Legrand SA
Legrand SA LGRVF Peers
See (LGRVF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGRVF | $123.11 | N/A | 32.3B | 24.14 | $5.10 | +1.63% |
| ABBNY | $57.43 | +0.21% | 105.6B | 25.64 | $2.24 | +1.72% |
| ABLZF | $58.16 | +2.45% | 105.6B | 25.96 | $2.24 | +1.80% |
| DLEGF | $4.35 | N/A | 54.3B | 87.00 | $0.05 | +0.32% |
| MIELF | $21.08 | +1.59% | 43.7B | 19.52 | $1.08 | +1.63% |
| MIELY | $40.79 | +0.37% | 42.4B | 18.71 | $2.18 | +0.81% |
| LGRDY | $24.99 | +1.59% | 32.8B | 24.50 | $1.02 | +1.95% |
| PRYMF | $67.17 | -1.29% | 19.3B | 24.97 | $2.69 | +1.15% |
| PRYMY | $33.32 | +0.53% | 19.1B | 24.32 | $1.37 | +1.20% |
| OSAGY | $51.10 | N/A | 14.8B | -26.34 | -$1.94 | +3.69% |
Stock Comparison
LGRVF vs ABBNY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ABBNY trades at $57.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ABLZF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ABLZF trades at $58.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs DLEGF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while DLEGF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs MIELF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while MIELF trades at $21.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs MIELY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while MIELY trades at $40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs LGRDY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while LGRDY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs PRYMF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PRYMF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while PRYMF trades at $67.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas PRYMF's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRYMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to PRYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs PRYMY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while PRYMY trades at $33.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs OSAGY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while OSAGY trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to OSAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs FELTF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while FELTF trades at $44.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to FELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs FELTY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while FELTY trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs PHPPY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while PHPPY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to PHPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs YASKF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while YASKF trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to YASKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs OSAGF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to OSAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs NEXNY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while NEXNY trades at $57.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs NXPRF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while NXPRF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to NXPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs NRKBF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while NRKBF trades at $78.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs FUWAF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while FUWAF trades at $48.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to FUWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs FUWAY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while FUWAY trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs SFFYF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while SFFYF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to SFFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs LMHDF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to LMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs YASKY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while YASKY trades at $42.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs LGYRF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while LGYRF trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to LGYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs GYUAF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs LDGYY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while LDGYY trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to LDGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs HMDPF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 956M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while HMDPF trades at $80.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ALFNF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 884.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ALFNF trades at $40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is -29.28. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs VARGF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while VARGF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to VARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs HOIEF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to HOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs VLXGF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 597.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while VLXGF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs EFLVF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs CBLNF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs CBLNY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 561.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while CBLNY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to CBLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs WSPCF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs RNRTY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to RNRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ZMTBY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 417.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs COSXF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 343.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while COSXF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs XPPLF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while XPPLF trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -18.06. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ABHBY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs CPWHF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 213.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while CPWHF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to CPWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs CRPHY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 193.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while CRPHY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs NVNXF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while NVNXF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs TGEN Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while TGEN trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -33.17. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs PCELF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while PCELF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -18.46. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to PCELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs AFGYF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while AFGYF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to AFGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs FCELB Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 121M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while FCELB trades at $327.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -1063.31. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs TNPOF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs VARTY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while VARTY trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ONMBF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ONMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ILIKF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ILIKF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -14.68. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs TNTLF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs DIALF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while DIALF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ARTGF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs GELNF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while GELNF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to GELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs EXROF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while EXROF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs NHHHF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while NHHHF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs QBAK Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while QBAK trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs IHGP Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while IHGP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs LPSIF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while LPSIF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs MNSEF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while MNSEF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ORBT Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ORBT trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs SSCFF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to SSCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs DFEL Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while DFEL trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to DFEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ASTO Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ASTO trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ASTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs HYEG Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while HYEG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to HYEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs LNNNF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to LNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs GPGC Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while GPGC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to GPGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs CECBF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while CECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to CECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs LPENF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while LPENF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs EGTYF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while EGTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs IDGC Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while IDGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to IDGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ENEVF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs OZSC Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while OZSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs GBLTF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to GBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs ZAIRF Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs TOGI Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while TOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs CAPC Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while CAPC trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAPC's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs KRFG Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while KRFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to KRFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs LNNNY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs BSTK Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 580.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while BSTK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs SGLN Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while SGLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGLN's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to SGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs PSTO Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 357.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while PSTO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to PSTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs USLG Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 337K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while USLG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs IMHCW Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 204K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs EIPC Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while EIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EIPC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to EIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs AIPG Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 20K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while AIPG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to AIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs DLYT Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while DLYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to DLYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs CHGI Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while CHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to CHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs FDEI Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while FDEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FDEI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to FDEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs LSCG Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while LSCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs GNAL Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while GNAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to GNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs GCHT Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while GCHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GCHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to GCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs USGA Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while USGA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USGA's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs DCFCQ Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 3.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while DCFCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs GCLL Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while GCLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is less volatile compared to GCLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs HLXW Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while HLXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs XNNHQ Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to XNNHQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs TMGY Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while TMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMGY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to TMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.
LGRVF vs AXPWQ Comparison
LGRVF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGRVF stands at 32.3B. In comparison, AXPWQ has a market cap of 960. Regarding current trading prices, LGRVF is priced at $123.11, while AXPWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGRVF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.14, whereas AXPWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGRVF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AXPWQ's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LGRVF is more volatile compared to AXPWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGRVF.