Lee Enterprises, Incorporated
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated LEE Peers
See (LEE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEE | $6.71 | +6.51% | 41.1M | -0.91 | -$7.28 | N/A |
| RELX | $53.76 | +0.26% | 99.3B | 38.41 | $1.41 | +1.46% |
| PSO | $14.37 | -0.38% | 9.8B | 16.77 | $0.86 | +2.11% |
| NYT | $55.92 | +0.14% | 9.1B | 30.81 | $1.83 | N/A |
| MDP | $59.07 | +0.12% | 2.7B | 10.05 | $5.88 | N/A |
| WLY | $42.87 | -0.42% | 2.3B | 28.45 | $1.53 | +4.04% |
| WLYB | $42.47 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 27.76 | $1.53 | +4.04% |
| GCI | $3.82 | -0.03% | 577M | 10.65 | $0.37 | N/A |
| SCHL | $21.48 | -1.40% | 573.5M | 37.59 | $0.59 | +3.60% |
| DALN | $13.59 | +209.57% | 72.6M | 2.44 | $5.55 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LEE vs RELX Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 99.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while RELX trades at $53.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 38.41. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to RELX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs PSO Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, PSO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while PSO trades at $14.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas PSO's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to PSO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to PSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs NYT Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, NYT has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while NYT trades at $55.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas NYT's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to NYT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to NYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs MDP Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, MDP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while MDP trades at $59.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas MDP's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to MDP's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to MDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs WLY Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, WLY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while WLY trades at $42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas WLY's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to WLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs WLYB Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, WLYB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while WLYB trades at $42.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas WLYB's P/E ratio is 27.76. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to WLYB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to WLYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs GCI Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, GCI has a market cap of 577M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while GCI trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas GCI's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to GCI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to GCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs SCHL Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, SCHL has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while SCHL trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas SCHL's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SCHL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to SCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs DALN Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, DALN has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while DALN trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas DALN's P/E ratio is 2.44. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to DALN's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to DALN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs AHC Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, AHC has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while AHC trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas AHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to AHC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to AHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs EDUC Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, EDUC has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while EDUC trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas EDUC's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to EDUC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to EDUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs IDW Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, IDW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while IDW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas IDW's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to IDW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to IDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs TPCO Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, TPCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while TPCO trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas TPCO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to TPCO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs JW-A Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, JW-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while JW-A trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas JW-A's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to JW-A's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs JW-B Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 41.1M. In comparison, JW-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.71, while JW-B trades at $53.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.91, whereas JW-B's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to JW-B's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.