 | -2.38% | 895.2M | 11.69 | €5.73 | +2.39% |
| BON.PA | €8.55 | -1.16% | 273.5M | 12.75 | €0.67 | +2.93% |
| WHATS.BR | €142.50 | +0.35% | 264.5M | 19.52 | €7.30 | +6.07% |
Stock Comparison
GL9.IR vs BN.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BN.PA has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while BN.PA trades at €66.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas BN.PA's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to BN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check BN.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs JDEP.AS Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, JDEP.AS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while JDEP.AS trades at €31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas JDEP.AS's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JDEP.AS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to JDEP.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check JDEP.AS's competition here
GL9.IR vs KRZ.IR Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KRZ.IR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while KRZ.IR trades at €69.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas KRZ.IR's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRZ.IR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to KRZ.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check KRZ.IR's competition here
GL9.IR vs LOTB.BR Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LOTB.BR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while LOTB.BR trades at €10,140.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas LOTB.BR's P/E ratio is 47.68. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOTB.BR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to LOTB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check LOTB.BR's competition here
GL9.IR vs LOUP.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LOUP.PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while LOUP.PA trades at €109.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas LOUP.PA's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOUP.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to LOUP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check LOUP.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs UNBL.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, UNBL.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while UNBL.PA trades at €1,180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas UNBL.PA's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNBL.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to UNBL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check UNBL.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs SAVE.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SAVE.PA has a market cap of 895.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while SAVE.PA trades at €65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas SAVE.PA's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAVE.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to SAVE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check SAVE.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs BON.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BON.PA has a market cap of 273.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while BON.PA trades at €8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas BON.PA's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BON.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to BON.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check BON.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs WHATS.BR Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, WHATS.BR has a market cap of 264.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while WHATS.BR trades at €142.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas WHATS.BR's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WHATS.BR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to WHATS.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check WHATS.BR's competition here
GL9.IR vs TERB.BR Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TERB.BR has a market cap of 169.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while TERB.BR trades at €93.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas TERB.BR's P/E ratio is 39.91. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TERB.BR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to TERB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check TERB.BR's competition here
GL9.IR vs ALFLE.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ALFLE.PA has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while ALFLE.PA trades at €22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas ALFLE.PA's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALFLE.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to ALFLE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check ALFLE.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs TIPI.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TIPI.PA has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while TIPI.PA trades at €88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas TIPI.PA's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIPI.PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to TIPI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check TIPI.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs MIKO.BR Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MIKO.BR has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while MIKO.BR trades at €61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas MIKO.BR's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MIKO.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to MIKO.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check MIKO.BR's competition here
GL9.IR vs SABE.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SABE.PA has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while SABE.PA trades at €20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas SABE.PA's P/E ratio is -63.75. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SABE.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to SABE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check SABE.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs ALPOU.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ALPOU.PA has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while ALPOU.PA trades at €9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas ALPOU.PA's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALPOU.PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to ALPOU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check ALPOU.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs ALMER.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ALMER.PA has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while ALMER.PA trades at €4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas ALMER.PA's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALMER.PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to ALMER.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check ALMER.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs MLOSA.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MLOSA.PA has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while MLOSA.PA trades at €2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas MLOSA.PA's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLOSA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to MLOSA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check MLOSA.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs ALPAU.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ALPAU.PA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while ALPAU.PA trades at €1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas ALPAU.PA's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALPAU.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to ALPAU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check ALPAU.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs MLFDV.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MLFDV.PA has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while MLFDV.PA trades at €0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas MLFDV.PA's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLFDV.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to MLFDV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check MLFDV.PA's competition here
GL9.IR vs FBEL.PA Comparison April 2026
GL9.IR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GL9.IR stands at 4.2B. In comparison, FBEL.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GL9.IR is priced at €19.15, while FBEL.PA trades at €550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GL9.IR currently has a P/E ratio of 28.26, whereas FBEL.PA's P/E ratio is 35.49. In terms of profitability, GL9.IR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBEL.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GL9.IR is more volatile compared to FBEL.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GL9.IR.Check FBEL.PA's competition here