Metro Brands Limited
Metro Brands Limited (METROBRAND.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (METROBRAND.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| METROBRAND.NS | ₹1,055.80 | +0.00% | 282.3B | 72.70 | ₹14.25 | +1.93% |
| BATAINDIA.BO | ₹825.60 | +0.00% | 104.4B | 61.28 | ₹13.25 | +1.11% |
| BATAINDIA.NS | ₹825.50 | +0.00% | 104.4B | 58.66 | ₹13.84 | +1.11% |
| SAFARI.BO | ₹1,847.25 | +0.00% | 90.2B | 53.76 | ₹34.26 | N/A |
| SAFARI.NS | ₹1,845.70 | +0.00% | 90B | 53.65 | ₹34.23 | +0.19% |
| RELAXO.NS | ₹365.35 | +0.00% | 89.1B | 53.12 | ₹6.74 | +0.84% |
| RELAXO.BO | ₹364.80 | +0.00% | 88.8B | 52.92 | ₹6.74 | +0.84% |
| CAMPUS.NS | ₹268.15 | +0.00% | 81B | 57.53 | ₹4.61 | +0.11% |
| CAMPUS.BO | ₹268.05 | +0.00% | 80.8B | 57.34 | ₹4.61 | +0.11% |
| REDTAPE.BO | ₹124.65 | +0.00% | 69.6B | 32.79 | ₹3.84 | +0.60% |
Stock Comparison
METROBRAND.NS vs BATAINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.BO has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BATAINDIA.BO trades at ₹825.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BATAINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 61.28. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BATAINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BATAINDIA.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs BATAINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BATAINDIA.NS trades at ₹825.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BATAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 58.66. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BATAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BATAINDIA.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SAFARI.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SAFARI.BO has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SAFARI.BO trades at ₹1,847.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SAFARI.BO's P/E ratio is 53.76. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAFARI.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to SAFARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SAFARI.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SAFARI.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SAFARI.NS has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SAFARI.NS trades at ₹1,845.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SAFARI.NS's P/E ratio is 53.65. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAFARI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to SAFARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SAFARI.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs RELAXO.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, RELAXO.NS has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while RELAXO.NS trades at ₹365.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas RELAXO.NS's P/E ratio is 53.12. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RELAXO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to RELAXO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check RELAXO.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs RELAXO.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, RELAXO.BO has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while RELAXO.BO trades at ₹364.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas RELAXO.BO's P/E ratio is 52.92. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RELAXO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to RELAXO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check RELAXO.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs CAMPUS.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, CAMPUS.NS has a market cap of 81B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while CAMPUS.NS trades at ₹268.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas CAMPUS.NS's P/E ratio is 57.53. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAMPUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check CAMPUS.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs CAMPUS.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, CAMPUS.BO has a market cap of 80.8B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while CAMPUS.BO trades at ₹268.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas CAMPUS.BO's P/E ratio is 57.34. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAMPUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check CAMPUS.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs REDTAPE.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, REDTAPE.BO has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while REDTAPE.BO trades at ₹124.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas REDTAPE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.79. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REDTAPE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to REDTAPE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check REDTAPE.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs VIPIND.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, VIPIND.BO has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while VIPIND.BO trades at ₹356.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas VIPIND.BO's P/E ratio is -26.74. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIPIND.BO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to VIPIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check VIPIND.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs VIPIND.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, VIPIND.NS has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while VIPIND.NS trades at ₹355.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas VIPIND.NS's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIPIND.NS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to VIPIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check VIPIND.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs BIL.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BIL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BIL.NS trades at ₹851.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BIL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to BIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BIL.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs BIL.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BIL.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BIL.BO trades at ₹855.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BIL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to BIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BIL.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs BIZOTIC.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BIZOTIC.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BIZOTIC.BO trades at ₹989.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BIZOTIC.BO's P/E ratio is 75.66. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BIZOTIC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to BIZOTIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BIZOTIC.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs MIRZAINT.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while MIRZAINT.BO trades at ₹35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas MIRZAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 56.69. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIRZAINT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to MIRZAINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check MIRZAINT.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs MIRZAINT.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while MIRZAINT.NS trades at ₹35.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas MIRZAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 56.65. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIRZAINT.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to MIRZAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check MIRZAINT.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SREEL.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SREEL.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SREEL.NS trades at ₹201.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SREEL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SREEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to SREEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SREEL.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SREEL.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SREEL.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SREEL.BO trades at ₹201.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SREEL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SREEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to SREEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SREEL.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs MANBRO.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, MANBRO.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while MANBRO.BO trades at ₹760.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas MANBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 264.25. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MANBRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to MANBRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check MANBRO.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while LIBERTSHOE.NS trades at ₹252.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas LIBERTSHOE.NS's P/E ratio is 32.16. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while LIBERTSHOE.BO trades at ₹251.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas LIBERTSHOE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs LEHAR.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, LEHAR.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while LEHAR.BO trades at ₹232.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas LEHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LEHAR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to LEHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check LEHAR.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs BCONCEPTS.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BCONCEPTS.NS trades at ₹269.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BCONCEPTS.NS's P/E ratio is 708.11. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BCONCEPTS.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs BCONCEPTS.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BCONCEPTS.BO trades at ₹271.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BCONCEPTS.BO's P/E ratio is 686.58. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BCONCEPTS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs OMNITEX.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, OMNITEX.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while OMNITEX.BO trades at ₹615.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas OMNITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 5295.42. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OMNITEX.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to OMNITEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check OMNITEX.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs KHADIM.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, KHADIM.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while KHADIM.NS trades at ₹138.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas KHADIM.NS's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KHADIM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to KHADIM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check KHADIM.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs KHADIM.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, KHADIM.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while KHADIM.BO trades at ₹138.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas KHADIM.BO's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KHADIM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to KHADIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check KHADIM.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs VANDANA.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, VANDANA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while VANDANA.BO trades at ₹18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas VANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is 1828.00. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VANDANA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to VANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check VANDANA.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs VIRAT.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, VIRAT.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while VIRAT.BO trades at ₹377.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas VIRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 108.82. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIRAT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to VIRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check VIRAT.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SUPERHOUSE.BO trades at ₹161.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SUPERHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SUPERHOUSE.NS trades at ₹163.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SUPERHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs ACTIVE.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, ACTIVE.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while ACTIVE.BO trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas ACTIVE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACTIVE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to ACTIVE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check ACTIVE.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs GARMNTMNTR.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, GARMNTMNTR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while GARMNTMNTR.BO trades at ₹1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas GARMNTMNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check GARMNTMNTR.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs CEENIK.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, CEENIK.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while CEENIK.BO trades at ₹300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas CEENIK.BO's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CEENIK.BO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to CEENIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check CEENIK.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SCOOBEEDAY.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SCOOBEEDAY.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SCOOBEEDAY.BO trades at ₹73.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SCOOBEEDAY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SCOOBEEDAY.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs CRAVATEX.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, CRAVATEX.BO has a market cap of 956.1M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while CRAVATEX.BO trades at ₹362.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas CRAVATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRAVATEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to CRAVATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check CRAVATEX.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs BANARBEADS.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.BO has a market cap of 822.9M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BANARBEADS.BO trades at ₹125.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BANARBEADS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BANARBEADS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to BANARBEADS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BANARBEADS.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs BANARBEADS.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.NS has a market cap of 803M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BANARBEADS.NS trades at ₹125.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BANARBEADS.NS's P/E ratio is 42.61. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BANARBEADS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to BANARBEADS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BANARBEADS.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs ACKNIT.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, ACKNIT.BO has a market cap of 801.6M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while ACKNIT.BO trades at ₹247.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas ACKNIT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACKNIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to ACKNIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check ACKNIT.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs ELAND.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, ELAND.BO has a market cap of 783.2M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while ELAND.BO trades at ₹17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas ELAND.BO's P/E ratio is -5.44. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ELAND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to ELAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check ELAND.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs JAIPURKURT.NS Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, JAIPURKURT.NS has a market cap of 615.9M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while JAIPURKURT.NS trades at ₹36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas JAIPURKURT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JAIPURKURT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to JAIPURKURT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check JAIPURKURT.NS's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs AKI.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, AKI.BO has a market cap of 615.1M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while AKI.BO trades at ₹6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas AKI.BO's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AKI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to AKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check AKI.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SUNILTX.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SUNILTX.BO has a market cap of 331.8M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SUNILTX.BO trades at ₹75.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SUNILTX.BO's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SUNILTX.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to SUNILTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SUNILTX.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SCARNOSE.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SCARNOSE.BO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SCARNOSE.BO trades at ₹76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SCARNOSE.BO's P/E ratio is 104.11. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCARNOSE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to SCARNOSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SCARNOSE.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SPENTA.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SPENTA.BO has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SPENTA.BO trades at ₹85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SPENTA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.05. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPENTA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to SPENTA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SPENTA.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs CITYMAN.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, CITYMAN.BO has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while CITYMAN.BO trades at ₹13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas CITYMAN.BO's P/E ratio is -49.42. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CITYMAN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to CITYMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check CITYMAN.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs VIVAA.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, VIVAA.BO has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while VIVAA.BO trades at ₹37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas VIVAA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VIVAA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to VIVAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check VIVAA.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs NEWLIGHT.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, NEWLIGHT.BO has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while NEWLIGHT.BO trades at ₹1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas NEWLIGHT.BO's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEWLIGHT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to NEWLIGHT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check NEWLIGHT.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs NBFOOT.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, NBFOOT.BO has a market cap of 120.6M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while NBFOOT.BO trades at ₹9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas NBFOOT.BO's P/E ratio is -52.53. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NBFOOT.BO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to NBFOOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check NBFOOT.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs BILLWIN.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, BILLWIN.BO has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while BILLWIN.BO trades at ₹24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas BILLWIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BILLWIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to BILLWIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check BILLWIN.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs WELTI.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, WELTI.BO has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while WELTI.BO trades at ₹23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas WELTI.BO's P/E ratio is -37.34. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WELTI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to WELTI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check WELTI.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs EUROLED.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, EUROLED.BO has a market cap of 92.9M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while EUROLED.BO trades at ₹19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas EUROLED.BO's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EUROLED.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to EUROLED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check EUROLED.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs KARANWO.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, KARANWO.BO has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while KARANWO.BO trades at ₹10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas KARANWO.BO's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KARANWO.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to KARANWO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check KARANWO.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SIDDHEGA.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SIDDHEGA.BO has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SIDDHEGA.BO trades at ₹21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SIDDHEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 538.00. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIDDHEGA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to SIDDHEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SIDDHEGA.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs SRIND.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, SRIND.BO has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while SRIND.BO trades at ₹3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SRIND.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SRIND.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to SRIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check SRIND.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs RICHAIND.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, RICHAIND.BO has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while RICHAIND.BO trades at ₹1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas RICHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RICHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is less volatile compared to RICHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check RICHAIND.BO's competition here
METROBRAND.NS vs AKM.BO Comparison February 2026
METROBRAND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, METROBRAND.NS stands at 282.3B. In comparison, AKM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, METROBRAND.NS is priced at ₹1,055.80, while AKM.BO trades at ₹122.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
METROBRAND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas AKM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, METROBRAND.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AKM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, METROBRAND.NS is more volatile compared to AKM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for METROBRAND.NS.Check AKM.BO's competition here