The Kroger Co.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, LBLCF has a market cap of 47.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while LBLCF trades at $158.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas LBLCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LBLCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to LBLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 39.34B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while SVNDY trades at $15.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 37.80B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while AHODF trades at $43.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 37.36B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while ADRNY trades at $40.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 35.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while SVNDF trades at $13.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 29.74. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 34.00B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while TSCDY trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 33.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while TSCDF trades at $4.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 24.56B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while WNGRF trades at $190.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 23.63B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while WOLWF trades at $19.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 20.12B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CLEGF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 18.28B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while KKOYY trades at $11.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 16.76B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while MTRAF trades at $76.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 16.27B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CVPBF trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, SFM has a market cap of 15.48B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while SFM trades at $158.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SFM's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SFM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to SFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 15.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CVPUF trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 13.92B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while DNOPY trades at $71.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 34.98. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 13.72B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CPPCY trades at $15.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 18.18. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, ACI has a market cap of 12.85B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while ACI trades at $22.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ACI's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to ACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 10.09B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CRRFY trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 9.96B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CRERF trades at $15.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 8.54B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while EMLAF trades at $36.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 8.21B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while JSNSF trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 8.06B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while KKOYF trades at $20.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.84B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 6.48B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while GCHEF trades at $6.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, ASAI has a market cap of 6.28B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while ASAI trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ASAI's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASAI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to ASAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 6.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while KOBNF trades at $28.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while AXFOY trades at $25.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CUYTY trades at $10.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while DFILF trades at $2.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is -14.72. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DFILF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 3.26B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while DFIHY trades at $12.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -13.24. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while OCDGF trades at $3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while OCDDY trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while GGGSF trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while GGGSY trades at $8.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, WMK has a market cap of 2.17B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while WMK trades at $80.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas WMK's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WMK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to WMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while JSAIY trades at $14.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while NNWWF trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while SHUFF trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, GO has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while GO trades at $14.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas GO's P/E ratio is 37.45. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to GO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, IMKTA has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while IMKTA trades at $61.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas IMKTA's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IMKTA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to IMKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, NGVC has a market cap of 1.05B. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while NGVC trades at $45.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas NGVC's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NGVC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to NGVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 771.43M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while RLEVF trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 11.64. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, DNUT has a market cap of 556.35M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while DNUT trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas DNUT's P/E ratio is 163.00. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DNUT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to DNUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 487.07M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while EUSHY trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -175.00. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, VLGEA has a market cap of 480.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while VLGEA trades at $36.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas VLGEA's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VLGEA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to VLGEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, DDL has a market cap of 367.06M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while DDL trades at $2.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas DDL's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DDL's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to DDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 237.97M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 66.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while HWIN trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HWIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 48.13M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while HCMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HCMC's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, MSS has a market cap of 12.04M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while MSS trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas MSS's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to MSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, MF has a market cap of 7.85M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while MF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas MF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to MF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.23M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 2.88M. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while CGUIF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KR and CGUIF have similar daily volatility (1.53).

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822777.00. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while MTVX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 9640.00. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while OMHI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 9627.00. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while IFMK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152.00. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while QKLS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QKLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is less volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.

KR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KR stands at 47.47B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 8.00. Regarding current trading prices, KR is priced at $71.82, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KR currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KR's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KR is more volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KR.