Kennametal India Limited
Kennametal India Limited (KENNAMET.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KENNAMET.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENNAMET.NS | ₹2,430.50 | -1.84% | 53.4B | 72.70 | ₹33.43 | +1.64% |
| TIMKEN.NS | ₹3,330.60 | +3.58% | 244.8B | 56.69 | ₹57.42 | +1.11% |
| TIMKEN.BO | ₹3,332.55 | +3.58% | 244.6B | 56.65 | ₹57.40 | +1.11% |
| RKFORGE.NS | ₹542.60 | -1.92% | 98.5B | 45.75 | ₹11.89 | +0.37% |
| RKFORGE.BO | ₹542.15 | -1.90% | 98.2B | 45.66 | ₹11.90 | +0.37% |
| SKFINDIA.NS | ₹1,820.20 | +1.40% | 93.9B | 19.17 | ₹99.04 | +0.76% |
| SKFINDIA.BO | ₹1,821.70 | +1.36% | 93.7B | 17.47 | ₹108.50 | +0.76% |
| ESABINDIA.NS | ₹5,494.50 | -0.03% | 84.7B | 40.29 | ₹136.60 | +1.67% |
| ESABINDIA.BO | ₹5,500.00 | -0.46% | 84.7B | 40.65 | ₹135.29 | +1.67% |
| TIIL.NS | ₹2,290.00 | -0.91% | 54B | 19.59 | ₹121.47 | +0.84% |
Stock Comparison
KENNAMET.NS vs TIMKEN.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, TIMKEN.NS has a market cap of 244.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while TIMKEN.NS trades at ₹3,330.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas TIMKEN.NS's P/E ratio is 56.69. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIMKEN.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to TIMKEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check TIMKEN.NS's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs TIMKEN.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, TIMKEN.BO has a market cap of 244.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while TIMKEN.BO trades at ₹3,332.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas TIMKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 56.65. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIMKEN.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to TIMKEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check TIMKEN.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs RKFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, RKFORGE.NS has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while RKFORGE.NS trades at ₹542.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas RKFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.75. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RKFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to RKFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check RKFORGE.NS's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs RKFORGE.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, RKFORGE.BO has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while RKFORGE.BO trades at ₹542.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas RKFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.66. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RKFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to RKFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check RKFORGE.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs SKFINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, SKFINDIA.NS has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while SKFINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,820.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SKFINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKFINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to SKFINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check SKFINDIA.NS's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs SKFINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, SKFINDIA.BO has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while SKFINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,821.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas SKFINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKFINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to SKFINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check SKFINDIA.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs ESABINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, ESABINDIA.NS has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while ESABINDIA.NS trades at ₹5,494.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas ESABINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 40.29. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESABINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to ESABINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check ESABINDIA.NS's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs ESABINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, ESABINDIA.BO has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while ESABINDIA.BO trades at ₹5,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas ESABINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.65. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESABINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to ESABINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check ESABINDIA.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs TIIL.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, TIIL.NS has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while TIIL.NS trades at ₹2,290.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas TIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to TIIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check TIIL.NS's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs TIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, TIIL.BO has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while TIIL.BO trades at ₹2,281.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas TIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TIIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to TIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check TIIL.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs KENNAMET.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, KENNAMET.BO has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while KENNAMET.BO trades at ₹2,417.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas KENNAMET.BO's P/E ratio is 48.13. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KENNAMET.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to KENNAMET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check KENNAMET.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs HARSHA.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, HARSHA.NS has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while HARSHA.NS trades at ₹373.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas HARSHA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HARSHA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to HARSHA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check HARSHA.NS's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs HARSHA.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, HARSHA.BO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while HARSHA.BO trades at ₹374.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas HARSHA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HARSHA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to HARSHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check HARSHA.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs WENDT.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, WENDT.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while WENDT.BO trades at ₹6,721.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas WENDT.BO's P/E ratio is 60.41. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WENDT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to WENDT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check WENDT.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs WENDT.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, WENDT.NS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while WENDT.NS trades at ₹6,735.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas WENDT.NS's P/E ratio is 60.24. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WENDT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to WENDT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check WENDT.NS's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs STERTOOLS.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, STERTOOLS.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while STERTOOLS.BO trades at ₹225.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas STERTOOLS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STERTOOLS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to STERTOOLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check STERTOOLS.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs STERTOOLS.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, STERTOOLS.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while STERTOOLS.NS trades at ₹225.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas STERTOOLS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STERTOOLS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to STERTOOLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check STERTOOLS.NS's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs KPT.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, KPT.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while KPT.BO trades at ₹570.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas KPT.BO's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KPT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS and KPT.BO have similar daily volatility (5.43).Check KPT.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs AAIL.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, AAIL.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while AAIL.BO trades at ₹89.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas AAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is less volatile compared to AAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check AAIL.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs NIBL.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, NIBL.BO has a market cap of 757.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while NIBL.BO trades at ₹31.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas NIBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NIBL.BO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is less volatile compared to NIBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check NIBL.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs NIBL.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, NIBL.NS has a market cap of 751.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while NIBL.NS trades at ₹31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas NIBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NIBL.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to NIBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check NIBL.NS's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs TAPARIA.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, TAPARIA.BO has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while TAPARIA.BO trades at ₹19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas TAPARIA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TAPARIA.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to TAPARIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check TAPARIA.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs JAINEX.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, JAINEX.BO has a market cap of 178.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while JAINEX.BO trades at ₹120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas JAINEX.BO's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAINEX.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to JAINEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check JAINEX.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs LAKPRE.BO Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, LAKPRE.BO has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while LAKPRE.BO trades at ₹5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas LAKPRE.BO's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAKPRE.BO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is more volatile compared to LAKPRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check LAKPRE.BO's competition here
KENNAMET.NS vs LAKPRE.NS Comparison February 2026
KENNAMET.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENNAMET.NS stands at 53.4B. In comparison, LAKPRE.NS has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KENNAMET.NS is priced at ₹2,430.50, while LAKPRE.NS trades at ₹4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENNAMET.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 72.70, whereas LAKPRE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KENNAMET.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAKPRE.NS's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KENNAMET.NS is less volatile compared to LAKPRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENNAMET.NS.Check LAKPRE.NS's competition here