Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CDS.DE's competitors and their performance on the XETRA and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CDS.DE and its XETRA peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDS.DE | €246.55 | +0.96% | 67.9B | 44.94 | €5.49 | N/A |
| SAP.DE | €183.12 | -2.60% | 211.4B | 28.52 | €6.42 | +1.37% |
| FOO.DE | €209.40 | -1.83% | 171.5B | 17.60 | €11.90 | +0.71% |
| UT8.DE | €61.55 | -0.47% | 125.3B | 14.97 | €4.11 | N/A |
| ADP.DE | €236.50 | -0.02% | 94.8B | 25.82 | €9.19 | +2.48% |
| ADB.DE | €217.55 | -0.09% | 87B | 12.44 | €17.60 | N/A |
| ITU.DE | €267.55 | -4.77% | 73.2B | 15.78 | €16.96 | +1.55% |
| AUD.DE | €189.12 | -0.58% | 39.9B | 19.76 | €9.57 | N/A |
| VEE.DE | €229.20 | -1.25% | 37.2B | 34.89 | €6.57 | N/A |
| PMTA.DE | €118.02 | +0.89% | 13.6B | 15.82 | €7.46 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SAP SE (XETRA: SAP.DE)
CDS.DE vs SAP.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, SAP.DE has a market cap of 211.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while SAP.DE trades at €183.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas SAP.DE's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAP.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to SAP.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check SAP.DE's competition here
Salesforce, Inc. (XETRA: FOO.DE)
CDS.DE vs FOO.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, FOO.DE has a market cap of 171.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while FOO.DE trades at €209.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas FOO.DE's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FOO.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to FOO.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check FOO.DE's competition here
Uber Technologies, Inc. (XETRA: UT8.DE)
CDS.DE vs UT8.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, UT8.DE has a market cap of 125.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while UT8.DE trades at €61.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas UT8.DE's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UT8.DE's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to UT8.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check UT8.DE's competition here
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (XETRA: ADP.DE)
CDS.DE vs ADP.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, ADP.DE has a market cap of 94.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while ADP.DE trades at €236.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas ADP.DE's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADP.DE's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to ADP.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check ADP.DE's competition here
Adobe Inc. (XETRA: ADB.DE)
CDS.DE vs ADB.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, ADB.DE has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while ADB.DE trades at €217.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas ADB.DE's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADB.DE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to ADB.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check ADB.DE's competition here
Intuit Inc. (XETRA: ITU.DE)
CDS.DE vs ITU.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, ITU.DE has a market cap of 73.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while ITU.DE trades at €267.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas ITU.DE's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ITU.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to ITU.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check ITU.DE's competition here
Autodesk, Inc. (XETRA: AUD.DE)
CDS.DE vs AUD.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, AUD.DE has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while AUD.DE trades at €189.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas AUD.DE's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUD.DE's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to AUD.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check AUD.DE's competition here
Veeva Systems Inc. (XETRA: VEE.DE)
CDS.DE vs VEE.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, VEE.DE has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while VEE.DE trades at €229.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas VEE.DE's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEE.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to VEE.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check VEE.DE's competition here
PTC Inc. (XETRA: PMTA.DE)
CDS.DE vs PMTA.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, PMTA.DE has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while PMTA.DE trades at €118.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas PMTA.DE's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PMTA.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to PMTA.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check PMTA.DE's competition here
Citrix Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CTX.DE)
CDS.DE vs CTX.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, CTX.DE has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while CTX.DE trades at €106.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas CTX.DE's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CTX.DE's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to CTX.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check CTX.DE's competition here
Nemetschek SE (XETRA: NEM.DE)
CDS.DE vs NEM.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, NEM.DE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while NEM.DE trades at €60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas NEM.DE's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEM.DE's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to NEM.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check NEM.DE's competition here
Lyft, Inc. (XETRA: LY0.DE)
CDS.DE vs LY0.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, LY0.DE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while LY0.DE trades at €11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas LY0.DE's P/E ratio is 2.04. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LY0.DE's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to LY0.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check LY0.DE's competition here
ATOSS Software AG (XETRA: AOF.DE)
CDS.DE vs AOF.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, AOF.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while AOF.DE trades at €92.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas AOF.DE's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AOF.DE's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to AOF.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check AOF.DE's competition here
CHAPTERS Group AG (XETRA: CHG.DE)
CDS.DE vs CHG.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, CHG.DE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while CHG.DE trades at €42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas CHG.DE's P/E ratio is -188.73. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHG.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to CHG.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check CHG.DE's competition here
TeamViewer AG (XETRA: TMV.DE)
CDS.DE vs TMV.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, TMV.DE has a market cap of 997.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while TMV.DE trades at €6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas TMV.DE's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TMV.DE's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to TMV.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check TMV.DE's competition here
Verve Group SE (XETRA: VRF.DE)
CDS.DE vs VRF.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, VRF.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while VRF.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas VRF.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRF.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to VRF.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check VRF.DE's competition here
MGI - Media and Games Invest SE (XETRA: M8G.DE)
CDS.DE vs M8G.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, M8G.DE has a market cap of 710.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while M8G.DE trades at €3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas M8G.DE's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to M8G.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to M8G.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check M8G.DE's competition here
PSI Software AG (XETRA: PSAN.DE)
CDS.DE vs PSAN.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, PSAN.DE has a market cap of 709.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while PSAN.DE trades at €45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas PSAN.DE's P/E ratio is -200.88. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PSAN.DE's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to PSAN.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check PSAN.DE's competition here
GK Software SE (HAM: GKS.HM)
CDS.DE vs GKS.HM Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, GKS.HM has a market cap of 647.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while GKS.HM trades at €285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas GKS.HM's P/E ratio is -123.38. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GKS.HM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to GKS.HM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check GKS.HM's competition here
Mensch und Maschine Software SE (XETRA: MUM.DE)
CDS.DE vs MUM.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, MUM.DE has a market cap of 583.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while MUM.DE trades at €35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas MUM.DE's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MUM.DE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to MUM.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check MUM.DE's competition here
Cerence Inc. (XETRA: 0S6.DE)
CDS.DE vs 0S6.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, 0S6.DE has a market cap of 576M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while 0S6.DE trades at €14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas 0S6.DE's P/E ratio is 49.21. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 0S6.DE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to 0S6.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check 0S6.DE's competition here
GK Software SE (XETRA: GKS.DE)
CDS.DE vs GKS.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, GKS.DE has a market cap of 494.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while GKS.DE trades at €219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas GKS.DE's P/E ratio is -44.88. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GKS.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to GKS.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check GKS.DE's competition here
IVU Traffic Technologies AG (XETRA: IVU.DE)
CDS.DE vs IVU.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, IVU.DE has a market cap of 414.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while IVU.DE trades at €23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas IVU.DE's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IVU.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to IVU.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check IVU.DE's competition here
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (XETRA: DBD.DE)
CDS.DE vs DBD.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, DBD.DE has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while DBD.DE trades at €2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas DBD.DE's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DBD.DE's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to DBD.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check DBD.DE's competition here
Verve Group SE (XETRA: VRV.DE)
CDS.DE vs VRV.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, VRV.DE has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while VRV.DE trades at €1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas VRV.DE's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRV.DE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to VRV.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check VRV.DE's competition here
Fabasoft AG (XETRA: FAA.DE)
CDS.DE vs FAA.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, FAA.DE has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while FAA.DE trades at €16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas FAA.DE's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FAA.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to FAA.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check FAA.DE's competition here
Msg Life Ag (HAM: MSGL.HM)
CDS.DE vs MSGL.HM Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, MSGL.HM has a market cap of 158.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while MSGL.HM trades at €3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas MSGL.HM's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSGL.HM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to MSGL.HM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check MSGL.HM's competition here
Serviceware SE (XETRA: SJJ.DE)
CDS.DE vs SJJ.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, SJJ.DE has a market cap of 136.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while SJJ.DE trades at €13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas SJJ.DE's P/E ratio is -286.98. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SJJ.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to SJJ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check SJJ.DE's competition here
The Platform Group AG (XETRA: TPG.DE)
CDS.DE vs TPG.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, TPG.DE has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while TPG.DE trades at €5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas TPG.DE's P/E ratio is 2.28. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TPG.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to TPG.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check TPG.DE's competition here
Vectron Systems AG (XETRA: V3S.DE)
CDS.DE vs V3S.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, V3S.DE has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while V3S.DE trades at €12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas V3S.DE's P/E ratio is -43.75. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to V3S.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to V3S.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check V3S.DE's competition here
Easy Software AG (XETRA: ESY.DE)
CDS.DE vs ESY.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, ESY.DE has a market cap of 87.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while ESY.DE trades at €13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas ESY.DE's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESY.DE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to ESY.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check ESY.DE's competition here
Cenit AG (XETRA: CSH.DE)
CDS.DE vs CSH.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, CSH.DE has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while CSH.DE trades at €7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas CSH.DE's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CSH.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to CSH.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check CSH.DE's competition here
Exasol AG (XETRA: EXL.DE)
CDS.DE vs EXL.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, EXL.DE has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while EXL.DE trades at €1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas EXL.DE's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EXL.DE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to EXL.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check EXL.DE's competition here
Net-Digital AG (XETRA: VRL.DE)
CDS.DE vs VRL.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, VRL.DE has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while VRL.DE trades at €23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas VRL.DE's P/E ratio is -34.25. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VRL.DE's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to VRL.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check VRL.DE's competition here
MeVis Medical Solutions AG (XETRA: M3V.DE)
CDS.DE vs M3V.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, M3V.DE has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while M3V.DE trades at €23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas M3V.DE's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to M3V.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to M3V.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check M3V.DE's competition here
OTRS AG (XETRA: TR9.DE)
CDS.DE vs TR9.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, TR9.DE has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while TR9.DE trades at €17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas TR9.DE's P/E ratio is -24.55. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TR9.DE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to TR9.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check TR9.DE's competition here
INTERSHOP Communications AG (XETRA: ISHA.DE)
CDS.DE vs ISHA.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, ISHA.DE has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while ISHA.DE trades at €1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas ISHA.DE's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ISHA.DE's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to ISHA.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check ISHA.DE's competition here
One More Level S.A. (STU: 1OJ.SG)
CDS.DE vs 1OJ.SG Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, 1OJ.SG has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while 1OJ.SG trades at €0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas 1OJ.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 1OJ.SG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to 1OJ.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check 1OJ.SG's competition here
niiio finance group AG (XETRA: NIIN.DE)
CDS.DE vs NIIN.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, NIIN.DE has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while NIIN.DE trades at €0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas NIIN.DE's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NIIN.DE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to NIIN.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check NIIN.DE's competition here
The Platform Group AG (XETRA: TPG0.DE)
CDS.DE vs TPG0.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, TPG0.DE has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while TPG0.DE trades at €0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas TPG0.DE's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TPG0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to TPG0.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check TPG0.DE's competition here
mVISE AG I (XETRA: C1V0.DE)
CDS.DE vs C1V0.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, C1V0.DE has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while C1V0.DE trades at €7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas C1V0.DE's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to C1V0.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to C1V0.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check C1V0.DE's competition here
Advanced Blockchain AG (XETRA: BWQ.DE)
CDS.DE vs BWQ.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, BWQ.DE has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while BWQ.DE trades at €3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas BWQ.DE's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BWQ.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to BWQ.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check BWQ.DE's competition here
InVision AG (XETRA: IVX.DE)
CDS.DE vs IVX.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, IVX.DE has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while IVX.DE trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas IVX.DE's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IVX.DE's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to IVX.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check IVX.DE's competition here
Brightline Interactive, Inc. (STU: 9DR.SG)
CDS.DE vs 9DR.SG Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, 9DR.SG has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while 9DR.SG trades at €0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas 9DR.SG's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 9DR.SG's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to 9DR.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check 9DR.SG's competition here
B+S Banksysteme AG (XETRA: DTD2.DE)
CDS.DE vs DTD2.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, DTD2.DE has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while DTD2.DE trades at €1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas DTD2.DE's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DTD2.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to DTD2.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check DTD2.DE's competition here
Mobility One Ltd. (STU: 31M.SG)
CDS.DE vs 31M.SG Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, 31M.SG has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while 31M.SG trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas 31M.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 31M.SG's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to 31M.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check 31M.SG's competition here
Binect AG (XETRA: MA10.DE)
CDS.DE vs MA10.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, MA10.DE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while MA10.DE trades at €1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas MA10.DE's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MA10.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to MA10.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check MA10.DE's competition here
Advanced Blockchain AG (XETRA: ABX.DE)
CDS.DE vs ABX.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, ABX.DE has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while ABX.DE trades at €1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas ABX.DE's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ABX.DE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to ABX.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check ABX.DE's competition here
NorCom Information Technology GmbH & Co. KGaA (XETRA: NC5A.DE)
CDS.DE vs NC5A.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, NC5A.DE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while NC5A.DE trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas NC5A.DE's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NC5A.DE's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to NC5A.DE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check NC5A.DE's competition here
Art Games Studio S.A. (STU: 223.SG)
CDS.DE vs 223.SG Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, 223.SG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while 223.SG trades at €0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas 223.SG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to 223.SG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is less volatile compared to 223.SG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check 223.SG's competition here
Nuance Communications, Inc. (XETRA: SC2.DE)
CDS.DE vs SC2.DE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (XETRA: CDS.DE) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the XETRA reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDS.DE stands at 67.9B. In comparison, SC2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CDS.DE is priced at €246.55 on the XETRA, while SC2.DE trades at €50.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDS.DE currently has a P/E ratio of 44.94, whereas SC2.DE's P/E ratio is -168.31. In terms of profitability, CDS.DE's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SC2.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDS.DE is more volatile compared to SC2.DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDS.DE.Check SC2.DE's competition here