Missfresh Limited
Missfresh Limited (MF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 7.8M | -0.04 | -$26.39 | N/A |
| KR | $67.25 | +0.27% | 41.5B | 43.68 | $1.54 | +2.09% |
| SFM | $86.71 | +1.55% | 8.2B | 16.64 | $5.21 | N/A |
| ACI | $16.21 | -0.37% | 8B | 40.53 | $0.40 | +3.78% |
| ASAI | $4.67 | +1.74% | 6.3B | 11.97 | $0.39 | +1.61% |
| WMK | $72.30 | +0.08% | 1.8B | 17.86 | $4.05 | +1.86% |
| IMKTA | $88.42 | +1.21% | 1.7B | 16.11 | $5.49 | +0.75% |
| GO | $8.02 | +0.12% | 792.9M | -2.06 | -$3.89 | N/A |
| VLGEA | $46.27 | -0.71% | 682.6M | 12.11 | $3.82 | +2.14% |
| NGVC | $28.76 | -0.93% | 662.4M | 13.82 | $2.08 | +1.95% |
Stock Comparison
MF vs KR Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KR has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while KR trades at $67.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KR's P/E ratio is 43.68. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to KR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to KR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check KR's competition here
MF vs SFM Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SFM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while SFM trades at $86.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SFM's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to SFM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to SFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check SFM's competition here
MF vs ACI Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ACI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ACI trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ACI's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ACI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ACI's competition here
MF vs ASAI Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ASAI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ASAI trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ASAI's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ASAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ASAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ASAI's competition here
MF vs WMK Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WMK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while WMK trades at $72.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WMK's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to WMK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to WMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check WMK's competition here
MF vs IMKTA Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, IMKTA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while IMKTA trades at $88.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IMKTA's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to IMKTA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to IMKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check IMKTA's competition here
MF vs GO Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GO has a market cap of 792.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while GO trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GO's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to GO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to GO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check GO's competition here
MF vs VLGEA Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, VLGEA has a market cap of 682.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while VLGEA trades at $46.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VLGEA's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to VLGEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to VLGEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check VLGEA's competition here
MF vs NGVC Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NGVC has a market cap of 662.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while NGVC trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NGVC's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to NGVC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to NGVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check NGVC's competition here
MF vs DNUT Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 563.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while DNUT trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to DNUT's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check DNUT's competition here
MF vs DDL Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DDL has a market cap of 553.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while DDL trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DDL's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to DDL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to DDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check DDL's competition here
MF vs MSS Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MSS has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while MSS trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MSS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to MSS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to MSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check MSS's competition here
MF vs ECACU Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ECACU has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ECACU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ECACU's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ECACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ECACU's competition here
MF vs CST Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while CST trades at $48.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to CST's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to CST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check CST's competition here
MF vs KKD Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while KKD trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KKD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to KKD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to KKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check KKD's competition here