The Kroger Co.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for KR
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for KR
The Kroger Co. (KR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR | $73.03 | +0.94% | 46.2B | 47.41 | $1.54 | +1.89% |
| ACI | $17.99 | +3.09% | 9.9B | 11.68 | $1.54 | +3.35% |
| SFM | $77.43 | -0.14% | 7.5B | 14.58 | $5.31 | N/A |
| ASAI | $4.67 | +1.74% | 6.3B | 11.97 | $0.39 | N/A |
| IMKTA | $92.76 | +1.80% | 1.8B | 18.51 | $5.01 | +0.72% |
| WMK | $71.15 | +1.24% | 1.8B | 19.49 | $3.65 | +1.92% |
| GO | $7.10 | -1.66% | 696.9M | -3.09 | -$2.30 | N/A |
| VLGEA | $43.17 | +0.16% | 636.8M | 11.30 | $3.82 | +2.32% |
| NGVC | $26.38 | +0.92% | 607.4M | 12.80 | $2.06 | +2.05% |
| DNUT | $3.45 | +1.47% | 594.1M | -1.13 | -$3.04 | +1.01% |
Stock Comparison
KR vs ACI Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ACI has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while ACI trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas ACI's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to ACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check ACI's competition here
KR vs SFM Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, SFM has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while SFM trades at $77.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas SFM's P/E ratio is 14.58. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFM's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to SFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check SFM's competition here
KR vs ASAI Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ASAI has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while ASAI trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas ASAI's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to ASAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check ASAI's competition here
KR vs IMKTA Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, IMKTA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while IMKTA trades at $92.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas IMKTA's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IMKTA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to IMKTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check IMKTA's competition here
KR vs WMK Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, WMK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while WMK trades at $71.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas WMK's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WMK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to WMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check WMK's competition here
KR vs GO Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, GO has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while GO trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas GO's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to GO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check GO's competition here
KR vs VLGEA Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, VLGEA has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while VLGEA trades at $43.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas VLGEA's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLGEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to VLGEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check VLGEA's competition here
KR vs NGVC Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, NGVC has a market cap of 607.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while NGVC trades at $26.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas NGVC's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NGVC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to NGVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check NGVC's competition here
KR vs DNUT Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 594.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while DNUT trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DNUT's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check DNUT's competition here
KR vs DDL Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, DDL has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while DDL trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas DDL's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DDL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to DDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check DDL's competition here
KR vs MF Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MF has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while MF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas MF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to MF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check MF's competition here
KR vs MSS Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, MSS has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while MSS trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas MSS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to MSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check MSS's competition here
KR vs ECACU Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, ECACU has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while ECACU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas ECACU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ECACU's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to ECACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check ECACU's competition here
KR vs CST Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, CST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while CST trades at $48.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas CST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CST's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to CST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check CST's competition here
KR vs KKD Comparison April 2026
KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 46.2B. In comparison, KKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $73.03, while KKD trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KR currently has a P/E ratio of 47.41, whereas KKD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KKD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to KKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.Check KKD's competition here