Loblaw Companies Limited
Loblaw Companies Limited (LBLCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LBLCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBLCF | $162.40 | +0.40% | 48.3B | 27.62 | $5.88 | +0.93% |
| TSCDF | $5.74 | -1.20% | 37.4B | 18.52 | $0.31 | +3.15% |
| TSCDY | $16.92 | +0.06% | 37.2B | 18.18 | $0.93 | +3.15% |
| ADRNY | $39.47 | +0.05% | 36.6B | 17.50 | $2.26 | +3.32% |
| AHODF | $39.15 | -1.41% | 35.4B | 17.10 | $2.29 | +3.34% |
| SVNDY | $13.35 | +1.44% | 33.9B | 25.48 | $0.52 | +1.27% |
| SVNDF | $13.25 | +0.00% | 33.8B | 25.48 | $0.52 | +2.05% |
| WNGRF | $192.87 | +0.00% | 24.7B | 34.50 | $5.59 | +1.24% |
| WOLWF | $19.24 | -0.57% | 23.5B | 22.11 | $0.87 | +4.41% |
| KKOYY | $11.05 | +1.56% | 17.8B | 20.02 | $0.55 | +5.19% |
Stock Comparison
LBLCF vs TSCDF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while TSCDF trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDF's competition here
LBLCF vs TSCDY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while TSCDY trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDY's competition here
LBLCF vs ADRNY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while ADRNY trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check ADRNY's competition here
LBLCF vs AHODF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while AHODF trades at $39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AHODF's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while SVNDY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDY's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while SVNDF trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDF's competition here
LBLCF vs WNGRF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while WNGRF trades at $192.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check WNGRF's competition here
LBLCF vs WOLWF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while WOLWF trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check WOLWF's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while KKOYY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYY's competition here
LBLCF vs CLEGF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CLEGF trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CLEGF's competition here
LBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while MTRAF trades at $76.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MTRAF's competition here
LBLCF vs CPPCY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CPPCY trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CPPCY's competition here
LBLCF vs DNOPY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while DNOPY trades at $68.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 327.14. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DNOPY's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPBF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CVPBF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CVPBF's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPUF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CVPUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CVPUF's competition here
LBLCF vs CRRFY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CRRFY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRRFY's competition here
LBLCF vs CRERF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CRERF trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRERF's competition here
LBLCF vs JSNSF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while JSNSF trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSNSF's competition here
LBLCF vs EMLAF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while EMLAF trades at $39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EMLAF's competition here
LBLCF vs JSAIY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while JSAIY trades at $16.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSAIY's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while KKOYF trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYF's competition here
LBLCF vs GCHEF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while GCHEF trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GCHEF's competition here
LBLCF vs BMBRF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check BMBRF's competition here
LBLCF vs KOBNF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while KOBNF trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 41.65. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KOBNF's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AXFOY's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTF's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CUYTY trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTY's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AXFOF's competition here
LBLCF vs DFIHY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while DFIHY trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -12.40. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFIHY's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDDY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while OCDDY trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OCDDY's competition here
LBLCF vs DFILF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while DFILF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DFILF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFILF's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDGF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while OCDGF trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OCDGF's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while GGGSY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSY's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while GGGSF trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUSY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CGUSY's competition here
LBLCF vs SHUFF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while SHUFF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SHUFF's competition here
LBLCF vs NNWWF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while NNWWF trades at $35.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check NNWWF's competition here
LBLCF vs RLEVF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check RLEVF's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while EUSHY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHY's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while EUSHF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -16.69. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUIF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 220.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while CGUIF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CGUIF's competition here
LBLCF vs HWIN Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while HWIN trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HWIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HWIN's competition here
LBLCF vs HCMC Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HCMC's ROE of -753.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HCMC's competition here
LBLCF vs FLOCF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check FLOCF's competition here
LBLCF vs MTVX Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MTVX's competition here
LBLCF vs IFMK Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check IFMK's competition here
LBLCF vs OMHI Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OMHI's competition here
LBLCF vs MFLTY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 718. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MFLTY's competition here
LBLCF vs QKLS Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.3B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.40, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 27.62, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QKLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check QKLS's competition here