Lockheed Martin Corporation
Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMT | $666.51 | +1.25% | 153B | 30.81 | $21.46 | +2.02% |
| GE | $334.74 | -2.47% | 357.6B | 42.22 | $8.03 | +0.43% |
| RTX | $205.41 | +0.24% | 271.1B | 40.81 | $4.95 | +1.34% |
| BA | $233.71 | +0.72% | 181B | 92.91 | $2.48 | N/A |
| NOC | $736.87 | +1.84% | 102.9B | 24.92 | $29.11 | +1.27% |
| GD | $354.34 | +0.83% | 94.4B | 22.57 | $15.46 | +1.72% |
| TDG | $1,330.13 | -0.66% | 73.1B | 41.69 | $31.06 | +6.90% |
| LHX | $358.70 | +0.72% | 66.4B | 41.59 | $8.54 | +1.35% |
| HEI | $345.99 | -1.61% | 48.2B | 70.53 | $4.91 | +0.07% |
| ERJ | $64.52 | -1.06% | 47.4B | 37.73 | $1.71 | +0.45% |
Stock Comparison
LMT vs GE Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 357.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while GE trades at $334.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check GE's competition here
LMT vs RTX Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 271.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while RTX trades at $205.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RTX's competition here
LMT vs BA Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 181B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while BA trades at $233.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BA's P/E ratio is 92.91. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BA's competition here
LMT vs NOC Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, NOC has a market cap of 102.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while NOC trades at $736.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas NOC's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to NOC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to NOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check NOC's competition here
LMT vs GD Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while GD trades at $354.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check GD's competition here
LMT vs TDG Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while TDG trades at $1,330.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TDG's competition here
LMT vs LHX Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while LHX trades at $358.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LHX's competition here
LMT vs HEI Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while HEI trades at $345.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 70.53. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HEI's competition here
LMT vs ERJ Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while ERJ trades at $64.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ERJ's competition here
LMT vs HEI-A Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while HEI-A trades at $260.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 52.95. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HEI-A's competition here
LMT vs RKLB Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while RKLB trades at $76.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -184.76. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RKLB's competition here
LMT vs ESLT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while ESLT trades at $730.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 75.62. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ESLT's competition here
LMT vs AXON Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while AXON trades at $441.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 133.58. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AXON's competition here
LMT vs CW Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, CW has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while CW trades at $702.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas CW's P/E ratio is 54.33. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CW's competition here
LMT vs WWD Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while WWD trades at $390.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check WWD's competition here
LMT vs BWXT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while BWXT trades at $209.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 59.41. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BWXT's competition here
LMT vs TXT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while TXT trades at $99.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TXT's competition here
LMT vs HII Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while HII trades at $443.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HII's competition here
LMT vs KTOS Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while KTOS trades at $105.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 725.46. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KTOS's competition here
LMT vs EMBJ Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, EMBJ has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while EMBJ trades at $72.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas EMBJ's P/E ratio is 42.17. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to EMBJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EMBJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EMBJ's competition here
LMT vs AVAV Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while AVAV trades at $281.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is -214.20. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AVAV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AVAV's competition here
LMT vs MOG-A Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while MOG-A trades at $338.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MOG-A's competition here
LMT vs MOG-B Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while MOG-B trades at $326.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 43.05. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MOG-B's competition here
LMT vs KRMN Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while KRMN trades at $88.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 1016.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KRMN's competition here
LMT vs SARO Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while SARO trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 56.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SARO's competition here
LMT vs DRS Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while DRS trades at $41.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check DRS's competition here
LMT vs CAE Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while CAE trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CAE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CAE's competition here
LMT vs PL Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while PL trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -55.28. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to PL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PL's competition here
LMT vs HXL Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while HXL trades at $87.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 66.39. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HXL's competition here
LMT vs AMTM Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, AMTM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while AMTM trades at $32.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AMTM's P/E ratio is 73.88. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AMTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AMTM's competition here
LMT vs LOAR Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while LOAR trades at $67.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 98.71. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LOAR's competition here
LMT vs MRCY Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while MRCY trades at $89.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is -165.19. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MRCY's competition here
LMT vs ACHR Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while ACHR trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ACHR's competition here
LMT vs RAL Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while RAL trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RAL's competition here
LMT vs AJRD Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while AJRD trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AJRD's competition here
LMT vs SPR Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while SPR trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SPR's competition here
LMT vs AIR Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while AIR trades at $115.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AIR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AIR's competition here
LMT vs VSEC Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while VSEC trades at $224.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 73.85. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VSEC's competition here
LMT vs BETA Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, BETA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while BETA trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BETA's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BETA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BETA's competition here
LMT vs PL-WT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while PL-WT trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PL-WT's competition here
LMT vs LUNR Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while LUNR trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LUNR's competition here
LMT vs FLY Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, FLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while FLY trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas FLY's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to FLY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to FLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check FLY's competition here
LMT vs POWWP Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while POWWP trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is 84.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check POWWP's competition here
LMT vs ATRO Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while ATRO trades at $78.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is -847.78. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ATRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ATRO's competition here
LMT vs VVX Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while VVX trades at $70.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VVX's competition here
LMT vs TGI Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while TGI trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 56.54. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to TGI's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TGI's competition here
LMT vs DCO Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while DCO trades at $126.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is -53.71. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to DCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check DCO's competition here
LMT vs ACHR-WT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while ACHR-WT trades at -$9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ACHR-WT's competition here
LMT vs CDRE Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while CDRE trades at $43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 38.10. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CDRE's competition here
LMT vs VOYG Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, VOYG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while VOYG trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VOYG's P/E ratio is -14.99. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to VOYG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VOYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VOYG's competition here
LMT vs RDW Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while RDW trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to RDW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RDW's competition here
LMT vs KAMN Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while KAMN trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KAMN's competition here
LMT vs EVEX-WT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while EVEX-WT trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EVEX-WT's competition here
LMT vs VEC Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while VEC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VEC's competition here
LMT vs NPK Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 912M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while NPK trades at $127.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check NPK's competition here
LMT vs EVEX Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 889.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while EVEX trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EVEX's competition here
LMT vs TATT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, TATT has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while TATT trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas TATT's P/E ratio is 40.46. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to TATT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TATT's competition here
LMT vs SKYH Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 667.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while SKYH trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SKYH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SKYH's competition here
LMT vs RGR Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 596.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while RGR trades at $38.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 267.36. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to RGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RGR's competition here
LMT vs SWBI Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 517.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while SWBI trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 55.43. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SWBI's competition here
LMT vs PKE Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 512.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while PKE trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 59.84. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PKE's competition here
LMT vs EH Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 443M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while EH trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -21.49. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EH's competition here
LMT vs ISSC Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 418.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while ISSC trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ISSC's competition here
LMT vs EVTL Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 405.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while EVTL trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +17.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EVTL's competition here
LMT vs AIRO Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, AIRO has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while AIRO trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AIRO's P/E ratio is -64.33. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AIRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AIRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AIRO's competition here
LMT vs BYRN Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, BYRN has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while BYRN trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas BYRN's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to BYRN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BYRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BYRN's competition here
LMT vs POWW Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 252.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while POWW trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check POWW's competition here
LMT vs DPRO Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while DPRO trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check DPRO's competition here
LMT vs CODA Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while CODA trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CODA's competition here
LMT vs SPCE Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 153.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while SPCE trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SPCE's competition here
LMT vs VWAV Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, VWAV has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while VWAV trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VWAV's P/E ratio is -16.52. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to VWAV's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VWAV's competition here
LMT vs IVAC Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while IVAC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check IVAC's competition here
LMT vs FJET Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, FJET has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while FJET trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas FJET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to FJET's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to FJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check FJET's competition here
LMT vs PEW Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while PEW trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to PEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PEW's competition here
LMT vs SIF Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while SIF trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SIF's competition here
LMT vs HOVR Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while HOVR trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HOVR's competition here
LMT vs OPXS Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while OPXS trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check OPXS's competition here
LMT vs SIDU Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while SIDU trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SIDU's competition here
LMT vs SPAI Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, SPAI has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while SPAI trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SPAI's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SPAI's ROE of -2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SPAI's competition here
LMT vs LLAP Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while LLAP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LLAP's competition here
LMT vs CVU Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while CVU trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is -78.48. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to CVU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CVU's competition here
LMT vs LLAP-WT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LLAP-WT's competition here
LMT vs VTSI Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while VTSI trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to VTSI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VTSI's competition here
LMT vs LILM Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while LILM trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LILM's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LILM's competition here
LMT vs KITTW Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, KITTW has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while KITTW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KITTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to KITTW's ROE of +19.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KITTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KITTW's competition here
LMT vs XTIA Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, XTIA has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while XTIA trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas XTIA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to XTIA's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to XTIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check XTIA's competition here
LMT vs PRZO Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, PRZO has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while PRZO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas PRZO's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to PRZO's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PRZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PRZO's competition here
LMT vs SKYH-WT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, SKYH-WT has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while SKYH-WT trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas SKYH-WT's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to SKYH-WT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SKYH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SKYH-WT's competition here
LMT vs GPUS Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while GPUS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check GPUS's competition here
LMT vs HOVRW Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while HOVRW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HOVRW's competition here
LMT vs AIRI Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, AIRI has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while AIRI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AIRI's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AIRI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AIRI's competition here
LMT vs ASTR Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, ASTR has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while ASTR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ASTR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ASTR's ROE of -51.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ASTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ASTR's competition here
LMT vs AULT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, AULT has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while AULT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas AULT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to AULT's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AULT's competition here
LMT vs KWESW Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, KWESW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while KWESW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KWESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to KWESW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KWESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KWESW's competition here
LMT vs KWE Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, KWE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while KWE trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KWE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to KWE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KWE's competition here
LMT vs ASTC Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, ASTC has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while ASTC trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas ASTC's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to ASTC's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ASTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ASTC's competition here
LMT vs KITT Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, KITT has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while KITT trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas KITT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to KITT's ROE of +19.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KITT's competition here
LMT vs LILMW Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, LILMW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while LILMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas LILMW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to LILMW's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to LILMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LILMW's competition here
LMT vs MNTS Comparison February 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 153B. In comparison, MNTS has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $666.51, while MNTS trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 30.81, whereas MNTS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.81%, compared to MNTS's ROE of +5.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MNTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MNTS's competition here