Dazed, Inc.
Dazed, Inc. MEDH Peers
See (MEDH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Tobacco Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDH | $0.00 | -12.50% | 78.6K | -0.03 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| BTAFF | $45.43 | -1.02% | 99.7B | 24.69 | $1.84 | +6.69% |
| JAPAF | $31.00 | N/A | 55B | 44.29 | $0.70 | +3.93% |
| JAPAY | $15.33 | +0.59% | 54.4B | 43.80 | $0.35 | +1.42% |
| IMBBF | $38.27 | +1.04% | 32.2B | 9.43 | $4.06 | +5.77% |
| IMBBY | $37.91 | +0.56% | 31.9B | 9.34 | $4.06 | +5.75% |
| SWMAY | $10.57 | N/A | 16.1B | 27.82 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SMORF | $1.22 | +31.01% | 7.5B | 40.81 | $0.03 | +0.65% |
| PHJMF | $0.06 | +12.20% | 7B | 6.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| PHPMF | $875.00 | +2.94% | 1.7B | 15.80 | $55.39 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MEDH vs BTAFF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, BTAFF has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while BTAFF trades at $45.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas BTAFF's P/E ratio is 24.69. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTAFF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and BTAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs JAPAF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, JAPAF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while JAPAF trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JAPAF's P/E ratio is 44.29. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JAPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and JAPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs JAPAY Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, JAPAY has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while JAPAY trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas JAPAY's P/E ratio is 43.80. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JAPAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to JAPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs IMBBF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, IMBBF has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while IMBBF trades at $38.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IMBBF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IMBBF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to IMBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs IMBBY Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, IMBBY has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while IMBBY trades at $37.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IMBBY's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IMBBY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to IMBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs SWMAY Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, SWMAY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while SWMAY trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SWMAY's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWMAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and SWMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs SMORF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, SMORF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while SMORF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SMORF's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMORF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to SMORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs PHJMF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, PHJMF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while PHJMF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PHJMF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PHJMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and PHJMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs PHPMF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, PHPMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while PHPMF trades at $875.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PHPMF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PHPMF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and PHPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs GGNPF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, GGNPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while GGNPF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GGNPF's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GGNPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and GGNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs SNDVF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, SNDVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while SNDVF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SNDVF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SNDVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to SNDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs GDNGY Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, GDNGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while GDNGY trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GDNGY's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GDNGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to GDNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs STBGY Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, STBGY has a market cap of 992.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while STBGY trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas STBGY's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STBGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to STBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs KCIGF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, KCIGF has a market cap of 828M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while KCIGF trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas KCIGF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KCIGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and KCIGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs PYYX Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, PYYX has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while PYYX trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas PYYX's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PYYX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and PYYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs CHUC Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, CHUC has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while CHUC trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CHUC's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHUC's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to CHUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs GGII Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, GGII has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while GGII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GGII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GGII's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and GGII have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs GRAM Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, GRAM has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while GRAM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas GRAM's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRAM's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to GRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs VAPR Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, VAPR has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while VAPR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VAPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VAPR's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to VAPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs VPRB Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, VPRB has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while VPRB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VPRB's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VPRB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and VPRB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs LBRG Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, LBRG has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while LBRG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas LBRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LBRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to LBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs VPOR Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, VPOR has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while VPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas VPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VPOR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to VPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs WSRRF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, WSRRF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while WSRRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas WSRRF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WSRRF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and WSRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs TOBAF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, TOBAF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while TOBAF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas TOBAF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TOBAF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH is less volatile compared to TOBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MEDH.
MEDH vs CBDW Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, CBDW has a market cap of 823.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while CBDW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas CBDW's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CBDW's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and CBDW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs HUMBF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, HUMBF has a market cap of 521.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while HUMBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas HUMBF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HUMBF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and HUMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs IDLSF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, IDLSF has a market cap of 80.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while IDLSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas IDLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IDLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and IDLSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs ASHI Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, ASHI has a market cap of 4.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while ASHI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas ASHI's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASHI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and ASHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MEDH vs SWMAF Comparison
MEDH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MEDH stands at 78.6K. In comparison, SWMAF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MEDH is priced at $0.00, while SWMAF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MEDH currently has a P/E ratio of -0.03, whereas SWMAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MEDH's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SWMAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MEDH and SWMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).