Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See LY0.DE's competitors and their performance on the XETRA and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for LY0.DE and its XETRA peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY0.DE | €11.85 | +4.41% | 4.5B | 2.04 | €5.82 | N/A |
| SAP.DE | €199.22 | -1.01% | 229.9B | 31.03 | €6.42 | +1.25% |
| FOO.DE | €212.55 | -3.21% | 174.1B | 17.86 | €11.90 | +0.70% |
| UT8.DE | €62.95 | -0.03% | 128.6B | 15.31 | €4.11 | N/A |
| ADP.DE | €258.10 | +1.89% | 101.4B | 27.86 | €9.19 | +2.33% |
| ADB.DE | €218.10 | -3.20% | 84.9B | 12.39 | €17.60 | N/A |
| CDS.DE | €284.00 | -1.70% | 78.2B | 51.78 | €5.49 | N/A |
| ITU.DE | €287.15 | -2.43% | 76.7B | 16.93 | €16.96 | +1.51% |
| VEE.DE | €277.20 | -0.65% | 45B | 42.19 | €6.57 | N/A |
| AUD.DE | €212.95 | -2.63% | 44.5B | 22.25 | €9.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SAP SE (XETRA: SAP.DE)
LY0.DE vs SAP.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SAP.DE has a market cap of 229.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while SAP.DE trades at €199.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas SAP.DE's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SAP.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to SAP.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check SAP.DE's competition here
Salesforce, Inc. (XETRA: FOO.DE)
LY0.DE vs FOO.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FOO.DE has a market cap of 174.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while FOO.DE trades at €212.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas FOO.DE's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FOO.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to FOO.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check FOO.DE's competition here
Uber Technologies, Inc. (XETRA: UT8.DE)
LY0.DE vs UT8.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, UT8.DE has a market cap of 128.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while UT8.DE trades at €62.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas UT8.DE's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to UT8.DE's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to UT8.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check UT8.DE's competition here
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (XETRA: ADP.DE)
LY0.DE vs ADP.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ADP.DE has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while ADP.DE trades at €258.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas ADP.DE's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ADP.DE's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to ADP.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check ADP.DE's competition here
Adobe Inc. (XETRA: ADB.DE)
LY0.DE vs ADB.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ADB.DE has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while ADB.DE trades at €218.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas ADB.DE's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ADB.DE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to ADB.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check ADB.DE's competition here
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE)
LY0.DE vs CDS.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CDS.DE has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while CDS.DE trades at €284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas CDS.DE's P/E ratio is 51.78. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CDS.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to CDS.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check CDS.DE's competition here
Intuit Inc. (XETRA: ITU.DE)
LY0.DE vs ITU.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ITU.DE has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while ITU.DE trades at €287.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas ITU.DE's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ITU.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to ITU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check ITU.DE's competition here
Veeva Systems Inc. (XETRA: VEE.DE)
LY0.DE vs VEE.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VEE.DE has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while VEE.DE trades at €277.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas VEE.DE's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to VEE.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to VEE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check VEE.DE's competition here
Autodesk, Inc. (XETRA: AUD.DE)
LY0.DE vs AUD.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AUD.DE has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while AUD.DE trades at €212.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas AUD.DE's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to AUD.DE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to AUD.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check AUD.DE's competition here
PTC Inc. (XETRA: PMTA.DE)
LY0.DE vs PMTA.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PMTA.DE has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while PMTA.DE trades at €171.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas PMTA.DE's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PMTA.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to PMTA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check PMTA.DE's competition here
Citrix Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CTX.DE)
LY0.DE vs CTX.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CTX.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while CTX.DE trades at €106.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas CTX.DE's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CTX.DE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to CTX.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check CTX.DE's competition here
Nemetschek SE (XETRA: NEM.DE)
LY0.DE vs NEM.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NEM.DE has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while NEM.DE trades at €73.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas NEM.DE's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NEM.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to NEM.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check NEM.DE's competition here
ATOSS Software AG (XETRA: AOF.DE)
LY0.DE vs AOF.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AOF.DE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while AOF.DE trades at €90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas AOF.DE's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to AOF.DE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to AOF.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check AOF.DE's competition here
TeamViewer AG (XETRA: TMV.DE)
LY0.DE vs TMV.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TMV.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while TMV.DE trades at €7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas TMV.DE's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TMV.DE's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to TMV.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check TMV.DE's competition here
CHAPTERS Group AG (XETRA: CHG.DE)
LY0.DE vs CHG.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CHG.DE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while CHG.DE trades at €44.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas CHG.DE's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CHG.DE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to CHG.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check CHG.DE's competition here
PSI Software SE (XETRA: PSAN.DE)
LY0.DE vs PSAN.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PSAN.DE has a market cap of 726.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while PSAN.DE trades at €45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas PSAN.DE's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to PSAN.DE's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to PSAN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check PSAN.DE's competition here
MGI - Media and Games Invest SE (XETRA: M8G.DE)
LY0.DE vs M8G.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, M8G.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while M8G.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas M8G.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to M8G.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to M8G.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check M8G.DE's competition here
Verve Group SE (XETRA: VRF.DE)
LY0.DE vs VRF.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VRF.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while VRF.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas VRF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to VRF.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to VRF.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check VRF.DE's competition here
GK Software SE (HAM: GKS.HM)
LY0.DE vs GKS.HM Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GKS.HM has a market cap of 647.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while GKS.HM trades at €285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas GKS.HM's P/E ratio is -123.38. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GKS.HM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to GKS.HM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check GKS.HM's competition here
Mensch und Maschine Software SE (XETRA: MUM.DE)
LY0.DE vs MUM.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MUM.DE has a market cap of 581.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while MUM.DE trades at €34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas MUM.DE's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to MUM.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to MUM.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check MUM.DE's competition here
Cerence Inc. (XETRA: 0S6.DE)
LY0.DE vs 0S6.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 0S6.DE has a market cap of 576M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while 0S6.DE trades at €14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas 0S6.DE's P/E ratio is 49.21. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to 0S6.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to 0S6.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check 0S6.DE's competition here
GK Software SE (XETRA: GKS.DE)
LY0.DE vs GKS.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GKS.DE has a market cap of 494.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while GKS.DE trades at €219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas GKS.DE's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to GKS.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to GKS.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check GKS.DE's competition here
IVU Traffic Technologies AG (XETRA: IVU.DE)
LY0.DE vs IVU.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IVU.DE has a market cap of 470.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while IVU.DE trades at €27.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas IVU.DE's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to IVU.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to IVU.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check IVU.DE's competition here
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (XETRA: DBD.DE)
LY0.DE vs DBD.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DBD.DE has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while DBD.DE trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas DBD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DBD.DE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to DBD.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check DBD.DE's competition here
Verve Group SE (XETRA: VRV.DE)
LY0.DE vs VRV.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VRV.DE has a market cap of 206.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while VRV.DE trades at €1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas VRV.DE's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to VRV.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to VRV.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check VRV.DE's competition here
Fabasoft AG (XETRA: FAA.DE)
LY0.DE vs FAA.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FAA.DE has a market cap of 170.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while FAA.DE trades at €16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas FAA.DE's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to FAA.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to FAA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check FAA.DE's competition here
Msg Life Ag (HAM: MSGL.HM)
LY0.DE vs MSGL.HM Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MSGL.HM has a market cap of 157.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while MSGL.HM trades at €3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas MSGL.HM's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to MSGL.HM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to MSGL.HM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check MSGL.HM's competition here
Serviceware SE (XETRA: SJJ.DE)
LY0.DE vs SJJ.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SJJ.DE has a market cap of 136.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while SJJ.DE trades at €13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas SJJ.DE's P/E ratio is 64.68. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SJJ.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to SJJ.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check SJJ.DE's competition here
The Platform Group AG (XETRA: TPG.DE)
LY0.DE vs TPG.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TPG.DE has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while TPG.DE trades at €5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas TPG.DE's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TPG.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to TPG.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check TPG.DE's competition here
Vectron Systems AG (XETRA: V3S.DE)
LY0.DE vs V3S.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, V3S.DE has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while V3S.DE trades at €12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas V3S.DE's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to V3S.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to V3S.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check V3S.DE's competition here
Easy Software AG (XETRA: ESY.DE)
LY0.DE vs ESY.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ESY.DE has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while ESY.DE trades at €13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas ESY.DE's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ESY.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to ESY.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check ESY.DE's competition here
Cenit AG (XETRA: CSH.DE)
LY0.DE vs CSH.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CSH.DE has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while CSH.DE trades at €9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas CSH.DE's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to CSH.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to CSH.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check CSH.DE's competition here
Net-Digital AG (XETRA: VRL.DE)
LY0.DE vs VRL.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VRL.DE has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while VRL.DE trades at €31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas VRL.DE's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to VRL.DE's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to VRL.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check VRL.DE's competition here
Exasol AG (XETRA: EXL.DE)
LY0.DE vs EXL.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EXL.DE has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while EXL.DE trades at €1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas EXL.DE's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to EXL.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to EXL.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check EXL.DE's competition here
MeVis Medical Solutions AG (XETRA: M3V.DE)
LY0.DE vs M3V.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, M3V.DE has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while M3V.DE trades at €21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas M3V.DE's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to M3V.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to M3V.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check M3V.DE's competition here
OTRS AG (XETRA: TR9.DE)
LY0.DE vs TR9.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TR9.DE has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while TR9.DE trades at €17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas TR9.DE's P/E ratio is -38.15. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TR9.DE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to TR9.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check TR9.DE's competition here
INTERSHOP Communications AG (XETRA: ISHA.DE)
LY0.DE vs ISHA.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ISHA.DE has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while ISHA.DE trades at €1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas ISHA.DE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ISHA.DE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to ISHA.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check ISHA.DE's competition here
niiio finance group AG (XETRA: NIIN.DE)
LY0.DE vs NIIN.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NIIN.DE has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while NIIN.DE trades at €0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas NIIN.DE's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NIIN.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to NIIN.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check NIIN.DE's competition here
One More Level S.A. (STU: 1OJ.SG)
LY0.DE vs 1OJ.SG Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 1OJ.SG has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while 1OJ.SG trades at €0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas 1OJ.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to 1OJ.SG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to 1OJ.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check 1OJ.SG's competition here
The Platform Group AG (XETRA: TPG0.DE)
LY0.DE vs TPG0.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TPG0.DE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while TPG0.DE trades at €0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas TPG0.DE's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to TPG0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to TPG0.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check TPG0.DE's competition here
mVISE AG I (XETRA: C1V0.DE)
LY0.DE vs C1V0.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, C1V0.DE has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while C1V0.DE trades at €7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas C1V0.DE's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to C1V0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to C1V0.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check C1V0.DE's competition here
Advanced Blockchain AG (XETRA: BWQ.DE)
LY0.DE vs BWQ.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BWQ.DE has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while BWQ.DE trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas BWQ.DE's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to BWQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to BWQ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check BWQ.DE's competition here
InVision AG (XETRA: IVX.DE)
LY0.DE vs IVX.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IVX.DE has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while IVX.DE trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas IVX.DE's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to IVX.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to IVX.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check IVX.DE's competition here
Brightline Interactive, Inc. (STU: 9DR.SG)
LY0.DE vs 9DR.SG Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 9DR.SG has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while 9DR.SG trades at €4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas 9DR.SG's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to 9DR.SG's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to 9DR.SG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check 9DR.SG's competition here
B+S Banksysteme AG (XETRA: DTD2.DE)
LY0.DE vs DTD2.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DTD2.DE has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while DTD2.DE trades at €1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas DTD2.DE's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to DTD2.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to DTD2.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check DTD2.DE's competition here
Mobility One Ltd. (STU: 31M.SG)
LY0.DE vs 31M.SG Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 31M.SG has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while 31M.SG trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas 31M.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to 31M.SG's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to 31M.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check 31M.SG's competition here
Binect AG (XETRA: MA10.DE)
LY0.DE vs MA10.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MA10.DE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while MA10.DE trades at €1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas MA10.DE's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to MA10.DE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to MA10.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check MA10.DE's competition here
Advanced Blockchain AG (XETRA: ABX.DE)
LY0.DE vs ABX.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABX.DE has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while ABX.DE trades at €1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas ABX.DE's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to ABX.DE's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to ABX.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check ABX.DE's competition here
NorCom Information Technology GmbH & Co. KGaA (XETRA: NC5A.DE)
LY0.DE vs NC5A.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NC5A.DE has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while NC5A.DE trades at €1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas NC5A.DE's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to NC5A.DE's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is less volatile compared to NC5A.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check NC5A.DE's competition here
Art Games Studio S.A. (STU: 223.SG)
LY0.DE vs 223.SG Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, 223.SG has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while 223.SG trades at €0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas 223.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to 223.SG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to 223.SG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check 223.SG's competition here
Nuance Communications, Inc. (XETRA: SC2.DE)
LY0.DE vs SC2.DE Comparison October 2026
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LY0.DE stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SC2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LY0.DE is priced at €11.85 on the XETRA, while SC2.DE trades at €50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LY0.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 2.04, whereas SC2.DE's P/E ratio is -168.31. In terms of profitability, LY0.DE's ROE is +1.50%, compared to SC2.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LY0.DE is more volatile compared to SC2.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LY0.DE.Check SC2.DE's competition here