Aditya Infotech Limited
Aditya Infotech Limited (CPPLUS.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CPPLUS.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPPLUS.NS | ₹2,071.60 | +6.01% | 243.5B | 95.69 | ₹21.60 | N/A |
| ITI.BO | ₹290.90 | +0.59% | 280.4B | -190.72 | -₹1.53 | N/A |
| ITI.NS | ₹290.78 | +0.59% | 280.2B | -190.59 | -₹1.53 | N/A |
| HFCL.NS | ₹91.75 | +6.69% | 134.8B | 244.78 | ₹0.36 | +0.11% |
| HFCL.BO | ₹91.02 | +5.90% | 134.8B | 244.69 | ₹0.36 | +0.11% |
| STLTECH.NS | ₹257.61 | +6.11% | 124.4B | 3641.57 | ₹0.07 | N/A |
| ASTRAMICRO.NS | ₹1,074.85 | +5.45% | 98B | 61.24 | ₹16.86 | +0.21% |
| ASTRAMICRO.BO | ₹1,075.15 | +5.41% | 98B | 60.97 | ₹16.93 | +0.21% |
| TEJASNET.BO | ₹431.90 | -2.34% | 79.8B | -10.29 | -₹43.74 | +0.56% |
| TEJASNET.NS | ₹431.80 | -2.43% | 79.8B | -10.28 | -₹43.77 | +0.56% |
Stock Comparison
CPPLUS.NS vs ITI.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, ITI.BO has a market cap of 280.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while ITI.BO trades at ₹290.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas ITI.BO's P/E ratio is -190.72. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ITI.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to ITI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check ITI.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs ITI.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, ITI.NS has a market cap of 280.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while ITI.NS trades at ₹290.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas ITI.NS's P/E ratio is -190.59. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ITI.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to ITI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check ITI.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs HFCL.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, HFCL.NS has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while HFCL.NS trades at ₹91.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas HFCL.NS's P/E ratio is 244.78. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HFCL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to HFCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check HFCL.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs HFCL.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, HFCL.BO has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while HFCL.BO trades at ₹91.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas HFCL.BO's P/E ratio is 244.69. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HFCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to HFCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check HFCL.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs STLTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, STLTECH.NS has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while STLTECH.NS trades at ₹257.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas STLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 3641.57. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to STLTECH.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to STLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check STLTECH.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs ASTRAMICRO.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, ASTRAMICRO.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while ASTRAMICRO.NS trades at ₹1,074.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas ASTRAMICRO.NS's P/E ratio is 61.24. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASTRAMICRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAMICRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check ASTRAMICRO.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs ASTRAMICRO.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, ASTRAMICRO.BO has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while ASTRAMICRO.BO trades at ₹1,075.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas ASTRAMICRO.BO's P/E ratio is 60.97. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASTRAMICRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRAMICRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check ASTRAMICRO.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs TEJASNET.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, TEJASNET.BO has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while TEJASNET.BO trades at ₹431.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas TEJASNET.BO's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEJASNET.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to TEJASNET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check TEJASNET.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs TEJASNET.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, TEJASNET.NS has a market cap of 79.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while TEJASNET.NS trades at ₹431.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas TEJASNET.NS's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TEJASNET.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to TEJASNET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check TEJASNET.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs AVANTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, AVANTEL.BO has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while AVANTEL.BO trades at ₹155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas AVANTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 395.13. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AVANTEL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to AVANTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check AVANTEL.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs AVANTEL.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, AVANTEL.NS has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while AVANTEL.NS trades at ₹154.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas AVANTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 384.53. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AVANTEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to AVANTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check AVANTEL.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs GTLINFRA.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, GTLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while GTLINFRA.BO trades at ₹1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas GTLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GTLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to GTLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check GTLINFRA.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs GTLINFRA.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, GTLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while GTLINFRA.NS trades at ₹1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas GTLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GTLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to GTLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check GTLINFRA.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs DLINKINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, DLINKINDIA.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while DLINKINDIA.BO trades at ₹427.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas DLINKINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DLINKINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to DLINKINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check DLINKINDIA.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs DLINKINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, DLINKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while DLINKINDIA.NS trades at ₹429.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas DLINKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DLINKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to DLINKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check DLINKINDIA.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs NELCO.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, NELCO.NS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while NELCO.NS trades at ₹675.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas NELCO.NS's P/E ratio is -816.17. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NELCO.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to NELCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check NELCO.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs NELCO.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, NELCO.BO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while NELCO.BO trades at ₹675.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas NELCO.BO's P/E ratio is -813.89. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NELCO.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to NELCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check NELCO.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs PARACABLES.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, PARACABLES.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while PARACABLES.NS trades at ₹38.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas PARACABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PARACABLES.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to PARACABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check PARACABLES.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs PARACABLES.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, PARACABLES.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while PARACABLES.BO trades at ₹38.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas PARACABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PARACABLES.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to PARACABLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check PARACABLES.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs VALIANT.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, VALIANT.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while VALIANT.BO trades at ₹1,005.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas VALIANT.BO's P/E ratio is 55.55. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VALIANT.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to VALIANT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check VALIANT.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs ADCINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, ADCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while ADCINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,590.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas ADCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.49. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADCINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to ADCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check ADCINDIA.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs PANACHE.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, PANACHE.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while PANACHE.NS trades at ₹306.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas PANACHE.NS's P/E ratio is 54.19. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PANACHE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to PANACHE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check PANACHE.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs BIRLACABLE.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, BIRLACABLE.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while BIRLACABLE.BO trades at ₹142.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas BIRLACABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 57.84. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BIRLACABLE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check BIRLACABLE.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs BIRLACABLE.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, BIRLACABLE.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while BIRLACABLE.NS trades at ₹142.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas BIRLACABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 57.65. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BIRLACABLE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to BIRLACABLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check BIRLACABLE.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs FROG.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, FROG.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while FROG.NS trades at ₹162.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas FROG.NS's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FROG.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to FROG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check FROG.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs KAVDEFENCE.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, KAVDEFENCE.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while KAVDEFENCE.NS trades at ₹68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas KAVDEFENCE.NS's P/E ratio is 133.06. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAVDEFENCE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to KAVDEFENCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check KAVDEFENCE.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs KAVDEFENCE.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, KAVDEFENCE.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while KAVDEFENCE.BO trades at ₹67.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas KAVDEFENCE.BO's P/E ratio is 132.06. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAVDEFENCE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to KAVDEFENCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check KAVDEFENCE.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs PRECISIO.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, PRECISIO.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while PRECISIO.BO trades at ₹129.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas PRECISIO.BO's P/E ratio is 167.82. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRECISIO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to PRECISIO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check PRECISIO.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs KAVVERITEL.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, KAVVERITEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while KAVVERITEL.BO trades at ₹67.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas KAVVERITEL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAVVERITEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to KAVVERITEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check KAVVERITEL.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs SMARTLINK.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, SMARTLINK.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while SMARTLINK.BO trades at ₹123.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas SMARTLINK.BO's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMARTLINK.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to SMARTLINK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check SMARTLINK.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs SMARTLINK.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, SMARTLINK.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while SMARTLINK.NS trades at ₹125.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas SMARTLINK.NS's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMARTLINK.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to SMARTLINK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check SMARTLINK.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs VINTRON.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, VINTRON.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while VINTRON.BO trades at ₹12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas VINTRON.BO's P/E ratio is 2.16. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VINTRON.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to VINTRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check VINTRON.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs KAVVERITEL.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, KAVVERITEL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while KAVVERITEL.NS trades at ₹58.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas KAVVERITEL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.12. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAVVERITEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to KAVVERITEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check KAVVERITEL.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs MRO-TEK.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, MRO-TEK.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while MRO-TEK.NS trades at ₹61.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas MRO-TEK.NS's P/E ratio is 34.97. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MRO-TEK.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to MRO-TEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check MRO-TEK.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs MRO-TEK.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, MRO-TEK.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while MRO-TEK.BO trades at ₹61.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas MRO-TEK.BO's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MRO-TEK.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to MRO-TEK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check MRO-TEK.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs PTIL.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, PTIL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while PTIL.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas PTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -29.84. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PTIL.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to PTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check PTIL.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs AKSHOPTFBR.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, AKSHOPTFBR.NS has a market cap of 914.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while AKSHOPTFBR.NS trades at ₹5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas AKSHOPTFBR.NS's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AKSHOPTFBR.NS's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to AKSHOPTFBR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check AKSHOPTFBR.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs AKSHOPTFBR.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, AKSHOPTFBR.BO has a market cap of 912.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while AKSHOPTFBR.BO trades at ₹5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas AKSHOPTFBR.BO's P/E ratio is -4.16. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AKSHOPTFBR.BO's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to AKSHOPTFBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check AKSHOPTFBR.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs PUNJCOMMU.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, PUNJCOMMU.BO has a market cap of 603.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while PUNJCOMMU.BO trades at ₹50.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas PUNJCOMMU.BO's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PUNJCOMMU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to PUNJCOMMU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check PUNJCOMMU.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs TNTELE.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, TNTELE.BO has a market cap of 489.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while TNTELE.BO trades at ₹10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas TNTELE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TNTELE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to TNTELE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check TNTELE.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs TNTELE.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, TNTELE.NS has a market cap of 488.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while TNTELE.NS trades at ₹10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas TNTELE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TNTELE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to TNTELE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check TNTELE.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs SALORAINTL.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, SALORAINTL.BO has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while SALORAINTL.BO trades at ₹31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas SALORAINTL.BO's P/E ratio is -19.57. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SALORAINTL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to SALORAINTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check SALORAINTL.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs SHYAMTEL.NS Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, SHYAMTEL.NS has a market cap of 111.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while SHYAMTEL.NS trades at ₹10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas SHYAMTEL.NS's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHYAMTEL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to SHYAMTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check SHYAMTEL.NS's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs SHYAMTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, SHYAMTEL.BO has a market cap of 109.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while SHYAMTEL.BO trades at ₹10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas SHYAMTEL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHYAMTEL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to SHYAMTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check SHYAMTEL.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs CATVISION.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, CATVISION.BO has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while CATVISION.BO trades at ₹19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas CATVISION.BO's P/E ratio is -17.35. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CATVISION.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to CATVISION.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check CATVISION.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs VCU.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, VCU.BO has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while VCU.BO trades at ₹7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas VCU.BO's P/E ratio is -61.91. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VCU.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is less volatile compared to VCU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check VCU.BO's competition here
CPPLUS.NS vs SPAR.BO Comparison April 2026
CPPLUS.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CPPLUS.NS stands at 243.5B. In comparison, SPAR.BO has a market cap of 65.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CPPLUS.NS is priced at ₹2,071.60, while SPAR.BO trades at ₹6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CPPLUS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 95.69, whereas SPAR.BO's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, CPPLUS.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPAR.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CPPLUS.NS is more volatile compared to SPAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CPPLUS.NS.Check SPAR.BO's competition here