Logistic Properties of the Americas
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LPA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LPA
Logistic Properties of the Americas (LPA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LPA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPA | $3.09 | -0.96% | 97.7M | 9.36 | $0.33 | N/A |
| PLD | $133.77 | +0.33% | 124.3B | 37.58 | $3.56 | +3.06% |
| PSA | $280.35 | +1.49% | 49.2B | 31.15 | $9.00 | +4.28% |
| PSA-PK | $18.38 | +0.55% | 46.5B | 1.79 | $10.29 | +4.28% |
| PSA-PH | $21.97 | +0.14% | 45.4B | 2.14 | $10.29 | +4.28% |
| EXR | $133.86 | +1.03% | 28.3B | 29.16 | $4.59 | +4.84% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | +3.29% |
| EGP | $188.41 | +0.56% | 10.1B | 38.69 | $4.87 | +3.21% |
| CUBE | $37.19 | +1.81% | 8.4B | 25.47 | $1.46 | +5.65% |
| REXR-PB | $21.57 | -1.04% | 8.4B | 24.37 | $0.89 | +5.21% |
Stock Comparison
LPA vs PLD Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 124.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PLD trades at $133.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PLD's competition here
LPA vs PSA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PK Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PK trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PK's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PH Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PH trades at $21.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.14. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PH's competition here
LPA vs EXR Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while EXR trades at $133.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check EXR's competition here
LPA vs LSI Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check LSI's competition here
LPA vs EGP Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while EGP trades at $188.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check EGP's competition here
LPA vs CUBE Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while CUBE trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check CUBE's competition here
LPA vs REXR-PB Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while REXR-PB trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check REXR-PB's competition here
LPA vs REXR Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while REXR trades at $33.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 38.51. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check REXR's competition here
LPA vs FR Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while FR trades at $58.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check FR's competition here
LPA vs LINE Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while LINE trades at $32.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -76.58. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check LINE's competition here
LPA vs STAG Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while STAG trades at $36.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check STAG's competition here
LPA vs TRNO Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while TRNO trades at $62.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check TRNO's competition here
LPA vs REXR-PC Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while REXR-PC trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check REXR-PC's competition here
LPA vs RCC Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while RCC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check RCC's competition here
LPA vs GRP-UN Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while GRP-UN trades at $59.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check GRP-UN's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PF Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PF trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PF's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PG Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PG trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PG's competition here
LPA vs COLD Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while COLD trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -28.70. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check COLD's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PI Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PI trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PI's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PJ Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PJ trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.74. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PJ's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PL Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PL trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PL's competition here
LPA vs NSA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while NSA trades at $39.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 56.70. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check NSA's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PM Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PM trades at $15.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PM's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PS Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PS trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PS's competition here
LPA vs LXP Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while LXP trades at $46.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check LXP's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PR Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PR trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PR's competition here
LPA vs LXP-PC Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while LXP-PC trades at $46.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.86. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check LXP-PC's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PQ Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PQ's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PO Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PO trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PO's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PN Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PN trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.44. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PN's competition here
LPA vs NSA-PA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while NSA-PA trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check NSA-PA's competition here
LPA vs NYMTI Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, NYMTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while NYMTI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas NYMTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NYMTI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to NYMTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check NYMTI's competition here
LPA vs PMTU Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PMTU trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PMTU's competition here
LPA vs IIPR Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while IIPR trades at $50.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check IIPR's competition here
LPA vs SCCE Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while SCCE trades at $24.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCCE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check SCCE's competition here
LPA vs SCCD Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while SCCD trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCCD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check SCCD's competition here
LPA vs SCCF Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while SCCF trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check SCCF's competition here
LPA vs PLYM Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PLYM trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PLYM's competition here
LPA vs DHCNI Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 827.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while DHCNI trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check DHCNI's competition here
LPA vs LANDO Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 745M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while LANDO trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -71.49. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check LANDO's competition here
LPA vs NHPAP Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 543.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while NHPAP trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check NHPAP's competition here
LPA vs TPTA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 524.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while TPTA trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check TPTA's competition here
LPA vs LAND Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 428.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while LAND trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -35.66. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check LAND's competition here
LPA vs PSA-PP Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PSA-PP trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PSA-PP's competition here
LPA vs TFSA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while TFSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check TFSA's competition here
LPA vs ILPT Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 361.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while ILPT trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -5.43. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check ILPT's competition here
LPA vs LANDM Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while LANDM trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -208.93. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check LANDM's competition here
LPA vs PLYM-PA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PLYM-PA's competition here
LPA vs MDV Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 153.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while MDV trades at $14.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -47.87. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check MDV's competition here
LPA vs AJXA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check AJXA's competition here
LPA vs SCCB Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCCB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check SCCB's competition here
LPA vs SACC Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check SACC's competition here
LPA vs SELF Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while SELF trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check SELF's competition here
LPA vs IIPR-PA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while IIPR-PA trades at $21.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check IIPR-PA's competition here
LPA vs PW-PA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while PW-PA trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check PW-PA's competition here
LPA vs QTS-PB Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check QTS-PB's competition here
LPA vs CONE Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check CONE's competition here
LPA vs QTS-PA Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check QTS-PA's competition here
LPA vs DRE Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check DRE's competition here
LPA vs MNR-PC Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check MNR-PC's competition here
LPA vs QTS Comparison April 2026
LPA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LPA stands at 97.7M. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LPA is priced at $3.09, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LPA currently has a P/E ratio of 9.36, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LPA's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LPA is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LPA.Check QTS's competition here