Karelia Tobacco Company Inc.
Karelia Tobacco Company Inc. (KCIGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KCIGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Tobacco Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCIGF | $300.00 | +0.00% | 828M | 8.83 | $33.96 | N/A |
| BTAFF | $55.05 | +5.47% | 115.1B | 28.78 | $1.83 | +5.92% |
| JAPAF | $32.04 | +6.80% | 53.3B | 44.12 | $0.68 | +4.16% |
| JAPAY | $15.31 | +6.99% | 52.7B | 43.68 | $0.34 | N/A |
| IMBBF | $39.62 | +2.91% | 33.3B | 9.86 | $4.02 | +5.56% |
| IMBBY | $39.06 | +1.11% | 32.9B | 9.79 | $4.00 | +5.63% |
| SWMAY | $10.57 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 27.82 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SMORF | $1.25 | +0.00% | 7.6B | 41.67 | $0.03 | +1.07% |
| PHJMF | $0.05 | +0.00% | 5.8B | 5.00 | $0.01 | +6.86% |
| PHPMF | $869.36 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 14.92 | $58.25 | +6.55% |
Stock Comparison
KCIGF vs BTAFF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, BTAFF has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while BTAFF trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas BTAFF's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BTAFF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to BTAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check BTAFF's competition here
KCIGF vs JAPAF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, JAPAF has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while JAPAF trades at $32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas JAPAF's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and JAPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JAPAF's competition here
KCIGF vs JAPAY Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, JAPAY has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while JAPAY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas JAPAY's P/E ratio is 43.68. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAPAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to JAPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check JAPAY's competition here
KCIGF vs IMBBF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, IMBBF has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while IMBBF trades at $39.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas IMBBF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMBBF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to IMBBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check IMBBF's competition here
KCIGF vs IMBBY Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, IMBBY has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while IMBBY trades at $39.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas IMBBY's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMBBY's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to IMBBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check IMBBY's competition here
KCIGF vs SWMAY Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, SWMAY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while SWMAY trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas SWMAY's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWMAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and SWMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWMAY's competition here
KCIGF vs SMORF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, SMORF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while SMORF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas SMORF's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMORF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to SMORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check SMORF's competition here
KCIGF vs PHJMF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, PHJMF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while PHJMF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas PHJMF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHJMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to PHJMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check PHJMF's competition here
KCIGF vs PHPMF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, PHPMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while PHPMF trades at $869.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas PHPMF's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PHPMF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to PHPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check PHPMF's competition here
KCIGF vs GGNPF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, GGNPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while GGNPF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas GGNPF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GGNPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to GGNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check GGNPF's competition here
KCIGF vs STBGY Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, STBGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while STBGY trades at $6.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas STBGY's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STBGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to STBGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check STBGY's competition here
KCIGF vs SNDVF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, SNDVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while SNDVF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas SNDVF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SNDVF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to SNDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check SNDVF's competition here
KCIGF vs GDNGY Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, GDNGY has a market cap of 986.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while GDNGY trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas GDNGY's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GDNGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to GDNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check GDNGY's competition here
KCIGF vs PYYX Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, PYYX has a market cap of 126.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while PYYX trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas PYYX's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PYYX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to PYYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check PYYX's competition here
KCIGF vs CHUC Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, CHUC has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while CHUC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas CHUC's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHUC's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and CHUC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHUC's competition here
KCIGF vs GRAM Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, GRAM has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while GRAM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas GRAM's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRAM's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to GRAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check GRAM's competition here
KCIGF vs VPRB Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, VPRB has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while VPRB trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas VPRB's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VPRB's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to VPRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check VPRB's competition here
KCIGF vs VAPR Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, VAPR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while VAPR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas VAPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VAPR's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to VAPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check VAPR's competition here
KCIGF vs GGII Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, GGII has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while GGII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas GGII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GGII's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to GGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check GGII's competition here
KCIGF vs LBRG Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, LBRG has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while LBRG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas LBRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LBRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and LBRG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBRG's competition here
KCIGF vs WSRRF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, WSRRF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while WSRRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas WSRRF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WSRRF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and WSRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WSRRF's competition here
KCIGF vs TOBAF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, TOBAF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while TOBAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas TOBAF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TOBAF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and TOBAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TOBAF's competition here
KCIGF vs HUMBF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, HUMBF has a market cap of 521.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while HUMBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas HUMBF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUMBF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and HUMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HUMBF's competition here
KCIGF vs CBDW Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, CBDW has a market cap of 307.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while CBDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas CBDW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBDW's ROE of +2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to CBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check CBDW's competition here
KCIGF vs IDLSF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, IDLSF has a market cap of 80.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while IDLSF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas IDLSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDLSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and IDLSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IDLSF's competition here
KCIGF vs MEDH Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, MEDH has a market cap of 56.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while MEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas MEDH's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MEDH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to MEDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check MEDH's competition here
KCIGF vs VPOR Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, VPOR has a market cap of 27.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while VPOR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas VPOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VPOR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and VPOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VPOR's competition here
KCIGF vs ASHI Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, ASHI has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while ASHI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas ASHI's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASHI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF is less volatile compared to ASHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KCIGF.Check ASHI's competition here
KCIGF vs SWMAF Comparison August 2025
KCIGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KCIGF stands at 828M. In comparison, SWMAF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KCIGF is priced at $300.00, while SWMAF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KCIGF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.83, whereas SWMAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KCIGF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWMAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KCIGF and SWMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SWMAF's competition here