Kelly Services, Inc.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 123.67B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while ADP trades at $303.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to ADP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, RCRUY has a market cap of 85.00B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while RCRUY trades at $11.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas RCRUY's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RCRUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, RCRRF has a market cap of 83.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while RCRRF trades at $57.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas RCRRF's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RCRRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, PAYX has a market cap of 53.83B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while PAYX trades at $149.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas PAYX's P/E ratio is 31.07. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAYX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to PAYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, RANJY has a market cap of 14.10B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while RANJY trades at $20.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas RANJY's P/E ratio is 57.49. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RANJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RANJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, AHEXY has a market cap of 8.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while AHEXY trades at $12.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas AHEXY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AHEXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to AHEXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, RANJF has a market cap of 6.55B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while RANJF trades at $37.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas RANJF's P/E ratio is 54.20. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RANJF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RANJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, SKLTY has a market cap of 4.68B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while SKLTY trades at $26.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas SKLTY's P/E ratio is 174.92. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SKLTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to SKLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, RHI has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while RHI trades at $44.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas RHI's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, AHEXF has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while AHEXF trades at $25.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas AHEXF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AHEXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to AHEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, TNET has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while TNET trades at $80.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas TNET's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TNET's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, TEMPF has a market cap of 3.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while TEMPF trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas TEMPF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TEMPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TEMPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while BZ trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to BZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, KFY has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while KFY trades at $63.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas KFY's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to KFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, NSP has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while NSP trades at $64.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas NSP's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NSP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to NSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, MPGPY has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while MPGPY trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas MPGPY's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MPGPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to MPGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, TCCPY has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while TCCPY trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas TCCPY's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TCCPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, TXHPF has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while TXHPF trades at $20.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas TXHPF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TXHPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TXHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, MAN has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while MAN trades at $40.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas MAN's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MAN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to MAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, UPWK has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while UPWK trades at $13.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas UPWK's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UPWK's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to UPWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, HAYPY has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while HAYPY trades at $9.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas HAYPY's P/E ratio is -80.75. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HAYPY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HAYPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, MEITF has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while MEITF trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas MEITF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MEITF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to MEITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, MPGPF has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while MPGPF trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas MPGPF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MPGPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and MPGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, BBSI has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while BBSI trades at $41.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas BBSI's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BBSI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to BBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, HRT has a market cap of 967.19M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while HRT trades at $14.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas HRT's P/E ratio is -130.55. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HRT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, HSII has a market cap of 808.30M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while HSII trades at $39.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas HSII's P/E ratio is 95.59. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HSII's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, HHR has a market cap of 761.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while HHR trades at $15.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas HHR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HHR's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, ENJPY has a market cap of 715.78M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while ENJPY trades at $8.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas ENJPY's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ENJPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to ENJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, KFRC has a market cap of 700.30M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while KFRC trades at $37.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas KFRC's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KFRC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to KFRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, ZIP has a market cap of 563.06M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while ZIP trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas ZIP's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZIP's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to ZIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, IGPPF has a market cap of 498.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while IGPPF trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas IGPPF's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IGPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and IGPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, KELYA has a market cap of 401.72M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while KELYA trades at $11.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas KELYA's P/E ratio is -577.00. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KELYA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to KELYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, TGDLF has a market cap of 308.69M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while TGDLF trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas TGDLF's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TGDLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TGDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, HQI has a market cap of 142.66M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while HQI trades at $10.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas HQI's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HQI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HQI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, TBI has a market cap of 127.31M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while TBI trades at $4.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas TBI's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TBI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, EPWK has a market cap of 105.45M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while EPWK trades at $5.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas EPWK's P/E ratio is -112.40. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPWK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to EPWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, MHH has a market cap of 88.15M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while MHH trades at $7.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas MHH's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MHH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to MHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, DHX has a market cap of 61.34M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while DHX trades at $1.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas DHX's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DHX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to DHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, VOLT has a market cap of 61.05M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while VOLT trades at $22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas VOLT's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VOLT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and VOLT have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, CAEEF has a market cap of 55.94M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while CAEEF trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas CAEEF's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CAEEF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and CAEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, BGSF has a market cap of 37.11M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while BGSF trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas BGSF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BGSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to BGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, NIXX has a market cap of 32.50M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while NIXX trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas NIXX's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NIXX's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to NIXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, NIXXW has a market cap of 31.70M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while NIXXW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas NIXXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NIXXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and NIXXW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, HSON has a market cap of 28.09M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while HSON trades at $10.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas HSON's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HSON's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to HSON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, JOB has a market cap of 19.96M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while JOB trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas JOB's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JOB's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to JOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, CWLPF has a market cap of 16.25M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while CWLPF trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas CWLPF's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CWLPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and CWLPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, RLBY has a market cap of 14.76M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while RLBY trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas RLBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RLBY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RLBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, GLXG has a market cap of 11.17M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while GLXG trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas GLXG's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLXG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to GLXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, RCRT has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while RCRT trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas RCRT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RCRT's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, LTNC has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while LTNC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas LTNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LTNC's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to LTNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, CLIK has a market cap of 4.66M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while CLIK trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas CLIK's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLIK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to CLIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, IPDN has a market cap of 3.73M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while IPDN trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas IPDN's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IPDN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to IPDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, PIXY has a market cap of 3.27M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while PIXY trades at $6.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas PIXY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PIXY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to PIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, STAF has a market cap of 2.66M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while STAF trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas STAF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to STAF's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and STAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, TREP has a market cap of 2.51M. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while TREP trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas TREP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TREP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to TREP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, FTRS has a market cap of 876880.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while FTRS trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas FTRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FTRS's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and FTRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, RVLTF has a market cap of 521011.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while RVLTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas RVLTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RVLTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RVLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, WDHR has a market cap of 467189.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while WDHR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas WDHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WDHR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to WDHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, HIRRF has a market cap of 413508.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while HIRRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas HIRRF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HIRRF's ROE of -4.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and HIRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, GXXM has a market cap of 240561.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while GXXM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas GXXM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GXXM's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to GXXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, SSET has a market cap of 76177.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while SSET trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas SSET's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SSET's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to SSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, PBHG has a market cap of 45950.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while PBHG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas PBHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PBHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to PBHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, RCRTW has a market cap of 11498.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while RCRTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas RCRTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RCRTW's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to RCRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, MCTH has a market cap of 2450.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while MCTH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas MCTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MCTH's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to MCTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, CTPR has a market cap of 875.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while CTPR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas CTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to CTPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, NZIH has a market cap of 223.00. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while NZIH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas NZIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NZIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to NZIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, BNTOF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while BNTOF trades at $13.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas BNTOF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BNTOF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to BNTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, JOBS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while JOBS trades at $60.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas JOBS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JOBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB is less volatile compared to JOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KELYB.

KELYB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KELYB stands at 403.34M. In comparison, FRSI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KELYB is priced at $11.32, while FRSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KELYB currently has a P/E ratio of -565.75, whereas FRSI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KELYB's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FRSI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KELYB and FRSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).