Lineage, Inc.
Lineage, Inc. LINE Peers
See (LINE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
LINE vs PLD Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 97.74B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PLD trades at $105.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 52.67B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA trades at $300.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PK Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 52.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PK trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PH Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 52.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PH trades at $22.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PLDGP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PLDGP has a market cap of 41.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PLDGP trades at $54.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PLDGP's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLDGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PLDGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs EXR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 31.70B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while EXR trades at $149.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 37.07. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SEGXF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SEGXF has a market cap of 12.98B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SEGXF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SEGXF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SEGXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to SEGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LSI Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs CUBE Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while CUBE trades at $42.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs EGP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while EGP trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs REXR-PB Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while REXR-PB trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs REXR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while REXR trades at $34.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs FNCDY Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, FNCDY has a market cap of 6.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while FNCDY trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas FNCDY's P/E ratio is 84.72. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FNCDY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to FNCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs FR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while FR trades at $48.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs STAG Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 6.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while STAG trades at $33.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs TRNO Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 5.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while TRNO trades at $56.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs FBBPF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, FBBPF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while FBBPF trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas FBBPF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FBBPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to FBBPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs WDPSF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, WDPSF has a market cap of 5.48B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while WDPSF trades at $24.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas WDPSF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WDPSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to WDPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs COLD Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 5.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while COLD trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -56.71. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs REXR-PC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while REXR-PC trades at $22.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs NSA-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while NSA-PA trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs MAPIF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, MAPIF has a market cap of 4.93B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while MAPIF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas MAPIF's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAPIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to MAPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs NPONF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, NPONF has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while NPONF trades at $1,408.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas NPONF's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NPONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to NPONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs MAPGF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, MAPGF has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while MAPGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas MAPGF's P/E ratio is 28.20. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAPGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to MAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PF trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PG Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PG trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PI Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PI trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PJ Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.83. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PL Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PL trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.82. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PM Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PM trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs NSA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while NSA trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 33.13. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PS Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PS trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs GRP-UN Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while GRP-UN trades at $45.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PP trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PR trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PN Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PN trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PQ Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PO Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PSA-PO trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs BYLOF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, BYLOF has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while BYLOF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas BYLOF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BYLOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to BYLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LXP-PC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while LXP-PC trades at $45.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LXP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while LXP trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 40.30. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs FRLOF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, FRLOF has a market cap of 2.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while FRLOF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas FRLOF's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FRLOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to FRLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LXILF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, LXILF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while LXILF trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas LXILF's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LXILF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to LXILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs BUNNF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, BUNNF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while BUNNF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas BUNNF's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BUNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to BUNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs DREUF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, DREUF has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while DREUF trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas DREUF's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DREUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to DREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs GRFFF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, GRFFF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while GRFFF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas GRFFF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRFFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to GRFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SFSHF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SFSHF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SFSHF trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SFSHF's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SFSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to SFSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs IIPR-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while IIPR-PA trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs IIPR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while IIPR trades at $54.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs CBAOF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, CBAOF has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while CBAOF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas CBAOF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CBAOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to CBAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SCCD Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SCCD trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs DBMBF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, DBMBF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while DBMBF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas DBMBF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DBMBF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to DBMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PMTU Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PMTU trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SCCE Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 931.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SCCE trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs RCC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 770.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while RCC trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LANDO Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 752.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while LANDO trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -72.22. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PLYM Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 698.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PLYM trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PCILF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PCILF has a market cap of 697.17M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PCILF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PCILF's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PCILF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to PCILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs EPCFF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, EPCFF has a market cap of 630.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while EPCFF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas EPCFF's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EPCFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to EPCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs TFSA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 591.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while TFSA trades at $24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs DHCNI Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 489.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while DHCNI trades at $13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs TPTA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 431.25M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while TPTA trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs NHPAP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 400.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while NHPAP trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs EFRTF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, EFRTF has a market cap of 358.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while EFRTF trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas EFRTF's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EFRTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to EFRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LANDM Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 355.88M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while LANDM trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -224.55. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LAND Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 348.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while LAND trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -33.24. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SBBSF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SBBSF has a market cap of 262.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SBBSF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SBBSF's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SBBSF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SBBSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LPA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 213.45M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while LPA trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs ILPT Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 189.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while ILPT trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PLYM-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs CGIUF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, CGIUF has a market cap of 153.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while CGIUF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas CGIUF's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CGIUF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to CGIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LVVP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, LVVP has a market cap of 146.76M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while LVVP trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas LVVP's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LVVP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LVVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs AJXA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.85M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SCCB Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SACC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99.02M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs DOLHF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, DOLHF has a market cap of 69.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while DOLHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas DOLHF's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DOLHF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to DOLHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SELF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 58.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SELF trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SCCF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 48.41M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SCCF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs RGGLF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, RGGLF has a market cap of 29.58M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while RGGLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas RGGLF's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RGGLF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to RGGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PW-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 3.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while PW-PA trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs QTS Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, QTS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SMMCF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, SMMCF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while SMMCF trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas SMMCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SMMCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SMMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs MNR-PC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, MNR-PC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs DRE Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, DRE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs CONE Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, CONE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs QTS-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, QTS-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs QTS-PB Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 10.12B. In comparison, QTS-PB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $44.28, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -12.54, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLD | $105.34 | -0.07% | 97.74B | 26.27 | $4.01 | +3.69% |
| PSA | $300.26 | +0.04% | 52.67B | 29.76 | $10.09 | +3.98% |
| PSA-PK | $18.95 | -0.63% | 52.47B | 1.84 | $10.29 | +3.98% |
| PSA-PH | $22.54 | -0.77% | 52.42B | 2.19 | $10.29 | +3.98% |
| PLDGP | $54.54 | -0.80% | 41.70B | 10.92 | $5.00 | +3.69% |
| EXR | $149.38 | -0.12% | 31.70B | 37.07 | $4.03 | +4.34% |
| SEGXF | $9.60 | +22.29% | 12.98B | 16.27 | $0.59 | +2.96% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.33B | 30.95 | $4.30 | N/A |
| LINE | $44.28 | -2.21% | 10.12B | -12.54 | -$3.53 | +3.22% |
| CUBE | $42.83 | +0.61% | 9.81B | 25.34 | $1.69 | +4.81% |