Lockheed Martin Corporation
Lockheed Martin Corporation LMT Peers
See (LMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMT | $462.52 | -0.01% | 108.4B | 19.94 | $23.20 | +2.82% |
| GE | $246.88 | +0.87% | 263.3B | 38.94 | $6.34 | +0.49% |
| RTX | $145.75 | +0.85% | 194.7B | 42.62 | $3.42 | +1.76% |
| BA | $215.92 | +1.83% | 162.8B | -12.02 | -$17.96 | N/A |
| TDG | $1,522.98 | +0.75% | 85.5B | 51.26 | $29.71 | +4.92% |
| GD | $294.76 | +0.80% | 79.1B | 20.46 | $14.41 | +1.98% |
| NOC | $504.20 | +1.06% | 72.6B | 19.91 | $25.33 | +1.68% |
| AXON | $795.48 | +2.70% | 61.9B | 193.08 | $4.12 | N/A |
| LHX | $255.73 | +0.86% | 47.8B | 30.30 | $8.44 | +1.85% |
| HEI | $324.67 | +1.83% | 39.3B | 76.04 | $4.27 | +0.07% |
Stock Comparison
LMT vs GE Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 263.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while GE trades at $246.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs RTX Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while RTX trades at $145.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 42.62. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs BA Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 162.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while BA trades at $215.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas BA's P/E ratio is -12.02. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BA's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs TDG Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while TDG trades at $1,522.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 51.26. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs GD Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while GD trades at $294.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs NOC Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, NOC has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while NOC trades at $504.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas NOC's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to NOC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to NOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs AXON Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while AXON trades at $795.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 193.08. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs LHX Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while LHX trades at $255.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs HEI Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while HEI trades at $324.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 76.04. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs HEI-A Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while HEI-A trades at $253.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 59.32. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs ESLT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while ESLT trades at $444.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 56.24. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs CW Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CW has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while CW trades at $487.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas CW's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs RKLB Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while RKLB trades at $35.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -86.98. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs WWD Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while WWD trades at $252.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs TXT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while TXT trades at $82.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs BWXT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while BWXT trades at $142.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 45.37. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs DRS Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while DRS trades at $46.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 52.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs AVAV Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while AVAV trades at $246.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is 158.86. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AVAV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs ERJ Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while ERJ trades at $61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs SARO Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while SARO trades at $30.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 147.05. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs HII Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while HII trades at $252.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs CAE Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while CAE trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CAE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs LOAR Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while LOAR trades at $81.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 215.71. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs KTOS Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while KTOS trades at $44.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 343.54. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs ACHR Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while ACHR trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs ACHR-WT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while ACHR-WT trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs KRMN Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while KRMN trades at $45.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 1125.50. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs MOG-A Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while MOG-A trades at $185.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs MOG-B Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while MOG-B trades at $177.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs AJRD Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while AJRD trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs HXL Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while HXL trades at $57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs SPR Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while SPR trades at $38.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs MRCY Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while MRCY trades at $51.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is -46.33. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs PL-WT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while PL-WT trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs EVEX-WT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while EVEX-WT trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs VSEC Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while VSEC trades at $127.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 54.46. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs POWWP Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while POWWP trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is 78.44. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs AIR Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while AIR trades at $71.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is -198.50. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AIR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs RDW Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while RDW trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RDW's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs EVEX Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while EVEX trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs PL Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while PL trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -19.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to PL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs TGI Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while TGI trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 56.13. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to TGI's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs VVX Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while VVX trades at $49.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 38.28. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs LUNR Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while LUNR trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs CDRE Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while CDRE trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 33.93. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs KAMN Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while KAMN trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs DCO Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while DCO trades at $84.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to DCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs ATRO Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while ATRO trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is -296.64. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ATRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs VEC Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while VEC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs NPK Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 774.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while NPK trades at $108.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs SKYH Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 755M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while SKYH trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SKYH's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs BYRN Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, BYRN has a market cap of 752.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while BYRN trades at $33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas BYRN's P/E ratio is 53.52. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BYRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BYRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs EH Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 614M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while EH trades at $17.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -34.82. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs RGR Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 604.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while RGR trades at $36.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RGR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs EVTL Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 597.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while EVTL trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs SWBI Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 392.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while SWBI trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs TATT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, TATT has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while TATT trades at $31.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas TATT's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to TATT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs AZ Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AZ has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while AZ trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas AZ's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AZ's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs PKE Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 305.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while PKE trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 53.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs ISSC Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while ISSC trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs POWW Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while POWW trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs SPCE Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 116.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while SPCE trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs IVAC Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while IVAC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs CODA Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while CODA trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs OPXS Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while OPXS trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs VTSI Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while VTSI trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is 34.89. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VTSI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs LLAP Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while LLAP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs LLAP-WT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs HOVR Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while HOVR trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs CVU Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while CVU trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CVU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs SKYH-WT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SKYH-WT has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while SKYH-WT trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SKYH-WT's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SKYH-WT's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SKYH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs KITTW Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KITTW has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while KITTW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas KITTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KITTW's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KITTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs KITT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KITT has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while KITT trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas KITT's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KITT's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs LILM Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while LILM trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LILM's ROE of +11.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs SIDU Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while SIDU trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs SIF Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while SIF trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SIF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs PRZO Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PRZO has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while PRZO trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas PRZO's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to PRZO's ROE of -7.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PRZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs DPRO Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while DPRO trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -6.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs XTIA Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, XTIA has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while XTIA trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas XTIA's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to XTIA's ROE of -4.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to XTIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs AIRI Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AIRI has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while AIRI trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas AIRI's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AIRI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs ASTR Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ASTR has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while ASTR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ASTR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ASTR's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ASTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs ASTC Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ASTC has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while ASTC trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas ASTC's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ASTC's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ASTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs GPUS Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while GPUS trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs HOVRW Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while HOVRW trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs MNTSW Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, MNTSW has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while MNTSW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas MNTSW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MNTSW's ROE of +6.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MNTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs AULT Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AULT has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while AULT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas AULT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AULT's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs MNTS Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, MNTS has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while MNTS trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas MNTS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MNTS's ROE of +6.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MNTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs KWESW Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KWESW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while KWESW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas KWESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KWESW's ROE of -4.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KWESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs KWE Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KWE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while KWE trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas KWE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KWE's ROE of -4.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs LILMW Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LILMW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while LILMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas LILMW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LILMW's ROE of +11.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to LILMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs NILE Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, NILE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while NILE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas NILE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to NILE's ROE of +22.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to NILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs VORBW Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, VORBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while VORBW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas VORBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VORBW's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VORBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs FLY Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, FLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while FLY trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas FLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to FLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to FLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs RADA Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RADA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while RADA trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas RADA's P/E ratio is 89.73. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RADA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RADA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.
LMT vs VORB Comparison
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 108.4B. In comparison, VORB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $462.52, while VORB trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.94, whereas VORB's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VORB's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VORB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.