CST Brands, Inc. (CST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CST | $48.53 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KR | $63.96 | -1.16% | 39.5B | 41.60 | $1.54 | +2.19% |
| SFM | $84.29 | -2.37% | 8B | 16.39 | $5.21 | N/A |
| ACI | $14.96 | -2.95% | 7.3B | 37.13 | $0.40 | +4.17% |
| ASAI | $4.67 | +1.74% | 6.3B | 11.97 | $0.39 | +1.61% |
| WMK | $77.56 | -6.14% | 2B | 19.58 | $4.05 | +1.70% |
| IMKTA | $87.73 | -4.66% | 1.7B | 16.09 | $5.49 | +0.74% |
| GO | $9.55 | -0.37% | 951.6M | -2.47 | -$3.89 | N/A |
| NGVC | $30.62 | -3.06% | 707.4M | 14.76 | $2.08 | +1.84% |
| DNUT | $3.91 | -9.28% | 687.9M | -1.34 | -$2.98 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CST vs KR Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, KR has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while KR trades at $63.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KR's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to KR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check KR's competition here
CST vs SFM Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, SFM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while SFM trades at $84.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFM's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SFM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to SFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check SFM's competition here
CST vs ACI Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, ACI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while ACI trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACI's P/E ratio is 37.13. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ACI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to ACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check ACI's competition here
CST vs ASAI Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, ASAI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while ASAI trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAI's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to ASAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check ASAI's competition here
CST vs WMK Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, WMK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while WMK trades at $77.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WMK's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WMK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to WMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check WMK's competition here
CST vs IMKTA Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, IMKTA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while IMKTA trades at $87.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMKTA's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IMKTA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to IMKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check IMKTA's competition here
CST vs GO Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, GO has a market cap of 951.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while GO trades at $9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to GO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check GO's competition here
CST vs NGVC Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, NGVC has a market cap of 707.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while NGVC trades at $30.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGVC's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NGVC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to NGVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check NGVC's competition here
CST vs DNUT Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 687.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while DNUT trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DNUT's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check DNUT's competition here
CST vs YSWY Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, YSWY has a market cap of 676.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while YSWY trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSWY's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YSWY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to YSWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check YSWY's competition here
CST vs VLGEA Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, VLGEA has a market cap of 604.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while VLGEA trades at $40.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLGEA's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VLGEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to VLGEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check VLGEA's competition here
CST vs DDL Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, DDL has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while DDL trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDL's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to DDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check DDL's competition here
CST vs MF Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, MF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while MF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to MF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check MF's competition here
CST vs MSS Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, MSS has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while MSS trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MSS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to MSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check MSS's competition here
CST vs ECACU Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, ECACU has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while ECACU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ECACU's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to ECACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check ECACU's competition here
CST vs KKD Comparison June 2026
CST plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CST stands at 0. In comparison, KKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CST is priced at $48.53, while KKD trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CST currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CST's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KKD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CST is less volatile compared to KKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CST.Check KKD's competition here