Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation
Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation (LUCK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUCK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUCK | $7.85 | +0.00% | 1.1B | -11.85 | -$0.66 | +2.94% |
| CCL | $23.99 | +0.27% | 33.2B | 11.87 | $2.02 | +0.63% |
| CUK | $23.86 | -0.19% | 31.3B | 11.82 | $2.02 | +0.63% |
| AS | $32.34 | -0.03% | 18.7B | 42.55 | $0.76 | N/A |
| HAS | $93.40 | -1.80% | 13.1B | -40.96 | -$2.28 | +2.98% |
| PLNT | $73.62 | -1.52% | 6.1B | 28.11 | $2.62 | N/A |
| LTH | $26.30 | +2.18% | 5.8B | 15.85 | $1.66 | N/A |
| GOLF | $93.02 | +0.14% | 5.5B | 29.91 | $3.11 | +1.03% |
| MAT | $16.06 | -0.99% | 5B | 12.85 | $1.25 | N/A |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LUCK vs CCL Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while CCL trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check CCL's competition here
LUCK vs CUK Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while CUK trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check CUK's competition here
LUCK vs AS Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while AS trades at $32.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 42.55. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check AS's competition here
LUCK vs HAS Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while HAS trades at $93.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is -40.96. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to HAS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check HAS's competition here
LUCK vs PLNT Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while PLNT trades at $73.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check PLNT's competition here
LUCK vs LTH Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while LTH trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check LTH's competition here
LUCK vs GOLF Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while GOLF trades at $93.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check GOLF's competition here
LUCK vs MAT Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while MAT trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check MAT's competition here
LUCK vs ELY Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to ELY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check ELY's competition here
LUCK vs SEAS Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check SEAS's competition here
LUCK vs YETI Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while YETI trades at $36.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check YETI's competition here
LUCK vs MODG Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while MODG trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to MODG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check MODG's competition here
LUCK vs SIX Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check SIX's competition here
LUCK vs VSTO Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check VSTO's competition here
LUCK vs CALY Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CALY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while CALY trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas CALY's P/E ratio is 63.79. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to CALY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to CALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check CALY's competition here
LUCK vs OSW Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while OSW trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check OSW's competition here
LUCK vs PRKS Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while PRKS trades at $30.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check PRKS's competition here
LUCK vs FUN Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while FUN trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to FUN's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check FUN's competition here
LUCK vs PTON Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while PTON trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -30.92. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check PTON's competition here
LUCK vs GEAR Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check GEAR's competition here
LUCK vs JOUT Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 460.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while JOUT trades at $44.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -20.11. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check JOUT's competition here
LUCK vs HERE Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HERE has a market cap of 424.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while HERE trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas HERE's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to HERE's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to HERE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check HERE's competition here
LUCK vs CNXA Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to CNXA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check CNXA's competition here
LUCK vs ESCA Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 237.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while ESCA trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check ESCA's competition here
LUCK vs FNKO Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 226.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while FNKO trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check FNKO's competition here
LUCK vs JAKK Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 225.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while JAKK trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check JAKK's competition here
LUCK vs XPOF Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 200.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while XPOF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check XPOF's competition here
LUCK vs SRM Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while SRM trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to SRM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check SRM's competition here
LUCK vs PLBY Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while PLBY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +3.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check PLBY's competition here
LUCK vs CLAR Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while CLAR trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check CLAR's competition here
LUCK vs AOUT Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while AOUT trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -18.17. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check AOUT's competition here
LUCK vs AGH Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while AGH trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -22.95. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check AGH's competition here
LUCK vs NOMA Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NOMA has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while NOMA trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas NOMA's P/E ratio is -38.33. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to NOMA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to NOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check NOMA's competition here
LUCK vs ISPO Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while ISPO trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check ISPO's competition here
LUCK vs TRON Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRON has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while TRON trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas TRON's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to TRON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to TRON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check TRON's competition here
LUCK vs BTN Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check BTN's competition here
LUCK vs KMRK Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMRK has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while KMRK trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas KMRK's P/E ratio is 73.33. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to KMRK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to KMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check KMRK's competition here
LUCK vs NLS Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check NLS's competition here
LUCK vs FGH Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check FGH's competition here
LUCK vs DOGZ Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while DOGZ trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check DOGZ's competition here
LUCK vs YYAI Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while YYAI trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is 0.19. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to YYAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check YYAI's competition here
LUCK vs HWH Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while HWH trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to HWH's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check HWH's competition here
LUCK vs FXLV Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while FXLV trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check FXLV's competition here
LUCK vs NWTG Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while NWTG trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check NWTG's competition here
LUCK vs MMA Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while MMA trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to MMA's ROE of -20.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check MMA's competition here
LUCK vs GDHG Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while GDHG trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check GDHG's competition here
LUCK vs SPGC Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -5.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check SPGC's competition here
LUCK vs BBIG Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 109.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while BBIG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check BBIG's competition here
LUCK vs ISPOW Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check ISPOW's competition here
LUCK vs DS Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check DS's competition here
LUCK vs BWL-A Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check BWL-A's competition here
LUCK vs DS-PC Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check DS-PC's competition here
LUCK vs DVD Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check DVD's competition here
LUCK vs DS-PD Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check DS-PD's competition here
LUCK vs ILG Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ILG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while ILG trades at $34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas ILG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to ILG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to ILG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check ILG's competition here
LUCK vs MYCC Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MYCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while MYCC trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas MYCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to MYCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is more volatile compared to MYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check MYCC's competition here
LUCK vs DS-PB Comparison March 2026
LUCK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUCK stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUCK is priced at $7.85, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUCK currently has a P/E ratio of -11.85, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUCK's ROE is +0.61%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LUCK is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUCK.Check DS-PB's competition here