The Lion Electric Company

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while CAT trades at $428.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check CAT's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while DE trades at $500.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check DE's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while PCAR trades at $96.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check PCAR's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while CNH trades at $12.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check CNH's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while CNHI trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check CNHI's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while AGCO trades at $113.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AGCO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check AGCO's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while OSK trades at $130.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check OSK's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while TEX trades at $48.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check TEX's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while ALG trades at $215.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check ALG's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while REVG trades at $48.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check REVG's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while LNN trades at $133.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check LNN's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while ASTE trades at $37.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 57.44. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check ASTE's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 713.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while HY trades at $40.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas HY's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check HY's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 539.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while TWI trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -26.48. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check TWI's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while SHYF trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 627.00. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check SHYF's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 427.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while MTW trades at $12.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check MTW's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 405.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while CMCO trades at $14.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is -25.65. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check CMCO's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 392.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while WNC trades at $9.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check WNC's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while GENC trades at $14.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check GENC's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while MNTX trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check MNTX's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while XOSWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check XOSWW's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while XOS trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to XOS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check XOS's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while HYFM trades at $4.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check HYFM's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while ARTW trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check ARTW's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while NKLA trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check NKLA's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while ZEV trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check ZEV's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while CEAD trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CEAD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check CEAD's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while UGRO trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to UGRO's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check UGRO's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while IDEX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check IDEX's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while CEADW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CEADW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check CEADW's competition here

LEV plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEV stands at 56.6M. In comparison, NAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEV is priced at $0.25, while NAV trades at $44.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.43, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, LEV's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEV is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEV.Check NAV's competition here