Lockheed Martin Corporation
Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMT | $446.92 | -0.06% | 104.2B | 25.01 | $17.84 | +2.93% |
| GE | $269.64 | +0.35% | 282.7B | 38.03 | $7.01 | +0.48% |
| RTX | $157.06 | +0.47% | 209.1B | 34.26 | $4.56 | +1.68% |
| BA | $228.68 | +1.88% | 173.9B | -13.91 | -$16.54 | N/A |
| GD | $320.41 | +1.22% | 86B | 21.48 | $14.88 | +1.83% |
| NOC | $593.80 | -0.57% | 84.8B | 21.87 | $27.08 | +1.44% |
| TDG | $1,417.30 | +1.73% | 79.3B | 46.70 | $30.15 | +5.33% |
| AXON | $771.81 | +1.09% | 60.2B | 189.20 | $4.05 | N/A |
| LHX | $277.33 | +0.44% | 51.6B | 30.81 | $8.95 | +1.71% |
| HEI-A | $243.72 | +1.71% | 37.6B | 56.91 | $4.28 | +0.07% |
Stock Comparison
LMT vs GE Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 282.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while GE trades at $269.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check GE's competition here
LMT vs RTX Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 209.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while RTX trades at $157.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 34.26. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RTX's competition here
LMT vs BA Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 173.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while BA trades at $228.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas BA's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BA's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BA's competition here
LMT vs GD Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 86B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while GD trades at $320.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check GD's competition here
LMT vs NOC Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, NOC has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while NOC trades at $593.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas NOC's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NOC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to NOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check NOC's competition here
LMT vs TDG Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while TDG trades at $1,417.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 46.70. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TDG's competition here
LMT vs AXON Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while AXON trades at $771.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 189.20. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AXON's competition here
LMT vs LHX Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while LHX trades at $277.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LHX's competition here
LMT vs HEI-A Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while HEI-A trades at $243.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HEI-A's competition here
LMT vs HEI Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while HEI trades at $310.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 72.38. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HEI's competition here
LMT vs RKLB Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while RKLB trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -96.48. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RKLB's competition here
LMT vs ESLT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while ESLT trades at $459.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 51.12. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ESLT's competition here
LMT vs CW Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, CW has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while CW trades at $484.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CW's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CW's competition here
LMT vs BWXT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while BWXT trades at $163.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 50.82. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BWXT's competition here
LMT vs WWD Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while WWD trades at $249.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check WWD's competition here
LMT vs TXT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while TXT trades at $81.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TXT's competition here
LMT vs AVAV Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while AVAV trades at $242.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is 154.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AVAV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AVAV's competition here
LMT vs KTOS Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while KTOS trades at $67.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 667.10. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KTOS's competition here
LMT vs DRS Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while DRS trades at $41.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check DRS's competition here
LMT vs HII Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while HII trades at $271.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HII's competition here
LMT vs ERJ Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while ERJ trades at $57.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ERJ's competition here
LMT vs SARO Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while SARO trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 68.02. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SARO's competition here
LMT vs CAE Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while CAE trades at $27.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CAE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CAE's competition here
LMT vs KRMN Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while KRMN trades at $53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 871.08. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KRMN's competition here
LMT vs LOAR Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while LOAR trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 157.75. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LOAR's competition here
LMT vs FLY Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, FLY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while FLY trades at $45.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas FLY's P/E ratio is -23.53. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to FLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check FLY's competition here
LMT vs MOG-A Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while MOG-A trades at $197.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MOG-A's competition here
LMT vs ACHR Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while ACHR trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ACHR's competition here
LMT vs ACHR-WT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while ACHR-WT trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ACHR-WT's competition here
LMT vs MOG-B Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while MOG-B trades at $195.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MOG-B's competition here
LMT vs HXL Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while HXL trades at $63.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 58.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HXL's competition here
LMT vs SPR Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while SPR trades at $40.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SPR's competition here
LMT vs AJRD Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while AJRD trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AJRD's competition here
LMT vs MRCY Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while MRCY trades at $66.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is -102.82. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MRCY's competition here
LMT vs VSEC Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while VSEC trades at $168.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 49.70. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VSEC's competition here
LMT vs POWWP Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while POWWP trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is 82.29. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check POWWP's competition here
LMT vs AIR Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while AIR trades at $75.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is 216.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AIR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AIR's competition here
LMT vs PL Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while PL trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -18.87. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PL's competition here
LMT vs TGI Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while TGI trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 56.54. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TGI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TGI's competition here
LMT vs VVX Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while VVX trades at $59.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VVX's competition here
LMT vs PL-WT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while PL-WT trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PL-WT's competition here
LMT vs LUNR Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while LUNR trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LUNR's competition here
LMT vs DCO Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while DCO trades at $93.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check DCO's competition here
LMT vs RDW Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while RDW trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RDW's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RDW's competition here
LMT vs KAMN Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while KAMN trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KAMN's competition here
LMT vs ATRO Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while ATRO trades at $36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is -330.36. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ATRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ATRO's competition here
LMT vs CDRE Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while CDRE trades at $30.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CDRE's competition here
LMT vs EVEX Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while EVEX trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EVEX's competition here
LMT vs EVEX-WT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while EVEX-WT trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EVEX-WT's competition here
LMT vs VEC Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while VEC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VEC's competition here
LMT vs SKYH Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 817.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while SKYH trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SKYH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SKYH's competition here
LMT vs NPK Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 787.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while NPK trades at $109.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check NPK's competition here
LMT vs EH Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 641.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while EH trades at $18.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -37.78. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EH's competition here
LMT vs RGR Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 565M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while RGR trades at $34.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 105.94. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RGR's competition here
LMT vs EVTL Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 501.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while EVTL trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EVTL's competition here
LMT vs TATT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, TATT has a market cap of 476.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while TATT trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas TATT's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TATT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TATT's competition here
LMT vs BYRN Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, BYRN has a market cap of 458.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while BYRN trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas BYRN's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BYRN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BYRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BYRN's competition here
LMT vs PKE Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 379M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while PKE trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 56.15. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PKE's competition here
LMT vs SWBI Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 363M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while SWBI trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SWBI's competition here
LMT vs AZ Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, AZ has a market cap of 333.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while AZ trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas AZ's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AZ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AZ's competition here
LMT vs ISSC Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 250.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while ISSC trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ISSC's competition here
LMT vs SPCE Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 180.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while SPCE trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SPCE's competition here
LMT vs POWW Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 173.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while POWW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check POWW's competition here
LMT vs IVAC Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while IVAC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check IVAC's competition here
LMT vs HOVRW Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while HOVRW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HOVRW's competition here
LMT vs CODA Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while CODA trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CODA's competition here
LMT vs OPXS Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while OPXS trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check OPXS's competition here
LMT vs VTSI Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while VTSI trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is 57.40. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VTSI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VTSI's competition here
LMT vs HOVR Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while HOVR trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HOVR's competition here
LMT vs SKYH-WT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, SKYH-WT has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while SKYH-WT trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas SKYH-WT's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SKYH-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SKYH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SKYH-WT's competition here
LMT vs LLAP Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while LLAP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LLAP's competition here
LMT vs LLAP-WT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LLAP-WT's competition here
LMT vs SIF Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while SIF trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is -22.87. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SIF's competition here
LMT vs LILM Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while LILM trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LILM's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LILM's competition here
LMT vs KITT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, KITT has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while KITT trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas KITT's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KITT's ROE of +9.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KITT's competition here
LMT vs CVU Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while CVU trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CVU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CVU's competition here
LMT vs SIDU Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while SIDU trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SIDU's competition here
LMT vs XTIA Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, XTIA has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while XTIA trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas XTIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to XTIA's ROE of -5.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to XTIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check XTIA's competition here
LMT vs PRZO Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, PRZO has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while PRZO trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas PRZO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PRZO's ROE of -7.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PRZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PRZO's competition here
LMT vs KITTW Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, KITTW has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while KITTW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas KITTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KITTW's ROE of +9.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KITTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KITTW's competition here
LMT vs DPRO Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while DPRO trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check DPRO's competition here
LMT vs MNTS Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, MNTS has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while MNTS trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas MNTS's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MNTS's ROE of +6.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MNTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MNTS's competition here
LMT vs GPUS Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while GPUS trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -8.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check GPUS's competition here
LMT vs ASTR Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, ASTR has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while ASTR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas ASTR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ASTR's ROE of -51.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ASTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ASTR's competition here
LMT vs AIRI Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, AIRI has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while AIRI trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas AIRI's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AIRI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AIRI's competition here
LMT vs ASTC Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, ASTC has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while ASTC trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas ASTC's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ASTC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ASTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ASTC's competition here
LMT vs AULT Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, AULT has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while AULT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas AULT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AULT's ROE of -11.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AULT's competition here
LMT vs KWESW Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, KWESW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while KWESW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas KWESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KWESW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KWESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KWESW's competition here
LMT vs KWE Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, KWE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while KWE trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas KWE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KWE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KWE's competition here
LMT vs MNTSW Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, MNTSW has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while MNTSW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas MNTSW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MNTSW's ROE of +6.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to MNTSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MNTSW's competition here
LMT vs LILMW Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, LILMW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while LILMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas LILMW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LILMW's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to LILMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LILMW's competition here
LMT vs RADA Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, RADA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while RADA trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas RADA's P/E ratio is 89.73. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RADA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RADA's competition here
LMT vs VORBW Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, VORBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while VORBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas VORBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VORBW's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VORBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VORBW's competition here
LMT vs VORB Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, VORB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while VORB trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas VORB's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VORB's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VORB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VORB's competition here
LMT vs NILE Comparison August 2025
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 104.2B. In comparison, NILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $446.92, while NILE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 25.01, whereas NILE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NILE's ROE of +22.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to NILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check NILE's competition here