Mastercard Incorporated
Mastercard Incorporated MA Peers
See (MA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA | $584.65 | +1.19% | 526.9B | 40.97 | $14.27 | +0.49% |
| V | $364.94 | +0.70% | 707.8B | 36.64 | $9.96 | +0.63% |
| AXP | $293.89 | -0.51% | 205.9B | 20.51 | $14.33 | +0.99% |
| COF-PI | $18.80 | +1.46% | 124.1B | 0.74 | $25.57 | +1.26% |
| COF-PL | $16.42 | +1.45% | 124.1B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.26% |
| COF-PN | $16.26 | +1.28% | 123.9B | 0.64 | $25.57 | +1.26% |
| COF-PK | $17.18 | +0.59% | 123B | 0.67 | $25.57 | +1.26% |
| COF-PJ | $17.84 | +0.28% | 122.7B | 0.70 | $25.57 | +1.26% |
| COF | $189.07 | -0.89% | 121B | 15.89 | $11.90 | +1.26% |
| BNH | $16.17 | +3.20% | 98.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.57% |
Stock Comparison
MA vs V Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 707.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while V trades at $364.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas V's P/E ratio is 36.64. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AXP Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 205.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AXP trades at $293.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MA and AXP have similar daily volatility (1.41).
MA vs COF-PI Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while COF-PI trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs COF-PL Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while COF-PL trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs COF-PN Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 123.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while COF-PN trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs COF-PK Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while COF-PK trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs COF-PJ Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while COF-PJ trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs COF Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 121B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while COF trades at $189.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs BNH Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while BNH trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs PYPL Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while PYPL trades at $70.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs DFS Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SYF Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SYF trades at $57.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs KKRS Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while KKRS trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SOFI Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SOFI trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs ALLY Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while ALLY trades at $34.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 58.30. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AGM-PC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SYF-PB Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SYF-PB trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs OBDC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while OBDC trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SLMBP Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SLMBP trades at $78.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SLM Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SLM trades at $32.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SYF-PA Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SYF-PA trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs OMF Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while OMF trades at $51.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs CGABL Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while CGABL trades at $16.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs FCFS Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while FCFS trades at $127.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs CACC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while CACC trades at $477.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs ORCC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs JSM Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while JSM trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs IX Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while IX trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs UPST Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while UPST trades at $47.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -64.62. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs NNI Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while NNI trades at $115.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SEZL Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SEZL trades at $106.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 35.93. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs WU Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while WU trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs ADS Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs QFIN Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while QFIN trades at $41.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs BFH Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while BFH trades at $51.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs ENVA Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while ENVA trades at $92.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs FINV Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while FINV trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AGM-A Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AGM-A trades at $138.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AGM-PG Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AGM-PG trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AGM-PE Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AGM-PE trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.92. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AGM Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AGM trades at $186.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AGM-PD Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AGM-PD trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.89. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AGM-PF Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AGM-PF trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs NAVI Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while NAVI trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 25.83. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs OCSL Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while OCSL trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 121.92. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs LU Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while LU trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs LC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while LC trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs MGI Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs BBDC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 979.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while BBDC trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs WRLD Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 821M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while WRLD trades at $154.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs NRDS Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 785.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while NRDS trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs ATLC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 741.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while ATLC trades at $49.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs ATLCZ Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 741.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while ATLCZ trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs EZPW Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 739.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while EZPW trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs ATLCL Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 735.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while ATLCL trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs LX Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 610M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while LX trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs PRAA Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 562.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while PRAA trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs GDOT Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 506.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while GDOT trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -76.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs QD Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 487.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while QD trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 42.21. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs RWAY Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while RWAY trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs RWAYZ Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while RWAYZ trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs RWAYL Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 366.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while RWAYL trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs ATLCP Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 341.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while ATLCP trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs NEWTI Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 286.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while NEWTI trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs YRD Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 270.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while YRD trades at $6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.49. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs RM Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 262M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while RM trades at $26.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs PMTS Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while PMTS trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs OPRT Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while OPRT trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs FOA Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 242.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while FOA trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs LPRO Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while LPRO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs MFIN Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 214M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while MFIN trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs CPSS Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 195.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while CPSS trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SUNL Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs XYF Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while XYF trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AHG Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 116M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AHG trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs ELVT Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs NICK Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs OMCC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 34.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while OMCC trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs CURR Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while CURR trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs NISN Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while NISN trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs JT Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs MCVT Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while MCVT trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs LMFA Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while LMFA trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs AIHS Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while AIHS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SNTG Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SNTG trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs CURO Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while CURO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CURO's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs PT Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 375.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while PT trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs DXF Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while DXF trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs KTN Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, KTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while KTN trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs NRUC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, NRUC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while NRUC trades at $23.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs GJO Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, GJO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while GJO trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs GJT Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, GJT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while GJT trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SOFIW Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SOFIW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs IPB Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, IPB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while IPB trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs PYT Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, PYT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while PYT trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs GJS Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, GJS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while GJS trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs GJP Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, GJP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while GJP trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs SC Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, SC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while SC trades at $41.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.
MA vs WEI Comparison
MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 526.9B. In comparison, WEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $584.65, while WEI trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MA currently has a P/E ratio of 40.97, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.