iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDD.AS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IWDD.AS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWDD.AS | €7.11 | -0.38% | 126.3B | 23.31 | €0.31 | +1.24% |
| CSPX.AS | €611.32 | +0.21% | 110.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €110.37 | +0.02% | 108.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €107.85 | +0.23% | 68.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.99% |
| VWRL.AS | €140.80 | -0.17% | 51.6B | N/A | N/A | +1.41% |
| SP5C.PA | €412.36 | +0.21% | 23.2B | 26.63 | €15.48 | N/A |
| SP5H.PA | €318.05 | -0.31% | 23.1B | 25.97 | €12.25 | +1.04% |
| IUSA.AS | €56.67 | +0.16% | 17.3B | N/A | N/A | +0.98% |
| ISFA.AS | €11.70 | +0.66% | 17.1B | N/A | N/A | +2.90% |
| CSH2.PA | €108.76 | -0.02% | 17.1B | 28.29 | €3.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IWDD.AS vs CSPX.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CSPX.AS has a market cap of 110.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CSPX.AS trades at €611.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CSPX.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSPX.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CSPX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CSPX.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IWDA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IWDA.AS trades at €110.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IWDA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while VUSA.AS trades at €107.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VUSA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VWRL.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while VWRL.AS trades at €140.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VWRL.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SP5C.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SP5C.PA trades at €412.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SP5C.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SP5H.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SP5H.PA trades at €318.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SP5H.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IUSA.AS trades at €56.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IUSA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ISFA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while ISFA.AS trades at €11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ISFA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CSH2.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CSH2.PA trades at €108.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CSH2.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs HAL.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while HAL.AS trades at €170.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check HAL.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AMUN.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while AMUN.PA trades at €74.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AMUN.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs MEUD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while MEUD.PA trades at €289.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check MEUD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs I500.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while I500.AS trades at €10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check I500.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs I50D.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while I50D.AS trades at €7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check I50D.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs GOLD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while GOLD.PA trades at €160.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check GOLD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IMEU.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IMEU.AS trades at €37.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IMEU.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VHYL.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while VHYL.AS trades at €73.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VHYL.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs GBLB.BR Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while GBLB.BR trades at €78.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is -29.79. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check GBLB.BR's competition here
IWDD.AS vs PSH.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check PSH.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WLDHC.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, WLDHC.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while WLDHC.PA trades at €14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas WLDHC.PA's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDHC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to WLDHC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WLDHC.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WLDH.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while WLDH.PA trades at €233.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WLDH.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WLD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while WLD.PA trades at €371.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WLD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CBUG.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CBUG.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CBUG.AS trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CBUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CBUG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CBUG.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CEUU.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CEUU.AS trades at €11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CEUU.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IEMM.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IEMM.AS trades at €48.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IEMM.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SOF.BR Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SOF.BR trades at €214.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 65.71. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SOF.BR's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IWRD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IWRD.AS trades at €79.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IWRD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SJPD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SJPD.AS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SJPD.AS trades at €7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SJPD.AS's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SJPD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SJPD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SJPD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AEME.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while AEME.PA trades at €84.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AEME.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IEMA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IEMA.AS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IEMA.AS trades at €46.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IEMA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to IEMA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IEMA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs PHAU.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while PHAU.AS trades at €375.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check PHAU.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VEUR.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while VEUR.AS trades at €46.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VEUR.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs LCWD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check LCWD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SJPE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SJPE.AS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SJPE.AS trades at €13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SJPE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SJPE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SJPE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SJPE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CC4.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CC4.PA trades at €225.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CC4.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ECRP.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ECRP.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IJPA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IJPA.AS trades at €63.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IJPA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CW8.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CW8.PA trades at €600.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CW8.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs TDIV.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while TDIV.AS trades at €52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check TDIV.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EWLD.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, EWLD.PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while EWLD.PA trades at €35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas EWLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EWLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to EWLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EWLD.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs 500.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while 500.PA trades at €113.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check 500.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs KBCA.BR Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while KBCA.BR trades at €72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check KBCA.BR's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AUEM.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while AUEM.PA trades at €7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AUEM.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EUEA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while EUEA.AS trades at €57.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EUEA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ALLFG.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while ALLFG.AS trades at €8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -33.08. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ALLFG.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs UST.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while UST.PA trades at €84.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check UST.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs C50U.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while C50U.PA trades at €173.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check C50U.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs S500H.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while S500H.PA trades at €93.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check S500H.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs S500.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while S500.PA trades at €166.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check S500.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs REINA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while REINA.AS trades at €27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check REINA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs USA.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while USA.PA trades at €520.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check USA.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs USAC.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while USAC.PA trades at €568.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check USAC.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AEEM.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while AEEM.PA trades at €6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AEEM.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs VERX.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while VERX.AS trades at €45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check VERX.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EXCH.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while EXCH.AS trades at €7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EXCH.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SEMD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SEMD.AS trades at €6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SEMD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CAC.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CAC.PA trades at €78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CAC.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CACC.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CACC.PA trades at €39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CACC.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs MSE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while MSE.PA trades at €63.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check MSE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs C50.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while C50.PA trades at €150.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check C50.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CD5.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CD5.PA trades at €90.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CD5.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ICHD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while ICHD.AS trades at €4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ICHD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ICHN.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ICHN.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs 500X.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while 500X.AS trades at €41.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check 500X.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EEUE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while EEUE.PA trades at €18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EEUE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WSRI.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WSRI.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AGGD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, AGGD.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while AGGD.AS trades at €5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas AGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGGD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to AGGD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AGGD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs GLUH.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check GLUH.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SRIL.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SRIL.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SRIL.AS trades at €11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SRIL.AS's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SRIL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SRIL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SRIL.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EHYD.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EHYD.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs WESE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while WESE.PA trades at €74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check WESE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ROLA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while ROLA.AS trades at €63.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ROLA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs GEMU.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check GEMU.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EHYA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EHYA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs MF.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while MF.PA trades at €79.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -19.88. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check MF.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IDSE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IDSE.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IDSE.AS trades at €137.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDSE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IDSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IDSE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs CB3.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while CB3.PA trades at €219.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check CB3.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ISED.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, ISED.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while ISED.AS trades at €7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas ISED.AS's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISED.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ISED.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ISED.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs BNKE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while BNKE.PA trades at €300.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check BNKE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IMBE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IMBE.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IMBE.AS trades at €4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IMBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IMBE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IMBE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs BREB.BR Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while BREB.BR trades at €103.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check BREB.BR's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ESE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while ESE.PA trades at €28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ESE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs TKO.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while TKO.PA trades at €16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 71.83. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check TKO.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs EPAB.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while EPAB.PA trades at €37.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check EPAB.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SGLU.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SGLU.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SGLU.AS trades at €5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SGLU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SGLU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SGLU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SGLU.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs PHAG.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while PHAG.AS trades at €56.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check PHAG.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SUOA.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SUOA.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs RF.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while RF.PA trades at €41.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check RF.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs TI5A.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while TI5A.AS trades at €115.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check TI5A.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs BNK.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while BNK.PA trades at €57.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check BNK.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs JAPB.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, JAPB.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while JAPB.AS trades at €922.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas JAPB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JAPB.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to JAPB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check JAPB.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs INRE.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, INRE.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while INRE.PA trades at €23.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas INRE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INRE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to INRE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check INRE.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs SEMI.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, SEMI.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while SEMI.AS trades at €12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas SEMI.AS's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to SEMI.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check SEMI.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs TNOW.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while TNOW.PA trades at €896.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check TNOW.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IGLE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IGLE.AS trades at €3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IGLE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs ANX.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while ANX.PA trades at €237.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check ANX.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs IUHE.AS Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, IUHE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while IUHE.AS trades at €6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas IUHE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUHE.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to IUHE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check IUHE.AS's competition here
IWDD.AS vs AASI.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while AASI.PA trades at €47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check AASI.PA's competition here
IWDD.AS vs USRI.PA Comparison April 2026
IWDD.AS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IWDD.AS stands at 126.3B. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IWDD.AS is priced at €7.11, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IWDD.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.31, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IWDD.AS's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IWDD.AS is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IWDD.AS.Check USRI.PA's competition here