LEM Holding SA
LEM Holding SA (LMHDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LMHDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMHDF | $2,548.66 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 40.16 | $63.46 | N/A |
| ABLZF | $66.25 | +0.01% | 123.4B | 29.64 | $2.28 | +1.51% |
| ABBNY | $67.04 | +0.13% | 123B | 29.38 | $2.28 | +1.48% |
| DLEGF | $4.00 | +0.00% | 52.8B | 80.00 | $0.05 | +0.34% |
| MIELF | $22.76 | +3.92% | 47.2B | 21.67 | $1.05 | +1.49% |
| MIELY | $44.74 | -1.54% | 46.4B | 21.20 | $2.11 | +1.05% |
| LGRVF | $149.84 | +2.74% | 39.3B | 28.43 | $5.27 | +1.53% |
| LGRDY | $29.39 | -0.41% | 38.5B | 27.97 | $1.05 | +1.64% |
| PRYMY | $38.67 | -0.77% | 22.2B | 27.61 | $1.40 | +1.17% |
| PRYMF | $76.59 | -3.05% | 22B | 27.35 | $2.80 | +1.19% |
Stock Comparison
LMHDF vs ABLZF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ABLZF trades at $66.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ABLZF's competition here
LMHDF vs ABBNY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ABBNY trades at $67.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 29.38. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ABBNY's competition here
LMHDF vs DLEGF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while DLEGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check DLEGF's competition here
LMHDF vs MIELF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while MIELF trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check MIELF's competition here
LMHDF vs MIELY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while MIELY trades at $44.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check MIELY's competition here
LMHDF vs LGRVF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while LGRVF trades at $149.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and LGRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGRVF's competition here
LMHDF vs LGRDY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while LGRDY trades at $29.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check LGRDY's competition here
LMHDF vs PRYMY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while PRYMY trades at $38.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check PRYMY's competition here
LMHDF vs PRYMF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRYMF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while PRYMF trades at $76.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas PRYMF's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRYMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to PRYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check PRYMF's competition here
LMHDF vs OSAGY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while OSAGY trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and OSAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSAGY's competition here
LMHDF vs FELTY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while FELTY trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check FELTY's competition here
LMHDF vs FELTF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while FELTF trades at $45.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and FELTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FELTF's competition here
LMHDF vs PHPPY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while PHPPY trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and PHPPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHPPY's competition here
LMHDF vs NEXNY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while NEXNY trades at $70.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check NEXNY's competition here
LMHDF vs NXPRF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while NXPRF trades at $141.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and NXPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NXPRF's competition here
LMHDF vs YASKF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while YASKF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and YASKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YASKF's competition here
LMHDF vs OSAGF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and OSAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSAGF's competition here
LMHDF vs NRKBF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while NRKBF trades at $81.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check NRKBF's competition here
LMHDF vs FUWAF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while FUWAF trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and FUWAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUWAF's competition here
LMHDF vs FUWAY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while FUWAY trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check FUWAY's competition here
LMHDF vs SFFYF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while SFFYF trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and SFFYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFFYF's competition here
LMHDF vs YASKY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while YASKY trades at $44.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check YASKY's competition here
LMHDF vs LDGYY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while LDGYY trades at $20.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is -27.54. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and LDGYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LDGYY's competition here
LMHDF vs LGYRF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while LGYRF trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and LGYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGYRF's competition here
LMHDF vs GYUAF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check GYUAF's competition here
LMHDF vs HMDPF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while HMDPF trades at $85.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check HMDPF's competition here
LMHDF vs VLXGF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 939.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while VLXGF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check VLXGF's competition here
LMHDF vs VARGF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while VARGF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and VARGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VARGF's competition here
LMHDF vs HOIEF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and HOIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOIEF's competition here
LMHDF vs EFLVF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check EFLVF's competition here
LMHDF vs CBLNF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check CBLNF's competition here
LMHDF vs CBLNY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 561.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while CBLNY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and CBLNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CBLNY's competition here
LMHDF vs WSPCF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check WSPCF's competition here
LMHDF vs RNRTY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and RNRTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RNRTY's competition here
LMHDF vs ZMTBY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 414.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ZMTBY's competition here
LMHDF vs XPPLF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 334.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while XPPLF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -21.82. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check XPPLF's competition here
LMHDF vs ALFNF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ALFNF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ALFNF's competition here
LMHDF vs COSXF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while COSXF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 43.81. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check COSXF's competition here
LMHDF vs ABHBY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ABHBY's competition here
LMHDF vs CRPHY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while CRPHY trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check CRPHY's competition here
LMHDF vs CPWHF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 246.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while CPWHF trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and CPWHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPWHF's competition here
LMHDF vs NVNXF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while NVNXF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check NVNXF's competition here
LMHDF vs PCELF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while PCELF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -39.44. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and PCELF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCELF's competition here
LMHDF vs FCELB Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while FCELB trades at $327.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -1062.82. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check FCELB's competition here
LMHDF vs GELNF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while GELNF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and GELNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GELNF's competition here
LMHDF vs AFGYF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while AFGYF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and AFGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFGYF's competition here
LMHDF vs TNPOF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check TNPOF's competition here
LMHDF vs ILIKF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 109.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ILIKF trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ILIKF's competition here
LMHDF vs DIALF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while DIALF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check DIALF's competition here
LMHDF vs VARTY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while VARTY trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check VARTY's competition here
LMHDF vs MNSEF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while MNSEF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check MNSEF's competition here
LMHDF vs ONMBF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and ONMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ONMBF's competition here
LMHDF vs TNTLF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check TNTLF's competition here
LMHDF vs ARTGF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ARTGF's competition here
LMHDF vs EXROF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while EXROF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check EXROF's competition here
LMHDF vs NHHHF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while NHHHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check NHHHF's competition here
LMHDF vs IHGP Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while IHGP trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check IHGP's competition here
LMHDF vs QBAK Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while QBAK trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check QBAK's competition here
LMHDF vs ORBT Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ORBT trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ORBT's competition here
LMHDF vs LPSIF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while LPSIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check LPSIF's competition here
LMHDF vs DFEL Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while DFEL trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and DFEL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DFEL's competition here
LMHDF vs SSCFF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and SSCFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSCFF's competition here
LMHDF vs ASTO Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ASTO trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and ASTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASTO's competition here
LMHDF vs HYEG Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while HYEG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and HYEG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HYEG's competition here
LMHDF vs LNNNF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and LNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNNNF's competition here
LMHDF vs GPGC Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while GPGC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and GPGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPGC's competition here
LMHDF vs CECBF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while CECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and CECBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CECBF's competition here
LMHDF vs LPENF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while LPENF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check LPENF's competition here
LMHDF vs EGTYF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while EGTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check EGTYF's competition here
LMHDF vs IDGC Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while IDGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and IDGC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDGC's competition here
LMHDF vs OZSC Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while OZSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check OZSC's competition here
LMHDF vs GBLTF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and GBLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBLTF's competition here
LMHDF vs CAPC Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while CAPC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAPC's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check CAPC's competition here
LMHDF vs ENEVF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ENEVF's competition here
LMHDF vs KRFG Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while KRFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and KRFG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KRFG's competition here
LMHDF vs ZAIRF Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check ZAIRF's competition here
LMHDF vs USLG Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while USLG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check USLG's competition here
LMHDF vs TOGI Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while TOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check TOGI's competition here
LMHDF vs LNNNY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check LNNNY's competition here
LMHDF vs BSTK Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 580.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while BSTK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check BSTK's competition here
LMHDF vs SGLN Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while SGLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGLN's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and SGLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGLN's competition here
LMHDF vs PSTO Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 470.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while PSTO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and PSTO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSTO's competition here
LMHDF vs HLXW Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 265.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while HLXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check HLXW's competition here
LMHDF vs IMHCW Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 204K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check IMHCW's competition here
LMHDF vs AIPG Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 20.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while AIPG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and AIPG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AIPG's competition here
LMHDF vs EIPC Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while EIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EIPC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and EIPC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EIPC's competition here
LMHDF vs DLYT Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while DLYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and DLYT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLYT's competition here
LMHDF vs CHGI Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while CHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and CHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHGI's competition here
LMHDF vs FDEI Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while FDEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FDEI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and FDEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FDEI's competition here
LMHDF vs DCFCQ Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while DCFCQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check DCFCQ's competition here
LMHDF vs LSCG Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while LSCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check LSCG's competition here
LMHDF vs GNAL Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while GNAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and GNAL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNAL's competition here
LMHDF vs GCHT Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while GCHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GCHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and GCHT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCHT's competition here
LMHDF vs USGA Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while USGA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to USGA's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check USGA's competition here
LMHDF vs GCLL Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while GCLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and GCLL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCLL's competition here
LMHDF vs XNNHQ Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and XNNHQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XNNHQ's competition here
LMHDF vs TMGY Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while TMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TMGY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and TMGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMGY's competition here
LMHDF vs TRUL Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TRUL has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while TRUL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas TRUL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRUL's ROE of +7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF is less volatile compared to TRUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMHDF.Check TRUL's competition here
LMHDF vs AXPWQ Comparison July 2025
LMHDF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMHDF stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AXPWQ has a market cap of 960. Regarding current trading prices, LMHDF is priced at $2,548.66, while AXPWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMHDF currently has a P/E ratio of 40.16, whereas AXPWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMHDF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AXPWQ's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LMHDF and AXPWQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXPWQ's competition here