Level 14 Ventures Ltd.
Level 14 Ventures Ltd. (LVL.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LVL.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVL.CN | CA$0.60 | +200.00% | 18.4M | -12.00 | -CA$0.05 | N/A |
| TECK-B.TO | CA$46.16 | -0.71% | 23.4B | 102.58 | CA$0.45 | +2.17% |
| TECK-A.TO | CA$46.56 | -0.72% | 22.8B | 103.47 | CA$0.45 | +2.13% |
| IVN.TO | CA$11.75 | +0.34% | 15.9B | 29.38 | CA$0.40 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | CA$8.86 | -0.56% | 5.7B | 9.53 | CA$0.93 | N/A |
| FIL.TO | CA$32.25 | -1.01% | 4.4B | -31.01 | -CA$1.04 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | CA$21.03 | +0.00% | 4.4B | -46.73 | -CA$0.45 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | CA$21.26 | +0.57% | 2.4B | -14.17 | -CA$1.50 | N/A |
| VZLA.TO | CA$4.83 | -0.41% | 1.7B | -161.00 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| FOM.TO | CA$2.87 | +2.14% | 1.5B | -95.67 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LVL.CN vs TECK-B.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TECK-B.TO trades at CA$46.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 102.58. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TECK-B.TO has daily volatility of 2.15.Check TECK-B.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TECK-A.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TECK-A.TO trades at CA$46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 103.47. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TECK-A.TO has daily volatility of 2.31.Check TECK-A.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs IVN.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while IVN.TO trades at CA$11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 29.38. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IVN.TO has daily volatility of 1.96.Check IVN.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs AKE.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AKE.TO trades at CA$8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AKE.TO has daily volatility of 4.07.Check AKE.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FIL.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FIL.TO trades at CA$32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FIL.TO has daily volatility of 0.65.Check FIL.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NGEX.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NGEX.TO trades at CA$21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -46.73. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NGEX.TO has daily volatility of 1.94.Check NGEX.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SKE.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SKE.TO trades at CA$21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SKE.TO has daily volatility of 2.59.Check SKE.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs VZLA.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while VZLA.TO trades at CA$4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -161.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VZLA.TO has daily volatility of 2.47.Check VZLA.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FOM.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FOM.TO trades at CA$2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -95.67. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FOM.TO has daily volatility of 2.46.Check FOM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ALS.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ALS.TO trades at CA$29.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ALS.TO has daily volatility of 1.23.Check ALS.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs AII.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AII.TO trades at CA$5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AII.TO has daily volatility of 8.04.Check AII.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs USA.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 901.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while USA.TO trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and USA.TO has daily volatility of 7.25.Check USA.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LAC.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 875.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LAC.TO trades at CA$3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LAC.TO has daily volatility of 6.40.Check LAC.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs MDI.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 741.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MDI.TO trades at CA$9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MDI.TO has daily volatility of 2.08.Check MDI.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NDM.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 662.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NDM.TO trades at CA$1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NDM.TO has daily volatility of 3.25.Check NDM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FVL.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 656M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FVL.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -124.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FVL.TO has daily volatility of 5.71.Check FVL.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LAAC.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LAAC.TO trades at CA$3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LAAC.TO has daily volatility of 6.24.Check LAAC.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs PMET.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 618.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PMET.TO trades at CA$3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -127.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PMET.TO has daily volatility of 3.17.Check PMET.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs POM.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while POM.TO trades at CA$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and POM.TO has daily volatility of 5.80.Check POM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SAU.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 470.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SAU.TO trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SAU.TO has daily volatility of 9.52.Check SAU.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LUCA.V Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 455.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LUCA.V trades at CA$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -17.30. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LUCA.V has daily volatility of 11.57.Check LUCA.V's competition here
LVL.CN vs ETG.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 439.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ETG.TO trades at CA$2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -30.29. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ETG.TO has daily volatility of 2.36.Check ETG.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs PRYM.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PRYM.TO trades at CA$2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -23.18. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PRYM.TO has daily volatility of 1.96.Check PRYM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SOLG.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SOLG.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SOLG.TO has daily volatility of 7.69.Check SOLG.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ERD.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 398.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ERD.TO trades at CA$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -36.33. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ERD.TO has daily volatility of 8.61.Check ERD.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TLO.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TLO.TO trades at CA$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TLO.TO has daily volatility of 4.88.Check TLO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs WRN.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while WRN.TO trades at CA$1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -92.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WRN.TO has daily volatility of 1.63.Check WRN.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TMQ.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 361.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TMQ.TO trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TMQ.TO has daily volatility of 0.90.Check TMQ.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ECOR.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 338.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ECOR.TO trades at CA$1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -27.20. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ECOR.TO has daily volatility of 3.64.Check ECOR.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ARA.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 334.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ARA.TO trades at CA$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -25.33. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ARA.TO has daily volatility of 8.47.Check ARA.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TLG.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 324.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TLG.TO trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -8.20. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TLG.TO has daily volatility of 8.92.Check TLG.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LIRC.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LIRC.TO trades at CA$5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -41.21. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIRC.TO has daily volatility of 0.52.Check LIRC.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs MNO.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 299M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MNO.TO trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -10.62. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MNO.TO has daily volatility of 2.35.Check MNO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LIFT.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LIFT.CN trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIFT.CN has daily volatility of 2.69.Check LIFT.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs SMT.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SMT.TO trades at CA$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SMT.TO has daily volatility of 0.87.Check SMT.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs GLO.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 190.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GLO.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is -11.20. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GLO.TO has daily volatility of 14.81.Check GLO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FAR.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 188.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FAR.TO trades at CA$1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FAR.TO has daily volatility of 1.58.Check FAR.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs VROY.V Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while VROY.V trades at CA$2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -21.38. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VROY.V has daily volatility of 6.32.Check VROY.V's competition here
LVL.CN vs TI.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 177.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TI.TO trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of +9.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TI.TO has daily volatility of 4.58.Check TI.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs MOLY.NE Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MOLY.NE trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MOLY.NE has daily volatility of 6.41.Check MOLY.NE's competition here
LVL.CN vs GEO.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GEO.TO trades at CA$3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GEO.TO has daily volatility of 5.52.Check GEO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LAM.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LAM.TO has daily volatility of 1.94.Check LAM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs IBAT.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while IBAT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IBAT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check IBAT.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs LGO.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LGO.TO trades at CA$2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LGO.TO has daily volatility of 13.40.Check LGO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs CDPR.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while CDPR.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CDPR.CN has daily volatility of 1.98.Check CDPR.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs NB.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NB.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of -9.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NB.TO has daily volatility of 23.60.Check NB.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FSY.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -53.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FSY.TO has daily volatility of 3.85.Check FSY.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FURY.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FURY.TO trades at CA$0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FURY.TO has daily volatility of 2.99.Check FURY.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TSK.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TSK.TO trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -12.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TSK.TO has daily volatility of 5.56.Check TSK.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SLR.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 97.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SLR.TO trades at CA$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SLR.TO has daily volatility of 12.44.Check SLR.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs AMC.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AMC.TO trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AMC.TO has daily volatility of 2.15.Check AMC.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NCF.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NCF.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NCF.TO has daily volatility of 14.29.Check NCF.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs GENM.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GENM.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GENM.TO has daily volatility of 5.88.Check GENM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs AOT.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AOT.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AOT.TO has daily volatility of 9.52.Check AOT.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs GMX.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 74M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GMX.TO trades at CA$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 132.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GMX.TO has daily volatility of 3.83.Check GMX.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NEXT.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NEXT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NEXT.TO has daily volatility of 13.66.Check NEXT.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs WM.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while WM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WM.TO has daily volatility of 7.41.Check WM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs PM.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PM.CN trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PM.CN has daily volatility of 13.95.Check PM.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs S.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while S.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and S.TO has daily volatility of 3.64.Check S.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NVLH.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NVLH.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NVLH.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check NVLH.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs RUA.V Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while RUA.V trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RUA.V has daily volatility of 5.26.Check RUA.V's competition here
LVL.CN vs OGD.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while OGD.TO trades at CA$1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and OGD.TO has daily volatility of 3.12.Check OGD.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs RTG.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while RTG.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RTG.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check RTG.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TOC.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TOC.CN trades at CA$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -29.33. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TOC.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check TOC.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs ARS.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ARS.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ARS.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check ARS.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs MIN.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MIN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MIN.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check MIN.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FT.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FT.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FT.TO has daily volatility of 6.45.Check FT.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FOX.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FOX.CN trades at CA$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FOX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check FOX.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs RUA.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while RUA.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RUA.CN has daily volatility of 5.71.Check RUA.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs VALU.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while VALU.CN trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VALU.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check VALU.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs LFLR.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LFLR.CN has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LFLR.CN trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LFLR.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LFLR.CN's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LFLR.CN has daily volatility of 10.17.Check LFLR.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs BKI.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while BKI.TO trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BKI.TO has daily volatility of 8.33.Check BKI.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs AVL.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AVL.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AVL.TO has daily volatility of 11.76.Check AVL.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs VOY.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while VOY.CN trades at CA$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VOY.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check VOY.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs EGFV.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while EGFV.CN trades at CA$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EGFV.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check EGFV.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs AMPS.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AMPS.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check AMPS.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs AAN.V Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AAN.V trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AAN.V has daily volatility of 2.74.Check AAN.V's competition here
LVL.CN vs SX.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SX.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SX.CN has daily volatility of 6.45.Check SX.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs SAM.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SAM.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SAM.TO has daily volatility of 11.20.Check SAM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs MAXX.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MAXX.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MAXX.CN has daily volatility of 6.45.Check MAXX.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs URNM.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while URNM.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and URNM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check URNM.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs EXN.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while EXN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EXN.TO has daily volatility of 10.91.Check EXN.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs WRX.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while WRX.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WRX.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check WRX.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SLV.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SLV.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SLV.CN has daily volatility of 8.00.Check SLV.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs SUPR.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SUPR.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SUPR.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check SUPR.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs PNRG.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PNRG.CN has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PNRG.CN trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PNRG.CN's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PNRG.CN's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PNRG.CN has daily volatility of 7.41.Check PNRG.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs SVB.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SVB.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SVB.TO has daily volatility of 4.80.Check SVB.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs COSA.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while COSA.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and COSA.CN has daily volatility of 3.28.Check COSA.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs ASND.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ASND.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ASND.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check ASND.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TTX.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TTX.CN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TTX.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TTX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TTX.CN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TTX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check TTX.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs SCY.TO Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SCY.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SCY.TO has daily volatility of 15.38.Check SCY.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs PEK.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PEK.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PEK.CN has daily volatility of 18.75.Check PEK.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs EMET.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, EMET.CN has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while EMET.CN trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EMET.CN's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EMET.CN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EMET.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check EMET.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs PSE.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PSE.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PSE.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PSE.CN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PSE.CN's ROE of +4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PSE.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check PSE.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs NXU.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NXU.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NXU.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check NXU.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs LIM.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LIM.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check LIM.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs STGX.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, STGX.CN has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while STGX.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas STGX.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STGX.CN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and STGX.CN has daily volatility of 19.18.Check STGX.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs GAMA.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GAMA.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GAMA.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GAMA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GAMA.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GAMA.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check GAMA.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs TN.CN Comparison August 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TN.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TN.CN has daily volatility of 13.33.Check TN.CN's competition here