Mastercard Incorporated

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 683.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while V trades at $352.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas V's P/E ratio is 35.46. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to V's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MA and V have similar daily volatility (0.85).

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 199.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AXP trades at $284.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 84.83B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while BNH trades at $15.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 71.85B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while COF trades at $187.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 68.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while PYPL trades at $70.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 47.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while DFS trades at $190.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AGRIP has a market cap of 46.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AGRIP trades at $99.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AGRIP's P/E ratio is 103.63. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGRIP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGRIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ORXCF has a market cap of 21.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ORXCF trades at $19.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ORXCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ORXCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ORXCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 21.17B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SYF trades at $55.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 15.54B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while KKRS trades at $17.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to KKRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 14.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SOFI trades at $13.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 10.63B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ALLY trades at $34.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 61.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MIUFY has a market cap of 10.03B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MIUFY trades at $13.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MIUFY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MIUFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MIUFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MIUFF has a market cap of 9.39B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MIUFF trades at $6.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MIUFF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MIUFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to MIUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 9.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SYF-PB trades at $24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, EDNMF has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while EDNMF trades at $36.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas EDNMF's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to EDNMF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to EDNMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, EDNMY has a market cap of 7.50B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while EDNMY trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas EDNMY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to EDNMY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to EDNMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while COF-PI trades at $18.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 7.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while OBDC trades at $13.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 6.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while COF-PJ trades at $18.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SYF-PA trades at $17.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 6.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while COF-PK trades at $17.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while COF-PL trades at $16.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 6.26B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while COF-PN trades at $16.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA and COF-PN have similar daily volatility (0.85).

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CGABL trades at $16.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 5.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FCFS trades at $132.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while OMF trades at $48.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.71B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CACC trades at $491.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 5.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SLM trades at $26.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SLMBP trades at $69.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while JSM trades at $17.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to JSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while IX trades at $20.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while UPST trades at $47.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is -64.62. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to UPST's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while NNI trades at $112.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, KGTHY has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while KGTHY trades at $13.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas KGTHY's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to KGTHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to KGTHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MAURY has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MAURY trades at $37.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MAURY's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MAURY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to MAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FREJO has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FREJO trades at $15.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FREJO's P/E ratio is -167.03. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FREJO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FREJO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FREJP has a market cap of 3.32B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FREJP trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FREJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FREJP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FREJP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while WU trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to WU's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CSASF has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CSASF trades at $19.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CSASF's P/E ratio is 6.54. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CSASF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CSASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while QFIN trades at $42.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SEZL trades at $87.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 39.77. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MAURF has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MAURF trades at $15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MAURF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MAURF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to MAURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CMPRF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CMPRF trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CMPRF's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CMPRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CMPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ENVA trades at $94.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while BFH trades at $50.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FINV trades at $8.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AGM-A trades at $137.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AGM trades at $185.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, KRKKF has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while KRKKF trades at $101.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas KRKKF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to KRKKF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to KRKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AGM-PE trades at $22.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AGM-PG trades at $18.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 1.87B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AGM-PD trades at $22.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.98. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AGM-PF trades at $19.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, EHMEF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while EHMEF trades at $103.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas EHMEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to EHMEF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to EHMEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AEOJF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AEOJF trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AEOJF's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AEOJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ZIZTF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ZIZTF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ZIZTF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ZIZTF's ROE of +9.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ZIZTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AIFLF has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AIFLF trades at $3.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AIFLF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AIFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AIFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, HYPOF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while HYPOF trades at $214.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas HYPOF's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to HYPOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to HYPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while NAVI trades at $13.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NAVI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while OCSL trades at $13.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 114.92. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while LC trades at $10.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while LU trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, UMTAF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while UMTAF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas UMTAF's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to UMTAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to UMTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, PRLPF has a market cap of 971.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while PRLPF trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas PRLPF's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PRLPF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to PRLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AIFLY has a market cap of 909.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AIFLY trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AIFLY's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AIFLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AIFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 902.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while BBDC trades at $8.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 839.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ATLCZ trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 829.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ATLC trades at $54.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 826.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while NRDS trades at $11.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 816.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while EZPW trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 816.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ATLCL trades at $24.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 807.70M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while WRLD trades at $140.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ZNKKY has a market cap of 802.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ZNKKY trades at $8.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ZNKKY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ZNKKY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ZNKKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 653.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while LX trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ECNCF has a market cap of 611.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ECNCF trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ECNCF's P/E ratio is 72.47. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ECNCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ECNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 599.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while GDOT trades at $10.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -21.84. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, EGTIF has a market cap of 575.11M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while EGTIF trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas EGTIF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to EGTIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to EGTIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 531.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while PRAA trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PRAA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 484.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while QD trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SHGKY has a market cap of 482.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SHGKY trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SHGKY's P/E ratio is -30.75. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SHGKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SHGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FDCHF has a market cap of 475.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FDCHF trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FDCHF's P/E ratio is 0.90. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FDCHF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FDCHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ITJTY has a market cap of 361.81M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ITJTY trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ITJTY's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ITJTY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ITJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 350.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ATLCP trades at $23.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 340.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while RWAY trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 339.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while RWAYL trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, INJJF has a market cap of 338.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while INJJF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas INJJF's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to INJJF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to INJJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 335.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while RWAYZ trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, IPFPF has a market cap of 327.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while IPFPF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas IPFPF's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IPFPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to IPFPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 286.71M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while RM trades at $28.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, NECA has a market cap of 275.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while NECA trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas NECA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NECA's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NECA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 274.19M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while NEWTI trades at $25.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 271.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while YRD trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 251.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while OPRT trades at $6.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OPRT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, GCSSF has a market cap of 248.96M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while GCSSF trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas GCSSF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GCSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GCSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 242.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while PMTS trades at $21.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 236.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FOA trades at $21.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 213.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MFIN trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 208.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while LPRO trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, HUNTF has a market cap of 204.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while HUNTF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas HUNTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to HUNTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to HUNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CHFHF has a market cap of 202.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CHFHF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CHFHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CHFHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CHFHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 200.49M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CPSS trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FPLPF has a market cap of 190.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FPLPF trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FPLPF's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FPLPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FPLPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SEZNL has a market cap of 180.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SEZNL trades at $14.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SEZNL's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SEZNL's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SEZNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CFNB has a market cap of 171.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CFNB trades at $18.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CFNB's P/E ratio is 5.26. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CFNB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CFNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, IMMFF has a market cap of 144.22M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while IMMFF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas IMMFF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IMMFF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to IMMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 112.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AHG trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FAVO has a market cap of 111.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FAVO trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FAVO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FAVO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FAVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 96.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while XYF trades at $13.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 55.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CURR trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.19M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while NICK trades at $6.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 34.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while OMCC trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, RYTTF has a market cap of 34.18M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while RYTTF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas RYTTF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RYTTF's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RYTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 23.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while NISN trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NISN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FIGI has a market cap of 22.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FIGI trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FIGI's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FIGI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to FIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ACCFF has a market cap of 22.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ACCFF trades at $2.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ACCFF's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ACCFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ACCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, IOUFF has a market cap of 17.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while IOUFF trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas IOUFF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IOUFF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IOUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, RMIAF has a market cap of 10.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while RMIAF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas RMIAF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RMIAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to RMIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AMSA has a market cap of 10.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AMSA trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AMSA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AMSA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AMSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AIHS has a market cap of 10.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AIHS trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AIHS's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AIHS's ROE of +129.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AIHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 10.06M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MCVT trades at $1.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MCVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, LMFA has a market cap of 10.01M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while LMFA trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas LMFA's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to LMFA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to LMFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MRBLF has a market cap of 9.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MRBLF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MRBLF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MRBLF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MRBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, PRPS has a market cap of 6.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while PRPS trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas PRPS's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PRPS's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PRPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, GWSFF has a market cap of 6.12M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while GWSFF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas GWSFF's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GWSFF's ROE of +2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GWSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MITJF has a market cap of 5.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MITJF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MITJF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MITJF's ROE of -245.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MITJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ALEDY has a market cap of 5.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ALEDY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ALEDY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ALEDY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ALEDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SPFX has a market cap of 5.05M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SPFX trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SPFX's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SPFX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SPFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SNTG has a market cap of 4.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SNTG trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SNTG's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SNTG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FNNZF has a market cap of 3.60M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FNNZF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FNNZF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FNNZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to FNNZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, KYNC has a market cap of 3.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while KYNC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas KYNC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to KYNC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to KYNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MBDC has a market cap of 3.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MBDC trades at $29.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to MBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CURO has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CURO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CURO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CURO's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CURO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, XSHLF has a market cap of 2.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while XSHLF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas XSHLF's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to XSHLF's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to XSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AIJTY has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AIJTY trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AIJTY's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AIJTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to AIJTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CUROQ has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CUROQ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CUROQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CUROQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CUROQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CHWWF has a market cap of 1.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CHWWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CHWWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CHWWF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CHWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CAFI has a market cap of 1.07M. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CAFI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CAFI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CAFI's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CAFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ATNPQ has a market cap of 925827.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ATNPQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ATNPQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ATNPQ's ROE of +24.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ATNPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, COSG has a market cap of 458596.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while COSG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas COSG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to COSG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to COSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CBRJ has a market cap of 415596.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CBRJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CBRJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CBRJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CBRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 379147.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while PT trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CYIO has a market cap of 351023.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CYIO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CYIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CYIO's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CYIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CFGX has a market cap of 315928.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CFGX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CFGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CFGX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CFGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, BCAP has a market cap of 284236.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while BCAP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas BCAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to BCAP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to BCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SUNLQ has a market cap of 79203.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SUNLQ trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SUNLQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SUNLQ's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SUNLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ECDD has a market cap of 28889.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ECDD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ECDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ECDD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to ECDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FDTC has a market cap of 17426.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FDTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FDTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FDTC's ROE of -4.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to FDTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, ARWD has a market cap of 7675.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while ARWD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas ARWD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to ARWD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to ARWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, YUANF has a market cap of 4892.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while YUANF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas YUANF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to YUANF's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to YUANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 3558.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while DXF trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to DXF's ROE of -22.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, RAHGF has a market cap of 2684.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while RAHGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas RAHGF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RAHGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to RAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, VIEWF has a market cap of 2675.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while VIEWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas VIEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to VIEWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to VIEWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, EPOR has a market cap of 2052.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while EPOR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas EPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to EPOR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to EPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, RBRI has a market cap of 1953.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while RBRI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas RBRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to RBRI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to RBRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, WORC has a market cap of 1910.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while WORC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas WORC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to WORC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to WORC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, DKGH has a market cap of 1489.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while DKGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas DKGH's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to DKGH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to DKGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, GAFL has a market cap of 1464.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while GAFL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas GAFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GAFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to GAFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, WEIDY has a market cap of 1409.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while WEIDY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas WEIDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to WEIDY's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to WEIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FRNV has a market cap of 596.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FRNV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FRNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FRNV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to FRNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CHFI has a market cap of 577.00. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CHFI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CHFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CHFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to CHFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, NRUC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while NRUC trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas NRUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to NRUC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to NRUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, GJP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while GJP trades at $24.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas GJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GJP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, IPB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while IPB trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas IPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to IPB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to IPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, GJO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while GJO trades at $24.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas GJO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GJO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AEFC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AEFC trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AEFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AEFC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AEFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, FLXP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while FLXP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas FLXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to FLXP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to FLXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, PYT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while PYT trades at $23.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas PYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to PYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to PYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, MRLN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while MRLN trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas MRLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to MRLN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to MRLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AWKS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AWKS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AWKS's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AWKS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, WEI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while WEI trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas WEI's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to WEI's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to WEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SOFIW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SOFIW trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SOFIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SOFIW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to SOFIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, CIAS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while CIAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas CIAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to CIAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to CIAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, TSLMF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while TSLMF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas TSLMF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to TSLMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to TSLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, AATRL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while AATRL trades at $54.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas AATRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to AATRL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to AATRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, SC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while SC trades at $41.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas SC's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to SC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to SC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, EPORP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while EPORP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas EPORP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to EPORP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to EPORP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, KTN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while KTN trades at $26.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas KTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to KTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to KTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, KTBA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while KTBA trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas KTBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to KTBA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to KTBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, GJS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while GJS trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas GJS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GJS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is more volatile compared to GJS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.

MA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MA stands at 512.40B. In comparison, GJT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MA is priced at $568.53, while GJT trades at $22.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MA currently has a P/E ratio of 39.84, whereas GJT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MA's ROE is +1.88%, compared to GJT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MA is less volatile compared to GJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MA.