Manhattan Corporation Limited
Manhattan Corporation Limited (MHC.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MHC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHC.AX | A$0.02 | +4.55% | 12.9M | -2.30 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| ELV.AX | A$12.89 | +4.37% | 2.2B | -5.56 | -A$2.32 | N/A |
| MI6.AX | A$0.85 | +3.68% | 1.9B | -42.25 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| BRE.AX | A$6.61 | +5.76% | 1.9B | -38.88 | -A$0.17 | N/A |
| ZIM.AX | A$16.26 | +1.06% | 1.8B | 6.89 | A$2.36 | N/A |
| SYS.AX | A$17.00 | -0.02% | 1B | -2833.33 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| LRV.AX | A$1.25 | +1.21% | 647.8M | -31.25 | -A$0.04 | N/A |
| A1M.AX | A$0.65 | +6.56% | 518.5M | 21.67 | A$0.03 | N/A |
| AZY.AX | A$0.67 | +4.72% | 440.7M | -66.50 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| 29M.AX | A$0.28 | +5.77% | 376.4M | 13.75 | A$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MHC.AX vs ELV.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ELV.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ELV.AX trades at A$12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ELV.AX's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ELV.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to ELV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check ELV.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MI6.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MI6.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MI6.AX trades at A$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MI6.AX's P/E ratio is -42.25. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MI6.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to MI6.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MI6.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BRE.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BRE.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BRE.AX trades at A$6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BRE.AX's P/E ratio is -38.88. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BRE.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to BRE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BRE.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs ZIM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ZIM.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ZIM.AX trades at A$16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ZIM.AX's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ZIM.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to ZIM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check ZIM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs SYS.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SYS.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SYS.AX trades at A$17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SYS.AX's P/E ratio is -2833.33. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SYS.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to SYS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check SYS.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs LRV.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, LRV.AX has a market cap of 647.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LRV.AX trades at A$1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LRV.AX's P/E ratio is -31.25. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LRV.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to LRV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check LRV.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs A1M.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, A1M.AX has a market cap of 518.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while A1M.AX trades at A$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas A1M.AX's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to A1M.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to A1M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check A1M.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs AZY.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, AZY.AX has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while AZY.AX trades at A$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AZY.AX's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AZY.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to AZY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check AZY.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs 29M.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, 29M.AX has a market cap of 376.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while 29M.AX trades at A$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas 29M.AX's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to 29M.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to 29M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check 29M.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs SMI.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SMI.AX has a market cap of 359.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SMI.AX trades at A$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SMI.AX's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SMI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX and SMI.AX have similar daily volatility (9.09).Check SMI.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MTM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MTM.AX has a market cap of 335.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MTM.AX trades at A$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MTM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MTM.AX's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to MTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MTM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs TOK.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, TOK.AX has a market cap of 288.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while TOK.AX trades at A$1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TOK.AX's P/E ratio is -23.83. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TOK.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to TOK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check TOK.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs CEL.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CEL.AX has a market cap of 271M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CEL.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CEL.AX's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CEL.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to CEL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check CEL.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MM8.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MM8.AX has a market cap of 266M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MM8.AX trades at A$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MM8.AX's P/E ratio is -21.25. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MM8.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to MM8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MM8.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs FRS.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, FRS.AX has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while FRS.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas FRS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FRS.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to FRS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check FRS.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs STK.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, STK.AX has a market cap of 253.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while STK.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas STK.AX's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to STK.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to STK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check STK.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BOC.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BOC.AX has a market cap of 246.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BOC.AX trades at A$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BOC.AX's P/E ratio is -61.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BOC.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to BOC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BOC.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs XAM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, XAM.AX has a market cap of 183.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while XAM.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas XAM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to XAM.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to XAM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check XAM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check EGR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs CNB.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CNB.AX has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CNB.AX trades at A$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CNB.AX's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CNB.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to CNB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check CNB.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs SPD.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SPD.AX has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SPD.AX trades at A$1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SPD.AX's P/E ratio is -24.33. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SPD.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to SPD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check SPD.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MM1.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MM1.AX has a market cap of 148.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MM1.AX trades at A$0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MM1.AX's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MM1.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to MM1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MM1.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs PUA.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PUA.AX has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PUA.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PUA.AX's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PUA.AX's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to PUA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check PUA.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs G50.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, G50.AX has a market cap of 136.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while G50.AX trades at A$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas G50.AX's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to G50.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to G50.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check G50.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MPK.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MPK.AX has a market cap of 132.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MPK.AX trades at A$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MPK.AX's P/E ratio is -48.25. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MPK.AX's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to MPK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MPK.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MKR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MKR.AX has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MKR.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MKR.AX's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MKR.AX's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to MKR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MKR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs ANS.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ANS.AX has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ANS.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ANS.AX's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ANS.AX's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to ANS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check ANS.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs NWF.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, NWF.AX has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while NWF.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas NWF.AX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NWF.AX's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to NWF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check NWF.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MMA.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MMA.AX has a market cap of 81.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MMA.AX trades at A$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MMA.AX's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MMA.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to MMA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MMA.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs AGD.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, AGD.AX has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while AGD.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AGD.AX's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AGD.AX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to AGD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check AGD.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs OSM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, OSM.AX has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while OSM.AX trades at A$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas OSM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to OSM.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to OSM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check OSM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs FTL.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, FTL.AX has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while FTL.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas FTL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FTL.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to FTL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check FTL.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs FEG.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, FEG.AX has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while FEG.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas FEG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FEG.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to FEG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check FEG.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs TSK.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, TSK.AX has a market cap of 44M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while TSK.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TSK.AX's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TSK.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to TSK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check TSK.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs PTR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PTR.AX has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PTR.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PTR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PTR.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to PTR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check PTR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs ODE.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ODE.AX has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ODE.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ODE.AX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ODE.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to ODE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check ODE.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs SDL.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SDL.AX has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SDL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SDL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SDL.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to SDL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check SDL.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs HAR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, HAR.AX has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while HAR.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas HAR.AX's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to HAR.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to HAR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check HAR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs HMX.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, HMX.AX has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while HMX.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas HMX.AX's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to HMX.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to HMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check HMX.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs E2M.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, E2M.AX has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while E2M.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas E2M.AX's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to E2M.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to E2M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check E2M.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MXR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MXR.AX has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MXR.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MXR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MXR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to MXR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MXR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs RIM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, RIM.AX has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RIM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RIM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RIM.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to RIM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check RIM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs QML.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, QML.AX has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while QML.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas QML.AX's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to QML.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to QML.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check QML.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs CAE.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CAE.AX has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CAE.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CAE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CAE.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to CAE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check CAE.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs LKY.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, LKY.AX has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LKY.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LKY.AX's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LKY.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to LKY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check LKY.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BMR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BMR.AX has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BMR.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BMR.AX's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BMR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to BMR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BMR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BDM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BDM.AX has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BDM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BDM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BDM.AX's ROE of +5.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to BDM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BDM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs PNX.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PNX.AX has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PNX.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PNX.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PNX.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to PNX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check PNX.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BHM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BHM.AX has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BHM.AX trades at A$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BHM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BHM.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to BHM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BHM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs LDR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, LDR.AX has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LDR.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LDR.AX's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LDR.AX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to LDR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check LDR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs GGR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, GGR.AX has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while GGR.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GGR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GGR.AX's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to GGR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check GGR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs GSN.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, GSN.AX has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while GSN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GSN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GSN.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to GSN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check GSN.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs TAR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, TAR.AX has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while TAR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TAR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TAR.AX's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to TAR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check TAR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BPM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BPM.AX has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BPM.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BPM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BPM.AX's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to BPM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BPM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs FME.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, FME.AX has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while FME.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas FME.AX's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FME.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to FME.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check FME.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs SCN.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SCN.AX has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SCN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SCN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SCN.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to SCN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check SCN.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs IDA.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, IDA.AX has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while IDA.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas IDA.AX's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to IDA.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to IDA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check IDA.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs C1X.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, C1X.AX has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while C1X.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas C1X.AX's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to C1X.AX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to C1X.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check C1X.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs TLM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, TLM.AX has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while TLM.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TLM.AX's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TLM.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to TLM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check TLM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs ERL.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ERL.AX has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ERL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ERL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ERL.AX's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to ERL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check ERL.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs PGM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PGM.AX has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PGM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PGM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PGM.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to PGM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check PGM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs RDN.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, RDN.AX has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RDN.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RDN.AX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RDN.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to RDN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check RDN.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs CBY.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CBY.AX has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CBY.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CBY.AX's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CBY.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to CBY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check CBY.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs XPD.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, XPD.AX has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while XPD.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas XPD.AX's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to XPD.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to XPD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check XPD.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs OMX.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, OMX.AX has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while OMX.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas OMX.AX's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to OMX.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to OMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check OMX.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs LCL.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, LCL.AX has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LCL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LCL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LCL.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to LCL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check LCL.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs KOB.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, KOB.AX has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while KOB.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas KOB.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to KOB.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to KOB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check KOB.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs PKO.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PKO.AX has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PKO.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PKO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PKO.AX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to PKO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check PKO.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MPG.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MPG.AX has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MPG.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MPG.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MPG.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to MPG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MPG.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs GIB.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, GIB.AX has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while GIB.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GIB.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GIB.AX's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to GIB.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check GIB.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs DUN.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, DUN.AX has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while DUN.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas DUN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to DUN.AX's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to DUN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check DUN.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs RB6.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, RB6.AX has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RB6.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RB6.AX's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RB6.AX's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to RB6.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check RB6.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs MOH.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, MOH.AX has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while MOH.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas MOH.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MOH.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to MOH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check MOH.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BIM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BIM.AX has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BIM.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BIM.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BIM.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to BIM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BIM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs HWK.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, HWK.AX has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while HWK.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas HWK.AX's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to HWK.AX's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to HWK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check HWK.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BRX.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BRX.AX has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BRX.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BRX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BRX.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to BRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BRX.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs LYN.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, LYN.AX has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LYN.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LYN.AX's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LYN.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to LYN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check LYN.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs NFL.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, NFL.AX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while NFL.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas NFL.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NFL.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to NFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check NFL.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs GRL.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, GRL.AX has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while GRL.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas GRL.AX's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GRL.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to GRL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check GRL.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs RON.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, RON.AX has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RON.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RON.AX's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RON.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to RON.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check RON.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs T88.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, T88.AX has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while T88.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas T88.AX's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to T88.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to T88.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check T88.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs KFM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, KFM.AX has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while KFM.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas KFM.AX's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to KFM.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to KFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check KFM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs ALV.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ALV.AX has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ALV.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ALV.AX's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ALV.AX's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to ALV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check ALV.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs SLA.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SLA.AX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SLA.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SLA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SLA.AX's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to SLA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check SLA.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs LOM.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, LOM.AX has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while LOM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas LOM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LOM.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to LOM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check LOM.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs RCR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, RCR.AX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while RCR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas RCR.AX's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RCR.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to RCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check RCR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs ERE.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ERE.AX has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ERE.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ERE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ERE.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to ERE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check ERE.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs PRS.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PRS.AX has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PRS.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PRS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PRS.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to PRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check PRS.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs SMX.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, SMX.AX has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while SMX.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas SMX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SMX.AX's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to SMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check SMX.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs COY.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, COY.AX has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while COY.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas COY.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to COY.AX's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to COY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check COY.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BYH.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BYH.AX has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BYH.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BYH.AX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BYH.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to BYH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BYH.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs WRX.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, WRX.AX has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while WRX.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas WRX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to WRX.AX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to WRX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check WRX.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs PEL.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, PEL.AX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while PEL.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas PEL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PEL.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to PEL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check PEL.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs EMS.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, EMS.AX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while EMS.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas EMS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to EMS.AX's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to EMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check EMS.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs BMO.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, BMO.AX has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while BMO.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas BMO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BMO.AX's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to BMO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check BMO.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs TG1.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, TG1.AX has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while TG1.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas TG1.AX's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TG1.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to TG1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check TG1.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs CUS.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, CUS.AX has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while CUS.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas CUS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CUS.AX's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is less volatile compared to CUS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check CUS.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs ABR.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, ABR.AX has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while ABR.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas ABR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ABR.AX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to ABR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check ABR.AX's competition here
MHC.AX vs AS2.AX Comparison May 2026
MHC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MHC.AX stands at 12.9M. In comparison, AS2.AX has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MHC.AX is priced at A$0.02, while AS2.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MHC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -2.30, whereas AS2.AX's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, MHC.AX's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AS2.AX's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MHC.AX is more volatile compared to AS2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MHC.AX.Check AS2.AX's competition here