ITI Limited
ITI Limited (ITI.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ITI.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITI.NS | ₹297.99 | +2.19% | 279.7B | -190.22 | -₹1.53 | N/A |
| ITI.BO | ₹298.35 | +2.24% | 279.9B | -190.36 | -₹1.53 | N/A |
| CPPLUS.NS | ₹2,219.40 | +7.38% | 247.2B | 97.15 | ₹21.60 | N/A |
| HFCL.BO | ₹92.00 | +4.44% | 140B | 254.14 | ₹0.36 | +0.11% |
| HFCL.NS | ₹92.10 | +4.52% | 140B | 254.11 | ₹0.36 | +0.11% |
| STLTECH.NS | ₹267.49 | +4.94% | 125.1B | 3662.14 | ₹0.07 | N/A |
| ASTRAMICRO.NS | ₹1,086.40 | +5.22% | 102B | 63.74 | ₹16.86 | +0.20% |
| ASTRAMICRO.BO | ₹1,084.60 | +5.08% | 102B | 63.47 | ₹16.93 | +0.20% |
| TEJASNET.NS | ₹424.50 | -5.64% | 76.7B | -9.88 | -₹43.77 | +0.58% |
| TEJASNET.BO | ₹423.80 | -5.80% | 76.6B | -9.87 | -₹43.73 | +0.58% |
Stock Comparison
ITI.NS vs ITI.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, ITI.BO has a market cap of 279.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while ITI.BO trades at ₹298.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas ITI.BO's P/E ratio is -190.36. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ITI.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to ITI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check ITI.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs CPPLUS.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, CPPLUS.NS has a market cap of 247.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while CPPLUS.NS trades at ₹2,219.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas CPPLUS.NS's P/E ratio is 97.15. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CPPLUS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to CPPLUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check CPPLUS.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs HFCL.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, HFCL.BO has a market cap of 140B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while HFCL.BO trades at ₹92.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas HFCL.BO's P/E ratio is 254.14. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HFCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to HFCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check HFCL.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs HFCL.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, HFCL.NS has a market cap of 140B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while HFCL.NS trades at ₹92.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas HFCL.NS's P/E ratio is 254.11. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HFCL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to HFCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check HFCL.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs STLTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, STLTECH.NS has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while STLTECH.NS trades at ₹267.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas STLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 3662.14. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to STLTECH.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to STLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check STLTECH.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs ASTRAMICRO.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, ASTRAMICRO.NS has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while ASTRAMICRO.NS trades at ₹1,086.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas ASTRAMICRO.NS's P/E ratio is 63.74. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ASTRAMICRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAMICRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check ASTRAMICRO.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs ASTRAMICRO.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, ASTRAMICRO.BO has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while ASTRAMICRO.BO trades at ₹1,084.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas ASTRAMICRO.BO's P/E ratio is 63.47. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ASTRAMICRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAMICRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check ASTRAMICRO.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs TEJASNET.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, TEJASNET.NS has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while TEJASNET.NS trades at ₹424.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas TEJASNET.NS's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TEJASNET.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to TEJASNET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check TEJASNET.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs TEJASNET.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, TEJASNET.BO has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while TEJASNET.BO trades at ₹423.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas TEJASNET.BO's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TEJASNET.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to TEJASNET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check TEJASNET.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs AVANTEL.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, AVANTEL.NS has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while AVANTEL.NS trades at ₹155.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas AVANTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 388.05. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AVANTEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to AVANTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check AVANTEL.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs AVANTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, AVANTEL.BO has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while AVANTEL.BO trades at ₹155.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas AVANTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 397.31. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AVANTEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to AVANTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check AVANTEL.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs GTLINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, GTLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while GTLINFRA.BO trades at ₹1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas GTLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GTLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to GTLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check GTLINFRA.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs GTLINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, GTLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while GTLINFRA.NS trades at ₹1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas GTLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GTLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to GTLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check GTLINFRA.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs NELCO.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, NELCO.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while NELCO.BO trades at ₹677.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas NELCO.BO's P/E ratio is -831.05. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NELCO.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to NELCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check NELCO.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs NELCO.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, NELCO.NS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while NELCO.NS trades at ₹678.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas NELCO.NS's P/E ratio is -829.26. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NELCO.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to NELCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check NELCO.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs DLINKINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, DLINKINDIA.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while DLINKINDIA.BO trades at ₹445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas DLINKINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLINKINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is less volatile compared to DLINKINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check DLINKINDIA.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs DLINKINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, DLINKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while DLINKINDIA.NS trades at ₹445.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas DLINKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DLINKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to DLINKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check DLINKINDIA.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs PARACABLES.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, PARACABLES.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while PARACABLES.BO trades at ₹38.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas PARACABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PARACABLES.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to PARACABLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check PARACABLES.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs PARACABLES.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, PARACABLES.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while PARACABLES.NS trades at ₹38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas PARACABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PARACABLES.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to PARACABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check PARACABLES.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs VALIANT.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, VALIANT.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while VALIANT.BO trades at ₹1,004.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas VALIANT.BO's P/E ratio is 56.56. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VALIANT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to VALIANT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check VALIANT.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs ADCINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, ADCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while ADCINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,557.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas ADCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADCINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is less volatile compared to ADCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check ADCINDIA.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs PANACHE.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, PANACHE.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while PANACHE.NS trades at ₹303.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas PANACHE.NS's P/E ratio is 54.81. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PANACHE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to PANACHE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check PANACHE.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs BIRLACABLE.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, BIRLACABLE.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while BIRLACABLE.BO trades at ₹141.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas BIRLACABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 56.39. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BIRLACABLE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check BIRLACABLE.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs BIRLACABLE.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, BIRLACABLE.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while BIRLACABLE.NS trades at ₹142.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas BIRLACABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 56.21. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BIRLACABLE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACABLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check BIRLACABLE.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs FROG.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, FROG.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while FROG.NS trades at ₹161.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas FROG.NS's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FROG.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to FROG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check FROG.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs KAVDEFENCE.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, KAVDEFENCE.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while KAVDEFENCE.NS trades at ₹71.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas KAVDEFENCE.NS's P/E ratio is 139.24. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KAVDEFENCE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to KAVDEFENCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check KAVDEFENCE.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs KAVDEFENCE.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, KAVDEFENCE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while KAVDEFENCE.BO trades at ₹71.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas KAVDEFENCE.BO's P/E ratio is 138.65. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KAVDEFENCE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to KAVDEFENCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check KAVDEFENCE.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs PRECISIO.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, PRECISIO.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while PRECISIO.BO trades at ₹135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas PRECISIO.BO's P/E ratio is 165.37. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PRECISIO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to PRECISIO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check PRECISIO.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs KAVVERITEL.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, KAVVERITEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while KAVVERITEL.BO trades at ₹71.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas KAVVERITEL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.55. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KAVVERITEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to KAVVERITEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check KAVVERITEL.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs SMARTLINK.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, SMARTLINK.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while SMARTLINK.NS trades at ₹128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas SMARTLINK.NS's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SMARTLINK.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to SMARTLINK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check SMARTLINK.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs SMARTLINK.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, SMARTLINK.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while SMARTLINK.BO trades at ₹123.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas SMARTLINK.BO's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SMARTLINK.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is less volatile compared to SMARTLINK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check SMARTLINK.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs VINTRON.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, VINTRON.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while VINTRON.BO trades at ₹12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas VINTRON.BO's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VINTRON.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to VINTRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check VINTRON.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs KAVVERITEL.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, KAVVERITEL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while KAVVERITEL.NS trades at ₹58.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas KAVVERITEL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.12. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KAVVERITEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to KAVVERITEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check KAVVERITEL.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs MRO-TEK.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, MRO-TEK.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while MRO-TEK.NS trades at ₹61.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas MRO-TEK.NS's P/E ratio is 34.97. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MRO-TEK.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to MRO-TEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check MRO-TEK.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs MRO-TEK.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, MRO-TEK.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while MRO-TEK.BO trades at ₹61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas MRO-TEK.BO's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MRO-TEK.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to MRO-TEK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check MRO-TEK.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs PTIL.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, PTIL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while PTIL.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas PTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.84. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PTIL.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to PTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check PTIL.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs AKSHOPTFBR.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, AKSHOPTFBR.NS has a market cap of 878.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while AKSHOPTFBR.NS trades at ₹5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas AKSHOPTFBR.NS's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AKSHOPTFBR.NS's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to AKSHOPTFBR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check AKSHOPTFBR.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs AKSHOPTFBR.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, AKSHOPTFBR.BO has a market cap of 878.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while AKSHOPTFBR.BO trades at ₹5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas AKSHOPTFBR.BO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AKSHOPTFBR.BO's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is less volatile compared to AKSHOPTFBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check AKSHOPTFBR.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs PUNJCOMMU.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, PUNJCOMMU.BO has a market cap of 618.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while PUNJCOMMU.BO trades at ₹50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas PUNJCOMMU.BO's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PUNJCOMMU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to PUNJCOMMU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check PUNJCOMMU.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs TNTELE.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, TNTELE.NS has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while TNTELE.NS trades at ₹10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas TNTELE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TNTELE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is less volatile compared to TNTELE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check TNTELE.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs TNTELE.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, TNTELE.BO has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while TNTELE.BO trades at ₹10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas TNTELE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TNTELE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is less volatile compared to TNTELE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check TNTELE.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs SALORAINTL.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, SALORAINTL.BO has a market cap of 268.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while SALORAINTL.BO trades at ₹31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas SALORAINTL.BO's P/E ratio is -18.91. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SALORAINTL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to SALORAINTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check SALORAINTL.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs SHYAMTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, SHYAMTEL.BO has a market cap of 121.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while SHYAMTEL.BO trades at ₹10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas SHYAMTEL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHYAMTEL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is less volatile compared to SHYAMTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check SHYAMTEL.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs SHYAMTEL.NS Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, SHYAMTEL.NS has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while SHYAMTEL.NS trades at ₹10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas SHYAMTEL.NS's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SHYAMTEL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is less volatile compared to SHYAMTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check SHYAMTEL.NS's competition here
ITI.NS vs CATVISION.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, CATVISION.BO has a market cap of 110.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while CATVISION.BO trades at ₹20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas CATVISION.BO's P/E ratio is -17.64. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CATVISION.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to CATVISION.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check CATVISION.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs VCU.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, VCU.BO has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while VCU.BO trades at ₹7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas VCU.BO's P/E ratio is -63.91. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VCU.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is less volatile compared to VCU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check VCU.BO's competition here
ITI.NS vs SPAR.BO Comparison April 2026
ITI.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITI.NS stands at 279.7B. In comparison, SPAR.BO has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, ITI.NS is priced at ₹297.99, while SPAR.BO trades at ₹7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -190.22, whereas SPAR.BO's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, ITI.NS's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SPAR.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITI.NS is more volatile compared to SPAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITI.NS.Check SPAR.BO's competition here