LaFleur Minerals Inc.
LaFleur Minerals Inc. (LFLR.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LFLR.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFLR.CN | CA$0.58 | +9.43% | 37M | -7.25 | -CA$0.08 | N/A |
| TECK-B.TO | CA$46.49 | +5.30% | 23.6B | 103.31 | CA$0.45 | +2.14% |
| TECK-A.TO | CA$46.90 | +5.23% | 22.9B | 104.22 | CA$0.45 | +2.13% |
| IVN.TO | CA$11.71 | +5.02% | 15.8B | 29.26 | CA$0.40 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | CA$8.86 | -0.56% | 5.7B | 9.53 | CA$0.93 | N/A |
| FIL.TO | CA$32.25 | -1.01% | 4.4B | -31.01 | -CA$1.04 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | CA$21.03 | +0.86% | 4.4B | -46.73 | -CA$0.45 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | CA$21.14 | +0.96% | 2.4B | -14.09 | -CA$1.50 | N/A |
| VZLA.TO | CA$4.85 | +1.04% | 1.7B | -161.67 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| FOM.TO | CA$2.81 | +2.55% | 1.5B | -93.67 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LFLR.CN vs TECK-B.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TECK-B.TO trades at CA$46.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 103.31. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to TECK-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TECK-B.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TECK-A.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TECK-A.TO trades at CA$46.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 104.22. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to TECK-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TECK-A.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs IVN.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while IVN.TO trades at CA$11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to IVN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check IVN.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs AKE.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while AKE.TO trades at CA$8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to AKE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check AKE.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs FIL.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while FIL.TO trades at CA$32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to FIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check FIL.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs NGEX.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while NGEX.TO trades at CA$21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -46.73. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to NGEX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check NGEX.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SKE.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SKE.TO trades at CA$21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -14.09. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to SKE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SKE.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs VZLA.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while VZLA.TO trades at CA$4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -161.67. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to VZLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check VZLA.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs FOM.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while FOM.TO trades at CA$2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -93.67. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to FOM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check FOM.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs ALS.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while ALS.TO trades at CA$29.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to ALS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check ALS.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs AII.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while AII.TO trades at CA$5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -10.78. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to AII.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check AII.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs USA.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 955.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while USA.TO trades at CA$1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to USA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check USA.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs LAC.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 859.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while LAC.TO trades at CA$3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to LAC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check LAC.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs MDI.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 743.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while MDI.TO trades at CA$9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 28.38. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to MDI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check MDI.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs NDM.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 668M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while NDM.TO trades at CA$1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to NDM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check NDM.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs LAAC.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while LAAC.TO trades at CA$3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to LAAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check LAAC.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs FVL.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 629.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while FVL.TO trades at CA$1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -119.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to FVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check FVL.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs PMET.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 624.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while PMET.TO trades at CA$3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -128.33. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to PMET.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check PMET.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs POM.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while POM.TO trades at CA$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to POM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check POM.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SAU.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SAU.TO has a market cap of 495.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SAU.TO trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SAU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SAU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to SAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SAU.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs LUCA.V Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 466.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while LUCA.V trades at CA$1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -17.70. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to LUCA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check LUCA.V's competition here
LFLR.CN vs ETG.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 439.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while ETG.TO trades at CA$2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -30.29. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to ETG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check ETG.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs PRYM.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 422.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while PRYM.TO trades at CA$2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to PRYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check PRYM.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SOLG.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SOLG.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to SOLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SOLG.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TLO.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 394.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TLO.TO trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to TLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TLO.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs ERD.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 376.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while ERD.TO trades at CA$1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -34.33. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to ERD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check ERD.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs WRN.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 368M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while WRN.TO trades at CA$1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -92.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to WRN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check WRN.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TMQ.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 363M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TMQ.TO trades at CA$2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -27.62. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to TMQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TMQ.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs ARA.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 336.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while ARA.TO trades at CA$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to ARA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check ARA.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs ECOR.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 336.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while ECOR.TO trades at CA$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to ECOR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check ECOR.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs LIRC.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while LIRC.TO trades at CA$5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -41.43. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to LIRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check LIRC.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs MNO.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while MNO.TO trades at CA$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to MNO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check MNO.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TLG.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 297.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TLG.TO trades at CA$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to TLG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TLG.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs LIFT.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while LIFT.CN trades at CA$7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to LIFT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check LIFT.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SMT.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SMT.TO trades at CA$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to SMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SMT.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs VROY.V Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 190.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while VROY.V trades at CA$2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -21.85. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to VROY.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check VROY.V's competition here
LFLR.CN vs FAR.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 187.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while FAR.TO trades at CA$1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to FAR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check FAR.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TI.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 180M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TI.TO trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of +9.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to TI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TI.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs GLO.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 171.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while GLO.TO trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to GLO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check GLO.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs MOLY.NE Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while MOLY.NE trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to MOLY.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check MOLY.NE's competition here
LFLR.CN vs GEO.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while GEO.TO trades at CA$3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to GEO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check GEO.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs IBAT.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while IBAT.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to IBAT.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check IBAT.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs LAM.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 141.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check LAM.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs LGO.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 134M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while LGO.TO trades at CA$2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to LGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check LGO.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs CDPR.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while CDPR.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to CDPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check CDPR.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs NB.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while NB.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of -9.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to NB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check NB.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs FSY.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 109.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check FSY.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs FURY.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while FURY.TO trades at CA$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to FURY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check FURY.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TSK.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TSK.TO trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -12.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to TSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TSK.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SLR.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 100.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SLR.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to SLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SLR.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs AMC.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 96.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while AMC.TO trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to AMC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check AMC.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs NCF.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while NCF.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to NCF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check NCF.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs GENM.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 84.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while GENM.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to GENM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check GENM.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs NEXT.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while NEXT.TO trades at CA$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to NEXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check NEXT.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs WM.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while WM.TO trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to WM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check WM.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs AOT.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while AOT.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to AOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check AOT.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs GMX.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while GMX.TO trades at CA$1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to GMX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check GMX.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs PM.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while PM.CN trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to PM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check PM.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs S.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while S.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to S.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check S.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs RTG.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while RTG.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to RTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check RTG.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs RUA.V Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 62.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while RUA.V trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to RUA.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check RUA.V's competition here
LFLR.CN vs NVLH.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while NVLH.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to NVLH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check NVLH.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs OGD.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while OGD.TO trades at CA$1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to OGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check OGD.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TOC.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TOC.CN trades at CA$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -28.67. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to TOC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TOC.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs ARS.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while ARS.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to ARS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check ARS.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs MIN.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while MIN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to MIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check MIN.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs FT.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while FT.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to FT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check FT.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs FOX.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while FOX.CN trades at CA$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -25.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to FOX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check FOX.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs RUA.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while RUA.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to RUA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check RUA.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs VALU.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while VALU.CN trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to VALU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check VALU.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs BKI.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while BKI.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to BKI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check BKI.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs VOY.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while VOY.CN trades at CA$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to VOY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check VOY.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs EGFV.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while EGFV.CN trades at CA$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to EGFV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check EGFV.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs AMPS.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while AMPS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to AMPS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check AMPS.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs AVL.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while AVL.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to AVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check AVL.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs AAN.V Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while AAN.V trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to AAN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check AAN.V's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SX.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SX.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to SX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SX.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SAM.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SAM.TO trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to SAM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SAM.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs MAXX.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while MAXX.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to MAXX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check MAXX.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs URNM.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while URNM.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to URNM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check URNM.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs EXN.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while EXN.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to EXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check EXN.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs LVL.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, LVL.CN has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while LVL.CN trades at CA$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LVL.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to LVL.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LFLR.CN has daily volatility of 5.31 and LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check LVL.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SLV.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SLV.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to SLV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SLV.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs WRX.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while WRX.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to WRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check WRX.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SUPR.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SUPR.CN trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to SUPR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SUPR.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs PNRG.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, PNRG.CN has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while PNRG.CN trades at CA$0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas PNRG.CN's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PNRG.CN's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to PNRG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check PNRG.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs COSA.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while COSA.CN trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to COSA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check COSA.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SVB.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SVB.TO trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to SVB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SVB.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs ASND.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while ASND.TO trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to ASND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check ASND.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TTX.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TTX.CN has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TTX.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TTX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TTX.CN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to TTX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TTX.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs SCY.TO Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while SCY.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to SCY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check SCY.TO's competition here
LFLR.CN vs PEK.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while PEK.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to PEK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check PEK.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs EMET.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, EMET.CN has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while EMET.CN trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas EMET.CN's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to EMET.CN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to EMET.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check EMET.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs PSE.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, PSE.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while PSE.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas PSE.CN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to PSE.CN's ROE of +4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to PSE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check PSE.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs NXU.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while NXU.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to NXU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check NXU.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TN.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TN.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to TN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TN.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs TICO.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, TICO.CN has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while TICO.CN trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas TICO.CN's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to TICO.CN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to TICO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check TICO.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs LIM.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while LIM.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is more volatile compared to LIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check LIM.CN's competition here
LFLR.CN vs STGX.CN Comparison August 2025
LFLR.CN plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LFLR.CN stands at 37M. In comparison, STGX.CN has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFLR.CN is priced at CA$0.58, while STGX.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LFLR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -7.25, whereas STGX.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LFLR.CN's ROE is -1.21%, compared to STGX.CN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFLR.CN is less volatile compared to STGX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFLR.CN.Check STGX.CN's competition here