Lindsay Corporation
Lindsay Corporation (LNN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LNN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNN | $137.91 | +0.31% | 1.5B | 19.80 | $6.96 | +1.05% |
| CAT | $433.58 | +0.94% | 204B | 21.17 | $20.49 | +1.32% |
| DE | $511.20 | -0.67% | 140.2B | 25.02 | $20.69 | +1.22% |
| PCAR | $100.53 | -0.89% | 53.3B | 17.43 | $5.83 | +3.92% |
| CNH | $13.03 | -1.40% | 16.6B | 16.63 | $0.80 | +1.88% |
| CNHI | $11.45 | -0.61% | 14.4B | 6.66 | $1.72 | N/A |
| AGCO | $110.43 | -0.07% | 8.4B | -14.40 | -$7.80 | +1.04% |
| OSK | $129.43 | +1.25% | 8.3B | 13.74 | $9.36 | +1.51% |
| TEX | $51.73 | -0.53% | 3.4B | 14.25 | $3.67 | +1.30% |
| ALG | $218.58 | +0.60% | 2.7B | 22.84 | $9.60 | +0.53% |
Stock Comparison
LNN vs CAT Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 204B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while CAT trades at $433.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CAT's competition here
LNN vs DE Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while DE trades at $511.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check DE's competition here
LNN vs PCAR Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while PCAR trades at $100.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check PCAR's competition here
LNN vs CNH Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while CNH trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CNH's competition here
LNN vs CNHI Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while CNHI trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CNHI's competition here
LNN vs AGCO Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while AGCO trades at $110.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check AGCO's competition here
LNN vs OSK Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while OSK trades at $129.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check OSK's competition here
LNN vs TEX Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while TEX trades at $51.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check TEX's competition here
LNN vs ALG Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while ALG trades at $218.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check ALG's competition here
LNN vs REVG Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while REVG trades at $49.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check REVG's competition here
LNN vs ASTE Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 915.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while ASTE trades at $40.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 60.64. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check ASTE's competition here
LNN vs HY Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 776.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while HY trades at $43.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas HY's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check HY's competition here
LNN vs TWI Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 610M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while TWI trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -41.63. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check TWI's competition here
LNN vs MTW Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 468.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while MTW trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check MTW's competition here
LNN vs CMCO Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 463.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while CMCO trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is -89.83. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CMCO's competition here
LNN vs SHYF Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while SHYF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 627.00. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check SHYF's competition here
LNN vs WNC Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 417.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while WNC trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -6.97. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check WNC's competition here
LNN vs GENC Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while GENC trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check GENC's competition here
LNN vs MNTX Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while MNTX trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check MNTX's competition here
LNN vs LEV Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while LEV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check LEV's competition here
LNN vs XOS Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while XOS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XOS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check XOS's competition here
LNN vs XOSWW Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while XOSWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check XOSWW's competition here
LNN vs HYFM Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while HYFM trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check HYFM's competition here
LNN vs ARTW Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while ARTW trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check ARTW's competition here
LNN vs NKLA Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while NKLA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check NKLA's competition here
LNN vs ZEV Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while ZEV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check ZEV's competition here
LNN vs CEAD Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while CEAD trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEAD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CEAD's competition here
LNN vs UGRO Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while UGRO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UGRO's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check UGRO's competition here
LNN vs IDEX Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while IDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check IDEX's competition here
LNN vs CEADW Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while CEADW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEADW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CEADW's competition here
LNN vs NAV Comparison July 2025
LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $137.91, while NAV trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.80, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check NAV's competition here