Largo Inc.
Largo Inc. (LGO.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LGO.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGO.TO | CA$1.91 | -4.02% | 122.5M | -1.95 | -CA$0.98 | N/A |
| TECK-A.TO | CA$45.37 | -3.47% | 21.9B | 100.82 | CA$0.45 | +1.11% |
| TECK-B.TO | CA$44.50 | -2.22% | 21.5B | 98.89 | CA$0.45 | +2.26% |
| IVN.TO | CA$11.02 | -1.17% | 14.9B | 25.05 | CA$0.44 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | CA$8.86 | -0.56% | 5.7B | 9.53 | CA$0.93 | N/A |
| FIL.TO | CA$32.25 | -1.01% | 4.4B | -31.01 | -CA$1.04 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | CA$19.42 | -0.82% | 4B | -49.79 | -CA$0.39 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | CA$19.33 | -6.03% | 2.2B | -12.16 | -CA$1.59 | N/A |
| VZLA.TO | CA$4.12 | -5.07% | 1.4B | -137.33 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| FOM.TO | CA$2.53 | +0.00% | 1.4B | -50.60 | -CA$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LGO.TO vs TECK-A.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TECK-A.TO trades at CA$45.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 100.82. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to TECK-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TECK-A.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs TECK-B.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TECK-B.TO trades at CA$44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 98.89. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to TECK-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TECK-B.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs IVN.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while IVN.TO trades at CA$11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to IVN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check IVN.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs AKE.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while AKE.TO trades at CA$8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to AKE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check AKE.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs FIL.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while FIL.TO trades at CA$32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to FIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check FIL.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs NGEX.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while NGEX.TO trades at CA$19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -49.79. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to NGEX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check NGEX.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs SKE.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SKE.TO trades at CA$19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -12.16. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to SKE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SKE.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs VZLA.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while VZLA.TO trades at CA$4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -137.33. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to VZLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check VZLA.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs FOM.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while FOM.TO trades at CA$2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -50.60. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to FOM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check FOM.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs ALS.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while ALS.TO trades at CA$29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to ALS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check ALS.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs AII.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while AII.TO trades at CA$4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -19.16. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to AII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check AII.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs USA.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 808.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while USA.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to USA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check USA.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs LAC.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 772.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while LAC.TO trades at CA$3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to LAC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check LAC.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs MDI.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 711.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while MDI.TO trades at CA$8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to MDI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check MDI.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs FVL.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 692.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while FVL.TO trades at CA$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -131.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to FVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check FVL.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs LAAC.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while LAAC.TO trades at CA$3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to LAAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check LAAC.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs PMET.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while PMET.TO trades at CA$3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -95.75. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to PMET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check PMET.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs NDM.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 603.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while NDM.TO trades at CA$1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to NDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check NDM.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs POM.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while POM.TO trades at CA$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to POM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check POM.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs SAU.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 500.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SAU.TO trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to SAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SAU.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs ETG.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 464.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while ETG.TO trades at CA$2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to ETG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check ETG.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs LUCA.V Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 416.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while LUCA.V trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -15.80. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to LUCA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check LUCA.V's competition here
LGO.TO vs SOLG.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SOLG.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to SOLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SOLG.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs PRYM.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 390.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while PRYM.TO trades at CA$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to PRYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check PRYM.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs TMQ.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 371.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TMQ.TO trades at CA$2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -28.25. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to TMQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TMQ.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs LIRC.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 347.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while LIRC.TO trades at CA$6.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -89.43. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to LIRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check LIRC.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs WRN.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 338M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while WRN.TO trades at CA$1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -56.33. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to WRN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check WRN.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs ERD.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 336.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while ERD.TO trades at CA$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to ERD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check ERD.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs ECOR.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 321.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while ECOR.TO trades at CA$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -25.80. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to ECOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check ECOR.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs ARA.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while ARA.TO trades at CA$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to ARA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check ARA.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs TLO.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 285.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TLO.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to TLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TLO.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs LIFT.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while LIFT.CN trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to LIFT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check LIFT.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs MNO.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while MNO.TO trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to MNO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check MNO.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs SMT.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SMT.TO trades at CA$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to SMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SMT.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs TLG.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TLG.TO trades at CA$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to TLG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TLG.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs GLO.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 221.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while GLO.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to GLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check GLO.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs VROY.V Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while VROY.V trades at CA$2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to VROY.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check VROY.V's competition here
LGO.TO vs MOLY.NE Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 187.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while MOLY.NE trades at CA$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -52.33. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to MOLY.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check MOLY.NE's competition here
LGO.TO vs TI.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TI.TO trades at CA$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of -10.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to TI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TI.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs GEO.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 179.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while GEO.TO trades at CA$3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to GEO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check GEO.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs FAR.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while FAR.TO trades at CA$1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to FAR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check FAR.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs IBAT.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while IBAT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to IBAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check IBAT.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs LAM.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check LAM.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs CDPR.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while CDPR.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to CDPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check CDPR.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs NB.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while NB.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to NB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check NB.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs FURY.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 110.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while FURY.TO trades at CA$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to FURY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check FURY.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs FSY.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check FSY.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs AOT.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while AOT.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to AOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check AOT.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs AMC.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 102.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while AMC.TO trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to AMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check AMC.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs GENM.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while GENM.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to GENM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check GENM.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs SLR.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SLR.TO trades at CA$0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO and SLR.TO have similar daily volatility (5.13).Check SLR.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs TSK.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TSK.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -12.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to TSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TSK.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs GMX.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while GMX.TO trades at CA$1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 42.67. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to GMX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check GMX.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs WM.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while WM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to WM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check WM.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs NEXT.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while NEXT.TO trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to NEXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check NEXT.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs S.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while S.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to S.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check S.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs NVLH.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while NVLH.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to NVLH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check NVLH.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs OGD.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while OGD.TO trades at CA$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to OGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check OGD.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs RTG.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while RTG.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to RTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check RTG.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs RUA.V Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while RUA.V trades at CA$0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to RUA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check RUA.V's competition here
LGO.TO vs TOC.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TOC.CN trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to TOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TOC.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs ARS.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while ARS.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to ARS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check ARS.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs FT.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while FT.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to FT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check FT.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs NCF.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while NCF.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to NCF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check NCF.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs MIN.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while MIN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to MIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check MIN.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs RUA.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while RUA.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to RUA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check RUA.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs VALU.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while VALU.CN trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to VALU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check VALU.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs FOX.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while FOX.CN trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to FOX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check FOX.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs PM.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while PM.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to PM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check PM.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs LFLR.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, LFLR.CN has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while LFLR.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LFLR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LFLR.CN's ROE of -4.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to LFLR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check LFLR.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs BKI.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while BKI.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to BKI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check BKI.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs EGFV.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while EGFV.CN trades at CA$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to EGFV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check EGFV.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs AMPS.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while AMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to AMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check AMPS.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs AVL.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while AVL.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to AVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check AVL.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs AAN.V Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while AAN.V trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to AAN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check AAN.V's competition here
LGO.TO vs VOY.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while VOY.CN trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to VOY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check VOY.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs SAM.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SAM.TO trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to SAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SAM.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs SX.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SX.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.17. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to SX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SX.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs URNM.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while URNM.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to URNM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check URNM.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs NICO.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, NICO.CN has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while NICO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NICO.CN's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NICO.CN's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to NICO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check NICO.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs EXN.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while EXN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to EXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check EXN.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs LVL.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, LVL.CN has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while LVL.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LVL.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LVL.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LGO.TO has daily volatility of 5.13 and LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check LVL.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs MAXX.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while MAXX.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to MAXX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check MAXX.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs WRX.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while WRX.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to WRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check WRX.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs SUPR.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SUPR.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to SUPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SUPR.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs TICO.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TICO.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TICO.CN trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TICO.CN's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TICO.CN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to TICO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TICO.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs COSA.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while COSA.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to COSA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check COSA.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs ASND.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while ASND.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to ASND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check ASND.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs SLV.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SLV.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to SLV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SLV.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs SVB.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SVB.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to SVB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SVB.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs TTX.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TTX.CN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TTX.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TTX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TTX.CN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to TTX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TTX.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs SCY.TO Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while SCY.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to SCY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check SCY.TO's competition here
LGO.TO vs PEK.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while PEK.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to PEK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check PEK.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs TN.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while TN.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to TN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check TN.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs NXU.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while NXU.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to NXU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check NXU.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs FNI.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, FNI.CN has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while FNI.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas FNI.CN's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FNI.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is less volatile compared to FNI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check FNI.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs LIM.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while LIM.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to LIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check LIM.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs GAMA.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, GAMA.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while GAMA.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GAMA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GAMA.CN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to GAMA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check GAMA.CN's competition here
LGO.TO vs GDIG.CN Comparison July 2025
LGO.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGO.TO stands at 122.5M. In comparison, GDIG.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGO.TO is priced at CA$1.91, while GDIG.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGO.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.95, whereas GDIG.CN's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, LGO.TO's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GDIG.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LGO.TO is more volatile compared to GDIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGO.TO.Check GDIG.CN's competition here