Lineage, Inc.
Lineage, Inc. LINE Peers
See (LINE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINE | $43.52 | +0.00% | 9.9B | -16.02 | -$2.70 | +3.63% |
| PLD | $107.52 | +2.28% | 98.9B | 26.58 | $4.01 | +3.68% |
| PSA | $298.06 | +1.58% | 52.3B | 29.61 | $10.07 | +4.02% |
| PSA-PK | $19.03 | +0.58% | 52B | 1.84 | $10.29 | +4.02% |
| PSA-PH | $22.65 | +1.03% | 51.6B | 2.19 | $10.29 | +4.02% |
| EXR | $151.17 | +2.53% | 31.9B | 35.08 | $4.29 | +4.30% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | N/A |
| CUBE | $42.88 | +0.89% | 9.7B | 25.23 | $1.69 | +4.84% |
| EGP | $168.88 | +1.05% | 8.8B | 36.71 | $4.58 | +3.32% |
| REXR-PB | $22.32 | -0.33% | 8.7B | 25.39 | $0.89 | +4.66% |
Stock Comparison
LINE vs PLD Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PLD trades at $107.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA trades at $298.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PK Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PK trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PH Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PH trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs EXR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while EXR trades at $151.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LSI Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs CUBE Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while CUBE trades at $42.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs EGP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while EGP trades at $168.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs REXR-PB Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while REXR-PB trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs REXR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while REXR trades at $36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs STAG Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while STAG trades at $36.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs FR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while FR trades at $48.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs TRNO Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while TRNO trades at $56.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs REXR-PC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while REXR-PC trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs COLD Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while COLD trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -39.62. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs NSA-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while NSA-PA trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PG Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PG trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PI Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PI trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PJ Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PL Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PL trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs GRP-UN Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while GRP-UN trades at $50.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PM Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PM trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PS Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PS trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PP trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PQ Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PR trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PO Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PO trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PSA-PN Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PSA-PN trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs NSA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while NSA trades at $32.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 53.54. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LXP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while LXP trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LXP-PC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while LXP-PC trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs IIPR-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while IIPR-PA trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs IIPR Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while IIPR trades at $56.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PMTU Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PMTU trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SCCD Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while SCCD trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SCCE Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 912.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while SCCE trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs DHCNI Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 885.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while DHCNI trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs RCC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 781.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while RCC trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PLYM Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 740.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PLYM trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LANDO Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while LANDO trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -66.88. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs TFSA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 566.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while TFSA trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs TPTA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 474.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while TPTA trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs NHPAP Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 436.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while NHPAP trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LAND Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 374.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while LAND trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -41.36. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LANDM Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while LANDM trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -225.45. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs ILPT Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while ILPT trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs LPA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 226.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while LPA trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PLYM-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs AJXA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SCCB Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SACC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SELF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while SELF trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs SCCF Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while SCCF trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs PW-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while PW-PA trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs DRE Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs QTS-PA Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs MNR-PC Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs QTS-PB Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs QTS Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while QTS trades at $77.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.
LINE vs CONE Comparison
LINE plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LINE stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LINE is priced at $43.52, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LINE currently has a P/E ratio of -16.02, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, LINE's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LINE is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LINE.