K.P. Energy Limited
K.P. Energy Limited (KPEL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KPEL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPEL.BO | ₹299.00 | +0.00% | 19.7B | 13.33 | ₹22.08 | +0.29% |
| NTPC.NS | ₹363.20 | +0.00% | 3.6T | 20.62 | ₹18.09 | +2.37% |
| ADANIPOWER.NS | ₹140.45 | +0.00% | 2.8T | 24.35 | ₹5.86 | N/A |
| ADANIPOWER.BO | ₹140.55 | +0.00% | 2.8T | 24.34 | ₹5.86 | N/A |
| TATAPOWER.NS | ₹369.30 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 31.90 | ₹11.85 | +0.60% |
| TATAPOWER.BO | ₹369.50 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 31.92 | ₹11.84 | +0.60% |
| ADANIENSOL.NS | ₹1,007.20 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 53.57 | ₹18.63 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.BO | ₹1,007.40 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 53.52 | ₹18.64 | N/A |
| ADANITRANS.NS | ₹890.40 | -7.26% | 993.2B | 72.45 | ₹12.29 | N/A |
| JSWENERGY.NS | ₹480.10 | +0.00% | 863.3B | 37.97 | ₹13.01 | +0.40% |
Stock Comparison
KPEL.BO vs NTPC.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, NTPC.NS has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while NTPC.NS trades at ₹363.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas NTPC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NTPC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to NTPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check NTPC.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.NS has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while ADANIPOWER.NS trades at ₹140.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ADANIPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANIPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.BO has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while ADANIPOWER.BO trades at ₹140.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ADANIPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANIPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TATAPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while TATAPOWER.NS trades at ₹369.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TATAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TATAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TATAPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TATAPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while TATAPOWER.BO trades at ₹369.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TATAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TATAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TATAPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIENSOL.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while ADANIENSOL.NS trades at ₹1,007.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ADANIENSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.57. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANIENSOL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIENSOL.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIENSOL.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while ADANIENSOL.BO trades at ₹1,007.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ADANIENSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 53.52. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANIENSOL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIENSOL.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANITRANS.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, ADANITRANS.NS has a market cap of 993.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while ADANITRANS.NS trades at ₹890.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ADANITRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.45. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANITRANS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to ADANITRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANITRANS.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JSWENERGY.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.NS has a market cap of 863.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while JSWENERGY.NS trades at ₹480.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas JSWENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 37.97. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JSWENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JSWENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JSWENERGY.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JSWENERGY.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.BO has a market cap of 863B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while JSWENERGY.BO trades at ₹479.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas JSWENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JSWENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JSWENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JSWENERGY.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TORNTPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.BO has a market cap of 770.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while TORNTPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,491.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TORNTPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TORNTPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TORNTPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TORNTPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.NS has a market cap of 770.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while TORNTPOWER.NS trades at ₹1,492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TORNTPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.28. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TORNTPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs CESC.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, CESC.NS has a market cap of 206B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while CESC.NS trades at ₹151.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CESC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CESC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to CESC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check CESC.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, RPOWER.BO has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while RPOWER.BO trades at ₹26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to RPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, RPOWER.NS has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while RPOWER.NS trades at ₹26.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to RPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JPPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, JPPOWER.BO has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while JPPOWER.BO trades at ₹14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas JPPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JPPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JPPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JPPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JPPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, JPPOWER.NS has a market cap of 100.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while JPPOWER.NS trades at ₹14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas JPPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JPPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JPPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JPPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs WAAREERTL.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.BO has a market cap of 91.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while WAAREERTL.BO trades at ₹883.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas WAAREERTL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WAAREERTL.BO's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check WAAREERTL.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs PTC.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PTC.BO has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while PTC.BO trades at ₹171.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PTC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PTC.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to PTC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check PTC.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs PTC.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, PTC.NS has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while PTC.NS trades at ₹171.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PTC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PTC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to PTC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check PTC.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RTNINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, RTNINDIA.NS has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while RTNINDIA.NS trades at ₹32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RTNINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RTNINDIA.NS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to RTNINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RTNINDIA.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RELINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, RELINFRA.BO has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while RELINFRA.BO trades at ₹108.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RELINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RELINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to RELINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RELINFRA.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RELTD.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, RELTD.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while RELTD.BO trades at ₹148.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RELTD.BO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RELTD.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to RELTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RELTD.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GREENPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while GREENPOWER.BO trades at ₹10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GREENPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GREENPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to GREENPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GREENPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GREENPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while GREENPOWER.NS trades at ₹10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GREENPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GREENPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to GREENPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GREENPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GVKPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, GVKPIL.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while GVKPIL.BO trades at ₹3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GVKPIL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GVKPIL.BO's ROE of -7.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to GVKPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GVKPIL.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs SURANAT&P.NS Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, SURANAT&P.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while SURANAT&P.NS trades at ₹18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SURANAT&P.NS's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SURANAT&P.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to SURANAT&P.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check SURANAT&P.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs VENLONENT.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, VENLONENT.BO has a market cap of 297.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while VENLONENT.BO trades at ₹5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas VENLONENT.BO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to VENLONENT.BO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to VENLONENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check VENLONENT.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JAYCH.BO Comparison February 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 19.7B. In comparison, JAYCH.BO has a market cap of 192.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹299.00, while JAYCH.BO trades at ₹6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas JAYCH.BO's P/E ratio is -218.33. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JAYCH.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to JAYCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JAYCH.BO's competition here