Manomay Tex India Limited

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, RNBDENIMS.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while RNBDENIMS.BO trades at ₹196.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas RNBDENIMS.BO's P/E ratio is 68.10. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RNBDENIMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to RNBDENIMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check RNBDENIMS.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, NIBE.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while NIBE.BO trades at ₹1,020.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas NIBE.BO's P/E ratio is -213.01. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIBE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to NIBE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check NIBE.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, MAFATIND.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while MAFATIND.BO trades at ₹131.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas MAFATIND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAFATIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to MAFATIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check MAFATIND.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, VTMLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while VTMLTD.BO trades at ₹85.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas VTMLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 38.37. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTMLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to VTMLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check VTMLTD.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, RAJPALAYAM.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while RAJPALAYAM.BO trades at ₹810.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas RAJPALAYAM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check RAJPALAYAM.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, VOITHPAPR.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while VOITHPAPR.BO trades at ₹1,542.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas VOITHPAPR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOITHPAPR.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to VOITHPAPR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check VOITHPAPR.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while GLOSTERLTD.BO trades at ₹582.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas GLOSTERLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 84.17. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check GLOSTERLTD.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while GLOSTERLTD.NS trades at ₹581.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas GLOSTERLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 83.47. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check GLOSTERLTD.NS's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SHRJAGP.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SHRJAGP.BO trades at ₹598.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SHRJAGP.BO's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHRJAGP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SHRJAGP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SHRJAGP.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, LAKSHMIMIL.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while LAKSHMIMIL.BO trades at ₹7,381.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas LAKSHMIMIL.BO's P/E ratio is -21.35. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check LAKSHMIMIL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, AKSPINTEX.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while AKSPINTEX.BO trades at ₹943.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas AKSPINTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 74.69. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKSPINTEX.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to AKSPINTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check AKSPINTEX.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, RAGHUSYN.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while RAGHUSYN.BO trades at ₹113.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas RAGHUSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 68.10. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAGHUSYN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to RAGHUSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check RAGHUSYN.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, HIMFIBP.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while HIMFIBP.BO trades at ₹43.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas HIMFIBP.BO's P/E ratio is -118.30. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIMFIBP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to HIMFIBP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check HIMFIBP.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while CNOVAPETRO.BO trades at ₹112.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas CNOVAPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -211.51. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check CNOVAPETRO.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SUDTIND-B.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SUDTIND-B.BO trades at ₹80.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SUDTIND-B.BO's P/E ratio is 26.18. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUDTIND-B.BO's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SUDTIND-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SUDTIND-B.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ARL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ARL.BO trades at ₹138.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ARL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to ARL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ARL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, CANDOUR.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while CANDOUR.BO trades at ₹154.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas CANDOUR.BO's P/E ratio is -90.76. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANDOUR.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to CANDOUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check CANDOUR.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, BARODARY.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while BARODARY.BO trades at ₹110.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas BARODARY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BARODARY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to BARODARY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check BARODARY.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, OSIAJEE.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while OSIAJEE.BO trades at ₹435.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas OSIAJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSIAJEE.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to OSIAJEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check OSIAJEE.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, LUDLOWJUT.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while LUDLOWJUT.BO trades at ₹203.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas LUDLOWJUT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check LUDLOWJUT.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SHAHLON.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SHAHLON.BO trades at ₹24.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SHAHLON.BO's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHAHLON.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to SHAHLON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SHAHLON.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, BTTL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while BTTL.BO trades at ₹36.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas BTTL.BO's P/E ratio is -46.29. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTTL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to BTTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check BTTL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, RRIL.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while RRIL.BO trades at ₹17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas RRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RRIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to RRIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check RRIL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, RACE.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while RACE.NS trades at ₹122.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas RACE.NS's P/E ratio is 66.97. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RACE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to RACE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check RACE.NS's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, MKEXIM.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while MKEXIM.BO trades at ₹50.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas MKEXIM.BO's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MKEXIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to MKEXIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check MKEXIM.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SUPER.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SUPER.BO trades at ₹634.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SUPER.BO's P/E ratio is 58.55. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUPER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SUPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SUPER.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, JATTAINDUS.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while JATTAINDUS.BO trades at ₹425.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas JATTAINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 1250.00. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JATTAINDUS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to JATTAINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check JATTAINDUS.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, FILATFASH.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while FILATFASH.BO trades at ₹0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas FILATFASH.BO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FILATFASH.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to FILATFASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check FILATFASH.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SURYALA.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SURYALA.BO trades at ₹350.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SURYALA.BO's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SURYALA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SURYALA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SURYALA.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, WINSOMTX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while WINSOMTX.BO trades at ₹74.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas WINSOMTX.BO's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WINSOMTX.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to WINSOMTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check WINSOMTX.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, LAHOTIOV.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while LAHOTIOV.BO trades at ₹49.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas LAHOTIOV.BO's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAHOTIOV.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to LAHOTIOV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check LAHOTIOV.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ZBINTXPP.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ZBINTXPP.BO trades at ₹1,990.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ZBINTXPP.BO's P/E ratio is 45.87. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZBINTXPP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to ZBINTXPP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ZBINTXPP.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, PREMCO.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while PREMCO.BO trades at ₹423.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas PREMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PREMCO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to PREMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check PREMCO.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SWADPOL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SWADPOL.BO trades at ₹35.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SWADPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.47. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWADPOL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to SWADPOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SWADPOL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, TTFL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while TTFL.BO trades at ₹92.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas TTFL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.52. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to TTFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check TTFL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SHRIDINE.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SHRIDINE.BO trades at ₹237.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SHRIDINE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHRIDINE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIDINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SHRIDINE.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, BHUDEVI.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while BHUDEVI.BO trades at ₹272.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas BHUDEVI.BO's P/E ratio is -777.14. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHUDEVI.BO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to BHUDEVI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check BHUDEVI.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, GARNETINT.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while GARNETINT.BO trades at ₹60.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas GARNETINT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GARNETINT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to GARNETINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check GARNETINT.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, KGPETRO.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while KGPETRO.BO trades at ₹221.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas KGPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to KGPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check KGPETRO.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, HINDAPL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while HINDAPL.BO trades at ₹110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas HINDAPL.BO's P/E ratio is 1000.00. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HINDAPL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to HINDAPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check HINDAPL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ADDIND.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ADDIND.BO trades at ₹101.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ADDIND.BO's P/E ratio is 33.98. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADDIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to ADDIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ADDIND.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, JCTLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while JCTLTD.BO trades at ₹1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas JCTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JCTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to JCTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check JCTLTD.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SURATRAML.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SURATRAML.BO trades at ₹4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SURATRAML.BO's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SURATRAML.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SURATRAML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SURATRAML.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ALSTONE.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ALSTONE.BO trades at ₹0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ALSTONE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALSTONE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to ALSTONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ALSTONE.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, BHILSPIN.BO has a market cap of 971.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while BHILSPIN.BO trades at ₹107.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas BHILSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -46.25. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHILSPIN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to BHILSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check BHILSPIN.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, AMARJOTHI.BO has a market cap of 963.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while AMARJOTHI.BO trades at ₹142.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas AMARJOTHI.BO's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMARJOTHI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to AMARJOTHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check AMARJOTHI.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, VIPPYSP.BO has a market cap of 962.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while VIPPYSP.BO trades at ₹163.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas VIPPYSP.BO's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIPPYSP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to VIPPYSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check VIPPYSP.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, DIGJAMLMTD.NS has a market cap of 895.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while DIGJAMLMTD.NS trades at ₹44.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas DIGJAMLMTD.NS's P/E ratio is 55.99. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check DIGJAMLMTD.NS's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, DEEPAKSP.BO has a market cap of 875.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while DEEPAKSP.BO trades at ₹121.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas DEEPAKSP.BO's P/E ratio is 166.85. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DEEPAKSP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to DEEPAKSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check DEEPAKSP.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, CFEL.BO has a market cap of 875.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while CFEL.BO trades at ₹34.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas CFEL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CFEL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to CFEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check CFEL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SANTETX.BO has a market cap of 850.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SANTETX.BO trades at ₹149.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SANTETX.BO's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANTETX.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SANTETX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SANTETX.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, FLORATX.BO has a market cap of 830.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while FLORATX.BO trades at ₹138.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas FLORATX.BO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLORATX.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to FLORATX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check FLORATX.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, AICHAMP.BO has a market cap of 827.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while AICHAMP.BO trades at ₹26.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas AICHAMP.BO's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AICHAMP.BO's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to AICHAMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check AICHAMP.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, APMIN.BO has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while APMIN.BO trades at ₹37.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas APMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 53.06. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APMIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to APMIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check APMIN.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, INDIANACRY.BO has a market cap of 810.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while INDIANACRY.BO trades at ₹5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas INDIANACRY.BO's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDIANACRY.BO's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANACRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check INDIANACRY.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SUPTANERY.BO has a market cap of 747.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SUPTANERY.BO trades at ₹6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SUPTANERY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUPTANERY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SUPTANERY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SUPTANERY.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SHUBHAM.BO has a market cap of 711M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SHUBHAM.BO trades at ₹58.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SHUBHAM.BO's P/E ratio is 96.15. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHUBHAM.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SHUBHAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SHUBHAM.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, RIBATEX.BO has a market cap of 705.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while RIBATEX.BO trades at ₹73.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas RIBATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIBATEX.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to RIBATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check RIBATEX.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ASHNOOR.BO has a market cap of 687.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ASHNOOR.BO trades at ₹43.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ASHNOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASHNOOR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to ASHNOOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ASHNOOR.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ECOHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 687.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ECOHOTELS.BO trades at ₹13.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ECOHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECOHOTELS.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to ECOHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ECOHOTELS.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SKYIND.BO has a market cap of 658.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SKYIND.BO trades at ₹83.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SKYIND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKYIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SKYIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SKYIND.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, LAKHOTIA.BO has a market cap of 654.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while LAKHOTIA.BO trades at ₹62.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas LAKHOTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAKHOTIA.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to LAKHOTIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check LAKHOTIA.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, VICTMILL.BO has a market cap of 636.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while VICTMILL.BO trades at ₹6,462.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas VICTMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VICTMILL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to VICTMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check VICTMILL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SHINEFASH.BO has a market cap of 630.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SHINEFASH.BO trades at ₹25.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SHINEFASH.BO's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHINEFASH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SHINEFASH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SHINEFASH.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, AKI.NS has a market cap of 629.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while AKI.NS trades at ₹6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas AKI.NS's P/E ratio is 32.11. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKI.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to AKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check AKI.NS's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, BETXIND.BO has a market cap of 597M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while BETXIND.BO trades at ₹398.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas BETXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 47.38. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BETXIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to BETXIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check BETXIND.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, EVERFIN.BO has a market cap of 582.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while EVERFIN.BO trades at ₹93.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas EVERFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVERFIN.BO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to EVERFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check EVERFIN.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ARMAN.BO has a market cap of 566.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ARMAN.BO trades at ₹108.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ARMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 679.69. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARMAN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to ARMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ARMAN.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, MOHITE.BO has a market cap of 552.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while MOHITE.BO trades at ₹2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas MOHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOHITE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to MOHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check MOHITE.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, WIREFABR.BO has a market cap of 497.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while WIREFABR.BO trades at ₹162.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas WIREFABR.BO's P/E ratio is 117.90. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIREFABR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to WIREFABR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check WIREFABR.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, DHANFAB.BO has a market cap of 484.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while DHANFAB.BO trades at ₹56.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas DHANFAB.BO's P/E ratio is -33.40. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHANFAB.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to DHANFAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check DHANFAB.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, KAMADGIRI.BO has a market cap of 463.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while KAMADGIRI.BO trades at ₹79.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas KAMADGIRI.BO's P/E ratio is 59.42. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAMADGIRI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to KAMADGIRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check KAMADGIRI.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, GOKAKTEX.BO has a market cap of 463.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while GOKAKTEX.BO trades at ₹71.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas GOKAKTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOKAKTEX.BO's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to GOKAKTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check GOKAKTEX.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, AREXMIS.BO has a market cap of 444.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while AREXMIS.BO trades at ₹123.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas AREXMIS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AREXMIS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to AREXMIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check AREXMIS.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, HPCOTTON.BO has a market cap of 443.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while HPCOTTON.BO trades at ₹113.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas HPCOTTON.BO's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HPCOTTON.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to HPCOTTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check HPCOTTON.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, KGDENIM.BO has a market cap of 436.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while KGDENIM.BO trades at ₹17.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas KGDENIM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGDENIM.BO's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to KGDENIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check KGDENIM.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.NS has a market cap of 435M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while CNOVAPETRO.NS trades at ₹16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas CNOVAPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check CNOVAPETRO.NS's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SAMBANDAM.BO has a market cap of 428M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SAMBANDAM.BO trades at ₹100.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SAMBANDAM.BO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAMBANDAM.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SAMBANDAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SAMBANDAM.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, TILAK.BO has a market cap of 423.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while TILAK.BO trades at ₹0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas TILAK.BO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TILAK.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to TILAK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check TILAK.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SREEJAYA.BO has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SREEJAYA.BO trades at ₹92.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SREEJAYA.BO's P/E ratio is -172.04. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SREEJAYA.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SREEJAYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SREEJAYA.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, GTNINDS.BO has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while GTNINDS.BO trades at ₹22.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas GTNINDS.BO's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTNINDS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to GTNINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check GTNINDS.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, PBMPOLY.BO has a market cap of 388.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while PBMPOLY.BO trades at ₹56.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas PBMPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PBMPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to PBMPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check PBMPOLY.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SURYAAMBA.BO has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SURYAAMBA.BO trades at ₹124.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SURYAAMBA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SURYAAMBA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to SURYAAMBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SURYAAMBA.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ANJANI.BO has a market cap of 348.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ANJANI.BO trades at ₹23.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ANJANI.BO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANJANI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to ANJANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ANJANI.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ANGEL.BO has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ANGEL.BO trades at ₹13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ANGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANGEL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to ANGEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ANGEL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, JAIHINDS.BO has a market cap of 343.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while JAIHINDS.BO trades at ₹54.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas JAIHINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 2715.00. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JAIHINDS.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to JAIHINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check JAIHINDS.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SWASTIVI.BO has a market cap of 330.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SWASTIVI.BO trades at ₹3.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SWASTIVI.BO's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWASTIVI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to SWASTIVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SWASTIVI.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, GINISILK.BO has a market cap of 329.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while GINISILK.BO trades at ₹58.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas GINISILK.BO's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GINISILK.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to GINISILK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check GINISILK.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, GEMSPIN.BO has a market cap of 326.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while GEMSPIN.BO trades at ₹5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas GEMSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -59.11. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEMSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to GEMSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check GEMSPIN.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, ADITYASP.BO has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while ADITYASP.BO trades at ₹18.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas ADITYASP.BO's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADITYASP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to ADITYASP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check ADITYASP.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, CAMEXLTD.BO has a market cap of 301.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while CAMEXLTD.BO trades at ₹29.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas CAMEXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAMEXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to CAMEXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check CAMEXLTD.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, KATRSPG.BO has a market cap of 299.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while KATRSPG.BO trades at ₹105.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas KATRSPG.BO's P/E ratio is -22.88. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KATRSPG.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to KATRSPG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check KATRSPG.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, HINDMILL.BO has a market cap of 293.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while HINDMILL.BO trades at ₹176.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas HINDMILL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HINDMILL.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to HINDMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check HINDMILL.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, PASUSPG.BO has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while PASUSPG.BO trades at ₹31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas PASUSPG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PASUSPG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to PASUSPG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check PASUSPG.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, YARNSYN.BO has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while YARNSYN.BO trades at ₹13.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas YARNSYN.BO's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YARNSYN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to YARNSYN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check YARNSYN.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, KHOOBSURAT.BO has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while KHOOBSURAT.BO trades at ₹0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas KHOOBSURAT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KHOOBSURAT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is less volatile compared to KHOOBSURAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check KHOOBSURAT.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, KAPILCO.BO has a market cap of 285.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while KAPILCO.BO trades at ₹148.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas KAPILCO.BO's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAPILCO.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to KAPILCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check KAPILCO.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, PARMSILK.BO has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while PARMSILK.BO trades at ₹94.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas PARMSILK.BO's P/E ratio is 3.16. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PARMSILK.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to PARMSILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check PARMSILK.BO's competition here

MANOMAY.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MANOMAY.NS stands at 4B. In comparison, SHANTAI.BO has a market cap of 270.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MANOMAY.NS is priced at ₹218.99, while SHANTAI.BO trades at ₹36.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MANOMAY.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.96, whereas SHANTAI.BO's P/E ratio is -32.19. In terms of profitability, MANOMAY.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHANTAI.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MANOMAY.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANOMAY.NS.Check SHANTAI.BO's competition here