Mattel, Inc.
Mattel, Inc. MAT Peers
See (MAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAT | $18.86 | +1.75% | 6.1B | 12.24 | $1.54 | N/A |
| CCL | $24.27 | +1.04% | 31.5B | 15.66 | $1.55 | N/A |
| CUK | $21.94 | +1.13% | 28.4B | 14.15 | $1.55 | N/A |
| AS | $37.52 | +0.37% | 20.8B | 101.41 | $0.37 | N/A |
| HAS | $66.32 | +1.75% | 9.3B | 21.96 | $3.02 | +4.22% |
| PLNT | $105.54 | +0.36% | 8.8B | 49.78 | $2.12 | N/A |
| LTH | $29.00 | +1.01% | 6.4B | 30.21 | $0.96 | N/A |
| GOLF | $71.11 | +0.57% | 4.2B | 19.54 | $3.64 | +1.57% |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
| FUN | $33.24 | +1.19% | 3.4B | -11.91 | -$2.79 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MAT vs CCL Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while CCL trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs CUK Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while CUK trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs AS Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while AS trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 101.41. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs HAS Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while HAS trades at $66.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HAS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs PLNT Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while PLNT trades at $105.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 49.78. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs LTH Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while LTH trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 30.21. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs GOLF Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while GOLF trades at $71.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs ELY Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs FUN Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while FUN trades at $33.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs SEAS Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs PTON Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while PTON trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -16.98. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs SIX Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs YETI Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while YETI trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs VSTO Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs PRKS Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while PRKS trades at $42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs OSW Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while OSW trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs LUCK Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while LUCK trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -130.14. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LUCK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs MODG Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while MODG trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs GEAR Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs XPOF Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 460.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while XPOF trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs DOGZ Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 340.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while DOGZ trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -68.59. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs JOUT Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while JOUT trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs CNXA Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNXA's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs FNKO Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while FNKO trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs JAKK Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 241.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while JAKK trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs ESCA Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 208.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while ESCA trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs AOUT Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while AOUT trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -34.79. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs PLBY Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 149.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while PLBY trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +286.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs CLAR Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while CLAR trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs BTN Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs ISPO Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while ISPO trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs NLS Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs FGH Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs SRM Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while SRM trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SRM's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs YYAI Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while YYAI trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YYAI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs MMA Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while MMA trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MMA's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs AGH Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while AGH trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -31.77. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs HWH Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while HWH trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HWH's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs FXLV Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while FXLV trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs NWTG Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while NWTG trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -8.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs GDHG Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while GDHG trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs SPGC Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs ISPOW Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 128.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs BBIG Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while BBIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs DS-PB Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs BWL-A Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs DS Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs DS-PC Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs DS-PD Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.
MAT vs DVD Comparison
MAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAT stands at 6.1B. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAT is priced at $18.86, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAT currently has a P/E ratio of 12.24, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, MAT's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAT is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAT.