Loblaw Companies Limited
Loblaw Companies Limited LBLCF Peers
See (LBLCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBLCF | $162.52 | -0.64% | 48.5B | 31.13 | $5.22 | +0.93% |
| SVNDF | $16.04 | +1.07% | 41.6B | 34.87 | $0.46 | +1.69% |
| SVNDY | $16.05 | +1.20% | 41.5B | 34.78 | $0.46 | +1.06% |
| ADRNY | $41.73 | +0.72% | 38.1B | 18.63 | $2.24 | +3.13% |
| AHODF | $40.51 | -4.36% | 36.9B | 18.00 | $2.25 | +3.23% |
| TSCDY | $16.74 | +0.54% | 36.6B | 17.97 | $0.93 | +3.19% |
| TSCDF | $5.53 | +0.09% | 36.2B | 17.82 | $0.31 | +3.27% |
| WOLWF | $19.04 | +0.00% | 25.9B | 24.71 | $0.86 | +3.99% |
| WNGRF | $199.99 | +2.25% | 25.3B | 31.06 | $6.32 | +1.22% |
| CLEGF | $13.79 | +0.03% | 19.9B | 27.50 | $0.54 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
LBLCF vs SVNDF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while SVNDF trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs SVNDY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while SVNDY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs ADRNY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while ADRNY trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs AHODF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while AHODF trades at $40.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs TSCDY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while TSCDY trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs TSCDF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while TSCDF trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs WOLWF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while WOLWF trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs WNGRF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while WNGRF trades at $199.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CLEGF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CLEGF trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs KKOYY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while KKOYY trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CVPUF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CVPUF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while MTRAF trades at $77.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CVPBF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CVPBF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs DNOPY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while DNOPY trades at $72.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CPPCY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CPPCY trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs JSNSF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while JSNSF trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CRRFY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CRRFY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CRERF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CRERF trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs EMLAF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while EMLAF trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs JSAIY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while JSAIY trades at $16.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs GCHEF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while GCHEF trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs KKOYF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while KKOYF trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs BMBRF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs AXFOF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs AXFOY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs KOBNF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while KOBNF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CUYTF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CUYTY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CUYTY trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs DFIHY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while DFIHY trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -17.17. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs DFILF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while DFILF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is -15.39. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DFILF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs GGGSY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while GGGSY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs OCDDY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while OCDDY trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs GGGSF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while GGGSF trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs OCDGF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while OCDGF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CGUSY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs NNWWF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while NNWWF trades at $34.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs SHUFF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while SHUFF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs RLEVF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs EUSHY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 521.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while EUSHY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs EUSHF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs HWIN Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while HWIN trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HWIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs CGUIF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 32.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while CGUIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs FLOCF Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs MTVX Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs HCMC Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 481.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HCMC's ROE of -753.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs IFMK Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs OMHI Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs MFLTY Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 718. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.
LBLCF vs QKLS Comparison
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 48.5B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $162.52, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 31.13, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QKLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.