Level 14 Ventures Ltd.
Level 14 Ventures Ltd. (LVL.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LVL.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVL.CN | CA$0.60 | +200.00% | 18.4M | -12.00 | -CA$0.05 | N/A |
| TECK-A.TO | CA$47.74 | +2.60% | 23.1B | 106.09 | CA$0.45 | +1.07% |
| TECK-B.TO | CA$46.35 | +2.48% | 22.4B | 103.00 | CA$0.45 | +2.16% |
| IVN.TO | CA$11.31 | -0.62% | 15.3B | 25.70 | CA$0.44 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | CA$8.86 | -0.56% | 5.7B | 9.53 | CA$0.93 | N/A |
| FIL.TO | CA$32.25 | -1.01% | 4.4B | -31.01 | -CA$1.04 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | CA$19.46 | -1.96% | 4B | -49.90 | -CA$0.39 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | CA$20.26 | -4.25% | 2.3B | -12.74 | -CA$1.59 | N/A |
| VZLA.TO | CA$4.33 | -4.42% | 1.5B | -144.33 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| FOM.TO | CA$2.61 | -1.51% | 1.4B | -52.20 | -CA$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LVL.CN vs TECK-A.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TECK-A.TO trades at CA$47.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 106.09. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TECK-A.TO has daily volatility of 3.06.Check TECK-A.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TECK-B.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TECK-B.TO trades at CA$46.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 103.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TECK-B.TO has daily volatility of 4.23.Check TECK-B.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs IVN.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while IVN.TO trades at CA$11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IVN.TO has daily volatility of 4.30.Check IVN.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs AKE.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AKE.TO trades at CA$8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AKE.TO has daily volatility of 4.07.Check AKE.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FIL.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FIL.TO trades at CA$32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FIL.TO has daily volatility of 0.65.Check FIL.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NGEX.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NGEX.TO trades at CA$19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -49.90. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NGEX.TO has daily volatility of 2.26.Check NGEX.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SKE.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SKE.TO trades at CA$20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -12.74. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SKE.TO has daily volatility of 5.93.Check SKE.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs VZLA.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while VZLA.TO trades at CA$4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -144.33. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VZLA.TO has daily volatility of 5.23.Check VZLA.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FOM.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FOM.TO trades at CA$2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -52.20. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FOM.TO has daily volatility of 2.68.Check FOM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ALS.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ALS.TO trades at CA$29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ALS.TO has daily volatility of 1.65.Check ALS.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs AII.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AII.TO trades at CA$4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -19.68. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AII.TO has daily volatility of 9.38.Check AII.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LAC.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 853.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LAC.TO trades at CA$3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LAC.TO has daily volatility of 7.74.Check LAC.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs USA.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 848.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while USA.TO trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and USA.TO has daily volatility of 6.11.Check USA.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs MDI.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 760.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MDI.TO trades at CA$9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MDI.TO has daily volatility of 2.05.Check MDI.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FVL.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 745.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FVL.TO trades at CA$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -141.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FVL.TO has daily volatility of 8.28.Check FVL.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs PMET.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 679.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PMET.TO trades at CA$4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -104.75. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PMET.TO has daily volatility of 5.26.Check PMET.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LAAC.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LAAC.TO trades at CA$3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LAAC.TO has daily volatility of 6.24.Check LAAC.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NDM.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 619.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NDM.TO trades at CA$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NDM.TO has daily volatility of 11.86.Check NDM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SAU.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SAU.TO trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SAU.TO has daily volatility of 16.22.Check SAU.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs POM.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while POM.TO trades at CA$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and POM.TO has daily volatility of 5.80.Check POM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ETG.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 485.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ETG.TO trades at CA$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -33.43. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ETG.TO has daily volatility of 3.38.Check ETG.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LUCA.V Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LUCA.V trades at CA$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LUCA.V has daily volatility of 4.44.Check LUCA.V's competition here
LVL.CN vs TMQ.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 418.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TMQ.TO trades at CA$2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -31.87. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TMQ.TO has daily volatility of 5.05.Check TMQ.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SOLG.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SOLG.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SOLG.TO has daily volatility of 7.69.Check SOLG.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs PRYM.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 366.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PRYM.TO trades at CA$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -18.77. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PRYM.TO has daily volatility of 4.57.Check PRYM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs WRN.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 358M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while WRN.TO trades at CA$1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -59.67. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WRN.TO has daily volatility of 1.66.Check WRN.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LIRC.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 346.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LIRC.TO trades at CA$6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -90.14. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIRC.TO has daily volatility of 2.86.Check LIRC.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ERD.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 343.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ERD.TO trades at CA$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ERD.TO has daily volatility of 2.68.Check ERD.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ECOR.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 339.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ECOR.TO trades at CA$1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -27.30. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ECOR.TO has daily volatility of 10.53.Check ECOR.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ARA.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 323.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ARA.TO trades at CA$1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -29.40. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ARA.TO has daily volatility of 6.62.Check ARA.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs MNO.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MNO.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MNO.TO has daily volatility of 3.73.Check MNO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LIFT.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LIFT.CN trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIFT.CN has daily volatility of 2.69.Check LIFT.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs TLO.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TLO.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TLO.TO has daily volatility of 17.32.Check TLO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TLG.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 249.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TLG.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TLG.TO has daily volatility of 12.70.Check TLG.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs GLO.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 247.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GLO.TO trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GLO.TO has daily volatility of 8.33.Check GLO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SMT.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SMT.TO trades at CA$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SMT.TO has daily volatility of 0.87.Check SMT.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs GEO.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GEO.TO trades at CA$3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GEO.TO has daily volatility of 4.13.Check GEO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs MOLY.NE Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 185.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MOLY.NE trades at CA$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -51.67. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MOLY.NE has daily volatility of 4.42.Check MOLY.NE's competition here
LVL.CN vs TI.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TI.TO trades at CA$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of -10.64%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TI.TO has daily volatility of 5.13.Check TI.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs VROY.V Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while VROY.V trades at CA$2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -54.40. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VROY.V has daily volatility of 3.70.Check VROY.V's competition here
LVL.CN vs FAR.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FAR.TO trades at CA$1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FAR.TO has daily volatility of 2.90.Check FAR.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs LAM.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LAM.TO has daily volatility of 8.70.Check LAM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs IBAT.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while IBAT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and IBAT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check IBAT.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs LGO.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LGO.TO trades at CA$2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LGO.TO has daily volatility of 12.17.Check LGO.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs CDPR.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while CDPR.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CDPR.CN has daily volatility of 1.98.Check CDPR.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs NB.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NB.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NB.TO has daily volatility of 23.60.Check NB.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FURY.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FURY.TO trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FURY.TO has daily volatility of 6.71.Check FURY.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FSY.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 113.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FSY.TO has daily volatility of 5.41.Check FSY.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs AMC.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AMC.TO trades at CA$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -4.15. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AMC.TO has daily volatility of 3.64.Check AMC.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NEXT.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NEXT.TO trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NEXT.TO has daily volatility of 18.87.Check NEXT.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs GENM.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 97.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GENM.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GENM.TO has daily volatility of 4.08.Check GENM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs AOT.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AOT.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AOT.TO has daily volatility of 7.41.Check AOT.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SLR.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SLR.TO trades at CA$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -10.20. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SLR.TO has daily volatility of 2.96.Check SLR.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TSK.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TSK.TO trades at CA$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -12.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TSK.TO has daily volatility of 9.17.Check TSK.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs GMX.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GMX.TO trades at CA$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 47.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GMX.TO has daily volatility of 2.86.Check GMX.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs WM.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while WM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WM.TO has daily volatility of 14.29.Check WM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs S.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while S.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and S.TO has daily volatility of 6.90.Check S.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NVLH.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NVLH.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NVLH.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check NVLH.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs OGD.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while OGD.TO trades at CA$1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and OGD.TO has daily volatility of 3.06.Check OGD.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs RTG.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while RTG.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RTG.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check RTG.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs NCF.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NCF.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NCF.TO has daily volatility of 5.71.Check NCF.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs RUA.V Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while RUA.V trades at CA$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RUA.V has daily volatility of 3.17.Check RUA.V's competition here
LVL.CN vs ARS.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ARS.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -13.25. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ARS.CN has daily volatility of 3.77.Check ARS.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs MIN.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MIN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MIN.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check MIN.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs FT.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FT.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FT.TO has daily volatility of 17.14.Check FT.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TOC.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TOC.CN trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -23.67. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TOC.CN has daily volatility of 4.32.Check TOC.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs RUA.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while RUA.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and RUA.CN has daily volatility of 5.71.Check RUA.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs VALU.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while VALU.CN trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VALU.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check VALU.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs FOX.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FOX.CN trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FOX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check FOX.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs LFLR.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LFLR.CN has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LFLR.CN trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LFLR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LFLR.CN's ROE of -4.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LFLR.CN has daily volatility of 7.69.Check LFLR.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs VOY.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while VOY.CN trades at CA$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VOY.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check VOY.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs AVL.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AVL.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AVL.TO has daily volatility of 10.53.Check AVL.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs EGFV.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while EGFV.CN trades at CA$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EGFV.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check EGFV.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs PM.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PM.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PM.CN has daily volatility of 8.00.Check PM.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs AMPS.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AMPS.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check AMPS.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs AAN.V Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 26.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while AAN.V trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.56. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and AAN.V has daily volatility of 0.00.Check AAN.V's competition here
LVL.CN vs BKI.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while BKI.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BKI.TO has daily volatility of 11.11.Check BKI.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SAM.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SAM.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -5.58. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SAM.TO has daily volatility of 12.31.Check SAM.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs URNM.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while URNM.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and URNM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check URNM.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs NICO.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NICO.CN has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NICO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NICO.CN's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NICO.CN's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NICO.CN has daily volatility of 4.65.Check NICO.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs EXN.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while EXN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EXN.TO has daily volatility of 10.91.Check EXN.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SX.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SX.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check SX.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs MAXX.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while MAXX.CN trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MAXX.CN has daily volatility of 7.55.Check MAXX.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs WRX.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while WRX.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and WRX.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check WRX.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs SLV.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SLV.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SLV.CN has daily volatility of 8.40.Check SLV.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs SUPR.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SUPR.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SUPR.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check SUPR.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs TICO.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TICO.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TICO.CN trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TICO.CN's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TICO.CN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TICO.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check TICO.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs COSA.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while COSA.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and COSA.CN has daily volatility of 3.28.Check COSA.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs SVB.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SVB.TO trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SVB.TO has daily volatility of 3.39.Check SVB.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs ASND.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while ASND.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ASND.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check ASND.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TTX.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TTX.CN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TTX.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TTX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TTX.CN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TTX.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check TTX.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs SCY.TO Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while SCY.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SCY.TO has daily volatility of 15.38.Check SCY.TO's competition here
LVL.CN vs TN.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TN.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TN.CN has daily volatility of 5.71.Check TN.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs PEK.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while PEK.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PEK.CN has daily volatility of 18.75.Check PEK.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs TMAS.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, TMAS.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while TMAS.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TMAS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TMAS.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and TMAS.CN has daily volatility of 8.33.Check TMAS.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs NXU.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while NXU.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NXU.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check NXU.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs LIM.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while LIM.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LIM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check LIM.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs FNI.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, FNI.CN has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while FNI.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FNI.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FNI.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FNI.CN has daily volatility of 10.53.Check FNI.CN's competition here
LVL.CN vs GAMA.CN Comparison July 2025
LVL.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVL.CN stands at 18.4M. In comparison, GAMA.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVL.CN is priced at CA$0.60, while GAMA.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVL.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GAMA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LVL.CN's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GAMA.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GAMA.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check GAMA.CN's competition here