Energy Resources of Australia Ltd (ERA.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ERA.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERA.AX | A$0.00 | +0.00% | 810.8M | -0.69 | -A$0.00 | N/A |
| DPM.AX | A$50.00 | +6.54% | 11.1B | 16.56 | A$3.02 | +0.47% |
| PRN.AX | A$2.32 | +2.20% | 2.2B | 14.10 | A$0.16 | +3.23% |
| ELV.AX | A$10.56 | +4.87% | 1.8B | -4.19 | -A$2.52 | N/A |
| MI6.AX | A$0.76 | +3.40% | 1.7B | -35.82 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
| CYL.AX | A$6.09 | +19.18% | 1.6B | 13.06 | A$0.47 | N/A |
| ZIM.AX | A$13.54 | +4.23% | 1.5B | 8.09 | A$1.67 | N/A |
| ORE.AX | A$2.48 | +9.73% | 1.4B | 191.21 | A$0.01 | N/A |
| IPX.AX | A$4.15 | -0.95% | 1.4B | -292.25 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| VUL.AX | A$3.09 | +0.98% | 1.4B | -4.85 | -A$0.64 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ERA.AX vs DPM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, DPM.AX has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while DPM.AX trades at A$50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas DPM.AX's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DPM.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to DPM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check DPM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PRN.AX trades at A$2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check PRN.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs ELV.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, ELV.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ELV.AX trades at A$10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ELV.AX's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELV.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to ELV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check ELV.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MI6.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MI6.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MI6.AX trades at A$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MI6.AX's P/E ratio is -35.82. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MI6.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MI6.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MI6.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs CYL.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, CYL.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CYL.AX trades at A$6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CYL.AX's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYL.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to CYL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check CYL.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs ZIM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, ZIM.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ZIM.AX trades at A$13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ZIM.AX's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZIM.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to ZIM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check ZIM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs ORE.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, ORE.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ORE.AX trades at A$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ORE.AX's P/E ratio is 191.21. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORE.AX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to ORE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check ORE.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while IPX.AX trades at A$4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -292.25. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check IPX.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while VUL.AX trades at A$3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check VUL.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs BRE.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, BRE.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BRE.AX trades at A$4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BRE.AX's P/E ratio is -52.83. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRE.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to BRE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check BRE.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs EIQ.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, EIQ.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while EIQ.AX trades at A$1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas EIQ.AX's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIQ.AX's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to EIQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check EIQ.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs SYS.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, SYS.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SYS.AX trades at A$17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SYS.AX's P/E ratio is -2833.33. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYS.AX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and SYS.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYS.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs EQR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, EQR.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while EQR.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas EQR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EQR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to EQR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check EQR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs LRV.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, LRV.AX has a market cap of 659.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LRV.AX trades at A$1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas LRV.AX's P/E ratio is -20.98. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LRV.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to LRV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check LRV.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs JAV.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, JAV.AX has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while JAV.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas JAV.AX's P/E ratio is -10.66. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JAV.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to JAV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check JAV.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs A1M.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, A1M.AX has a market cap of 610.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while A1M.AX trades at A$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas A1M.AX's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to A1M.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to A1M.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check A1M.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs NMG.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, NMG.AX has a market cap of 499.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NMG.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas NMG.AX's P/E ratio is -127.78. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NMG.AX's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to NMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check NMG.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs AZY.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, AZY.AX has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AZY.AX trades at A$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AZY.AX's P/E ratio is -34.75. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AZY.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to AZY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check AZY.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs AUC.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, AUC.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AUC.AX trades at A$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AUC.AX's P/E ratio is -23.29. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AUC.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to AUC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check AUC.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs 29M.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, 29M.AX has a market cap of 362.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while 29M.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas 29M.AX's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to 29M.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to 29M.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check 29M.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs SMI.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, SMI.AX has a market cap of 304.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SMI.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SMI.AX's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to SMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check SMI.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 289M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -18.40. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check CTM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MTM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MTM.AX has a market cap of 264M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MTM.AX trades at A$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MTM.AX's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTM.AX's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MTM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MM8.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MM8.AX has a market cap of 259.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MM8.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MM8.AX's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MM8.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MM8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MM8.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs TOK.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, TOK.AX has a market cap of 253.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TOK.AX trades at A$1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas TOK.AX's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOK.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to TOK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check TOK.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs CEL.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, CEL.AX has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CEL.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CEL.AX's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CEL.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to CEL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check CEL.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs STK.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, STK.AX has a market cap of 220.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while STK.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas STK.AX's P/E ratio is -285.71. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STK.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to STK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check STK.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs POL.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, POL.AX has a market cap of 219.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while POL.AX trades at A$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas POL.AX's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POL.AX's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to POL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check POL.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs BKY.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, BKY.AX has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BKY.AX trades at A$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BKY.AX's P/E ratio is -22.30. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BKY.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to BKY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check BKY.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs FRS.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, FRS.AX has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FRS.AX trades at A$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FRS.AX's P/E ratio is -11.78. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRS.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to FRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check FRS.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs XAM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, XAM.AX has a market cap of 183.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while XAM.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas XAM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XAM.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to XAM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check XAM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs HGO.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, HGO.AX has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while HGO.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas HGO.AX's P/E ratio is 40.71. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HGO.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to HGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check HGO.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs PUA.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, PUA.AX has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PUA.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas PUA.AX's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PUA.AX's ROE of -85.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to PUA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check PUA.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MM1.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MM1.AX has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MM1.AX trades at A$0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MM1.AX's P/E ratio is -53.85. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MM1.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MM1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MM1.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs CNB.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, CNB.AX has a market cap of 137.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CNB.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CNB.AX's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNB.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to CNB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check CNB.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs FXG.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, FXG.AX has a market cap of 132.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FXG.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FXG.AX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FXG.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to FXG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check FXG.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs ATR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, ATR.AX has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ATR.AX trades at A$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ATR.AX's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATR.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to ATR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check ATR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs VAL.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, VAL.AX has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while VAL.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas VAL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VAL.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to VAL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check VAL.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs SPD.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, SPD.AX has a market cap of 114.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SPD.AX trades at A$1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SPD.AX's P/E ratio is -20.38. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPD.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to SPD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check SPD.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MPK.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MPK.AX has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MPK.AX trades at A$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MPK.AX's P/E ratio is -41.75. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MPK.AX's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MPK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MPK.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs OSM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, OSM.AX has a market cap of 98M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while OSM.AX trades at A$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas OSM.AX's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OSM.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to OSM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check OSM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs G50.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, G50.AX has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while G50.AX trades at A$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas G50.AX's P/E ratio is -157.36. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to G50.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to G50.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check G50.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MMA.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MMA.AX has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MMA.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MMA.AX's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MMA.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MMA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MMA.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs BOC.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, BOC.AX has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BOC.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BOC.AX's P/E ratio is -17.11. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BOC.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to BOC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check BOC.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs ANS.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, ANS.AX has a market cap of 86.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ANS.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ANS.AX's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANS.AX's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and ANS.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANS.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MKR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MKR.AX has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MKR.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MKR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MKR.AX's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MKR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MKR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs NWF.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, NWF.AX has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NWF.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas NWF.AX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NWF.AX's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to NWF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check NWF.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs AGD.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, AGD.AX has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AGD.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AGD.AX's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGD.AX's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to AGD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check AGD.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs TOE.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, TOE.AX has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TOE.AX trades at A$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas TOE.AX's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TOE.AX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to TOE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check TOE.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs OR3.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, OR3.AX has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while OR3.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas OR3.AX's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OR3.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to OR3.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check OR3.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs IOV.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, IOV.AX has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while IOV.AX trades at A$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas IOV.AX's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IOV.AX's ROE of +11.76%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to IOV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check IOV.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs FEG.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, FEG.AX has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FEG.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FEG.AX's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FEG.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to FEG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check FEG.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs FLG.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, FLG.AX has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FLG.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FLG.AX's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLG.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to FLG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check FLG.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs LNQ.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, LNQ.AX has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LNQ.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas LNQ.AX's P/E ratio is -23.36. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNQ.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to LNQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check LNQ.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs SHN.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, SHN.AX has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SHN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SHN.AX's P/E ratio is -27.88. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHN.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to SHN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check SHN.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MAT.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MAT.AX has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAT.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MAT.AX's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAT.AX's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MAT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MAT.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs HMX.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, HMX.AX has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while HMX.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas HMX.AX's P/E ratio is -24.12. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HMX.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to HMX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check HMX.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs FTL.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, FTL.AX has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FTL.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FTL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FTL.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to FTL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check FTL.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs SDL.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, SDL.AX has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SDL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SDL.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SDL.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and SDL.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SDL.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs ODE.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, ODE.AX has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ODE.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ODE.AX's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ODE.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to ODE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check ODE.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs PTR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, PTR.AX has a market cap of 37.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PTR.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas PTR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.69. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTR.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to PTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check PTR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs E2M.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, E2M.AX has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while E2M.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas E2M.AX's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to E2M.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to E2M.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check E2M.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs QML.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, QML.AX has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while QML.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas QML.AX's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QML.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to QML.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check QML.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MXR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MXR.AX has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MXR.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MXR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.70. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MXR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MXR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MXR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs HAR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, HAR.AX has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while HAR.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas HAR.AX's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAR.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to HAR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check HAR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs RIM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, RIM.AX has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RIM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas RIM.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RIM.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and RIM.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs BMR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, BMR.AX has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BMR.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BMR.AX's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BMR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and BMR.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs GCM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, GCM.AX has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while GCM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas GCM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GCM.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to GCM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check GCM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs CAE.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, CAE.AX has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CAE.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas CAE.AX's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAE.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to CAE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check CAE.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs TSK.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, TSK.AX has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TSK.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas TSK.AX's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSK.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to TSK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check TSK.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs BDM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, BDM.AX has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BDM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BDM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BDM.AX's ROE of +5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to BDM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check BDM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs PNX.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, PNX.AX has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PNX.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas PNX.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PNX.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and PNX.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PNX.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs HAW.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, HAW.AX has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while HAW.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas HAW.AX's P/E ratio is -322.73. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HAW.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to HAW.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check HAW.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs BHM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, BHM.AX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BHM.AX trades at A$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BHM.AX's P/E ratio is -5.98. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHM.AX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to BHM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check BHM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs ADV.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, ADV.AX has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ADV.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ADV.AX's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADV.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to ADV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check ADV.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs TAR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, TAR.AX has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TAR.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas TAR.AX's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TAR.AX's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to TAR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check TAR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs DES.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, DES.AX has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while DES.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas DES.AX's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DES.AX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and DES.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DES.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs GSN.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, GSN.AX has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while GSN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas GSN.AX's P/E ratio is 48.84. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSN.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to GSN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check GSN.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs PR1.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, PR1.AX has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PR1.AX trades at A$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas PR1.AX's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PR1.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and PR1.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PR1.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs TSL.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, TSL.AX has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TSL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas TSL.AX's P/E ratio is -400.00. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TSL.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to TSL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check TSL.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MGU.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MGU.AX has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MGU.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MGU.AX's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGU.AX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MGU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MGU.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs FME.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, FME.AX has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FME.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas FME.AX's P/E ratio is -8.45. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FME.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to FME.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check FME.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs ENX.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, ENX.AX has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ENX.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas ENX.AX's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ENX.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and ENX.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENX.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs LDR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, LDR.AX has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LDR.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas LDR.AX's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LDR.AX's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to LDR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check LDR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs VKA.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, VKA.AX has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while VKA.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas VKA.AX's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VKA.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to VKA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check VKA.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs LKY.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, LKY.AX has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LKY.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas LKY.AX's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LKY.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to LKY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check LKY.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs PGM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, PGM.AX has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PGM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas PGM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGM.AX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to PGM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check PGM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs SCN.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, SCN.AX has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SCN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas SCN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCN.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to SCN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check SCN.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs HTM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, HTM.AX has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while HTM.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas HTM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HTM.AX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and HTM.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs C1X.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, C1X.AX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while C1X.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas C1X.AX's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to C1X.AX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to C1X.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check C1X.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MAG.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MAG.AX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAG.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MAG.AX's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAG.AX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and MAG.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAG.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs BPM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, BPM.AX has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BPM.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas BPM.AX's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BPM.AX's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to BPM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check BPM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs IDA.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, IDA.AX has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while IDA.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas IDA.AX's P/E ratio is 0.31. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDA.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to IDA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check IDA.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs AKA.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, AKA.AX has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AKA.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AKA.AX's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKA.AX's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and AKA.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AKA.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MAN.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MAN.AX has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAN.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MAN.AX's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAN.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MAN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MAN.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs MHC.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, MHC.AX has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MHC.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas MHC.AX's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MHC.AX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to MHC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check MHC.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs GGR.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, GGR.AX has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while GGR.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas GGR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GGR.AX's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX is less volatile compared to GGR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERA.AX.Check GGR.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs TLM.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, TLM.AX has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TLM.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas TLM.AX's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TLM.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and TLM.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLM.AX's competition here
ERA.AX vs AQX.AX Comparison July 2026
ERA.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERA.AX stands at 810.8M. In comparison, AQX.AX has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERA.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AQX.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.69, whereas AQX.AX's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, ERA.AX's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AQX.AX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ERA.AX and AQX.AX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AQX.AX's competition here