McDonald's Corp

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, SBUX.NE has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while SBUX.NE trades at CA$24.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SBUX.NE's P/E ratio is 36.45. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to SBUX.NE's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is less volatile compared to SBUX.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check SBUX.NE's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, QSP-UN.TO has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while QSP-UN.TO trades at CA$94.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas QSP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to QSP-UN.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is more volatile compared to QSP-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check QSP-UN.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, QSR.TO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while QSR.TO trades at CA$93.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas QSR.TO's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to QSR.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is less volatile compared to QSR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check QSR.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, AW.TO has a market cap of 939M. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while AW.TO trades at CA$39.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas AW.TO's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to AW.TO's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is less volatile compared to AW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check AW.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, MTY.TO has a market cap of 876.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while MTY.TO trades at CA$38.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas MTY.TO's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to MTY.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is less volatile compared to MTY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check MTY.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, AW-UN.TO has a market cap of 538.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while AW-UN.TO trades at CA$36.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas AW-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to AW-UN.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is less volatile compared to AW-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check AW-UN.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, BPF-UN.TO has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while BPF-UN.TO trades at CA$19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas BPF-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to BPF-UN.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is less volatile compared to BPF-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check BPF-UN.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, PZA.TO has a market cap of 388.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while PZA.TO trades at CA$15.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas PZA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to PZA.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is less volatile compared to PZA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check PZA.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, KEG-UN.TO has a market cap of 211.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while KEG-UN.TO trades at CA$18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas KEG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to KEG-UN.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is more volatile compared to KEG-UN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check KEG-UN.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, SRV-UN.TO has a market cap of 119.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while SRV-UN.TO trades at CA$14.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas SRV-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to SRV-UN.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is less volatile compared to SRV-UN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check SRV-UN.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, FRII.TO has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while FRII.TO trades at CA$2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas FRII.TO's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to FRII.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is more volatile compared to FRII.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check FRII.TO's competition here

MCDS.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCDS.NE stands at 296.4B. In comparison, RECP.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCDS.NE is priced at CA$26.05, while RECP.TO trades at CA$20.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCDS.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 26.05, whereas RECP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, MCDS.NE's ROE is -1.89%, compared to RECP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MCDS.NE is more volatile compared to RECP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCDS.NE.Check RECP.TO's competition here