Karnika Industries Ltd.
Karnika Industries Ltd. (KARNIKA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KARNIKA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KARNIKA.NS | ₹108.15 | -0.78% | 8.2B | 37.16 | ₹2.91 | N/A |
| METROBRAND.NS | ₹910.60 | -3.10% | 248.1B | 63.77 | ₹14.28 | +0.57% |
| SAFARIND.BO | ₹1,915.30 | -0.29% | 91.1B | 1394.97 | ₹1.37 | N/A |
| BATAINDIA.BO | ₹632.70 | -4.06% | 81.3B | 47.75 | ₹13.25 | +1.42% |
| BATAINDIA.NS | ₹632.15 | -4.23% | 81.2B | 45.61 | ₹13.86 | +1.42% |
| SAFARI.NS | ₹1,442.10 | -5.52% | 70.7B | 41.99 | ₹34.34 | +0.24% |
| SAFARI.BO | ₹1,441.40 | -5.34% | 70.6B | 42.02 | ₹34.30 | +0.24% |
| CAMPUS.BO | ₹223.95 | -3.97% | 68.4B | 48.47 | ₹4.62 | +0.13% |
| CAMPUS.NS | ₹223.75 | -4.09% | 68.4B | 48.43 | ₹4.62 | +0.13% |
| REDTAPE.BO | ₹112.65 | -1.74% | 62.3B | 29.34 | ₹3.84 | +0.66% |
Stock Comparison
KARNIKA.NS vs METROBRAND.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, METROBRAND.NS has a market cap of 248.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while METROBRAND.NS trades at ₹910.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas METROBRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 63.77. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to METROBRAND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check METROBRAND.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SAFARIND.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SAFARIND.BO has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SAFARIND.BO trades at ₹1,915.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SAFARIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1394.97. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAFARIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SAFARIND.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BATAINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.BO has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BATAINDIA.BO trades at ₹632.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BATAINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 47.75. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BATAINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BATAINDIA.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BATAINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BATAINDIA.NS trades at ₹632.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BATAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.61. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BATAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BATAINDIA.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SAFARI.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SAFARI.NS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SAFARI.NS trades at ₹1,442.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SAFARI.NS's P/E ratio is 41.99. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAFARI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SAFARI.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SAFARI.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SAFARI.BO has a market cap of 70.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SAFARI.BO trades at ₹1,441.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SAFARI.BO's P/E ratio is 42.02. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAFARI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SAFARI.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs CAMPUS.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CAMPUS.BO has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while CAMPUS.BO trades at ₹223.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas CAMPUS.BO's P/E ratio is 48.47. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAMPUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check CAMPUS.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs CAMPUS.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CAMPUS.NS has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while CAMPUS.NS trades at ₹223.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas CAMPUS.NS's P/E ratio is 48.43. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAMPUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check CAMPUS.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs REDTAPE.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, REDTAPE.BO has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while REDTAPE.BO trades at ₹112.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas REDTAPE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to REDTAPE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check REDTAPE.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs RELAXO.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RELAXO.BO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while RELAXO.BO trades at ₹249.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas RELAXO.BO's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RELAXO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to RELAXO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check RELAXO.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs RELAXO.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RELAXO.NS has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while RELAXO.NS trades at ₹249.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas RELAXO.NS's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RELAXO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to RELAXO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check RELAXO.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs VIPIND.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VIPIND.NS has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while VIPIND.NS trades at ₹319.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas VIPIND.NS's P/E ratio is -19.17. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VIPIND.NS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to VIPIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check VIPIND.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs VIPIND.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VIPIND.BO has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while VIPIND.BO trades at ₹318.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas VIPIND.BO's P/E ratio is -23.08. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VIPIND.BO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to VIPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check VIPIND.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BIL.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BIL.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BIL.NS trades at ₹700.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BIL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to BIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BIL.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BIL.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BIL.BO trades at ₹697.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to BIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BIL.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BIZOTIC.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BIZOTIC.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BIZOTIC.BO trades at ₹887.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BIZOTIC.BO's P/E ratio is 68.84. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BIZOTIC.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to BIZOTIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BIZOTIC.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs MANBRO.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MANBRO.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while MANBRO.BO trades at ₹90.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas MANBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 300.33. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MANBRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to MANBRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check MANBRO.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs GRETEX.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GRETEX.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while GRETEX.NS trades at ₹300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas GRETEX.NS's P/E ratio is 312.50. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRETEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to GRETEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check GRETEX.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SREEL.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SREEL.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SREEL.BO trades at ₹175.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SREEL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SREEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SREEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SREEL.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SREEL.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SREEL.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SREEL.NS trades at ₹173.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SREEL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SREEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to SREEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SREEL.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while LIBERTSHOE.BO trades at ₹225.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas LIBERTSHOE.BO's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while LIBERTSHOE.NS trades at ₹225.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas LIBERTSHOE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.43. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs MIRZAINT.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while MIRZAINT.BO trades at ₹26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas MIRZAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 43.19. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MIRZAINT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to MIRZAINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check MIRZAINT.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs MIRZAINT.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while MIRZAINT.NS trades at ₹26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas MIRZAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 43.16. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MIRZAINT.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to MIRZAINT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check MIRZAINT.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs LEHAR.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, LEHAR.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while LEHAR.BO trades at ₹177.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas LEHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LEHAR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to LEHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check LEHAR.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs OMNITEX.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, OMNITEX.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while OMNITEX.BO trades at ₹705.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas OMNITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 10085.00. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to OMNITEX.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to OMNITEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check OMNITEX.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BCONCEPTS.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BCONCEPTS.BO trades at ₹218.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BCONCEPTS.BO's P/E ratio is 52.54. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BCONCEPTS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BCONCEPTS.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BCONCEPTS.NS trades at ₹216.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BCONCEPTS.NS's P/E ratio is 51.83. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BCONCEPTS.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs CPS.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CPS.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while CPS.NS trades at ₹993.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas CPS.NS's P/E ratio is 1257.09. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CPS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to CPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check CPS.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs VANDANA.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VANDANA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while VANDANA.BO trades at ₹18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas VANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is 1828.00. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VANDANA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to VANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check VANDANA.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs VIRAT.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VIRAT.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while VIRAT.BO trades at ₹323.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas VIRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 94.45. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VIRAT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to VIRAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check VIRAT.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs KHADIM.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KHADIM.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while KHADIM.NS trades at ₹84.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas KHADIM.NS's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KHADIM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to KHADIM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check KHADIM.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs KHADIM.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KHADIM.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while KHADIM.BO trades at ₹84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas KHADIM.BO's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KHADIM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to KHADIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check KHADIM.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs ACTIVE.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ACTIVE.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while ACTIVE.BO trades at ₹96.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas ACTIVE.BO's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ACTIVE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to ACTIVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check ACTIVE.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SUPERHOUSE.BO trades at ₹135.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SUPERHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SUPERHOUSE.NS trades at ₹134.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SUPERHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs CEENIK.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CEENIK.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while CEENIK.BO trades at ₹289.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas CEENIK.BO's P/E ratio is -14.27. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CEENIK.BO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to CEENIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check CEENIK.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SCOOBEEDAY.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SCOOBEEDAY.BO has a market cap of 938.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SCOOBEEDAY.BO trades at ₹66.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SCOOBEEDAY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SCOOBEEDAY.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs GARMNTMNTR.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, GARMNTMNTR.BO has a market cap of 846.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while GARMNTMNTR.BO trades at ₹1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas GARMNTMNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check GARMNTMNTR.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs CRAVATEX.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CRAVATEX.BO has a market cap of 828.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while CRAVATEX.BO trades at ₹320.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas CRAVATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CRAVATEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to CRAVATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check CRAVATEX.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs ACKNIT.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ACKNIT.BO has a market cap of 826.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while ACKNIT.BO trades at ₹271.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas ACKNIT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ACKNIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to ACKNIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check ACKNIT.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BANARBEADS.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.BO has a market cap of 670.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BANARBEADS.BO trades at ₹101.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BANARBEADS.BO's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BANARBEADS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to BANARBEADS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BANARBEADS.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BANARBEADS.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.NS has a market cap of 659.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BANARBEADS.NS trades at ₹99.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BANARBEADS.NS's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BANARBEADS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to BANARBEADS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BANARBEADS.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs ELAND.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, ELAND.BO has a market cap of 646.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while ELAND.BO trades at ₹13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas ELAND.BO's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELAND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to ELAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check ELAND.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs JAIPURKURT.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, JAIPURKURT.NS has a market cap of 437.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while JAIPURKURT.NS trades at ₹25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas JAIPURKURT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.52. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JAIPURKURT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to JAIPURKURT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check JAIPURKURT.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs AKI.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AKI.BO has a market cap of 414.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while AKI.BO trades at ₹4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas AKI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AKI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to AKI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check AKI.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SIGNORIA.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SIGNORIA.NS has a market cap of 268.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SIGNORIA.NS trades at ₹56.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SIGNORIA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGNORIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNORIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SIGNORIA.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SUNILTX.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SUNILTX.BO has a market cap of 249.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SUNILTX.BO trades at ₹59.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SUNILTX.BO's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUNILTX.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SUNILTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SUNILTX.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SPENTA.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SPENTA.BO has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SPENTA.BO trades at ₹89.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SPENTA.BO's P/E ratio is -236.76. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPENTA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to SPENTA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SPENTA.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SCARNOSE.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SCARNOSE.BO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SCARNOSE.BO trades at ₹76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SCARNOSE.BO's P/E ratio is 104.11. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCARNOSE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SCARNOSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SCARNOSE.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs CITYMAN.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CITYMAN.BO has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while CITYMAN.BO trades at ₹14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas CITYMAN.BO's P/E ratio is -50.71. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CITYMAN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to CITYMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check CITYMAN.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs VIVAA.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, VIVAA.BO has a market cap of 137.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while VIVAA.BO trades at ₹35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas VIVAA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VIVAA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to VIVAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check VIVAA.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs JIWANRAM.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, JIWANRAM.NS has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while JIWANRAM.NS trades at ₹5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas JIWANRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JIWANRAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to JIWANRAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check JIWANRAM.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs MISHDESIGN.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, MISHDESIGN.BO has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while MISHDESIGN.BO trades at ₹36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas MISHDESIGN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MISHDESIGN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to MISHDESIGN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check MISHDESIGN.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs BILLWIN.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, BILLWIN.BO has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while BILLWIN.BO trades at ₹25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas BILLWIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BILLWIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to BILLWIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check BILLWIN.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs NEWLIGHT.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NEWLIGHT.BO has a market cap of 107.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while NEWLIGHT.BO trades at ₹1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas NEWLIGHT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NEWLIGHT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to NEWLIGHT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check NEWLIGHT.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs CBAZAAR.NS Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, CBAZAAR.NS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while CBAZAAR.NS trades at ₹4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas CBAZAAR.NS's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CBAZAAR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to CBAZAAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check CBAZAAR.NS's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs KARANWO.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, KARANWO.BO has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while KARANWO.BO trades at ₹10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas KARANWO.BO's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KARANWO.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to KARANWO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check KARANWO.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs WELTI.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, WELTI.BO has a market cap of 88.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while WELTI.BO trades at ₹19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas WELTI.BO's P/E ratio is -33.32. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WELTI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to WELTI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check WELTI.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs NBFOOT.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, NBFOOT.BO has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while NBFOOT.BO trades at ₹6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas NBFOOT.BO's P/E ratio is -37.18. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NBFOOT.BO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to NBFOOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check NBFOOT.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs EUROLED.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, EUROLED.BO has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while EUROLED.BO trades at ₹18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas EUROLED.BO's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EUROLED.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to EUROLED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check EUROLED.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SIDDHEGA.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SIDDHEGA.BO has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SIDDHEGA.BO trades at ₹21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SIDDHEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 525.00. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIDDHEGA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to SIDDHEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SIDDHEGA.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs SRIND.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, SRIND.BO has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while SRIND.BO trades at ₹3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas SRIND.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SRIND.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is less volatile compared to SRIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check SRIND.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs RICHAIND.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, RICHAIND.BO has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while RICHAIND.BO trades at ₹1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas RICHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RICHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to RICHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check RICHAIND.BO's competition here
KARNIKA.NS vs AKM.BO Comparison April 2026
KARNIKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KARNIKA.NS stands at 8.2B. In comparison, AKM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KARNIKA.NS is priced at ₹108.15, while AKM.BO trades at ₹122.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KARNIKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.16, whereas AKM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KARNIKA.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AKM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KARNIKA.NS is more volatile compared to AKM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KARNIKA.NS.Check AKM.BO's competition here