CST Brands, Inc. (CST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CST | $48.53 | +0.00% | 0 | 11.98 | $4.05 | N/A |
| KR | $57.75 | +2.68% | 35.7B | 11.76 | $4.95 | +2.40% |
| SFM | $87.12 | +0.49% | 8.5B | 17.30 | $5.20 | N/A |
| ACI | $14.11 | +2.14% | 6.9B | 6.45 | $2.19 | +4.39% |
| ASAI | $4.67 | +1.74% | 6.3B | 11.97 | $0.39 | N/A |
| WMK | $79.21 | -0.76% | 2B | 19.44 | $4.12 | +1.70% |
| IMKTA | $89.45 | -0.18% | 1.7B | 16.42 | $5.49 | +0.73% |
| GO | $10.40 | +4.16% | 1B | 15.28 | $0.68 | N/A |
| NGVC | $32.93 | +3.33% | 751.1M | 15.67 | $2.08 | +1.75% |
| YSWY | $20.60 | -2.24% | 647.7M | 24.87 | $0.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CST vs KR Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, KR has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while KR trades at $57.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas KR's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to KR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check KR's competition here
CST vs SFM Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, SFM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while SFM trades at $87.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas SFM's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SFM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to SFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check SFM's competition here
CST vs ACI Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, ACI has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while ACI trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas ACI's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ACI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to ACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check ACI's competition here
CST vs ASAI Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, ASAI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while ASAI trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas ASAI's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to ASAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check ASAI's competition here
CST vs WMK Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, WMK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while WMK trades at $79.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas WMK's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WMK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to WMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check WMK's competition here
CST vs IMKTA Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, IMKTA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while IMKTA trades at $89.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas IMKTA's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IMKTA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to IMKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check IMKTA's competition here
CST vs GO Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, GO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while GO trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas GO's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to GO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check GO's competition here
CST vs NGVC Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, NGVC has a market cap of 751.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while NGVC trades at $32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas NGVC's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NGVC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to NGVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check NGVC's competition here
CST vs YSWY Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, YSWY has a market cap of 647.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while YSWY trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas YSWY's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YSWY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to YSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check YSWY's competition here
CST vs VLGEA Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, VLGEA has a market cap of 627M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while VLGEA trades at $42.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas VLGEA's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VLGEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to VLGEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check VLGEA's competition here
CST vs DNUT Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 605.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while DNUT trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is -35.10. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DNUT's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check DNUT's competition here
CST vs DDL Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, DDL has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while DDL trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas DDL's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to DDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check DDL's competition here
CST vs AGCC Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, AGCC has a market cap of 337.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while AGCC trades at $15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas AGCC's P/E ratio is 370.00. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AGCC's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to AGCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check AGCC's competition here
CST vs VHUB Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, VHUB has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while VHUB trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas VHUB's P/E ratio is -5.15. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VHUB's ROE of +13.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to VHUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check VHUB's competition here
CST vs MF Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, MF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while MF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas MF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to MF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check MF's competition here
CST vs MSS Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, MSS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while MSS trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas MSS's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MSS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to MSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check MSS's competition here
CST vs ECACU Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, ECACU has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while ECACU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas ECACU's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ECACU's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to ECACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check ECACU's competition here
CST vs KKD Comparison July 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, KKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while KKD trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of 11.98, whereas KKD's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KKD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to KKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check KKD's competition here