Missfresh Limited
Missfresh Limited (MF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 7.8M | -0.04 | -$26.39 | N/A |
| KR | $67.77 | -0.44% | 42.9B | 44.01 | $1.54 | +2.02% |
| ACI | $16.62 | -1.36% | 8.2B | 41.53 | $0.40 | +3.72% |
| SFM | $81.19 | -0.81% | 7.6B | 15.58 | $5.21 | N/A |
| ASAI | $4.67 | +1.74% | 6.3B | 11.97 | $0.39 | N/A |
| WMK | $70.95 | +1.10% | 1.8B | 19.43 | $3.65 | +1.94% |
| IMKTA | $91.31 | -0.17% | 1.7B | 18.23 | $5.01 | +0.73% |
| GO | $8.35 | +5.56% | 819.6M | -3.63 | -$2.30 | N/A |
| NGVC | $29.57 | +2.11% | 680.2M | 14.33 | $2.06 | +1.83% |
| DNUT | $3.82 | -3.05% | 657.8M | -1.26 | -$3.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MF vs KR Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KR has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while KR trades at $67.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KR's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to KR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to KR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check KR's competition here
MF vs ACI Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ACI has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ACI trades at $16.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ACI's P/E ratio is 41.53. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ACI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ACI's competition here
MF vs SFM Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SFM has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while SFM trades at $81.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SFM's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to SFM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to SFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check SFM's competition here
MF vs ASAI Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ASAI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ASAI trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ASAI's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ASAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ASAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ASAI's competition here
MF vs WMK Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WMK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while WMK trades at $70.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WMK's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to WMK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to WMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check WMK's competition here
MF vs IMKTA Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, IMKTA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while IMKTA trades at $91.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IMKTA's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to IMKTA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to IMKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check IMKTA's competition here
MF vs GO Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GO has a market cap of 819.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while GO trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GO's P/E ratio is -3.63. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to GO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to GO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check GO's competition here
MF vs NGVC Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NGVC has a market cap of 680.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while NGVC trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NGVC's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to NGVC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to NGVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check NGVC's competition here
MF vs DNUT Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 657.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while DNUT trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to DNUT's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check DNUT's competition here
MF vs VLGEA Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, VLGEA has a market cap of 649.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while VLGEA trades at $44.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VLGEA's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to VLGEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to VLGEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check VLGEA's competition here
MF vs DDL Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DDL has a market cap of 560.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while DDL trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DDL's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to DDL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to DDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check DDL's competition here
MF vs MSS Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MSS has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while MSS trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MSS's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to MSS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to MSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check MSS's competition here
MF vs ECACU Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ECACU has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ECACU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ECACU's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ECACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ECACU's competition here
MF vs CST Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while CST trades at $48.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to CST's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to CST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check CST's competition here
MF vs KKD Comparison May 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while KKD trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KKD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to KKD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to KKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check KKD's competition here