Loblaw Companies Limited
Loblaw Companies Limited (LBLCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LBLCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBLCF | $40.78 | -0.71% | 12.2B | 28.34 | $1.45 | +3.67% |
| TSCDY | $17.60 | +0.74% | 39.6B | 18.71 | $0.93 | +3.06% |
| TSCDF | $5.79 | +0.17% | 37.6B | 18.68 | $0.31 | +3.12% |
| ADRNY | $40.58 | -0.83% | 37B | 17.18 | $2.35 | +3.34% |
| AHODF | $41.10 | -0.54% | 36.8B | 17.42 | $2.36 | +3.27% |
| SVNDY | $13.33 | -2.74% | 34.9B | 25.87 | $0.52 | +1.27% |
| SVNDF | $13.65 | +0.00% | 34.9B | 25.75 | $0.53 | +1.98% |
| WOLWF | $23.26 | +17.53% | 24.2B | 23.01 | $0.86 | +4.29% |
| KKOYY | $11.12 | -3.26% | 18B | 20.53 | $0.55 | +4.59% |
| CLEGF | $13.20 | +0.00% | 17.7B | 24.91 | $0.53 | +3.40% |
Stock Comparison
LBLCF vs TSCDY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while TSCDY trades at $17.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDY's competition here
LBLCF vs TSCDF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while TSCDF trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDF's competition here
LBLCF vs ADRNY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while ADRNY trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check ADRNY's competition here
LBLCF vs AHODF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while AHODF trades at $41.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AHODF's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while SVNDY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDY's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while SVNDF trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDF's competition here
LBLCF vs WOLWF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while WOLWF trades at $23.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and WOLWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WOLWF's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while KKOYY trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYY's competition here
LBLCF vs CLEGF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CLEGF trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CLEGF's competition here
LBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while MTRAF trades at $72.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and MTRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTRAF's competition here
LBLCF vs CPPCY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CPPCY trades at $14.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CPPCY's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPBF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CVPBF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and CVPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CVPBF's competition here
LBLCF vs CRERF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CRERF trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRERF's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPUF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CVPUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CVPUF's competition here
LBLCF vs CRRFY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CRRFY trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRRFY's competition here
LBLCF vs JSAIY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while JSAIY trades at $16.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSAIY's competition here
LBLCF vs JSNSF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while JSNSF trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSNSF's competition here
LBLCF vs EMLAF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while EMLAF trades at $39.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EMLAF's competition here
LBLCF vs WNGRF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while WNGRF trades at $64.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and WNGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WNGRF's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while KKOYF trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYF's competition here
LBLCF vs GCHEF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while GCHEF trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and GCHEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GCHEF's competition here
LBLCF vs BMBRF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check BMBRF's competition here
LBLCF vs KOBNF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while KOBNF trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 41.65. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KOBNF's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and AXFOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXFOY's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CUYTY trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTY's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTF's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and AXFOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXFOF's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDGF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while OCDGF trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and OCDGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OCDGF's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDDY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while OCDDY trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OCDDY's competition here
LBLCF vs DFIHY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while DFIHY trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFIHY's competition here
LBLCF vs DFILF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while DFILF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is -8.82. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DFILF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFILF's competition here
LBLCF vs DNOPY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while DNOPY trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and DNOPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DNOPY's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while GGGSY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSY's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while GGGSF trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSF's competition here
LBLCF vs NNWWF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while NNWWF trades at $36.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and NNWWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNWWF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUSY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -33.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and CGUSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGUSY's competition here
LBLCF vs SHUFF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while SHUFF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and SHUFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHUFF's competition here
LBLCF vs RLEVF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check RLEVF's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while EUSHY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHY's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUIF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while CGUIF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CGUIF's competition here
LBLCF vs HWIN Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while HWIN trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HWIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HWIN's competition here
LBLCF vs HCMC Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HCMC's ROE of +6.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HCMC's competition here
LBLCF vs FLOCF Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and FLOCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLOCF's competition here
LBLCF vs MTVX Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MTVX's competition here
LBLCF vs IFMK Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and IFMK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IFMK's competition here
LBLCF vs OMHI Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OMHI's competition here
LBLCF vs MFLTY Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 764. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF and MFLTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MFLTY's competition here
LBLCF vs QKLS Comparison August 2025
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 12.2B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $40.78, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.34, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.22%, compared to QKLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check QKLS's competition here