Linkers Industries Limited

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while CRS trades at $275.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to CRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CRS's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while ATI trades at $94.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ATI's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while MLI trades at $87.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check MLI's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while ESAB trades at $130.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ESAB's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while AZZ trades at $112.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check AZZ's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, WOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while WOR trades at $61.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas WOR's P/E ratio is 32.15. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to WOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check WOR's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while ARNC trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ARNC's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while CMPO trades at $13.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMPO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CMPO's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while CMPOW trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check CMPOW's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 950.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while PRLB trades at $40.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 66.67. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check PRLB's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while HAYN trades at $60.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check HAYN's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 703.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while IIIN trades at $36.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check IIIN's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 699.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while RYI trades at $21.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -98.77. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check RYI's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while NWPX trades at $43.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check NWPX's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 354.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while MEC trades at $17.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MEC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check MEC's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while TG trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas TG's P/E ratio is -295.43. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check TG's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 112.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while GIFI trades at $6.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check GIFI's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while MTEN trades at $13.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check MTEN's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while AP trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas AP's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check AP's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while TPCS trades at $4.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check TPCS's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while TRSG trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is -58.33. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRSG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check TRSG's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while HIHO trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is 82.00. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HIHO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is more volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check HIHO's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while SGBX trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGBX's ROE of +7.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check SGBX's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check AP-WT's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while ALPP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNKS is less volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNKS.Check ALPP's competition here

LNKS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LNKS stands at 8.2M. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNKS is priced at $0.62, while CDSI trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LNKS currently has a P/E ratio of -15.19, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNKS's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LNKS has daily volatility of 6.29 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.Check CDSI's competition here