The LGL Group, Inc.
The LGL Group, Inc. LGL-WT Peers
See (LGL-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LGL-WT | $0.40 | +14.29% | 2.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APH | $96.98 | -0.04% | 117.3B | 46.63 | $2.08 | +0.68% |
| TEL | $169.05 | +0.70% | 50.1B | 36.83 | $4.59 | +1.57% |
| GLW | $51.70 | +0.60% | 44.3B | 99.46 | $0.52 | +2.17% |
| GRMN | $205.15 | +0.79% | 39.5B | 27.06 | $7.58 | +1.54% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $164.94 | +0.50% | 28.4B | 38.91 | $4.24 | N/A |
| FTV | $71.22 | +1.63% | 24.2B | 31.24 | $2.28 | +0.45% |
| TDY | $506.67 | +1.90% | 23.7B | 29.02 | $17.46 | N/A |
| JBL | $215.31 | +0.30% | 23.1B | 40.94 | $5.26 | +0.15% |
Stock Comparison
LGL-WT vs APH Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 117.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while APH trades at $96.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 46.63. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs TEL Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while TEL trades at $169.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs GLW Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while GLW trades at $51.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 99.46. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs GRMN Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while GRMN trades at $205.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs IIVI Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs KEYS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while KEYS trades at $164.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 38.91. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs FTV Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while FTV trades at $71.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs TDY Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while TDY trades at $506.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs JBL Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while JBL trades at $215.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 40.94. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs FLEX Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while FLEX trades at $50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs TRMB Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while TRMB trades at $75.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs CLS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while CLS trades at $150.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 41.94. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs COHR Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while COHR trades at $89.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -408.59. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs FN Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while FN trades at $298.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 33.36. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs BMI Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while BMI trades at $246.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 54.27. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SNDK Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SNDK trades at $47.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs MKSI Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while MKSI trades at $100.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs ITRI Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while ITRI trades at $132.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs LFUS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while LFUS trades at $226.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 59.44. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs VNT Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while VNT trades at $37.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs CGNX Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while CGNX trades at $31.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 45.80. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SANM Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SANM trades at $97.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs ESE Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while ESE trades at $193.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 42.40. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs NOVT Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while NOVT trades at $127.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs ST Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while ST trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 37.05. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs TTMI Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while TTMI trades at $39.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 53.15. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs OSIS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while OSIS trades at $224.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs PLXS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while PLXS trades at $136.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs VICR Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while VICR trades at $47.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 89.26. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs BHE Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while BHE trades at $39.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs OUST Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while OUST trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -13.14. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs CTS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while CTS trades at $43.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs ROG Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while ROG trades at $69.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 76.84. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs BELFB Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while BELFB trades at $93.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 28.72. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs BELFA Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while BELFA trades at $84.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs PENG Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while PENG trades at $20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -120.24. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs FARO Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 846.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while FARO trades at $43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1095.75. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs DAKT Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 738.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while DAKT trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is -71.57. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DAKT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs OUST-WTA Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs BKSY Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 648.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while BKSY trades at $20.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -9.27. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs ALNT Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 611.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while ALNT trades at $36.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 62.24. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs AMOT Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs MLAB Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 525.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while MLAB trades at $96.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -267.67. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs BKSY-WT Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 503.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs LYTS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 502.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while LYTS trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs OUST-WT Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SATLW Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 393.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SATLW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SATL Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 388.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SATL trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs VPG Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 371.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while VPG trades at $27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 121.93. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs NEON Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 345.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while NEON trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -55.70. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs MEI Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 334.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while MEI trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs VLDR Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs MVIS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 276.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while MVIS trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs KOPN Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 262.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while KOPN trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -20.12. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs KULR Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 200.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while KULR trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs EMAN Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs RELL Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 137.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while RELL trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -64.67. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs LPTH Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while LPTH trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs MPTI Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while MPTI trades at $41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs WBX Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while WBX trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs ODYS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while ODYS trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs WRAP Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while WRAP trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -9.44. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs GNSS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 75.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while GNSS trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs ELTK Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while ELTK trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs MIND Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while MIND trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 2.12. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SOTK Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SOTK trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs LINK Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while LINK trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -24.79. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs OST Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while OST trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs REFR Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while REFR trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SELX Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SELX trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -32.75. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs OPTX Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while OPTX trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 133.00. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs CPSH Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while CPSH trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs LGL Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while LGL trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 90.38. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs DSWL Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while DSWL trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SVRE Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SVRE trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs ISNS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs FCUV Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while FCUV trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.86. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs LUNA Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while LUNA trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -28.00. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs DAIO Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while DAIO trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -10.48. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs MTEK Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while MTEK trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -18.62. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs TMPOW Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs NSYS Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while NSYS trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -6.95. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs HOLO Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while HOLO trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs HOLOW Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, HOLOW has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while HOLOW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOLOW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to HOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SGMA Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SGMA trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs VIAO Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs ELSE Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while ELSE trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 38.55. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs KNW Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, KNW has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while KNW trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KNW's ROE of +2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to KNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SLNHP Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SLNHP trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SLNH Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SLNH trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs WATT Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while WATT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs BNSO Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs OUSTZ Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while OUSTZ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs MINDP Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SVREW Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SVREW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs SOBR Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while SOBR trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs MMAT Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs IMTE Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while IMTE trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.
LGL-WT vs OUSTW Comparison
LGL-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LGL-WT stands at 2.2M. In comparison, OUSTW has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LGL-WT is priced at $0.40, while OUSTW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LGL-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LGL-WT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUSTW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LGL-WT is less volatile compared to OUSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LGL-WT.