Lee Enterprises, Incorporated
Lee Enterprises, Incorporated (LEE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LEE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEE | $8.73 | +4.55% | 53.2M | -2.02 | -$4.32 | N/A |
| RELX | $31.22 | +2.36% | 56.6B | 20.42 | $1.53 | +2.68% |
| NYT | $75.84 | +0.73% | 12.3B | 36.28 | $2.09 | +0.95% |
| PSO | $12.65 | +1.44% | 8B | 14.22 | $0.89 | +2.36% |
| MDP | $59.07 | +0.12% | 2.7B | 10.05 | $5.88 | N/A |
| WLYB | $30.40 | +2.63% | 1.6B | 16.26 | $1.87 | +4.66% |
| WLY | $29.35 | +0.96% | 1.6B | 15.69 | $1.87 | +4.82% |
| GCI | $5.93 | -0.34% | 872.4M | 8.85 | $0.67 | N/A |
| TDAY | $5.85 | -2.34% | 859.1M | 8.72 | $0.67 | N/A |
| SCHL | $32.86 | +0.92% | 808.8M | -172.95 | -$0.19 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
LEE vs RELX Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, RELX has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while RELX trades at $31.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas RELX's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to RELX's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to RELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check RELX's competition here
LEE vs NYT Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, NYT has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while NYT trades at $75.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas NYT's P/E ratio is 36.28. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to NYT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to NYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check NYT's competition here
LEE vs PSO Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, PSO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while PSO trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas PSO's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to PSO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to PSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check PSO's competition here
LEE vs MDP Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, MDP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while MDP trades at $59.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas MDP's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to MDP's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to MDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check MDP's competition here
LEE vs WLYB Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, WLYB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while WLYB trades at $30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas WLYB's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WLYB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check WLYB's competition here
LEE vs WLY Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, WLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while WLY trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas WLY's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to WLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to WLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check WLY's competition here
LEE vs GCI Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, GCI has a market cap of 872.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while GCI trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas GCI's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to GCI's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to GCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check GCI's competition here
LEE vs TDAY Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, TDAY has a market cap of 859.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while TDAY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas TDAY's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TDAY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TDAY's competition here
LEE vs SCHL Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, SCHL has a market cap of 808.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while SCHL trades at $32.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas SCHL's P/E ratio is -172.95. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to SCHL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to SCHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check SCHL's competition here
LEE vs DALN Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, DALN has a market cap of 88.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while DALN trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas DALN's P/E ratio is -17.02. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to DALN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to DALN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check DALN's competition here
LEE vs AHC Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, AHC has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while AHC trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas AHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to AHC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to AHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check AHC's competition here
LEE vs EDUC Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, EDUC has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while EDUC trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas EDUC's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to EDUC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to EDUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check EDUC's competition here
LEE vs IDW Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, IDW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while IDW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas IDW's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to IDW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is less volatile compared to IDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check IDW's competition here
LEE vs TNMG Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while TNMG trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TNMG's competition here
LEE vs JW-B Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, JW-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while JW-B trades at $53.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas JW-B's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to JW-B's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check JW-B's competition here
LEE vs JW-A Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, JW-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while JW-A trades at $53.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas JW-A's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to JW-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to JW-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check JW-A's competition here
LEE vs TPCO Comparison February 2026
LEE plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEE stands at 53.2M. In comparison, TPCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEE is priced at $8.73, while TPCO trades at $17.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEE currently has a P/E ratio of -2.02, whereas TPCO's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, LEE's ROE is +0.62%, compared to TPCO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEE is more volatile compared to TPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEE.Check TPCO's competition here