LANXESS AG
LANXESS AG (LNXSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LNXSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNXSF | $15.43 | -16.14% | 1.3B | -4.73 | -$3.26 | +1.44% |
| AIQUF | $196.51 | +4.51% | 113.6B | 27.72 | $7.09 | +1.88% |
| AIQUY | $38.94 | -0.92% | 112.7B | 27.48 | $1.42 | +1.86% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 45.6B | 26.33 | $0.02 | +0.11% |
| PTCAY | $44.55 | -20.45% | 35.1B | 25.31 | $1.76 | +0.11% |
| GVDNY | $70.69 | -0.10% | 32.6B | 23.94 | $2.95 | +2.20% |
| GVDBF | $3,418.00 | -12.13% | 31.5B | 22.76 | $150.18 | +2.32% |
| AKZOY | $19.50 | -2.21% | 29.9B | 13.57 | $1.43 | +3.63% |
| SKFOF | $169.75 | -3.00% | 27.2B | 20.50 | $8.28 | +2.40% |
| SXYAY | $16.80 | -3.39% | 27B | 20.01 | $0.84 | +2.46% |
Stock Comparison
LNXSF vs AIQUF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while AIQUF trades at $196.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AIQUF's competition here
LNXSF vs AIQUY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 112.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while AIQUY trades at $38.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AIQUY's competition here
LNXSF vs PTPIF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check PTPIF's competition here
LNXSF vs PTCAY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while PTCAY trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check PTCAY's competition here
LNXSF vs GVDNY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while GVDNY trades at $70.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check GVDNY's competition here
LNXSF vs GVDBF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while GVDBF trades at $3,418.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check GVDBF's competition here
LNXSF vs AKZOY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while AKZOY trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AKZOY's competition here
LNXSF vs SKFOF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while SKFOF trades at $169.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SKFOF's competition here
LNXSF vs SXYAY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while SXYAY trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SXYAY's competition here
LNXSF vs NVZMY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while NVZMY trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NVZMY's competition here
LNXSF vs NVZMF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while NVZMF trades at $52.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NVZMF's competition here
LNXSF vs EMSHF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while EMSHF trades at $794.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check EMSHF's competition here
LNXSF vs NPCPF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while NPCPF trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NPCPF's competition here
LNXSF vs NDEKF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while NDEKF trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NDEKF's competition here
LNXSF vs COVTY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while COVTY trades at $34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -17.35. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check COVTY's competition here
LNXSF vs CVVTF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while CVVTF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -23.32. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CVVTF's competition here
LNXSF vs NDEKY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while NDEKY trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NDEKY's competition here
LNXSF vs SYIEF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while SYIEF trades at $89.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 43.24. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SYIEF's competition here
LNXSF vs SYIEY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while SYIEY trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 40.34. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SYIEY's competition here
LNXSF vs CRTSF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CRTSF's competition here
LNXSF vs CHYHY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CHYHY's competition here
LNXSF vs AKZOF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while AKZOF trades at $58.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AKZOF's competition here
LNXSF vs SCVUF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SCVUF's competition here
LNXSF vs BNTGY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while BNTGY trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check BNTGY's competition here
LNXSF vs ASGLY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ASGLY trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ASGLY's competition here
LNXSF vs EVKIF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while EVKIF trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check EVKIF's competition here
LNXSF vs EVKIY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while EVKIY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check EVKIY's competition here
LNXSF vs BNTGF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while BNTGF trades at $51.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check BNTGF's competition here
LNXSF vs OCLDF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while OCLDF trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 68.04. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check OCLDF's competition here
LNXSF vs OCLDY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while OCLDY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check OCLDY's competition here
LNXSF vs ASGLF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ASGLF trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ASGLF's competition here
LNXSF vs SASOF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while SASOF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is 42.61. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SASOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SASOF's competition here
LNXSF vs SCVPY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SCVPY's competition here
LNXSF vs FUPEF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check FUPEF's competition here
LNXSF vs COIHF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while COIHF trades at $36.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check COIHF's competition here
LNXSF vs FUPBY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while FUPBY trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check FUPBY's competition here
LNXSF vs IMDZF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while IMDZF trades at $85.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check IMDZF's competition here
LNXSF vs COIHY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while COIHY trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 59.33. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check COIHY's competition here
LNXSF vs MBGCF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while MBGCF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is -105.98. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check MBGCF's competition here
LNXSF vs ARKAF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ARKAF trades at $65.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ARKAF's competition here
LNXSF vs FUPPF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while FUPPF trades at $43.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check FUPPF's competition here
LNXSF vs ARKAY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ARKAY trades at $62.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 105.31. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ARKAY's competition here
LNXSF vs MITUY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while MITUY trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 41.43. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check MITUY's competition here
LNXSF vs MITUF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while MITUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 40.00. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check MITUF's competition here
LNXSF vs WKCMF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while WKCMF trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 181.30. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check WKCMF's competition here
LNXSF vs KDSKF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check KDSKF's competition here
LNXSF vs JMPLY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while JMPLY trades at $51.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is -42.93. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check JMPLY's competition here
LNXSF vs JMPLF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while JMPLF trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is -41.98. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check JMPLF's competition here
LNXSF vs ICPVF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ICPVF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is 46.80. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ICPVF's competition here
LNXSF vs NOFCF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while NOFCF trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NOFCF's competition here
LNXSF vs HXXPY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HXXPY's competition here
LNXSF vs CLZNF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while CLZNF trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CLZNF's competition here
LNXSF vs AWTRF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while AWTRF trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 5.66. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AWTRF's competition here
LNXSF vs CLZNY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while CLZNY trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CLZNY's competition here
LNXSF vs KSANF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while KSANF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check KSANF's competition here
LNXSF vs KPTCY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while KPTCY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check KPTCY's competition here
LNXSF vs INCZY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check INCZY's competition here
LNXSF vs VBVBF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while VBVBF trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -19.56. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check VBVBF's competition here
LNXSF vs HXPLF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while HXPLF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HXPLF's competition here
LNXSF vs KPLIF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while KPLIF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check KPLIF's competition here
LNXSF vs TKKYY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while TKKYY trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 34.26. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TKKYY's competition here
LNXSF vs AZLGF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while AZLGF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AZLGF's competition here
LNXSF vs DACHF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while DACHF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check DACHF's competition here
LNXSF vs ELKEF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ELKEF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ELKEF's competition here
LNXSF vs BRRDF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while BRRDF trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check BRRDF's competition here
LNXSF vs ZEOOY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ZEOOY's competition here
LNXSF vs FPLSF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while FPLSF trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check FPLSF's competition here
LNXSF vs KANKF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while KANKF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check KANKF's competition here
LNXSF vs ALZCF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ALZCF trades at $182.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ALZCF's competition here
LNXSF vs IRLCF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while IRLCF trades at $238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check IRLCF's competition here
LNXSF vs ZEOOF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ZEOOF's competition here
LNXSF vs TKYMY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while TKYMY trades at $11.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TKYMY's competition here
LNXSF vs HUABF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while HUABF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -50.09. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HUABF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HUABF's competition here
LNXSF vs HUIHY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while HUIHY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HUIHY's competition here
LNXSF vs ELMTY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ELMTY trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ELMTY's competition here
LNXSF vs CSNVY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while CSNVY trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CSNVY's competition here
LNXSF vs TKCBF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while TKCBF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TKCBF's competition here
LNXSF vs TKCBY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while TKCBY trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TKCBY's competition here
LNXSF vs LNXSY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while LNXSY trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check LNXSY's competition here
LNXSF vs CSNVF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while CSNVF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CSNVF's competition here
LNXSF vs ALPKF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while ALPKF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check ALPKF's competition here
LNXSF vs CUYRF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while CUYRF trades at $72.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check CUYRF's competition here
LNXSF vs EMNSF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while EMNSF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check EMNSF's competition here
LNXSF vs TKYMF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TKYMF's competition here
LNXSF vs LNTEF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check LNTEF's competition here
LNXSF vs OCINF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while OCINF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OCINF's ROE of +2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check OCINF's competition here
LNXSF vs SKKAF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while SKKAF trades at $66.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SKKAF's competition here
LNXSF vs HASGF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 801.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check HASGF's competition here
LNXSF vs NOPMF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 768.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while NOPMF trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -115.42. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NOPMF's competition here
LNXSF vs DALQF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check DALQF's competition here
LNXSF vs VTXPF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 740.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while VTXPF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check VTXPF's competition here
LNXSF vs SYCHF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check SYCHF's competition here
LNXSF vs TYOBY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TYOBY's competition here
LNXSF vs AECLY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 527.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while AECLY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AECLY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check AECLY's competition here
LNXSF vs DLNDY Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 454.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while DLNDY trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check DLNDY's competition here
LNXSF vs FLRAF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 427.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while FLRAF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check FLRAF's competition here
LNXSF vs TNMAF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TNMAF has a market cap of 407.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while TNMAF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas TNMAF's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TNMAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to TNMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TNMAF's competition here
LNXSF vs NCRBF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 349.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while NCRBF trades at $31.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check NCRBF's competition here
LNXSF vs TITMF Comparison March 2026
LNXSF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNXSF stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TITMF has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, LNXSF is priced at $15.43, while TITMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNXSF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.73, whereas TITMF's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, LNXSF's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TITMF's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNXSF is less volatile compared to TITMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNXSF.Check TITMF's competition here