Loblaw Companies Limited
Loblaw Companies Limited (LBLCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LBLCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBLCF | $49.24 | -2.03% | 58.2B | 32.83 | $1.50 | +0.81% |
| TSCDY | $20.46 | +0.54% | 44.3B | 21.98 | $0.93 | +2.71% |
| TSCDF | $6.84 | +5.39% | 43.5B | 22.06 | $0.31 | +2.77% |
| AHODF | $48.92 | +1.92% | 43.4B | 16.47 | $2.97 | +2.75% |
| ADRNY | $48.73 | +0.06% | 43.1B | 16.42 | $2.96 | +2.78% |
| SVNDF | $14.50 | -6.45% | 34.5B | 23.39 | $0.62 | +2.09% |
| SVNDY | $14.42 | +1.55% | 34.3B | 23.24 | $0.62 | +1.06% |
| WNGRF | $72.62 | -0.33% | 27.8B | 26.41 | $2.75 | +1.16% |
| WOLWF | $20.94 | +0.00% | 25.6B | 38.07 | $0.55 | +2.59% |
| CLEGF | $16.80 | +12.00% | 22.5B | 29.47 | $0.57 | +2.68% |
Stock Comparison
LBLCF vs TSCDY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while TSCDY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDY's competition here
LBLCF vs TSCDF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while TSCDF trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDF's competition here
LBLCF vs AHODF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while AHODF trades at $48.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AHODF's competition here
LBLCF vs ADRNY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while ADRNY trades at $48.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check ADRNY's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while SVNDF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDF's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while SVNDY trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDY's competition here
LBLCF vs WNGRF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while WNGRF trades at $72.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 26.41. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check WNGRF's competition here
LBLCF vs WOLWF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while WOLWF trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check WOLWF's competition here
LBLCF vs CLEGF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CLEGF trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CLEGF's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while KKOYY trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYY's competition here
LBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while MTRAF trades at $71.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MTRAF's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPBF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CVPBF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CVPBF's competition here
LBLCF vs CRRFY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CRRFY trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 34.82. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRRFY's competition here
LBLCF vs CRERF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CRERF trades at $18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRERF's competition here
LBLCF vs CPPCY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CPPCY trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CPPCY's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPUF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CVPUF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CVPUF's competition here
LBLCF vs DNOPY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while DNOPY trades at $11.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DNOPY's competition here
LBLCF vs JSAIY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while JSAIY trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSAIY's competition here
LBLCF vs JSNSF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while JSNSF trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSNSF's competition here
LBLCF vs EMLAF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while EMLAF trades at $36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EMLAF's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while KKOYF trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYF's competition here
LBLCF vs BMBRF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check BMBRF's competition here
LBLCF vs GCHEF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while GCHEF trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GCHEF's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AXFOY's competition here
LBLCF vs DFILF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while DFILF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is -14.96. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DFILF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFILF's competition here
LBLCF vs KOBNF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while KOBNF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KOBNF's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTF's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AXFOF's competition here
LBLCF vs DFIHY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while DFIHY trades at $16.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFIHY's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CUYTY trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTY's competition here
LBLCF vs SHUFF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while SHUFF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SHUFF's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDDY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while OCDDY trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OCDDY's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDGF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while OCDGF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OCDGF's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while GGGSY trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSY's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while GGGSF trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSF's competition here
LBLCF vs NNWWF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while NNWWF trades at $41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check NNWWF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUSY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -33.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CGUSY's competition here
LBLCF vs RLEVF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check RLEVF's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while EUSHY trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHY's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUIF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while CGUIF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CGUIF's competition here
LBLCF vs HCMC Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCMC's ROE of +3.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HCMC's competition here
LBLCF vs FLOCF Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check FLOCF's competition here
LBLCF vs IFMK Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check IFMK's competition here
LBLCF vs MTVX Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MTVX's competition here
LBLCF vs OMHI Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 20.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OMHI's competition here
LBLCF vs HWIN Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while HWIN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HWIN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HWIN's competition here
LBLCF vs MFLTY Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MFLTY's competition here
LBLCF vs QKLS Comparison February 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 58.2B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $49.24, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 32.83, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QKLS's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check QKLS's competition here