PT Gudang Garam Tbk
PT Gudang Garam Tbk (GDNGY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GDNGY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Tobacco Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDNGY | $3.75 | -4.34% | 1.8B | 10.71 | $0.35 | +3.27% |
| BTAFF | $64.53 | -1.57% | 139.6B | 13.67 | $4.72 | +4.71% |
| JAPAF | $38.64 | -8.31% | 75B | 23.88 | $1.77 | +3.67% |
| JAPAY | $20.17 | +0.90% | 71.8B | 22.71 | $0.89 | +3.43% |
| IMBBY | $38.65 | -1.07% | 29.9B | 13.67 | $2.83 | +5.53% |
| IMBBF | $37.56 | +0.06% | 29B | 13.04 | $2.88 | +5.57% |
| SWMAY | $10.57 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 27.82 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SMORF | $1.40 | +0.00% | 8.7B | 46.67 | $0.03 | +2.29% |
| PHJMF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 5.8B | 5.00 | $0.01 | +7.00% |
| GGNPF | $0.96 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 32.00 | $0.03 | +3.20% |
Stock Comparison
GDNGY vs BTAFF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BTAFF has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while BTAFF trades at $64.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas BTAFF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BTAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to BTAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check BTAFF's competition here
GDNGY vs JAPAF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JAPAF has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while JAPAF trades at $38.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas JAPAF's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JAPAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to JAPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check JAPAF's competition here
GDNGY vs JAPAY Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JAPAY has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while JAPAY trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas JAPAY's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JAPAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to JAPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check JAPAY's competition here
GDNGY vs IMBBY Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IMBBY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while IMBBY trades at $38.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas IMBBY's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMBBY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to IMBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check IMBBY's competition here
GDNGY vs IMBBF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IMBBF has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while IMBBF trades at $37.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas IMBBF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMBBF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to IMBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check IMBBF's competition here
GDNGY vs SWMAY Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SWMAY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while SWMAY trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas SWMAY's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SWMAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to SWMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check SWMAY's competition here
GDNGY vs SMORF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SMORF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while SMORF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas SMORF's P/E ratio is 46.67. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMORF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to SMORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check SMORF's competition here
GDNGY vs PHJMF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PHJMF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while PHJMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas PHJMF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PHJMF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to PHJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check PHJMF's competition here
GDNGY vs GGNPF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GGNPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while GGNPF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas GGNPF's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GGNPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to GGNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check GGNPF's competition here
GDNGY vs PHPMF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PHPMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while PHPMF trades at $910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas PHPMF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PHPMF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is less volatile compared to PHPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check PHPMF's competition here
GDNGY vs SNDVF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SNDVF has a market cap of 878.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while SNDVF trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas SNDVF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNDVF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to SNDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check SNDVF's competition here
GDNGY vs STBGY Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, STBGY has a market cap of 855M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while STBGY trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas STBGY's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STBGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to STBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check STBGY's competition here
GDNGY vs KCIGF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KCIGF has a market cap of 828M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while KCIGF trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas KCIGF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KCIGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to KCIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check KCIGF's competition here
GDNGY vs CHUC Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CHUC has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while CHUC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CHUC's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHUC's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to CHUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check CHUC's competition here
GDNGY vs PYYX Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PYYX has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while PYYX trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas PYYX's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PYYX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to PYYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check PYYX's competition here
GDNGY vs GGII Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GGII has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while GGII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas GGII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GGII's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to GGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check GGII's competition here
GDNGY vs WSRRF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, WSRRF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while WSRRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas WSRRF's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSRRF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to WSRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check WSRRF's competition here
GDNGY vs VPRB Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VPRB has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while VPRB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas VPRB's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VPRB's ROE of +11.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to VPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check VPRB's competition here
GDNGY vs VAPR Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VAPR has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while VAPR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas VAPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VAPR's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to VAPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check VAPR's competition here
GDNGY vs LBRG Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LBRG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while LBRG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas LBRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LBRG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is less volatile compared to LBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check LBRG's competition here
GDNGY vs HUMBF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HUMBF has a market cap of 521.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while HUMBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas HUMBF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HUMBF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to HUMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check HUMBF's competition here
GDNGY vs GRLF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GRLF has a market cap of 300.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while GRLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas GRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRLF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is less volatile compared to GRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check GRLF's competition here
GDNGY vs CBDW Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CBDW has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while CBDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas CBDW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBDW's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to CBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check CBDW's competition here
GDNGY vs VPOR Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VPOR has a market cap of 273K. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while VPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas VPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VPOR's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to VPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check VPOR's competition here
GDNGY vs MEDH Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MEDH has a market cap of 157.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while MEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas MEDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MEDH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to MEDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check MEDH's competition here
GDNGY vs IDLSF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IDLSF has a market cap of 80.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while IDLSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas IDLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IDLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to IDLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check IDLSF's competition here
GDNGY vs TOBAF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TOBAF has a market cap of 60K. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while TOBAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas TOBAF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOBAF's ROE of -2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is less volatile compared to TOBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check TOBAF's competition here
GDNGY vs ASHI Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ASHI has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while ASHI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas ASHI's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASHI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to ASHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check ASHI's competition here
GDNGY vs GRAM Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GRAM has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while GRAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas GRAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRAM's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is less volatile compared to GRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check GRAM's competition here
GDNGY vs SWMAF Comparison May 2026
GDNGY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GDNGY stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SWMAF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GDNGY is priced at $3.75, while SWMAF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GDNGY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.71, whereas SWMAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GDNGY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SWMAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GDNGY is more volatile compared to SWMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GDNGY.Check SWMAF's competition here