LTIMindtree Limited
LTIMindtree Limited (LTIM.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LTIM.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTIM.BO | ₹4,522.05 | +1.77% | 1.3T | 28.28 | ₹160.26 | +1.48% |
| TCS.BO | ₹2,559.80 | +0.79% | 9.3T | 19.42 | ₹131.82 | +4.26% |
| TCS.NS | ₹2,559.20 | +0.76% | 9.3T | 19.41 | ₹131.82 | +4.26% |
| INFY.BO | ₹1,346.25 | +0.46% | 5.5T | 19.31 | ₹69.73 | +3.34% |
| INFY.NS | ₹1,346.20 | +0.51% | 5.5T | 18.72 | ₹71.93 | +3.34% |
| HCLTECH.NS | ₹1,461.00 | +1.35% | 4T | 24.07 | ₹60.69 | +3.61% |
| HCLTECH.BO | ₹1,457.20 | +1.10% | 3.9T | 24.01 | ₹60.70 | +3.61% |
| WIPRO.NS | ₹203.42 | -0.64% | 2.1T | 16.11 | ₹12.63 | +5.41% |
| WIPRO.BO | ₹203.30 | -0.68% | 2.1T | 16.10 | ₹12.63 | +5.41% |
| LTIM.NS | ₹4,523.00 | +1.81% | 1.3T | 28.28 | ₹160.34 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
LTIM.BO vs TCS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TCS.BO has a market cap of 9.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while TCS.BO trades at ₹2,559.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas TCS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCS.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to TCS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check TCS.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs TCS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TCS.NS has a market cap of 9.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while TCS.NS trades at ₹2,559.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas TCS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCS.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to TCS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check TCS.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs INFY.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, INFY.BO has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while INFY.BO trades at ₹1,346.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas INFY.BO's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INFY.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to INFY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check INFY.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs INFY.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, INFY.NS has a market cap of 5.5T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while INFY.NS trades at ₹1,346.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas INFY.NS's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INFY.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to INFY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check INFY.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs HCLTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HCLTECH.NS has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while HCLTECH.NS trades at ₹1,461.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas HCLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCLTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to HCLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check HCLTECH.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs HCLTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HCLTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while HCLTECH.BO trades at ₹1,457.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas HCLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCLTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to HCLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check HCLTECH.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs WIPRO.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, WIPRO.NS has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while WIPRO.NS trades at ₹203.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas WIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to WIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check WIPRO.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs WIPRO.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, WIPRO.BO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while WIPRO.BO trades at ₹203.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas WIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to WIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check WIPRO.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs LTIM.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LTIM.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while LTIM.NS trades at ₹4,523.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas LTIM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTIM.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to LTIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check LTIM.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs LTM.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LTM.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while LTM.NS trades at ₹4,523.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas LTM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTM.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to LTM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check LTM.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs TECHM.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TECHM.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while TECHM.NS trades at ₹1,451.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas TECHM.NS's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TECHM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to TECHM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check TECHM.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs TECHM.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TECHM.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while TECHM.BO trades at ₹1,450.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas TECHM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TECHM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to TECHM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check TECHM.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs PERSISTENT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PERSISTENT.NS has a market cap of 840.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while PERSISTENT.NS trades at ₹5,373.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas PERSISTENT.NS's P/E ratio is 48.49. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PERSISTENT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to PERSISTENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check PERSISTENT.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs PERSISTENT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PERSISTENT.BO has a market cap of 840.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while PERSISTENT.BO trades at ₹5,373.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas PERSISTENT.BO's P/E ratio is 48.53. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PERSISTENT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to PERSISTENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check PERSISTENT.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs MPHASIS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MPHASIS.NS has a market cap of 448.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while MPHASIS.NS trades at ₹2,350.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas MPHASIS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MPHASIS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check MPHASIS.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs MPHASIS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MPHASIS.BO has a market cap of 447.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while MPHASIS.BO trades at ₹2,348.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas MPHASIS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MPHASIS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check MPHASIS.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs COFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, COFORGE.NS has a market cap of 426.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while COFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,270.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas COFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to COFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check COFORGE.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs COFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, COFORGE.BO has a market cap of 426.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while COFORGE.BO trades at ₹1,270.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas COFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 37.94. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to COFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check COFORGE.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs LTTS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LTTS.BO has a market cap of 358.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while LTTS.BO trades at ₹3,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas LTTS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTTS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to LTTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check LTTS.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs LTTS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LTTS.NS has a market cap of 357.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while LTTS.NS trades at ₹3,376.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas LTTS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTTS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to LTTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check LTTS.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs HEXT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HEXT.NS has a market cap of 282.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while HEXT.NS trades at ₹464.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas HEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEXT.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to HEXT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check HEXT.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs TATATECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TATATECH.BO has a market cap of 228B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while TATATECH.BO trades at ₹561.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas TATATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 42.29. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TATATECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to TATATECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check TATATECH.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs TATATECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TATATECH.NS has a market cap of 227.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while TATATECH.NS trades at ₹561.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas TATATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TATATECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to TATATECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check TATATECH.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs KPITTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, KPITTECH.NS has a market cap of 196.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while KPITTECH.NS trades at ₹721.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas KPITTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 27.45. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KPITTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to KPITTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check KPITTECH.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs KPITTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, KPITTECH.BO has a market cap of 196.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while KPITTECH.BO trades at ₹720.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas KPITTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KPITTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to KPITTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check KPITTECH.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs REDINGTON.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, REDINGTON.BO has a market cap of 170.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while REDINGTON.BO trades at ₹218.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas REDINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REDINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check REDINGTON.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs REDINGTON.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, REDINGTON.NS has a market cap of 170.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while REDINGTON.NS trades at ₹218.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas REDINGTON.NS's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REDINGTON.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check REDINGTON.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs FSL.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FSL.NS has a market cap of 153.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while FSL.NS trades at ₹222.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas FSL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to FSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check FSL.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs FSL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FSL.BO has a market cap of 153.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while FSL.BO trades at ₹222.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas FSL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to FSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check FSL.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ECLERX.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ECLERX.BO has a market cap of 145.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ECLERX.BO trades at ₹1,544.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ECLERX.BO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ECLERX.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to ECLERX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ECLERX.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ECLERX.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ECLERX.NS has a market cap of 143.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ECLERX.NS trades at ₹1,544.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ECLERX.NS's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ECLERX.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to ECLERX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ECLERX.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs HEXAWARE.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HEXAWARE.NS has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while HEXAWARE.NS trades at ₹470.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas HEXAWARE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEXAWARE.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to HEXAWARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check HEXAWARE.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ZENSARTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.BO has a market cap of 125B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ZENSARTECH.BO trades at ₹549.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ZENSARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZENSARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ZENSARTECH.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ZENSARTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.NS has a market cap of 124.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ZENSARTECH.NS trades at ₹549.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ZENSARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZENSARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ZENSARTECH.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs BSOFT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BSOFT.BO has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while BSOFT.BO trades at ₹370.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas BSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to BSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check BSOFT.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs BSOFT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BSOFT.NS has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while BSOFT.NS trades at ₹370.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas BSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to BSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check BSOFT.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs SONATSOFTW.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.NS has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while SONATSOFTW.NS trades at ₹245.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas SONATSOFTW.NS's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SONATSOFTW.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check SONATSOFTW.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs SONATSOFTW.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.BO has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while SONATSOFTW.BO trades at ₹245.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas SONATSOFTW.BO's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SONATSOFTW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check SONATSOFTW.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs RSYSTEMINT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RSYSTEMINT.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while RSYSTEMINT.BO trades at ₹531.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas RSYSTEMINT.BO's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check RSYSTEMINT.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs HAPPSTMNDS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.BO has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while HAPPSTMNDS.BO trades at ₹382.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check HAPPSTMNDS.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs HAPPSTMNDS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.NS has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while HAPPSTMNDS.NS trades at ₹382.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check HAPPSTMNDS.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs MASTEK.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MASTEK.BO has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while MASTEK.BO trades at ₹1,586.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas MASTEK.BO's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MASTEK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to MASTEK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check MASTEK.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs MASTEK.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MASTEK.NS has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while MASTEK.NS trades at ₹1,585.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas MASTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MASTEK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to MASTEK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check MASTEK.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs DATAMATICS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DATAMATICS.NS has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while DATAMATICS.NS trades at ₹705.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas DATAMATICS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DATAMATICS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to DATAMATICS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check DATAMATICS.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs DATAMATICS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DATAMATICS.BO has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while DATAMATICS.BO trades at ₹704.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas DATAMATICS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DATAMATICS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to DATAMATICS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check DATAMATICS.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs CAMS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CAMS.BO has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while CAMS.BO trades at ₹705.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas CAMS.BO's P/E ratio is 37.81. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAMS.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to CAMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check CAMS.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs CAMS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CAMS.NS has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while CAMS.NS trades at ₹704.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas CAMS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.81. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAMS.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to CAMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check CAMS.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs CIGNITITEC.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while CIGNITITEC.NS trades at ₹1,255.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas CIGNITITEC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CIGNITITEC.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check CIGNITITEC.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs CIGNITITEC.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while CIGNITITEC.BO trades at ₹1,252.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas CIGNITITEC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CIGNITITEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check CIGNITITEC.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs RPSGVENT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RPSGVENT.NS has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while RPSGVENT.NS trades at ₹1,026.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas RPSGVENT.NS's P/E ratio is -36.27. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RPSGVENT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to RPSGVENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check RPSGVENT.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs RPSGVENT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RPSGVENT.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while RPSGVENT.BO trades at ₹1,025.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas RPSGVENT.BO's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RPSGVENT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to RPSGVENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check RPSGVENT.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs RSYSTEMS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.BO has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while RSYSTEMS.BO trades at ₹284.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas RSYSTEMS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RSYSTEMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check RSYSTEMS.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs RSYSTEMS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.NS has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while RSYSTEMS.NS trades at ₹282.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas RSYSTEMS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RSYSTEMS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check RSYSTEMS.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ASMTEC.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ASMTEC.BO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ASMTEC.BO trades at ₹2,630.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ASMTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 65.21. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASMTEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to ASMTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ASMTEC.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs PROTEAN.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PROTEAN.BO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while PROTEAN.BO trades at ₹522.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas PROTEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PROTEAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to PROTEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check PROTEAN.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs PROTEAN.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PROTEAN.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while PROTEAN.NS trades at ₹521.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas PROTEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PROTEAN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to PROTEAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check PROTEAN.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs SASKEN.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SASKEN.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while SASKEN.NS trades at ₹1,240.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas SASKEN.NS's P/E ratio is 49.76. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SASKEN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to SASKEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check SASKEN.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs SASKEN.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SASKEN.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while SASKEN.BO trades at ₹1,234.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas SASKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 49.41. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SASKEN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to SASKEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check SASKEN.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs SAKSOFT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SAKSOFT.NS has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while SAKSOFT.NS trades at ₹137.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas SAKSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAKSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to SAKSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check SAKSOFT.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs SAKSOFT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SAKSOFT.BO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while SAKSOFT.BO trades at ₹137.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas SAKSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAKSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to SAKSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check SAKSOFT.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ACCELYA.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ACCELYA.BO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ACCELYA.BO trades at ₹1,140.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ACCELYA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACCELYA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to ACCELYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ACCELYA.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ACCELYA.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ACCELYA.NS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ACCELYA.NS trades at ₹1,139.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ACCELYA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACCELYA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to ACCELYA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ACCELYA.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs MCLOUD.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MCLOUD.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while MCLOUD.BO trades at ₹26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas MCLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCLOUD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check MCLOUD.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs MCLOUD.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MCLOUD.NS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while MCLOUD.NS trades at ₹26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas MCLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCLOUD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check MCLOUD.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs AURUM.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, AURUM.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while AURUM.BO trades at ₹172.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas AURUM.BO's P/E ratio is -50.86. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AURUM.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to AURUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check AURUM.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs AURUM.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, AURUM.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while AURUM.NS trades at ₹172.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas AURUM.NS's P/E ratio is -50.98. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AURUM.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to AURUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check AURUM.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs DSSL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DSSL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while DSSL.BO trades at ₹1,007.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas DSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSSL.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to DSSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check DSSL.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs DSSL.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DSSL.NS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while DSSL.NS trades at ₹1,004.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas DSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSSL.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to DSSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check DSSL.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ORIENTTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ORIENTTECH.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ORIENTTECH.NS trades at ₹271.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ORIENTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 58.42. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ORIENTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ORIENTTECH.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs EXPLEOSOL.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while EXPLEOSOL.NS trades at ₹766.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas EXPLEOSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check EXPLEOSOL.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs EXPLEOSOL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while EXPLEOSOL.BO trades at ₹765.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas EXPLEOSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check EXPLEOSOL.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs MMWL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MMWL.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while MMWL.BO trades at ₹9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas MMWL.BO's P/E ratio is 243.00. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MMWL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to MMWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check MMWL.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs BGDL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BGDL.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while BGDL.BO trades at ₹105.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas BGDL.BO's P/E ratio is 376.07. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BGDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to BGDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check BGDL.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs 3IINFOTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, 3IINFOTECH.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while 3IINFOTECH.BO trades at ₹54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas 3IINFOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check 3IINFOTECH.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs NINSYS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, NINSYS.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while NINSYS.NS trades at ₹424.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas NINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NINSYS.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to NINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check NINSYS.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs NINSYS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, NINSYS.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while NINSYS.BO trades at ₹424.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas NINSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NINSYS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to NINSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check NINSYS.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs VAKRANGEE.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while VAKRANGEE.BO trades at ₹6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas VAKRANGEE.BO's P/E ratio is 58.27. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VAKRANGEE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check VAKRANGEE.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs XCHANGING.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, XCHANGING.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while XCHANGING.NS trades at ₹62.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas XCHANGING.NS's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XCHANGING.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to XCHANGING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check XCHANGING.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs VAKRANGEE.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while VAKRANGEE.NS trades at ₹6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas VAKRANGEE.NS's P/E ratio is 58.18. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VAKRANGEE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check VAKRANGEE.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs XCHANGING.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, XCHANGING.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while XCHANGING.BO trades at ₹62.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas XCHANGING.BO's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XCHANGING.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to XCHANGING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check XCHANGING.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ADSL.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ADSL.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ADSL.NS trades at ₹113.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ADSL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to ADSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ADSL.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ADSL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ADSL.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ADSL.BO trades at ₹113.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ADSL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to ADSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ADSL.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs MINDTECK.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MINDTECK.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while MINDTECK.NS trades at ₹180.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas MINDTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MINDTECK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to MINDTECK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check MINDTECK.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ONWARDTEC.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ONWARDTEC.BO trades at ₹252.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ONWARDTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONWARDTEC.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ONWARDTEC.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs ONWARDTEC.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while ONWARDTEC.NS trades at ₹252.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas ONWARDTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONWARDTEC.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check ONWARDTEC.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs MINDTECK.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MINDTECK.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while MINDTECK.BO trades at ₹179.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas MINDTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MINDTECK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to MINDTECK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check MINDTECK.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs SIGMA.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SIGMA.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while SIGMA.BO trades at ₹42.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas SIGMA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGMA.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to SIGMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check SIGMA.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs SIGMA.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SIGMA.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while SIGMA.NS trades at ₹41.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas SIGMA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGMA.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to SIGMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check SIGMA.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs TERASOFT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TERASOFT.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while TERASOFT.NS trades at ₹338.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas TERASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TERASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to TERASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check TERASOFT.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs TERASOFT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TERASOFT.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while TERASOFT.BO trades at ₹338.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas TERASOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TERASOFT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to TERASOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check TERASOFT.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs CYBERTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CYBERTECH.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while CYBERTECH.NS trades at ₹129.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas CYBERTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYBERTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to CYBERTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check CYBERTECH.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs CYBERTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CYBERTECH.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while CYBERTECH.BO trades at ₹129.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas CYBERTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYBERTECH.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to CYBERTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check CYBERTECH.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs DIGISPICE.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DIGISPICE.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while DIGISPICE.BO trades at ₹16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas DIGISPICE.BO's P/E ratio is 62.74. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DIGISPICE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to DIGISPICE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check DIGISPICE.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs DIGISPICE.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DIGISPICE.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while DIGISPICE.NS trades at ₹16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas DIGISPICE.NS's P/E ratio is 62.33. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DIGISPICE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to DIGISPICE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check DIGISPICE.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs XTGLOBAL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, XTGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while XTGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹29.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas XTGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.17. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to XTGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check XTGLOBAL.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs INSPIRISYS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while INSPIRISYS.BO trades at ₹82.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas INSPIRISYS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INSPIRISYS.BO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check INSPIRISYS.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs SILVERTUC.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SILVERTUC.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while SILVERTUC.BO trades at ₹128.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas SILVERTUC.BO's P/E ratio is 51.44. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SILVERTUC.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is more volatile compared to SILVERTUC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check SILVERTUC.BO's competition here
LTIM.BO vs INSPIRISYS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while INSPIRISYS.NS trades at ₹82.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas INSPIRISYS.NS's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INSPIRISYS.NS's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check INSPIRISYS.NS's competition here
LTIM.BO vs 3IINFOLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
LTIM.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTIM.BO stands at 1.3T. In comparison, 3IINFOLTD.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTIM.BO is priced at ₹4,522.05, while 3IINFOLTD.BO trades at ₹15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTIM.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.28, whereas 3IINFOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, LTIM.BO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3IINFOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LTIM.BO is less volatile compared to 3IINFOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTIM.BO.Check 3IINFOLTD.BO's competition here