Lee Enterprises, Incorporated
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated LEE Peers
See (LEE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEE | $6.50 | -1.07% | 40.4M | -0.89 | -$7.28 | N/A |
| RELX | $52.77 | -0.93% | 96.9B | 37.69 | $1.40 | +1.50% |
| PSO | $14.61 | -1.58% | 9.9B | 17.18 | $0.85 | +2.08% |
| NYT | $55.62 | +0.05% | 9B | 30.39 | $1.83 | +1.03% |
| MDP | $59.07 | +0.12% | 2.7B | 10.05 | $5.88 | N/A |
| WLYB | $38.71 | N/A | 2.1B | 51.61 | $0.75 | +3.73% |
| WLY | $37.73 | -2.10% | 2B | 50.99 | $0.74 | +3.73% |
| GCI | $3.40 | -3.41% | 497.9M | 9.19 | $0.37 | N/A |
| SCHL | $18.65 | -1.74% | 482.3M | 31.61 | $0.59 | +4.28% |
| AHC | $7.56 | -1.31% | 40.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LEE vs RELX Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while RELX trades at $52.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to RELX's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs PSO Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, PSO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while PSO trades at $14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas PSO's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to PSO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to PSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs NYT Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, NYT has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while NYT trades at $55.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas NYT's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to NYT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to NYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs MDP Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, MDP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while MDP trades at $59.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas MDP's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to MDP's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to MDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs WLYB Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, WLYB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while WLYB trades at $38.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas WLYB's P/E ratio is 51.61. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to WLYB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs WLY Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, WLY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while WLY trades at $37.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas WLY's P/E ratio is 50.99. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to WLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs GCI Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, GCI has a market cap of 497.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while GCI trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas GCI's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to GCI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to GCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs SCHL Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, SCHL has a market cap of 482.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while SCHL trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas SCHL's P/E ratio is 31.61. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to SCHL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to SCHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs AHC Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, AHC has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while AHC trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas AHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to AHC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to AHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs DALN Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, DALN has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while DALN trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas DALN's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to DALN's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to DALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs EDUC Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, EDUC has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while EDUC trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas EDUC's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to EDUC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to EDUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs IDW Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, IDW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while IDW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas IDW's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to IDW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to IDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs JW-A Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, JW-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while JW-A trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas JW-A's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to JW-A's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs TPCO Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, TPCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while TPCO trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas TPCO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to TPCO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.
LEE vs JW-B Comparison
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 40.4M. In comparison, JW-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $6.50, while JW-B trades at $53.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.89, whereas JW-B's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +5.18%, compared to JW-B's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.