Imperial Brands PLC
Imperial Brands PLC (IMBBY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IMBBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Tobacco Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMBBY | $38.72 | -0.90% | 29.9B | 13.67 | $2.83 | +5.58% |
| BTAFF | $67.97 | +3.68% | 139.6B | 13.67 | $4.72 | +5.05% |
| JAPAF | $40.00 | -5.09% | 75B | 23.88 | $1.77 | +3.67% |
| JAPAY | $20.04 | +0.25% | 71.8B | 22.71 | $0.89 | +3.40% |
| IMBBF | $38.62 | +2.88% | 29B | 13.04 | $2.88 | +5.74% |
| SWMAY | $10.57 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 27.82 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SMORF | $1.40 | +0.00% | 8.7B | 46.67 | $0.03 | +2.29% |
| PHJMF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 5.8B | 5.00 | $0.01 | +7.00% |
| GGNPF | $0.96 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 32.00 | $0.03 | +3.20% |
| GDNGY | $3.75 | -4.34% | 1.8B | 10.71 | $0.35 | +3.27% |
Stock Comparison
IMBBY vs BTAFF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, BTAFF has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while BTAFF trades at $67.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas BTAFF's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BTAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to BTAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check BTAFF's competition here
IMBBY vs JAPAF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, JAPAF has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while JAPAF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas JAPAF's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JAPAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to JAPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check JAPAF's competition here
IMBBY vs JAPAY Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, JAPAY has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while JAPAY trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas JAPAY's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JAPAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to JAPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check JAPAY's competition here
IMBBY vs IMBBF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, IMBBF has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while IMBBF trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas IMBBF's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IMBBF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to IMBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check IMBBF's competition here
IMBBY vs SWMAY Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, SWMAY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while SWMAY trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SWMAY's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SWMAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to SWMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check SWMAY's competition here
IMBBY vs SMORF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, SMORF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while SMORF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SMORF's P/E ratio is 46.67. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SMORF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to SMORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check SMORF's competition here
IMBBY vs PHJMF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, PHJMF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while PHJMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PHJMF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PHJMF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to PHJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check PHJMF's competition here
IMBBY vs GGNPF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, GGNPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while GGNPF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GGNPF's P/E ratio is 32.00. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GGNPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to GGNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check GGNPF's competition here
IMBBY vs GDNGY Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, GDNGY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while GDNGY trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GDNGY's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GDNGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GDNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check GDNGY's competition here
IMBBY vs PHPMF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, PHPMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while PHPMF trades at $910.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PHPMF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PHPMF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to PHPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check PHPMF's competition here
IMBBY vs SNDVF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, SNDVF has a market cap of 878.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while SNDVF trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SNDVF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SNDVF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to SNDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check SNDVF's competition here
IMBBY vs STBGY Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, STBGY has a market cap of 855M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while STBGY trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas STBGY's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to STBGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to STBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check STBGY's competition here
IMBBY vs KCIGF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, KCIGF has a market cap of 828M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while KCIGF trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas KCIGF's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KCIGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to KCIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check KCIGF's competition here
IMBBY vs CHUC Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, CHUC has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while CHUC trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CHUC's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CHUC's ROE of +2.98%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to CHUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check CHUC's competition here
IMBBY vs PYYX Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, PYYX has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while PYYX trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas PYYX's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PYYX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to PYYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check PYYX's competition here
IMBBY vs GGII Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, GGII has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while GGII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GGII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GGII's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to GGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check GGII's competition here
IMBBY vs WSRRF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, WSRRF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while WSRRF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas WSRRF's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WSRRF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to WSRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check WSRRF's competition here
IMBBY vs VPRB Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, VPRB has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while VPRB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas VPRB's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VPRB's ROE of +11.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to VPRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check VPRB's competition here
IMBBY vs VAPR Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, VAPR has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while VAPR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas VAPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VAPR's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to VAPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check VAPR's competition here
IMBBY vs LBRG Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, LBRG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while LBRG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas LBRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LBRG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to LBRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check LBRG's competition here
IMBBY vs HUMBF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, HUMBF has a market cap of 521.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while HUMBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas HUMBF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HUMBF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to HUMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check HUMBF's competition here
IMBBY vs GRLF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, GRLF has a market cap of 300.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while GRLF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GRLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GRLF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check GRLF's competition here
IMBBY vs CBDW Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, CBDW has a market cap of 295.8K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while CBDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas CBDW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CBDW's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to CBDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check CBDW's competition here
IMBBY vs VPOR Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, VPOR has a market cap of 273K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while VPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas VPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VPOR's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to VPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check VPOR's competition here
IMBBY vs MEDH Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, MEDH has a market cap of 157.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while MEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas MEDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MEDH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to MEDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check MEDH's competition here
IMBBY vs IDLSF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, IDLSF has a market cap of 80.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while IDLSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas IDLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IDLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to IDLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check IDLSF's competition here
IMBBY vs TOBAF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, TOBAF has a market cap of 60K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while TOBAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas TOBAF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TOBAF's ROE of -2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to TOBAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check TOBAF's competition here
IMBBY vs ASHI Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, ASHI has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while ASHI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas ASHI's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ASHI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to ASHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check ASHI's competition here
IMBBY vs GRAM Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, GRAM has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while GRAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas GRAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GRAM's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is less volatile compared to GRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check GRAM's competition here
IMBBY vs SWMAF Comparison May 2026
IMBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMBBY stands at 29.9B. In comparison, SWMAF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMBBY is priced at $38.72, while SWMAF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMBBY currently has a P/E ratio of 13.67, whereas SWMAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMBBY's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SWMAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMBBY is more volatile compared to SWMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMBBY.Check SWMAF's competition here