Lindsay Corporation

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 324.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while CAT trades at $693.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 36.89. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CAT's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while DE trades at $577.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check DE's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while PCAR trades at $115.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check PCAR's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while CNHI trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CNHI's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while CNH trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CNH's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while OSK trades at $147.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check OSK's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while AGCO trades at $118.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check AGCO's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while TEX trades at $59.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check TEX's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while REVG trades at $63.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check REVG's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while ALG trades at $170.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 19.90. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check ALG's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while ASTE trades at $52.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check ASTE's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 553.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while HY trades at $31.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check HY's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 468M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while TWI trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check TWI's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while SHYF trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 627.00. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHYF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check SHYF's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 432.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while MTW trades at $12.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 60.95. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check MTW's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 421M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while CMCO trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 69.76. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CMCO's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 331.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while WNC trades at $8.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WNC's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check WNC's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 216.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while GENC trades at $14.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check GENC's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while MNTX trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check MNTX's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while LEV trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check LEV's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RYM has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while RYM trades at $17.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas RYM's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RYM's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to RYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check RYM's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while XOS trades at $2.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XOS's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check XOS's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while NKLA trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check NKLA's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while ARTW trades at $2.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check ARTW's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while XOSWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check XOSWW's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while ZEV trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check ZEV's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while CEAD trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEAD's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CEAD's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ZDAI has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while ZDAI trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas ZDAI's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZDAI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to ZDAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check ZDAI's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while HYFM trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check HYFM's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while UGRO trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UGRO's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check UGRO's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while IDEX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check IDEX's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while CEADW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CEADW's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check CEADW's competition here

LNN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNN stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNN is priced at $125.38, while NAV trades at $44.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.56, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, LNN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNN is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNN.Check NAV's competition here