LANXESS AG

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while AIQUY trades at $39.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AIQUY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while AIQUF trades at $196.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AIQUF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is -509.09. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check PTCAY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is -52.67. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check PTPIF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while GVDBF trades at $4,476.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check GVDBF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SKFOF trades at $243.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SKFOF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while GVDNY trades at $83.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check GVDNY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SXYAY trades at $23.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SXYAY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while AKZOY trades at $20.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AKZOY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while NVZMY trades at $65.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 56.66. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NVZMY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while NVZMF trades at $64.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 55.97. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NVZMF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while NPCPF trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NPCPF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while EMSHF trades at $764.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and EMSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EMSHF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while NDEKF trades at $20.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and NDEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NDEKF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while CVVTF trades at $69.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -30.55. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CVVTF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while COVTY trades at $34.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -30.53. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check COVTY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SYIEF trades at $91.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SYIEF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SYIEY trades at $22.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SYIEY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while AKZOF trades at $69.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AKZOF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CRTSF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CHYHY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while EVKIF trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check EVKIF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while BNTGF trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check BNTGF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while BNTGY trades at $12.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check BNTGY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while EVKIY trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check EVKIY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SCVUF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while IMDZF trades at $133.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check IMDZF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and ASGLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASGLF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ASGLY trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and ASGLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASGLY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while OCLDY trades at $13.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 109.50. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check OCLDY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while FUPBY trades at $11.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check FUPBY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and FUPEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUPEF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while NDEKY trades at $21.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NDEKY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SCVPY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while OCLDF trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 102.08. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check OCLDF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while COIHF trades at $40.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check COIHF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ARKAF trades at $70.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and ARKAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARKAF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ARKAY trades at $67.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ARKAY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while COIHY trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check COIHY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check KDSKF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while MITUF trades at $23.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check MITUF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check FUPPF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while MITUY trades at $11.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check MITUY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while JMPLY trades at $46.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check JMPLY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while AZLGF trades at $16.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and AZLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZLGF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while JMPLF trades at $23.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check JMPLF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while WKCMF trades at $73.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and WKCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WKCMF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CLZNF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while AWTRF trades at $15.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and AWTRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AWTRF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while CLZNY trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and CLZNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLZNY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and NOFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOFCF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while MBGCF trades at $17.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check MBGCF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while HXPLF trades at $9.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HXPLF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HXXPY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SASOF trades at $4.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SASOF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ICPVF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while INCZY trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check INCZY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while KSANF trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check KSANF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while KPTCY trades at $6.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check KPTCY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TKKYY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while LNXSY trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and LNXSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNXSY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while DACHF trades at $8.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and DACHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DACHF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and IRLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRLCF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ZEOOY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while OCINF trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to OCINF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check OCINF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ZEOOF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and BRRDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRRDF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check KPLIF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while TKYMY trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and TKYMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKYMY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while KANKF trades at $24.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and KANKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KANKF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ALZCF trades at $152.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ALZCF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ELKEF trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ELKEF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TKCBF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ELMTY trades at $8.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -30.74. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ELMTY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while EMNSF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check EMNSF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TKCBY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while CSNVF trades at $21.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CSNVF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while HUABF trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HUABF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HUABF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while CSNVY trades at $20.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and CSNVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CSNVY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CUYRF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while ALPKF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ALPKF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and TKYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKYMF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check LNTEF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HUIHY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 858.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while VBVBF trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -22.85. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check VBVBF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while AECLY trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and AECLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AECLY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SKKAF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while HASGF trades at $19.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HASGF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 801.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while FPLSF trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and FPLSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPLSF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while VTXPF trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check VTXPF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while DALQF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check DALQF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and SYCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYCHF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 625.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while DLNDY trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and DLNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLNDY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TYOBY's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 478.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while NOPMF trades at $11.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -30.89. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NOPMF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while FLRAF trades at $1.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and FLRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLRAF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 402.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TNMAF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and NCRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NCRBF's competition here

LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $27.75, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -15.16, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF and SYYYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SYYYF's competition here