Legend Biotech Corporation

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while VRTX trades at $458.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is 29.66. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VRTX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check VRTX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while REGN trades at $737.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check REGN's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while VRNA trades at $106.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -102.80. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check VRNA's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while SGEN trades at $228.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check SGEN's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ALNY trades at $311.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is 133.91. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALNY's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ALNY's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ARGX trades at $684.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ARGX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INSM has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while INSM trades at $144.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas INSM's P/E ratio is -21.18. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INSM's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to INSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check INSM's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while UTHR trades at $527.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check UTHR's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while BNTX trades at $89.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check BNTX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while MRNA trades at $52.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check MRNA's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while BGNE trades at $184.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BGNE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check BGNE's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ROIV trades at $27.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -23.68. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ROIV's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while RPRX trades at $45.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check RPRX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while RVMD trades at $99.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -16.10. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check RVMD's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check DNA-WT's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while INCY trades at $92.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check INCY's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while GMAB trades at $25.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check GMAB's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ASND trades at $223.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is -51.49. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ASND's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while BBIO trades at $70.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -18.14. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check BBIO's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while KRTX trades at $329.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check KRTX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while IONS trades at $71.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check IONS's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while SMMT trades at $15.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -10.77. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check SMMT's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RNAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while RNAM trades at $72.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas RNAM's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RNAM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to RNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check RNAM's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while JAZZ trades at $181.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is -30.88. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check JAZZ's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while EXEL trades at $41.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check EXEL's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while BMRN trades at $55.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check BMRN's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while MDGL trades at $454.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -34.30. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check MDGL's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while RXDX trades at $199.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check RXDX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while IMGN trades at $31.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check IMGN's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while IBRX trades at $8.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -22.29. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check IBRX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while BPMC trades at $129.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check BPMC's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CERE trades at $44.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CERE's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while TECH trades at $51.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 97.13. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check TECH's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while AXSM trades at $158.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -42.76. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check AXSM's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ABVX trades at $123.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -23.48. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ABVX's ROE of +50.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ABVX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ARWR trades at $56.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is 35.19. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ARWR's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ARWR's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while PCVX trades at $53.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check PCVX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CYTK trades at $62.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CYTK's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while HALO trades at $63.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HALO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check HALO's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while MTSR trades at $70.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check MTSR's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while KRYS trades at $258.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check KRYS's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while NUVL trades at $97.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check NUVL's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while MRUS trades at $90.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -17.05. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check MRUS's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ACLX trades at $114.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -28.21. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ACLX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while RETA trades at $172.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check RETA's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while KYMR trades at $79.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -21.11. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check KYMR's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while PTGX trades at $101.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is -48.23. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PTGX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check PTGX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PRAX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while PRAX trades at $297.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas PRAX's P/E ratio is -22.15. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PRAX's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to PRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check PRAX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while BLTE trades at $159.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -67.01. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check BLTE's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while RYTM trades at $90.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -28.12. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check RYTM's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CDTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CDTX trades at $221.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CDTX's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CDTX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to CDTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CDTX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ABCM trades at $23.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ABCM's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ISEE trades at $39.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ISEE's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CGON trades at $65.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -31.28. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CGON's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COGT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while COGT trades at $34.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas COGT's P/E ratio is -15.45. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to COGT's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to COGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check COGT's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while PTCT trades at $67.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PTCT's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check PTCT's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FBIOX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while FBIOX trades at $24.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas FBIOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FBIOX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to FBIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check FBIOX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CAI trades at $18.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CAI's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while SRRK trades at $45.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check SRRK's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CELC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CELC trades at $112.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CELC's P/E ratio is -28.86. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CELC's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to CELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CELC's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while TGTX trades at $30.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check TGTX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ALKS trades at $28.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ALKS's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while IMVT trades at $23.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check IMVT's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while XENE trades at $55.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check XENE's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ERAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ERAS trades at $15.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ERAS's P/E ratio is -33.18. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ERAS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to ERAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ERAS's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FOLD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while FOLD trades at $14.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas FOLD's P/E ratio is -160.06. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to FOLD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to FOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check FOLD's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while AKRO trades at $54.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check AKRO's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ALPN trades at $64.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ALPN's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while MIRM trades at $90.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -188.36. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check MIRM's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CRSP trades at $46.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CRSP's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TERN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while TERN trades at $49.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas TERN's P/E ratio is -47.49. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TERN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to TERN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check TERN's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while OPT trades at $3.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to OPT's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check OPT's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while MRTX trades at $58.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check MRTX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while LGND trades at $210.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is 33.47. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LGND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check LGND's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while RYZB trades at $62.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check RYZB's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while VKTX trades at $33.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -10.13. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check VKTX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CBAY trades at $32.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CBAY's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CRNX trades at $35.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CRNX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CORT trades at $34.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 42.26. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CORT's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while APGE trades at $68.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check APGE's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CNTA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CNTA trades at $28.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CNTA's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CNTA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to CNTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CNTA's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while SWTX trades at $46.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check SWTX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ACAD trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ACAD's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while KNSA trades at $45.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is 61.44. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to KNSA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check KNSA's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADMA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ADMA trades at $15.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ADMA's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ADMA's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to ADMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ADMA's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while NAMS trades at $30.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -16.83. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check NAMS's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LQDA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while LQDA trades at $37.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas LQDA's P/E ratio is -45.49. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LQDA's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to LQDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check LQDA's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while DNLI trades at $19.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check DNLI's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EWTX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while EWTX trades at $30.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas EWTX's P/E ratio is -17.82. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to EWTX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to EWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check EWTX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while TLX trades at $8.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is -437.50. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to TLX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check TLX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DYN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while DYN trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas DYN's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DYN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to DYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check DYN's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VERA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while VERA trades at $41.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas VERA's P/E ratio is -8.70. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to VERA's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to VERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check VERA's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IDYA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while IDYA trades at $32.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas IDYA's P/E ratio is -25.59. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to IDYA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to IDYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check IDYA's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MORF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while MORF trades at $56.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas MORF's P/E ratio is -14.88. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MORF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to MORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check MORF's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while MOR trades at $18.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas MOR's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MOR's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to MOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check MOR's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DNTH has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while DNTH trades at $80.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas DNTH's P/E ratio is -22.24. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DNTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to DNTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check DNTH's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while CPRX trades at $22.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check CPRX's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GPCR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while GPCR trades at $50.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas GPCR's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GPCR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to GPCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check GPCR's competition here

LEGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEGN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ARQT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEGN is priced at $17.87, while ARQT trades at $22.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEGN currently has a P/E ratio of -10.75, whereas ARQT's P/E ratio is -171.08. In terms of profitability, LEGN's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ARQT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEGN is less volatile compared to ARQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEGN.Check ARQT's competition here