Missfresh Limited (MF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 7.8M | -0.04 | -$26.39 | N/A |
| KR | $58.25 | +0.05% | 35.7B | 11.76 | $4.95 | +2.42% |
| SFM | $86.57 | -3.75% | 8.1B | 16.65 | $5.20 | N/A |
| ACI | $14.18 | +0.35% | 6.9B | 6.48 | $2.19 | +4.38% |
| ASAI | $4.67 | +1.74% | 6.3B | 11.97 | $0.39 | N/A |
| WMK | $80.27 | +0.21% | 2B | 19.47 | $4.12 | +1.71% |
| IMKTA | $90.52 | +0.39% | 1.7B | 16.49 | $5.49 | +0.74% |
| GO | $10.38 | -0.10% | 1B | 15.26 | $0.68 | N/A |
| NGVC | $33.21 | +1.87% | 765.6M | 15.98 | $2.08 | +1.70% |
| YSWY | $20.89 | +0.58% | 651.5M | 25.02 | $0.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MF vs KR Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KR has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while KR trades at $58.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KR's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to KR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to KR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check KR's competition here
MF vs SFM Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, SFM has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while SFM trades at $86.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SFM's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to SFM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to SFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check SFM's competition here
MF vs ACI Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ACI has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ACI trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ACI's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ACI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ACI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ACI's competition here
MF vs ASAI Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ASAI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ASAI trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ASAI's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ASAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ASAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ASAI's competition here
MF vs WMK Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, WMK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while WMK trades at $80.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WMK's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to WMK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to WMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check WMK's competition here
MF vs IMKTA Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, IMKTA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while IMKTA trades at $90.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IMKTA's P/E ratio is 16.49. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to IMKTA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to IMKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check IMKTA's competition here
MF vs GO Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, GO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while GO trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GO's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to GO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to GO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check GO's competition here
MF vs NGVC Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, NGVC has a market cap of 765.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while NGVC trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NGVC's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to NGVC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to NGVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check NGVC's competition here
MF vs YSWY Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, YSWY has a market cap of 651.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while YSWY trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas YSWY's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to YSWY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to YSWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check YSWY's competition here
MF vs VLGEA Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, VLGEA has a market cap of 632.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while VLGEA trades at $42.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VLGEA's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to VLGEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to VLGEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check VLGEA's competition here
MF vs DNUT Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 600M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while DNUT trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is -34.80. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to DNUT's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check DNUT's competition here
MF vs DDL Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, DDL has a market cap of 437.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while DDL trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DDL's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to DDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to DDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check DDL's competition here
MF vs AGCC Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, AGCC has a market cap of 352.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while AGCC trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AGCC's P/E ratio is 387.00. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to AGCC's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to AGCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check AGCC's competition here
MF vs VHUB Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, VHUB has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while VHUB trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VHUB's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to VHUB's ROE of +13.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to VHUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check VHUB's competition here
MF vs MSS Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, MSS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while MSS trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MSS's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to MSS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is less volatile compared to MSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check MSS's competition here
MF vs ECACU Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, ECACU has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while ECACU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECACU's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to ECACU's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to ECACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check ECACU's competition here
MF vs CST Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, CST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while CST trades at $48.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CST's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to CST's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to CST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check CST's competition here
MF vs KKD Comparison July 2026
MF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MF stands at 7.8M. In comparison, KKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MF is priced at $1.00, while KKD trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KKD's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, MF's ROE is +1.75%, compared to KKD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MF is more volatile compared to KKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MF.Check KKD's competition here