Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd.
Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. (KL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KL | $38.92 | -0.23% | 0 | 11.70 | $3.33 | +1.93% |
| NEM | $124.16 | -0.99% | 133.3B | 19.00 | $6.43 | +0.81% |
| AEM | $238.25 | +6.14% | 114.4B | 25.74 | $8.87 | +0.70% |
| B | $49.15 | +1.24% | 80.4B | 16.37 | $2.93 | +1.09% |
| WPM | $155.12 | +6.73% | 68.3B | 68.06 | $2.21 | +0.44% |
| AU | $120.90 | +12.33% | 57.7B | 26.33 | $4.34 | +2.21% |
| FNV | $268.78 | +5.42% | 50.2B | 54.57 | $4.77 | +0.58% |
| GFI | $56.61 | +7.13% | 48.4B | 25.88 | $2.09 | +1.29% |
| KGC | $35.33 | +5.62% | 40.9B | 23.38 | $1.43 | +0.38% |
| HL-PB | $79.00 | +5.05% | 37.4B | 2598.33 | $0.03 | +0.06% |
Stock Comparison
KL vs NEM Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 133.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while NEM trades at $124.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check NEM's competition here
KL vs AEM Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while AEM trades at $238.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check AEM's competition here
KL vs B Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, B has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while B trades at $49.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas B's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to B's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check B's competition here
KL vs WPM Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while WPM trades at $155.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 68.06. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check WPM's competition here
KL vs AU Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while AU trades at $120.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check AU's competition here
KL vs FNV Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while FNV trades at $268.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 54.57. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check FNV's competition here
KL vs GFI Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while GFI trades at $56.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check GFI's competition here
KL vs KGC Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while KGC trades at $35.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check KGC's competition here
KL vs HL-PB Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while HL-PB trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 2598.33. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check HL-PB's competition here
KL vs AGI Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while AGI trades at $49.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check AGI's competition here
KL vs RGLD Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while RGLD trades at $286.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check RGLD's competition here
KL vs HL Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while HL trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 77.44. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check HL's competition here
KL vs CDE Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while CDE trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check CDE's competition here
KL vs EQX Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while EQX trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 168.20. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check EQX's competition here
KL vs IAG Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while IAG trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 37.03. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is more volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check IAG's competition here
KL vs HMY Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while HMY trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check HMY's competition here
KL vs SBSW Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while SBSW trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -51.39. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check SBSW's competition here
KL vs NGD Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while NGD trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check NGD's competition here
KL vs EGO Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while EGO trades at $44.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check EGO's competition here
KL vs OR Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while OR trades at $44.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 55.97. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check OR's competition here
KL vs BTG Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while BTG trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check BTG's competition here
KL vs ORLA Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while ORLA trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 116.94. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check ORLA's competition here
KL vs SSRM Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while SSRM trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check SSRM's competition here
KL vs AUY Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check AUY's competition here
KL vs NG Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while NG trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -43.14. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check NG's competition here
KL vs ARMN Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while ARMN trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check ARMN's competition here
KL vs AAUC Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while AAUC trades at $31.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is -111.89. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check AAUC's competition here
KL vs CGAU Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while CGAU trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check CGAU's competition here
KL vs SA Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while SA trades at $36.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -88.70. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check SA's competition here
KL vs SAND Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while SAND trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check SAND's competition here
KL vs HYMC Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while HYMC trades at $42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check HYMC's competition here
KL vs DRD Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while DRD trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check DRD's competition here
KL vs IAUX Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while IAUX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check IAUX's competition here
KL vs GAU Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 792.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while GAU trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GAU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check GAU's competition here
KL vs DC Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 689.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while DC trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -23.42. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check DC's competition here
KL vs NFGC Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 657.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while NFGC trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -16.74. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check NFGC's competition here
KL vs IDR Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 600.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while IDR trades at $38.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 52.78. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check IDR's competition here
KL vs CMCL Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 585.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while CMCL trades at $30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check CMCL's competition here
KL vs ODV Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 548.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while ODV trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check ODV's competition here
KL vs TRX Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 516.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while TRX trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -180.00. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check TRX's competition here
KL vs THM Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 508.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while THM trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -90.33. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check THM's competition here
KL vs NVAWW Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 502.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while NVAWW trades at $35.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check NVAWW's competition here
KL vs GSS Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check GSS's competition here
KL vs DC-WT Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 439.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while DC-WT trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check DC-WT's competition here
KL vs VGZ Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while VGZ trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -38.64. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check VGZ's competition here
KL vs CTGO Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 340.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while CTGO trades at $29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is 146.74. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check CTGO's competition here
KL vs GLDG Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 328.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while GLDG trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -31.30. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check GLDG's competition here
KL vs MINE Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while MINE trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -34.25. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check MINE's competition here
KL vs USAU Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 256.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while USAU trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.66. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check USAU's competition here
KL vs GORO Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while GORO trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check GORO's competition here
KL vs PZG Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while PZG trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check PZG's competition here
KL vs NAMM Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while NAMM trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check NAMM's competition here
KL vs GSV Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check GSV's competition here
KL vs BGL Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while BGL trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BGL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check BGL's competition here
KL vs ODVWZ Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while ODVWZ trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check ODVWZ's competition here
KL vs AUST Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while AUST trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check AUST's competition here
KL vs AAU Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check AAU's competition here
KL vs BGLWW Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while BGLWW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check BGLWW's competition here
KL vs NAMMW Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while NAMMW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check NAMMW's competition here
KL vs HYMCZ Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check HYMCZ's competition here
KL vs HYMCL Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check HYMCL's competition here
KL vs HYMCW Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check HYMCW's competition here
KL vs PVG Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check PVG's competition here
KL vs GPL Comparison February 2026
KL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KL stands at 0. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KL is priced at $38.92, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KL currently has a P/E ratio of 11.70, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, KL's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KL is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KL.Check GPL's competition here